本研究目的在探討加拿大公私部門辦理識字教育的行動措施，藉此作為台灣推動成人識字教育的參考。本研究採用文件分析法，主要文件來源為加拿大政府官方網站、加拿大成人識字資料庫、以及EBSCO電子資料庫搜尋有關加拿大政府部門與民間團體推動識字教育的具體措施。

加拿大政府為了拓展成人識字教與學管道，加拿大政府採用公私部門協力的方式推展成人識字教育。推動成人識字教育的政府主管機關為人力資源暨社會發展部及識字秘書處，人力資源暨社會發展部負責識字政策的制訂與方案的規劃，秘書識字處則提供經費支持全國各地的識字教育計畫，並支持民間組織進行識字教育的宣導、研究及實施工作。

推展識字之民間團體方面，重要的全國性識字教育推廣團體包括ABC加拿大識字基金會、拓荒學院、加拿大羅北克組織、加拿大識字運動促進會等團體，在識字教育推展的具體措施為倡導識字運動、進行成人識字調查研究，提供政府與學術研究、培養專業識字人才、倡議政府立法制定相關政策與措施；地方性識字推展組織則以社區學院、志願服務團體以及成人學習中心為主要推廣團體，以提供教學活動與培育志願教師為主。

政府部門在識字教育的角色與功能，公部門扮演方案制定者以及催化者的角色，由人力資源暨社會發展部負責識字方案上的規劃、協調、執行與經費籌措工作；識字秘書處以審核民間申請方案計畫書的方式，給予技術上、經費上的實質協助，促進各省發展識字方案的實行與擴展。

民間團體在識字教育上所扮演的角色為方案執行者、倡議者、宣導者以及識字人才培育者的角色。協助政府執行制訂的識字方案；透過倡議的方式，呼籲政府制訂保障成人識字等相關法案；在方案宣導方面，透過與平面媒體、電視廣告合作的方式，宣導政府推廣之識字方案，使民眾覺察其重要性，促進全國性的識字方案之推廣；在識字人力的培育工作上，培育志願教師、志願服務人員作為識字推廣之人力。

本研究根據研究成果，研究者提出以下幾方面的建議：

壹、制定整體識字教育發展政策，建立識字教育有利發展環境
貳、宣導識字議題，使民間覺察識字重要性
參、建立與民間團體交流管道，以獎勵方式擴大學習推廣管道

關鍵字：成人識字教育、公私部門協力

The goal of this study is to understand the public- private partnership in current situation for Canadian government develops adult literacy education.

The research hopes that this study will become an inspirational and useful resource for those who are devoted to Taiwan’s adult literacy education. The research method is documentary analysis. The main documents are from Canadian government websites, National Adult Literacy Database, and EBSCO host Research Databases.

In order to expand the teaching and learning range, Canadian government uses the method of public- private partnership to develop adult literacy education. The Department of Human Resources and Social Development and the National Literacy Secretariat in Canada take charge of the promotion of the adult literacy in the whole nation. Human Resources and Social Development is responsible for making policies and Program planning. National Literacy Secretariat promotes the development of literacy education by funding the literacy projects throughout the country and supporting literacy organizations to advocate, study, and conduct literacy.

For promoting adult literacy, the main national civic organizations, such as ABC Canada Literacy Foundation, Frontier College, Laubach Literacy of Canada, and the Movement for Canadian Literacy are devoted to take the initiative in promoting adult literacy, doing the research of adult literacy for Canadian government and Academic institutions, enhancing professional practitioner, persuaded Canadian government made the laws and Acts of adult literacy.

As the provincial and territorial literacy organizations, such as community colleges, volunteer organizations, and adult learning canters, take charge of providing teaching activities of adult literacy and training the volunteer tutors.

The Government takes charge of program planning. Human Resource and Social Development takes charge of program coordination, planning, raising funds and program executing.

National Literacy Secretariat examines the proposal from civic organizations. It helps them with fund supporting and civic technical advises. National Literacy Secretariat also helps each provinces to develop literacy programs.

Civic organizations play roles of program executing, advocating, program promoting and human resource training. By the way of advocating, Civic organizations ask the government to make the law of adult literacy to protect civics’ learning right. By the way of promoting literacy programs, civic organizations work with television commercial to promote adult literacy programs. Civic organizations also take the charge of training voluntarily tutors to help the government advocating adult literacy programs.

According to the findings, the researcher gives suggestions on three aspects.

1. Planning the policy of adult literacy education and build the advantageous environment to develop adult literacy education.

2. The government should advocate the issue of adult literacy and let people know the Importance of adult literacy.

3. The government units should cooperate with private sectors and should set up some rewards to encourage expanding the teaching and learning range.

Keywords：Adult literacy education, Public- private partnership

目次
第一章　緒論
　第一節　研究背景與重要性 1
　第二節　研究動機與目的 11
第三節　研究方法與限制 13
第四節 名詞釋義 15

第二章　加拿大政府識字教育推動概況
第一節　加拿大識字教育的歷史發展概況 16
第二節 聯邦政府推動識字教育之情況 20
第三節 各省識字教育辦理概況 27

第三章　加拿大民間機構識字教育推動概況
　第一節　全國性組織推動識字教育現況 45
第二節 地方性組織推動識字教育現況 56

第四章 研究結果分析與結論
第一節 加拿大識字教育發展情形 66
第二節 加拿大識字教育公私協力之情形 70
第三節 加拿大識字公私協力推廣經驗對我國的啟示 75

第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論 80
第二節 建議 83

參考書目 86
附錄一 重要文件資料來源 92

中文文獻：

王俊元（2001）。企業捐贈型非營利組織公共服務功能之研究。東海大學公共行政學系碩士論文，未出版，台中。

行政院（1992）。國民小學附設國民小學補習學校實施要點。載於教育部社教司（編），成人基本教育法律彙編（頁5-7）。台北：編者。

何青蓉（1995）。我國成人識字教育的迷思與省思。台灣教育，535，23-26。

何青蓉（2007）。成人識字教育的可能性。高雄：復文。

吳濟華（1994）。推動民間參與都市發展：公私部門協力策略之探討，臺灣經濟，208，1-15。

汪敏棻（1999）。成人識字教育中女性非參與者參與障礙之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。

亞磊絲(1994)。從識字教育談成人教育。師友，330，10-12。

邱秀霜（2005）。台南縣市國小補校教育實施現況與問題研究。國立台南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士班論文。未出版，台南。

胡夢鯨（1998）。成人教育學理論與模型—國中補校文科教學的一項質性研究。臺北：師大書苑。

孫本初（2001）。公共管理。台北：智勝。

教育部（1991；1992；1993；1996）。獎勵與補助成人教育活動實施要點。載於教育部社會教育司（編），成人教育法規彙編（頁16-19）。台北：編者。

教育部（1999）。降低不識字率要點。（教育部台（88）社字第88043278號函修正）

教育部（編）（1991a）。發展與改進成人教育五年計畫綱要。台北：編者。未出版。

教育部（編）（1991b）。新民專案-加強成人基本教育五年計畫（草案）。未出版。

莫慧如（1990）。我國國民補習教育之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士班論文。臺北：未出版。

陳佩君（2000）。公私部門協力理論與應用之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學研究所碩士論文。臺北：未出版。

黃正治（1994）。當前國小附設補校的問題。成人教育雙月刊，20，41-46。

黃素型（2006）。 高雄縣國小補校師生對補校教育現況與功能認知之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，高雄。

黃富順（1991）。成人教育的意義、目的、功能與發展。載於教育部社會教育司（主編），成人基本教育（頁45-67）。台北：台灣書店。

黃富順(1994a)。我國失學國民識字標準及識字字彙之研究。成人教育，21，35-43。

黃富順等（1994b）。國民中小學辦理成人教育之研究。教育部委託專題研究報告，未出版。

楊國德（1994）。當前成人識字及基本教育的積極創新方向。成人教育雙月刊，50，53-54。

楊國德（1995）。我國成人教師專業培訓模式之建立─以成人基本教育教師為例。國立中正大學學報社會科學分冊，6（1），57-81。

蕭昭瑾（2005）高高屏地區國中補校教師知覺補校困境之研究。國立高雄師範大學在職進修專班碩士班論文。未出版，高雄。








英文文獻：

Barker (1992). Adult literacy in Canada：Initiatives, issues and imperatives. Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Ottawa.

Cairns, J. C. (1970). The 1960s-A decisive decade for literacy. Convergence 3(2).11-18.

Cat(1986). Labour force annual averages census. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.nald.ca/library/research/work/p8.htm

Darville, R. (1992). Adult literacy work in Canada. Vancouver: Canadian Association for Adult Education and Centre for Policy Studies in Education, University of British Columbia.

Entwistle, T. & Martin, S. (2005). From competition to collaboration in public service delivery: a new agenda for research, Public Administration, 83(1): 233-242.

Gidron, B.(1992). Government and the third sector in comparative perspective: Allies or adversaries? In B. Gidron, R. Kramer, and L. Salmon(Eds.), Government and the third sector: Emerging relationships in welfare states,1-30. California, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Godin, J.(1996). Working in Concert. Federal, Provincial and Territorial Actions in Support of Literacy in Canada. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.nald.ca/library/research/nls/inpub/wic/wictofc.htm

Harman, D. (1970). Illiteracy: An Overview. Harvard Education Review,40(2),226-243.

Hawkins, F. (1988.). Canada and immigration: Public policy and public concern. (Rev. ed. ). Montreal : McGill-Queen’s University Press.

HRSDC (2006). About human resources and social development Canada. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/corporate/about_us/index.shtml.

HRSDC (2007a). Trades and apprenticeship. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/asp/gateway.asp?hr=/en/hip/hrp/corporate/apprenticeship/apprenticeship2.shtml&hs=izp

HRSDC (2007b). Employment programs and services. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/topics/eie-gxr.shtml

HRSDC (2007c). Canada-EU Program for cooperation in higher education, training. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/gateways/nav/top_nav/program/iam.shtml

HRSDC (2007d). National literacy program. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/hip/lld/nls/GC/pdesc.shtml

Hunter, C. St. J. & Harman, D. (1979). Adult literacy in the United States: A report to the Ford Foundation. New York : McGrsw-Hill.

Jones (1999). Literacy and International Policy Development. In D. A. Wanger, R. L. Venezky ＆ B. V. Street (Eds.), Literacy: An international handbook. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.

Karon, Y. F. (1990). Listening to the voices of Marginalized People. Convergence (23). 9-13.

Knowles, M. S. (1980). Modern practice of education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge Adult Education.

Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, Newbury Park. California: Sage.

Langton, S. (1983). Public-private partnerships：Hope or hoax？ National civic review, (72). 256-261.

Levine, K. (1986). The social context of literacy. London: Routledge ＆ Kegan Paul.

Limage, L. J. (1986).Adult literacy policy in industrialized countries:Comparative Education Review. 50-72.

Listingscanada (2008). Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://listingsca.com/map-Canada.asp

Luke, A. ＆ Egan, K. (1986). Literacy, society and schooling: A reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mark, S.R. & Karen, S.H. (1983). Public/private relations and service delivery: The coproduction of personal safe. policy studies journal, 11(3).

Max O. Stephenson,Jr.（1991）Whither the public-private partnership. a critical overview Urban affairs quarterly, 27(1):109-127.

MCL（2005）.A 10-year, results-based national literacy action plan 2006-2016. From http://www.nald.ca/library/research/10year/tenyear.pdf

MCL.(2002. )Literacy matters:Why Canada should make adult literacy and Essential Skills a Policy and Funding Priority. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.nald.ca/library/research/mcl/matters/matters.pdf

Selman, G. & Dampier, P. (1991). The foundations of adult education in Canada. Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing.

Shohet, L (1999) Adult learning and literacy in Canada. in annual review of adult learning and literacy. National center for the study of adult learning and literacy, Cambridge, MA.

Shohet, L. (2001). Adult learning and literacy in Canada. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.ncsall.net/?id=551

Smith, J. (1998). Literacy, welfare, and work: Year II. Brandon, MN: Coalition for Brandon Literacy Servides.

Stamp, R. M. (1970). Government and education in post-war Canada. In J. D. Wilson, R. M. Stamp, & L. P. Audet (Eds.), Canadian education: A history. Scarborough, ON: Prentice-Hall of Canada.

Statistics Canada (2005a). National literacy action plan 2006-2016. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.nald.ca/library/research/10year/tenyear.pdf

Statistics Canada (2005b). Building on our competencies:Canadian results of 2003 International adult literacy and skills survey. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/89-617-XIE/89-617-XIE2005001.pdf

Teisman, R.(2002). Partnership arrangements: Governmental rhetoric or governance scheme? Public administration Review.

Thomas Audrey M.,(1987). Contribution of no-governmental lteracy goups in Canada. Toronto.

Thomas, Audrey M., (1976). Canadian adult basic education and literacy activities: A digest, Toronto, world literacy of Canada.

Timmons, V.& MacGillvray T.(2005) Enhancing family literacy in rural Prince Edward Island. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Prince Edward Island.

UNESCO (2003) United Nations Literacy Decade 2003-2012. .Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=53899&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

Victoria(1990). A Ministry policy on the provision of literacy programs by the community colleges of British Columbia, British Columbia Ministry of advanced education.

Well, A. (1987). Adult literacy: its impact on young adults in the United Kingdom. Prospects 17(2) . 259-265.