臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究以軍方、公私立醫院、公私立學校、政府機關、公營服務業/製造業、民營金融服務業、民營服務業、民營高科技製造業及民營傳統製造業等九大類41個機關為研究對象，抽樣時間從96年12月21日起至97年1月11日止，共計發出2,133份問卷，回收1,940份，回收率達91.0%，剔除無效問卷50份，有效問卷為1,890份，有效問卷回收率88.6%。調查資料分別使用描述性統計、信度分析、相關分析、探索性因素分析、層級線性模型等分析方法。
　　本研究結果發現：
1.組織成員的馬基維利人格傾向對組織成員的政治知覺有顯著影響。
2.組織成員的正面情感對組織成員的政治知覺有顯著影響。
3.組織成員的負面情感對組織成員的政治知覺有顯著影響。
4.組織的集權化對組織成員的政治知覺有顯著影響。
5.組織的正式化對組織成員的政治知覺無顯著影響。
6.組織層級對組織成員的政治知覺無顯著影響。
7.組織規模對組織成員的政治知覺無顯著影響。
8.組織的集權化對「組織成員的馬基維利人格傾向對政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
9.組織的正式化對「組織成員的馬基維利人格傾向對政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
10.組織的層級對「組織成員的馬基維利人格傾向對政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
11.組織的規模對「組織成員的馬基維利人格傾向對政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
12.組織的集權化對「組織成員的正面情感對政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
13.組織的正式化對「組織成員的正面情感對政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
14.組織的規模對「組織成員的正面情感對政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
15.組織的層級對「組織成員的正面情感對政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
16.組織的集權化對「組織成員的負面情感對政治知覺的影響力」具干擾效果。
17.組織的正式化對「組織成員的負面情感對政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
18.組織的規模對「組織成員的負面情感對政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。
19.組織的層級對「組織成員的負面情感對政治知覺的影響力」不具干擾效果。

The study population consisted of 41 institutions from 9 categories which were military, public or private hospital, public or private school, governmental agency, public-operated service industry, public-operated manufacturing industry, privately operated financial service industry, privately operated service industry, privately operated high tech manufacturing industry and privately operated traditional manufacturing industry. The survey started on December 21st2007 and continued until January 11th 2008.We totally sent out 2,133 questionnaires, returned 1,940 questionnaires, the returns-ratio reached 91.0%, eliminated invalid questionnaires were 50, the effective questionnaires were 1,890,effective questionnaires returns-ratio was 88.6%. Data was analyzed by using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, exploring factor analysis and level linear model.
The major results of this study are as following:
1.Machiavellianism of organizational members has a significant effect on perceptions of organizational politics.
2.Positive affect of organizational members has a significant effect on perceptions of organizational politics.
3.Negative affect of organizational members has a significant effect on perceptions of organizational politics.
4.The degree of centralization has a significant effect on perceptions of organizational politics.
5.The degree of formalization has no effect on perceptions of organizational politics.
6.Organizational hierarchical Level has no effect on perceptions of organizational politics.
7.Organization size has no effect on perceptions of organizational politics.
8.The degree of centralization has no moderate effect on the relationship between machiavellianism and perceptions of organizational politics.
9.The degree of formalization has no moderate effect on the relationship between machiavellianism and perceptions of organizational politics.
10.Organizational hierarchical Level has no moderate effect on the relationship between machiavellianism and perceptions of organizational politics.
11.Organization size has no moderate effect on the relationship between machiavellianism and perceptions of organizational politics.
12.The degree of centralization has no moderate effect on the relationship between positive affect of organizational members and perceptions of organizational politics.
13.The degree of formalization has no moderate effect on the relationship between negative affect of organizational members and perceptions of organizational politics.
14.Organization size has no moderate effect on the relationship between positive affect of organizational members and perceptions of organizational politics.
15.Organizational hierarchical Level has no moderate effect on the relationship between positive affect of organizational members and perceptions of organizational politics.
16.The degree of centralization has moderate effect on the relationship between positive affect of organizational members and perceptions of organizational politics.
17.The degree of formalization has no moderate effect on the relationship between positive affect of organizational members and perceptions of organizational politics.
18.Organization size has no moderate effect on the relationship between positive affect of organizational members and perceptions of organizational politics.
19.Organizational hierarchical Level has no moderate effect on the relationship between positive affect of organizational members and perceptions of organizational politics.

目錄 I
表目錄 II
圖目錄 III

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究步驟 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 組織的形成及組織結構要素 4
第二節 知覺及組織政治知覺的定義 6
第三節 組織政治知覺的形成因素及其相關研究 8
第三章 研究方法 16
第一節 研究架構 16
第二節 研究假設 17
第三節 分析方法 18
第四節 操作型定義與衡量工具 19
第五節 研究對象 23
第四章 實證分析 26
第一節 描述統計與量表信度分析 26
第二節 前因變數與組織政治知覺的關聯性 29
第三節 組織成員政治知覺的形成因素--層級線性模型分析 31
第五章 結論與建議 36
第一節 結論 36
第二節 管理實務建議 42
第三節 研究限制及後續研究建議 44
中文參考書目 45
英文參考書目 47
附錄一：「工作環境氣氛認知及其對工作態度之影響」研究問卷 52
附錄二：「工作環境氣氛認知及其工作態度之影響」調查問卷樣本描述 55

1.何金銘，2001，統計法輯要，台南：台灣復文興業股份有限公司。
2.何金銘，2003，組織政治知覺研究現況的缺撼，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所授課講義。
3.李長貴，1998，組織行為，台北：華泰。
4.李青芬．李雅婷．趙慕芬譯，Robbins著，2001，組織行為學，台北：華泰書局。
5.李安民，2002，組織政治知覺對員工工作態度之影響，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
6.李鈴蘭，2005，組織政治知覺的形成因素--外商與本土公司的比較分析，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
7.派屈克．藍奇歐尼，1999，董事會的前一夜，中國生產力中心。
8.林素華，2004，組織政治知覺的形成因素及其相應的管理對策，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
9.馬傑明，1979，組織層級化之研究，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
10.許士軍，1990，管理學，台北：華泰書局。
11.陳安瀅，2003，政治知覺對組織負面影響的干擾因素-以工作滿足為例，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
12.黃俊英、林震岩，1994，企業研究方法，台北：華泰書局。
13.黃俊英，2000，多變量分析，台北：華泰書局。
14.黃英忠，2001，現代管理學，第四版，台北：華泰書局。
15.曾淑雯，2003，個人、組織與環境因素在組織政治知覺形成過程中所扮演的角色，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
16.黃柏霖，2007，組織成員的馬基維利人格傾向與組織的「民主化程度」及「公民營特質」對組織成員政治知覺」之影響，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
17.楊思琪，2002，組織政治知覺的類型與各類型組織政治知覺的形成因素，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
18.楊少強，2008，商業周刊，1050期：106~107頁。
19.鄭丁榮，2003，員工情感與組織政治氣氛對組織公民行為的影響，國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
20.甄書芳，2005，組織政治知覺量表與構面－台灣經驗資料的建構，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
21.蔡雅芬，2005，跨組織學習對事業網絡價值創造之影響，國立雲林科技大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
22.趙必孝，2000，國際化管理-人力資源觀點，台北：華泰書局。
23.盧瑞陽，1993，組織行為，台北：華泰書局。
24.謝哲豪，2006，組織政治知覺、信任與知識分享關係之研究，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
25.蘇麗美，2002，組織政治知覺的類型及各類型中組織政治知覺對組織承諾與工作績效的影響，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
1.Cropanzano, R., John C. Howes, & Alicia A. Grandey, 1997,The Relationship of Organizational Politics & Support to Work Behaviors, Attitudes, & Stress, Journal of Organizational Behavior,Vol.18, 159-180.
2.Cropanzano R., Kacmar K.M., & Bozeman, 1995,The social setting of work organizations, Westport.
3.Daft, R.L.,1989, Organization theory & design（3rd ed.）, St. Paul: West Publishing Co.
Farrell D., & Petersen J. C., 1982, Patterns of Political Behavior in Organizations, Academy of Management Review, Vol.7, No.3, 403-412.
4.Ferris., Fedor., Chachere., & Pondy, 1989, Myths & politics in organizational contexts, Group & Organizational Studies, Vol.14, 88-103.
5.Ferris., Frink.,Gilmore.,& Kacmar., 1994, Understanding as an Antidote for the Dysfunctional Consequences of Organizational Politics as a Stressor, Journal of Applied Social Psychology,24,13,1204-1220.
6.Ferris G.R., 1996, Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, &Outcomes, Human Relations, Vol.49, No.2, 233-266.
7.Ferris G.R., & Judge.T.A., 1991, Personnel/Human Resources Management: A Political Influence Perspective, Journal of Management, Vol.17,No.2, 447-488.
8.Ferris G.R., & Kacmar K.M., 1991, Perceptions of Organizational Politics Scale(POPS): Development& Construct Validation, Educational & Psychological Measurement, Vol.51,No.1, 193-205.
9.Ferris G.R., & Kacmar K.M., 1992, Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Journal of Management,Vol.18, No.1, 93-116.
10.Ferris, G.R., 1994,Understanding as an Antidote for the Dysfunctional Consequences of Organizational
11. Ferris, G.R., & Dwight D. Frink, 1996, Reactions of Diverse Groups to Politics in the Workplace,Journal of Management, Vol.22, No.1, 23-44.
12. Ferris, G.R., & Dwight D. Frink, Maria Carment Galang, Jing Zhou, K. Michele Kacmar, & Jack L.Howard, 1996, Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, &Outcomes, Human Relations, Vol.49, No.2, 233-266.
13. Ferris, G.R., & K.Michele Kacmar, 1992,Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Journal of
Management, Vol.18, No.1, 93-116.- 56
14. Ferris, Harrell-Cook, & Dulebohn, 1999, Political Behaviors as Moderators of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics -- Work Outcomes Relationships, Journal of Organizational Behavior,Vol.20, 1093-1105.
15. Ferris, Kiewitz, Christian, Gerald R., Hochwarter, & Wayne A., 2002, The role of psychological climate in Neutralizing the effects of organizational politics on work outcomes, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.32, No.6, 1189.
16. Ferris, Russ, & Fandt, 1989, Politics in organizations, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gandz J., & Murray V., 1980, The Experience of Workplace Politics, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.23, No.2, 237-251
17. Hackman, & Oldham, 1980, Work redesign, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18. Hochwarter, Perrewe, Ferris, & Guercio, 1999, Commitment as an Antidote to the Tension & TurnoverConsequences of Organizational Politics, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.55, 277-297
19. Ing-Chung Huang, Chih-Hsun Jason Chuang, & Hao-Chieh Lin, 2003, The Role of Burnout in the Relationship Between Perceptions of Organizational Politics & Turnover Intentions, Public Personnel Management, Vol.32, No.4, 519.
20. Jabin, F. M.,1981, An exploratory study of subordinates’ perceptions of supervisory politics,Communication Quarterly, Fall, 269-275.
21. Jex, Beehr, 1991, Emerging theoretical issues in the study of work-related stress, Greenwich, CT.
22. Kacmar, & Dawn s. Carlson, 1997,Further Validation of the Perceptions of Politics Scale (POPS): A Multiple Sample Investigation, Journal of Management, Vol.23, No.5, 627-658
23. Kacmar, K.M., 1999, An Examination of Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication & Extension, Human Relations, Vol.52, No.3, 384-415.
24. Kacmar, K.M., Dennis P. Bozeman, Dawn S. Carison, & William P. Anthony, 1999, An Examination of Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication & Extension, Human Relations,Vol.135, No.3, 301-312.
25. Katz, Kahn,1978, The social psychology of organizations（2nd ed.）, New York.
Larwood, Laurie., Thomas A Wright, Stephan Desrochers, & Veronica Dahir, 1998, Extending latent role & psychological contract theories to predict intent to turnover & politics in business organizations, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 23, 100-123.
26. Madison D. L., 1980, Organizational Politics: An Exploration of Managers'' Perceptions, Human Relations, Vol.33, No.2, 79-100.
27. Martha C. Adnres, L.A. Witt & K. Michele Kacmar, 2001, The interactive effect of organizational politics & exchange ideology manager ratings of retention, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62,- 57 -357-369.
28. Matthew,Valle., K. Michele Kacmar, Suzanne Zivnuska, 2003, Self-Efficacy, Outcome Expectations & Organizational Politics Perceptions. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, Vol.5,No.1, 13
29. Matthew, Valle., L.A.Witt, 2001, The Moderating Effect of Teamwork Perceptions on the
Organizational Politics -- Job Satisfaction Relationship. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141,No.2, 379-388.Mayes, B. T., & Allen Robert W., 1977, Toward A Definition of Organizational Politics, Academy of Management Review, October, 672-678.
30. McGrath, J. E., 1976, Stress & behavior in organizations, Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Nye, Lendell G., & Wittl.Alan, 1993, Dimensionality & Construct Validity of The POPS. Educational & Psychological Measurement, Vol. 53, No.3, 821
31. Parker, Dipboye, 1995,Perceptions of Organizational Politics : An Investigation of Antecedents & Consequences, Journal of Management,Vol.21, No.5, 891-912.
32. Pfeffer, J., 1992, Managing with power, Boston.Politics: A Confirmatory Analysis, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.25, No.19, 1747-1764.
33. Politics as a Stressor , Journal of Applied Social Psychology,24, 13, 1204-1220.
Ferris, G.R., 1996,Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, &Outcomes, Human Relations, Vol.49, No.2, 233-266.
34.Poon, June, M.L., 2003, Situational antecedents & outcomes of organizational politics perceptions,Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.18, (Iss 1/2), 138.
35.Randall, Marjorie L., Russell Cropanzano, Carol A. Bormann, & Andrej Birjulin, 1999, Organizational Politics & Organizational Support as Predictors of Work Attitudes, Job Performance, & Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.20, 159-174.
36.Stephen P.Robbins, 2001, Organizational Behavior.
37.Sutton, Kahn, 1986, Prediction, understanding, & control as antidotes to organizational stress, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
38.Taylor, Ashford, 1990, Adptation to work transitions: An integrative approach. Greenwich, CT.Tetrick L. E., & LaRocco J. M.,1987, Understanding, Prediction, & Control as Moderators of the Relationships Between Perceived Stress, Satisfaction, & Psychological Well-Being, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.72,No.4, 538-543.
39.Valle, Matthew, 1997, Perceptions of Organizational Politics An Subsequent Behaviors, Psychological Reports, Vol.81, 945-946.
40.Vigoda, Eran., 2002, Stress-Related Aftermaths to Workplace Politics: the Relationships Among Politics, Job Distress, & Aggressive Behavior in Organizations, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.23, 571-591.
41.Wayne A. Hochwarter, Charles Kacmar, Pamela L. Perrewe & Diane Johnson, 2003, Perceived organizational support as a mediator of the relationship between politics perceptions & work outcomes, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.63, 438-456.
42.Wayne A. Hochwarter, K. Michele Kacmar, 2000, Research Reports Perceptions of Organizational Politics as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Conscientiousness & Job Performance,Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.85,No.4, 472-478.
43.Wendy E. O''Connor, 2001, A Comparison of Situational & Dispositional Predictors of Perceptions of Organizational Politics, The Journal of Psychology, Vol.135 , No.3, 301-312.
44.Witt L. A, Andrews Martha C, & Kacmar K Michele, 2000, The Role of Participation in
Decision-Making in the Organizational Politics-Job Satisfaction Relationship, Human Relations, Vol.53,No.3, 341-358.
45.Witt, L. A., K Michele Kacmar, Dawn S Carlson, & Suzanne Zivnuska, 2002, Interactive effects of personality & organizational politics on contextual performance, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.23, No.8, 911.
46.Witt, L.A., Patti, Anthony L., Farmer, & William L., 2002, Organizational politics & work identity as predictors of organizational commitment, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.32, No.3,486.
47.Zaleznik, Howard, 1977, Stress reactions in organizations: Syndromes, causes, & consequences, Behavior Science, Vol.22, 151-162.
48.Zhou J., & Gerald R. Ferris, 1995,The Dimensions & Consequences of Organizational Politics: A Confirmatory Analysis, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.25, No.19, 1747-1764.