跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.85) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/12 09:21
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:許美雲
研究生(外文):Mei-yun Hsu
論文名稱:不同重複閱讀教學法對國小一年級學童認字能力、閱讀流暢度與閱讀理解之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Two Repeated Reading Instruction on Word Recognition,Reading Fluency and Comprehension of First Graders.
指導教授:陸怡琮陸怡琮引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yi-tsung Lu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立屏東教育大學
系所名稱:教育心理與輔導學系
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:心理學類
論文種類:學術論文
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:95
中文關鍵詞:重複閱讀教學法教師示範同儕協助認字能力閱讀流暢度閱讀理解
外文關鍵詞:repeated readingteacher modelingpeer tutoringword recognitionoral reading fluencyreading comprehension.
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:41
  • 點閱點閱:2025
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:398
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:8
本研究旨在探討兩種不同重複閱讀教學法(教師示範與教師示範加同儕協助)對國小一年級學童認字能力、閱讀流暢度及閱讀理解之影響。
本研究採準實驗設計,以屏東縣某國小一年級的兩個班級為研究對象,分別接受教師示範與教師加同儕重複閱讀教學法。實驗教學時間總共八週,每週四次,每次20分鐘,教學前、教學後、及教學後兩週以「中文年級認字量表」、「口語閱讀流暢力量表」及「閱讀理解測驗」等研究工具進行施測,以了解接受不同重複閱讀教學法的學生,在各閱讀技能上是否有差異。
本研究發現如下:
一、在排除前測差異後,教師示範重複閱讀教學法較教師加同儕之重複閱讀教學法更能有效提升國小一年級學童在立即後測的認字能力,但在追蹤後測則無此效果。
二、兩個教學法在提升國小一年級學童之閱讀流暢度的效果上沒有顯著差異。
三、兩個教學法在提升國小一年級學童之閱讀理解的效果上沒有顯著差異。
四、接受兩種教學法的國小一年級學童在實驗教學前後的認字能力和閱讀流暢度上有顯著差異。
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two repeated reading instruction, teacher modeling (TM) versus teacher modeling and peer tutoring (TMPT) on word recognition, reading fluency and comprehension of first graders.
Using a quasi- experimental design, two first-grade classes from a primary school in Pingtung County were chosen. The two classes were assigned to the TM group and the TMPT group randomly. All students received the instruction for 20 minutes per day, 4 days per week, for a total of 8 weeks long. Before, right after, and two weeks after the experiment, the students were tested on word recognition, reading fluency and comprehension.
The major findings of the study were as the following:
1. Students who received TM instruction scored significantly higher on word recognition than the TMPT group in posttest, but the two groups were no differences in delayed posttest.
2. The two groups showed no differences in reading fluency and reading comprehension in the posttest and delayed posttest.
3. Both groups of students showed significant progresses in word recognition and reading fluency during the intervention, while no changes were found in reading comprehension.
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………… I
英文摘要………………………………………………………………………… II
目次……………………………………………………………………………… III
表次……………………………………………………………………………… V
圖次……………………………………………………………………………… VI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究問題 6
第三節 名詞釋義 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 閱讀流暢度 9
第二節 重複閱讀教學 19
第三節 教師示範重複閱讀教學法 24
第四節 教師加同儕教導重複閱讀教學法 29
第三章 研究方法 44
第一節 研究假設 44
第二節 研究設計 45
第三節 研究對象 47
第四節 研究工具 47
第五節 教學處理 50
第六節 研究程序 53

第七節 資料處理與分析 53
第四章 研究結果與討論 55
第一節 在認字能力之改變 55
第二節 在閱讀流暢度之改變 59
第三節 在閱讀理解之改變 64
第四節 討論 67
第五章 結論與建議 71
第一節 結論 71
第二節 研究限制 71
第三節 建議 72
參考文獻 74
一、中文部份 74
二、英文部分 76
一、中文部份
王曉平、張亭亭(2008)。閱讀文本研究述評。寧波大學學報,5,41- 46。
王瓊珠(2009)。閱讀流暢性教學對國小閱讀障礙學童識字與理解表現之影響。2009年5月15日,取自http://creativegp.com/HKU_Conference/PDF_version/F4_1_WangChiungChu
朱敬先(1997)。教育心理學。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
吳宜貞(2004)。重複閱讀及文章難度對五年級學生閱讀能力影響之探討。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學報,35(4),319-336。
吳宜真、黃秀霜(2004)。由中文造字原則探討學童認字發展。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學報,36(1),1-12。
呂素幸(1992)。同儕輔導對國小學生數學學習輔導效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
林哲璋(2007)。屁屁超人。台北:天下雜誌。
林翠玲(2007)。分享式閱讀教學對國小一年級學童認字能力、閱讀流暢度及閱讀理解之影響。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
岳修平譯(1998)。教學心理學:學習的認知基礎。臺北:遠流。E. D. Gagné, C. W. Yekovich, & F. R. Yekovich, 1993.
洪采菱(2008)。廣泛閱讀與重複閱讀教學法對國小一年級學童識字能力、口語閱讀流暢能力及閱讀理解之影響。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導系碩士論文。
洪蘭(2001)。兒童閱讀的理念-認知神經心裡學的觀點。教育資料與研究,38,1-4。
柯華葳、李俊仁(1996)。國小低年級學生語音覺識能力與認字能力的發展:一個縱貫的研究。國立中正大學學報社會科學分冊,7(1),49-66。
張世彗、楊坤堂(2005)。閱讀理解測驗指導手冊。台北市立教育大學特殊教育中心編印。
張春興(1994)。現代心理學。台北:東華。
張瓊文(2000)。同儕教導對國小聽覺障礙國語文學習成效之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。
陳東甫(2008)。電腦語音文字同步系統結合重複閱讀教學對識字困難學生學習成效之研究。國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所碩士論文。
程小蘋(1997)。同儕輔導實施之探討。學生輔導,52,35-42。
彭志業(2003)。基本字帶字教學與重複閱讀識字教學對國小學童識字成效差異之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
黃光雄(1981)。課程的界說與模式,國教天地, 7,3-11。
黃秀霜(2001)。中文年級認字量表。台北:心理。
黃德祥(1997)。同儕輔導的功能與推展。學生輔導,52,18-24。
萬雲英(1991)。兒童學習漢字的心理特點與教學。載於楊中方、高尚仁(合編):中國人、中國心-發展與教學篇(頁403-448)。台北:遠流。
魏麗敏(1997)。同儕輔導的理論與實務。學生輔導,52,52-61。
羅俊男(2005)。國小中年級自然與生活科技領域實施小組式同儕教學之研究。國立臺南大學教師在職進修自然碩士學位班碩士論文。
曾志朗(1991)。華語文的心理學研究:本土化的沉思。載於楊中方、高尚仁(合編):中國人、中國心-發展與教學篇(頁539-582)。台北:遠流。
曾明勤(2002)。應用網際網路輔助建構式鷹架教學之研究 ---以「研究方法」課程為例。國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理所碩士論文。
鄭昭明(1987)。認知心理學與教學研究-一般介紹。現代教育,2(2),86-114。
蘇宜芬(2004)。閱讀理解的影響因素及其在教學上的意義。教師天地,129,21-28。
蘇娟代(1997)。全班性同儕指導策略對增進國中輕度智障學生應與字彙學習及同儕關係之成效研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部分
Alber-Morgan, S. R., Ramp, E. M., Anderson, L. L., & Martin, C. M. (2007). Effects of repeated readings, error correction, and performance reed back on the fluency and comprehension of middle school students with behavior problems. Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 17-30.
Allington, R. L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The Reading Teacher, 36, 556-561.
Armstrong, S. W. (1983). The effects of material difficulty upon learning disabled children’s oral reading and reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6 (3), 339-348.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bentz, J. L., & Fuchs, L. S. (1996). Improving peers’ helping behavior to students with learning disabilities during mathematics peer tutoring. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 202–215.
Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effectives as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16
Breznitz. Z. (1977). Reading rate acceleration: Developmental aspects. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158, 427-441.
Brooks, G. (2002). What works for children with literacy difficulties? The effectiveness of intervention schemes. Research Report RR380. London: Department for Education and Skills.
Brooks, G., Flanagan, N., Henkhuzens, Z., & Hutchison, D. (1998). What works for slow readers? The effectiveness of early intervention schemes. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Bruner, J.S., Ross, G., & Wood, D.J. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Burts, M.E. (1990). A staff development program to implement a student tutorial program for the trainable mentally handicapped. Practicum Report, Nova University. (ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED 329 091).
Chafe, W. (1988). Punctuation and the prosody of written language. Written Communication, 5, 396-426.
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B.J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
Chomsky, C. (1976). After decoding: What? Language Arts, 53, 288-296.
Chomsky, C. (1978). When you still can’t read in third grade. After decoding, what? In S.J. Samuels (Ed.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp.13-30). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Chemidlin, K. M. (1999). The effect of cross age peer tutoring on the reading achievement of fifth grade and kindergarten students. (ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED 428 334).
Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
Cole, P., & Chan, L. (1990). Method and strategies for special education. London Sydney Prentice Hall.
Cunningham, P. (1990). The names test: A quick assessment of decoding ability. The Reading Teacher, 44(2), 124-129.
Dahl, P. R. (1979). An experimental program for teaching high speed word recognition and comprehension skills. In J. E. Button, T. Lovitt, & T. Rowland (Eds.), Communications research in learning disabilities and mental retardation (pp. 33-65). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Devault, R., & Joseph, L. M. (2004). Repeated readings combined with word boxes phonics technique increases fluency levels of high school students with severe reading delays. Preventing School Failure, 49(1), 22-27.
Dowhower, S. L. (1991). Speaking of prosody: Fluency’s unattended bedfellow. Theory Into Practice, 30, 165-175.
Eldredge, J., & Quinn, D. W. (1988). Increasing reading performance of low-achieving second graders with dyad reading groups. Journal of Educational Research 82(1): 40-46.
Ediger, M. (1999). Reading in the primary grades. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 434304).
Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116–125.
Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 331–339.
Farmer, M. E., Klein, R., & Bryson, S. E. (1992). Computer-assisted reading: Effects of whole-word feedback on fluency and comprehension in readers with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 13(2), 50-60.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Mathes, P. M., & Simmons, D. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classroom more responsible to students diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174-206.
Goodlad, S., & Hirst, B. (1989). Peer tutoring : A guide to learning by teaching. London : Kogan Page.
Green, G., Albright, L., & Kokaska, C. (1989). Instruction strategies for special education students in vocational education. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 11(2), 3-8.
Green S. K., Alderman G. & Liechty A. (2005). Peer tutoring, individualized intervention, and progress monitoring with at- risk second grade readers. Preventing School Failure, 1, 11-15.
Greenwood, C. R., Terry, B., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Finney, R. (1992). The classwide peer tutoring program: Implementation factors moderating students’ achievement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 101–116.
Greenwood, C. R., Terry, B., Utley, C. A., Montagna, D., & Walker, D. (1993). Achievement, placement and services: Middle school benefits of classwide peer tutoring used at the elementary school. School Psychology Review, 22, 497–516.
Heckelman. R.G. (1986). N.I.M.(neurological impress method) revisited. Academic Therapy, 21, 411-420.
Hollingsworth, P. M. (1970). An experiment with the impress method of teaching reading. The Reading Teacher, 24, 112-114.
Hollingsworth, P. M. (1979). An experimental approach to the impress method of teaching reading. The Reading Teacher, 31, 624-626.
Houghton, S. & Litwin, M., (1995). Peer mediated intervention in reading instruction using pause, prompt and praise. Educational Studies, 21, 361-378.
Huhn, M. R. & Stahl, S. A. (1995). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3-21.
Indrisano, R. & Chall, J. S. (1995). Literacy development. Journal of Education, 177(1), 63-83.
King, A.(1989). Verbal interaction and problem-solving within computerassisted cooperative learning groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 5(1), 1-15.
Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. Elementary School Journal, 96, 275–293.
Koskinen, P. S., & Blum, I. H. (1984). Repeated oral reading and the acquisition of fluency. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), Changing perspectives on research in reading/language processing and instruction: Thirty Third yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 183–187). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
Krueger, E. & Braun, B. (1999). Books and buddies: peers tutoring peers. Reading Teacher, 52, 410-415.
Kuhn, M. R. & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Fluency: A review of development and remedial practice. In Ruddell, R.B. et al. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, fifth ed (pp. 412-453). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
Labbo, Linda D. & Teale, William H. (1990). Cross-age reading: a strategy for helping poor readers. The Reading Teacher, 43, 362-369.
Leong, C. K. (1992). Text-to-speech, text, and hypertext: Reading and spelling with the computer. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(2), 95-105.
Mathes, P. G., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). The efficacy of peer tutoring in reading for students with mild disabilities: A best-evidence synthesis. School Psychology Review, 23, 59–80.
McCullough, C. S. (1995). Using computer technology to monitor student progress and remediate reading problems. School Psychology Review, 24(3), 426-439.
Miller, G. A. (1995). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
Mineo, B. A., & Caver, A. R. (1990). Speech output technology in education and rehabilitation: Implications from behavioral research. Speech-Tech, 2, 68-75.
Moskal, M. K. (2006). Student self-managed repeated reading: Successful fluency development for disfluent readers. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 34(1). 3-11.
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (National Institute of Health Pub. No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
O’Reilly, R.P., & Walker, J.E.(1990). An analysis of reading rates in college students. Reading Research and Instruction, Vol.29, 1-11.
O ’Shea, L .J., Sindelar, P.T., & O’Shea, D. J. (1985). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 129-142.
O’Shea, L .J., Sindelar, P.T., & O’Shea, D. J. (1987). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension of learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 103-109.
Rasinski, T.V. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 147-150.
Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403-408.
Samuels, S. J., Schermer, N., & Reinking, D. (1992). Reading fluency: Techniques for making decoding automatic. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research says about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp. 124–144). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Samuels, S. J. (1997). Toward a model of reading fluency. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 24-46). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Samuels, S. J. (2002). Reading fluency: its development and assessment. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 166-183). IRA.
Schreiber, P. A. (1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 177–186.
Schreiber, P.A. (1987). Prosody and structure in children’s syntactic processing. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 243-270). New York: Academic Press.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition 19.1:1-30.
Sindelar, P. T., Monda, L. E., & O’Shea, L. J. (1990). Effects of repeated readings on instructional- and master-level readers. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 220-226.
Stoddard, K., Valcante, G., Sindelar, P., O’Shea, L., & Algozzine, B. (1993). Increasing reading rate and comprehension: The effects of repeated readings, sentence segmentation, and intonation training. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 53-65.
Sutton, P. A. (1991). Strategies to increase oral reading fluency of primary resource students. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teaching Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED335660).
Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252–261.
Therrien, W. J., & Kubina, R. M. (2006). Developing reading fluency with repeated reading. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 156-160.
Therrien, W. J., Wickstrom K. & Jones K. (2006). Effect of a combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21(2), 89-97.
Topping, K. J. (1988). The peer tutoring handbook; promoting co-operative learning. Cambridge: Brookline Books.
Topping, K. J. (1989). Peer tutoring and paired reading: combining two powerful techniques. The Reading Teacher, 15, 120-136.
Topping, K. J. (1995). Paired reading, spelling and writing: The handbook for teachers and parents. New York: Cassell.
Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. (Eds.) (1998). Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ and Lawrence Erlbaum.
Topping, K. J. (2001). Peer assisted learning: A practical guide for teachers. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books. Retrieved from http://www.dundee.ac.uk/psychology/kjtopping/ plearning.html
Utley, C. A., Mortweet, S. L., & Greenwood, C. R. (1997). Peer-mediated instruction and interventions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29, 1-23.
Vacca, J. L., Vacca, R. T., Gove, M. K., Burkey, L., Lenhart, L. A., & Mckeon, C. (2003). Reading fluency. In J. A. Vacca, M. K. Gove, L. C. Burkey, & L. A. Lenhart: Reading and learning to read (pp. 212-239). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Vadasy P. F. & Sanders E. A. (2008). Repeated reading intervention: Outcomes and interactions with readers’ skills and classroom instruction. Journal of Educational Psycholog, 100, 272-290.
Webb, N. M. &. Farivar, S. (1999). Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. (pp. 117-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Yurick A. L., Robinson P. D., Cartledge G., Lo Y., & Evans T. L. (2006). Using peer-mediated repeated readings as a fluency- building activity for urban learners. Education and Treatment of Children, 3, 469-506.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top