(34.237.124.210) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/02/25 19:47
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡如茵
研究生(外文):Tsai Ju-yin
論文名稱:台灣學習者在英文定詞組之習得研究
論文名稱(外文):the acquisition of English DP by EFL learners in Taiwan
指導教授:忻愛莉忻愛莉引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsin Ai-li
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱:英語學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:英文
論文頁數:109
中文關鍵詞:外語習得定詞組冠詞名詞組可數定指
外文關鍵詞:L2 acquisitionDParticle systemNPcountabilitydefiniteness
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:226
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:28
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本論文旨在探討台灣學生在英文定詞組的學習與使用。本論文中的實驗包含了定詞組填空、引導翻譯、以及是非判斷三大測驗,受試者共有160位學生,以教育程度分為初級、中級、高級三組。三大測驗的結果互為支持,得出以下幾項發現。定詞組的學習涉及特定非特定、以及可數不可數的判斷,本研究發現學習者先習得特定與否的判斷,或者說學習者在特定與否的判斷上優於可數與否的判斷。他們首先能辨別the N和a N的不同。此外,思考過程似乎也影響學習者對於特定性以及可數性的判斷。在是非判斷測驗中,優先考慮特定性的人其表現優於優先考慮可數性的人。而且,在是非判斷測驗中得分高者,其在定詞組填空測驗中得分也高。本研究亦發現定冠詞以及空冠詞的誤用非常普遍。藉由錯誤分析發現,學生誤用空冠詞是受到母語的影響,將光桿名詞(bare noun)與泛指做聯結並視之有定指義。以往的研究大多將不可數名詞的錯誤使用解釋為學習者在可數性的判斷上產生困難,然而,本研究發現其實這問題反映的不只是可數性上的判斷問題,也是特定性上的判斷問題。在單複數皆可的語境中,學習者一致顯示出對複數的使用偏好,可見他們對可數性並没有那麼欠缺敏感度。定詞組的類別也影響學習的成效,其中泛指對於學生而言最困難,而具有[+SR]特性的類別,如定指與殊指似乎比較容易些。不過,學習者有誤將[+SR]特性視為表現定指語意的傾向。
The present study investigates the DP use of students in Taiwan learning English as a second or foreign language. 160 subjects categorized as low, intermediate, and advanced levels according to their education level participate in the experiment consisting of a three-part test: a fill-in-the-DP task, an elicited translation task, and a yes-no judgment task. The results of the three parts support each other and have led to several findings. First, in the learning of DP, there is a problem involving the determination of definiteness and countability; learners first learn to detect definiteness distinguishing the N from a N indicating that the ability to successfully detect definiteness is acquired earlier or better performed than countability. Furthermore, thinking processes may affect learners’ judgments about matters of definiteness and countability. Beginning with the consideration of definiteness leads to a better performance on the judgment task. Besides, those who perform well on the judgment test tend also to perform well in DP production. This study also finds that the overuse and Ø overuse are everywhere. By error analyses, it is found that the overuse of Ø results from the fact that learners, affected by L1, associate a bare noun with a generic reading and a self-evident identity of being definite. The failure in handling mass nouns has usually been taken to be the result of a difficulty with countability. However, it is found that the failure implies a difficulty not only in detecting countability but also in detecting definiteness. The insensitivity to countability may have been overestimated since learners show a preference in plurality, a subclass of countability. Moreover, DP type has great effects on performance. The generic context is the most difficult for learners. In addition, the type with feature [+SR], i.e. the definite and the specific types, seems to be easier for L2 learners. Yet, learners are prone to take [+SR] as a sign of being definite.
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Motivation 1
1.2 Chinese versus English DP Representation 3
1.2.1 Generic DP Environments 4
1.2.2 Definite DP Environments 6
1.2.3 Specific DP Environments 7
1.2.4 Indefinite DP Environments 9
1.3 Research Questions 11
1.4 Significance of This Study 13
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 15
2.1 Cross-Linguistic Contrast between English and Chinese DPs 15
2.1.1 Generic DPs 15
2.1.2 Definite & Indefinite DPs 18
2.1.3 Specific DPs 20
2.2 L2 Acquisition of English Articles 21
2.2.1 L1 with Articles vs. L1 without Articles 21
2.2.2 Interlanguage Development 22
2.3 Components Other Than Referentiality 28
2.3.1 Specificity in Semantic Interpretation 28
2.3.2 Specificity in Syntactic Representation 29
2.3.3 Countability 30
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY 33
3.1 Subjects 34
3.2 Instruments 35
3.2.1 Fill-in-the-DP Test 35
3.2.2 Elicited Chinese-English Translation Test 41
3.2.3 Yes-no Judgment on Article Use 41
3.3 Rating of the Test 42
3.4 Procedure 43
3.5 Data Analysis 43
CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 45
4.1 Acquisition Order of English Articles 45
4.2 Interlanguage Development 49
4.2.1 Overuse of the, a, Ø, and -s 49
4.2.2 Prominent Error Types 53
4.2.3 Relation between Article Omission and Modifier 57
4.2.4 Choice between a N and Ns 59
4.3 Variables in English DP Learning 60
4.3.1 DP Type 61
4.3.2 L1 Interference: Observation from the Guided Translation Task 72
4.3.3 Interaction Effect of DP Type and Countability 77
4.3.4 Sentential Position 82
4.4 Cognitive Constraint 84

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION 91
5.1 Summary of Major Findings 91
5.2 Pedagogical Implications 93
5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Study 96
REFERENCES 98
APPENDIX I 105
Avery, P., & Radišić, M. (2007). Accounting for variability in the acquisition of English articles. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA),ed. Alyona Belikova et al., 1-11. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Baldwin, T., & Bond, F. (2003). Learning the countability of English nouns from corpus data. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’ 03), pages 463-70, Sapporo, Japan.
Bataineh, R. F. (2005). Jordanian undergraduate EFL students’ errors in the use of the indefinite article. Asian EFL Journal. 7(1), 56-76.
Brown, J.D. & Rodgers, T.S. (2005). Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butler, Y.G. (2002). Second language learners’ theories on the use of English articles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(3), 451-480.
Butler, Y. G. (2002). Japanese students' metalinguistic knowledge of their use of English articles. In Y. Oshima-Takane, Y. Shirai, & H. Shirai (Eds.), Studies in Language Sciences, 2 (pp. 209-225) . Tokyo : Kuroshiro Publishing.
Carroll, D.W. (2004). Psychology of language. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ Thomson Learning.
Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL teacher’s course. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Chang, Hsiang-Hua (2004). The Definiteness and Information Status of the NPs in Mandarin You-Existentials. The 16th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 1-12.

Chen, Ping (2004). Identifiability and definiteness in Chinese. Linguistics, 42(6), 1129-84.
Cheng, Lisa L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1998). Yiwan tang, yige tang: classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 28(3), 385-412.
Cheng, Lisa L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structures of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30 (4), 509-542.
Cheng, Lisa L. S., & Sybesma, R. (2005). Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese, in: G. Cinque and R. Kayne (eds.). The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, New York: OUP USA, p.259-292.
Crystal, D. (2003). A dictionary of linguistics & phonetics (5th ed.). MA : Blackwell.
Enç, Mürvet (1991). The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22 (1), 1-25.
Geranpayeh, Ardeshir (2000). The acquisition of the English article system by Persian speakers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED453666)
Givón, T. (1993). English Grammar. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hawkins, R., Al-Eid, S., Almahboob, I., Athanasopoulos, P., Chaengchenkit, R., Hu, J., et al. (2006). Accounting for English article interpretation by L2 spekaers. EUROSLA Yearbook, 6, 7-25. Abstract obtained from EBSCO HOST Research Databases, Abstract No. 22673894.
Heusinger, Klaus von (2003). “Cross-linguistic Implementations of Specificity,” in K. M. Jaszczolt and K. Turner, eds., Meaning through Language Contrast, v(2), Amsterdam; Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Hsin, Ai-li (in press). Interlanguage variations and development in Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of English argument DPs.
Hsin, Ai-li (2007, June). A preliminary study of English DP acquisition by Chinese EFL learners in Taiwan. Paper presented at the meeting of Workshop of Interlanguage Development and Its Variabilities. National Sun Yet-sen University, Kaohsiung.
Hsin, Ai-li (2007). Interlanguage Development and Variations of Chinese EFL Learners: Syntax Domain. Taipei, Taiwan: Bookman Publishing Co.
Huang, C.T. James (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD thesis, MIT.
Huddleston, Rodney (1997). Introduction to the grammar of English. N.Y., USA: Cambridge University Press.
Huebner, T. (1985). System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning, 35(2), 141-163.
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K.(2004). Article Semantics in L2 Acquisition: The Role of Specificity. Language Acquisition, 12(1), 3-69.
Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M. L., & Maldonado, S. B. (in press). Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition o f English articles. Lingua.
James, M.A. (2007). Interlanguage variation and transfer of learning. IRAL, 45(2), 95-118.
Isac, Daniela (2006). In defense of a quantificational account of definite DPs. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(2), 275-288.
Jiang, Nan (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57(1), 1-33.
Krifka, M. (1995). Common nouns: a contrastive analysis of Chinese and English, in: G. Carlson and F. Pelletier (eds.). The generic book. The University of Chicage Press, Chicago, p.398-411.
Lang, Yong (1998). The acquisition sequence of English articles: a longitudinal case study of a Chinese ESL learner in the American context. Ph.D. Dissertation. The Ohia State University, Columbus.
Li, C. and Thompson, S. (1999). Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
Li, Yen-hui (1999). Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8(1), 75-99.
Lu, Fen-chuan (2001). The acquisition of English articles by Chinese learners. Second Language Studies, 20(1), 43-78.
Master, P. (1988). Acquiring the English Article System: A Cross-Linguistic Interlanguage Analysis. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED298768)
Master, P. (1990). Teaching the English articles as a binary system. TESOL Quarterly, 24(3), 461-478.
Master, P. (1994). The effect of systematic instruction on learning the English article system. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 229-252). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, J. M. (2004). Articles and proper names in L2 English. Ph.D. Dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Mizuno, Mitsuharu (1999). Interlanguage analysis of the English articles system: some cognitive constraints facing the Japanese adult learners. IRAL, 37(2), 127-152.
Park, Ki-hwa (1996). The article acquisition in English as a foreign language. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED397647)

Parrish, Betsy (1987). A new look at methodologies in the study of article acquisition for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 37(3), 361-383.
Robertson, Daniel (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16(2), 135-172.
Sand, Andrea (2004). Shared morpho-syntactic features in contact varieties of English: article use. World Englishes. 23(2), 281-298.
Sentence, Sue (1997). A rule network for English article usage within an intelligent language tutoring system. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 10(2), 173-200.
Shih, Yi-ju (2004). A study of Taiwanese learners’ use of the English article system. MA Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Sinclair, J. M. (Ed.). (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sneed, E. (2004, Nov.). The role of input in the acquisition of generic NPs. Poster presented at the 29th Annual Boston University Conference on language Department, Boston, MA.
Standwell, G.J. (1997). The English articles: a world wide exception? IRAL, 35(4), 269-276.
Takahashi, Toshiaki (1997). Japanese learners' acquisition and use of the English Article System. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 8, 98-110.
Tang, C. C. Jane (1990). A note on the DP analysis of the Chinese noun phrase. Linguistics, 28, 337-354.
Tang, C. C. Jane (2005). Nouns or classifiers: a non-movement analysis of classifiers in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 6(3), 431-472.
Tang, C. C. Jane (2007). Modifier licensing and Chinese DP: a feature analysis. Language and Linguistics, 8(4), 967-1024.
Tarone, E., & Parrish, B. (1988). Task-related variation in interlanguage: The case of articles. Language Learning 38, 21-44.
Thomas, M. (1989). The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 335-355.
Trademan, J.E. (2002). The acquisition of the English article system by native speakers of Spanish and Japanese: a cross-linguistic comparison. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Trenkic, Danijela (2007). Variability in second language article production: beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, 23(3), 289-327. Abstract obtained from ERIC, Abstract No. EJ776042.
Trenkic, Danijela (in press). The representation of English articles in second language grammars: determiners or adjectives? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan (2001). On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantic interface. Jorunal of East Asian Linguistics, 10, 129-168.
Wang, Yi-xuan (2005). Countability of nouns in English: a study of its performance among high school students in Taiwan. MA Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yamada, J. & Matsuura, N. (1982). The use of the English article among Japanese students. RELC Journal, 13, 50-63.

Yoon, K. K. (1994). Challenging prototype descriptions: perception of noun countability and indefinites vs. zero article use. IRAL, 31(4), 269-89.
Yule, George (1998). Explaining English grammar. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Zhang, Hong (2007). Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 16, 43-59.
Zhang, Nina (2006). Representing specificity by the internal order of indefinites. Linguistics, 44(1), 1-21.
湯廷池(民77)。英語認知語法:結構、意義與功用。臺北巿:臺灣學生。
湯廷池(民77)。漢語詞法句法論集。臺北巿:臺灣學生。
湯廷池(民81) 。漢語詞法句法四集。臺北巿:臺灣學生。
戴浩一(2002)。概念結構與非自主性語法:漢語語法概念系統初探。當代語言學, 4(1), 1-12。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關論文
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔