臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在全球化趨勢的影響下，越來越多的亞洲企業採行西方公司的管理制度，然而，不是所有管理制度都可以成功被引進而不考慮到文化的影響要素。在本研究中，將藉由著跨文化的比較，探討儒家思考如何影響教育訓練人員或講師的評鑑結果。

這篇研究的主要目的將會比較北美(加拿大和美國)跟台灣的員工，在不同研究變數(衝突處理方式、默許反應、儒家思考)下的差異性，以及變數間的影響關係。

最後的研究結果顯示，儒家思考對於受訓練人評估教育訓練人員或講師時所表現出的默許反應有顯著且正面的影響，特別是受儒家文化影響甚大的台灣員工。然而，這樣的影響將會扭曲最後的評估結果，因此，作者也提出了一些建議，希望此研究分析結果可以在訓練評估執行上，提供給採行西方管理制度的亞洲企業或尋求管理制度標準化的跨國公司一個有用的參考依據。

There is an increasing trend in this globalized economy for Asian corporations to utilize Western management practices. However, studies have shown not all western management practices can be imported into Asian corporations without accounting for the values and beliefs of Asian employees. This study will explore the effects of Confucianism on the respondents’ evaluation of their trainers/instructors.

The specific purpose of this study is to examine the differences between Taiwanese and North Americans respondents in (1) Confucius influence, (2) conflict handling style, and tendency of (3) acquiescence response, when evaluating trainers/instructors. The relationships among these major variables were examined statistically.

Results strongly suggest that Confucianism has a significant and positive impact on the tendency of acquiescence response. This response may skew the evaluation results in Taiwan, where the influence of Confucianism is significant as compared to North America. The data and analysis provided by this study is a useful reference for Asian corporations looking to import western management practices, and for international corporations looking to standardize their management systems across differing cultures.

Abstract iv
Table of Contents v
List of Figures vii
List of Tables viii
1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Purpose and Procedure of the Research 4
2: LITERATURE REVIEW 5
2.1 Confucianism 5
2.1.1 Focusing on interpersonal relationship 6
2.1.2 Honoring the teacher and respecting his teachings 7
2.2 Conflict Handling Style 9
2.3 Acquiescence Response - A Positivity Bias of Evaluation 11
2.4 Relationship among Confucianism, conflict handling style, and acquiescence response 13
2.4.1 Conflict handling style and acquiescence response 13
2.4.2 Confucianism and conflict handling styles 14
2.4.3 Confucianism and acquiescence response 15
2.4.4 Confucianism as moderator between conflict handling styles and acquiescence response 15
3: METHODOLOGY 20
3.1 Study Framework and Hypotheses 20
3.2 Questionnaire Development 21
3.2.1 Adoption of Chinese Value Survey (CVS) and ROCI-II scale 21
3.2.2 Questionnaire design for measurement of acquiescence response 24
3.2.3 Demographic information 26
3.2.4 Translation of questionnaire 26
3.2.5 Online questionnaire 26
3.3 Sampling 27
3.4 Data Analysis 28
3.4.1 Descriptive statistics 28
3.4.2 Factor analysis 28
3.4.3 Reliability analysis 28
3.4.4 Correlation analysis 29
3.4.5 Independent sample T-test 29
3.4.6 One-way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) 29
3.4.7 Regression analysis 29
4: RESULTS 30
4.1 Descriptive statistics 30
4.2 Factor analysis and reliability analysis 34
4.3 Correlation analysis 37
4.4 Independent sample T-test 39
4.5 One-way ANOVA analysis 41
4.6 Regression analysis 49
4.7 Outcomes of study hypotheses 55
5: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 56
5.1 Conclusion 56
5.1.1 Conflict handling style determines tendency of acquiescence response 56
5.1.2 Influence of Confucianism determines conflict handling style 57
5.1.3 Confucianism moderates the relationship between conflict handling styles and acquiescence response 58
5.2 Suggestion 59
5.2.1 Managerial implications 59
5.2.2 Future Studies 60
5.3 Limitation 60
5.3.1 Limitation of literatures 60
5.3.2 Limitation of samples 60
5.3.3 Limitation of methodology 61
REFERENCES 62
APPENDICES 68

陳素貞(1999)，企業訓練績效評估研究-國內外標竿企業比較，國立中央大學企業管理研究所。

Aycan, Z. & Kanungo, R.N. (2002), Impact of culture on human resource management practices: a 10-country comparison, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(1), 192-221.

Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J. (2001). Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 143-156.

Baron, R.M., & Kenny D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

Blake, R.R., & Mouton, J.S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.

Cai, D.A., & Fink E.I.(2002). Conflict handling style Differences Between Individualists and Collectivists. Communication Monographs, 69(1), 67-87.

Chan, S. (1999). The Chinese Learner- a Question of Style. Education and Training, 41(6/7), 294-304.

Cheung, T.S., Chan H.M., King, A.Y.C., Chiu, C.Y. & Yang, C.F. (2006), How Confucian are contemporary Chinese? Construction of an ideal type and its application to three Chinese communities. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(4), 157-180.

Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 18(2), 143-164.

Chiu, R.K., & Kosinski, F.A. Jr. (1994), Is Chinese conflict-handling behavior influenced by Chinese values? Social Behavior and Personality, 22(1), 81-90.

Chuang, S.F. (2007). The influence of Confucian philosophy on adults’ preference for learning: a comparison of Confucian adult learners and non- Confucian adult learners. A dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

Chung, K.Y., Eichenseher, J.W., & Taniguchi, T. (2007), Ethical perceptions of business students: differences between East Asia and the USA and among ‘‘Confucian’’ cultures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 121–132.

Dolnicar, S., & Grün, B. (2007). Cross-cultural differences in survey response patterns. International Marketing Review, 24, 127-143.
Dolnicar, S., & Grün, B. (2009). Response Style Contamination of Student Evaluation Data. Journal of Marketing Education Online First, 1-13.
Fwu, B.J., & Wang, H.H. (2002). The social status of teachers in Taiwan. Comparative Education, (38)2, 211-223.
GM Chen, J Chung. (1994). The impact of Confucianism on Organizational Communication, Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 93-105.
Harzing, A.W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research – a 26- country study, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(2), 243-266.
Herbig, P., & Martin, D. (1998). Negotiating with Chinese: a cultural perspective. Cross Cultural Management, 5(3), 42-56.
Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of
cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 13(1/2), 46-74.
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5-21.
Howell, J.P., Dorfman P.W., & Kerr S. (1986). Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 89-102.
Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: the case of communicative language teaching in China. Culture and Curriculum. (15)2, 93- 105.
Javeline, D. (1999) ‘Response effects in polite cultures. A test of acquiescence in Kazakhstan’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 63(1), 1–28.
Johnson, T., Kulesa P., Llc I., Cho Y.I., & Shavitt S. (2005). The relation between
culture and response styles: Evidence from 19 countries. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology. 36(2), 264-277.
Kirkbride, P.S., Tang, S.F.Y., Westwood, R.I. (1991). Chinese conflict preferences and negotiating behavior: cultural and psychological influences. Organizational Studies, 2(3), 365-386.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1979). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, 13, 3-26.
Kirkpatrick, L. D. (1996). Great ideas revisited-revisiting, Training and Development, 50(1), 54-59.
Kirkbride, P.A. and Tang, S.F.Y. (1992), Management development in the Nanyang Chinese societies of Southeast Asia, Journal of Management Development, 11(2), 6-66.
Kirkpatrick, L.D. & Kirkpatrick J.D. (2007). Implementing the Four Levels. Berrett-
Koehler Publishers, INC. San Francisco.
Lien, Y.H., Huang, Y.Y., & McLean, G.N. (2007). Training evaluation based on cases of Taiwanese benchmarked high-tech companies. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(1), 35-48.
L Shi. (2006). The successors to Confucianism or a new generation? A questionnaire study on Chinese students’ culture of learning English. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 122-126.
Mathews, B.M. (2000). The Chinese value survey: an interpretation of value scales and consideration of some preliminary result, International Education Journal, 1(2), 117-126.
Marsh, H.W. (1984). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology 76(5), 707-54.
Marsh, H.W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: research findings,
methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253-388.
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson,
P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Rossi, P.
E., Gilula, Z., & Allenby.
Phillips, J. J. (1997). Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Methods.
T.X.:Gulf.
Rahim, M.A. (1979). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict, Academy
of Management Journal, 26(2), 368-376.
Ting-Toomey, S., Gao, G., Trubisky, P., Yang, Z., Kim, H.S., Lin, S.L., & Nishida, T.
(1991). Culture, face maintenance, and styles of handling interpersonal conflict:
A study of five cultures. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2, 275–292.
Strachota, E., Schmidt, S., & Conceição, S. (2005). Using online surveys to evaluate
distance education programs. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Retrieved December 6, 2006, from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/05_1659A.pdf
Trubisky, P., Ting-Tommey. S., & Lin. S.L. (1991). The influence of individualism-
collectivism and self-monitoring on conflict handling styles. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, 68-84.
Triandias, H.C. (1999). Cross Cultural Psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 127-143.
van de Vliert, E. (1990). Sternberg’s styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A
theory-based reanalysis. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 69– 80.
Walker, A & Dimmock, C. (2000), One size fits all? Teacher appraisal in a Chinese
culture, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(2), 155-178.
Wang, G.G., Wang, WEA Ruona, J.W., Rojewski. (2005, September). Confucian
Values and the Implications for International HRD, Human Resource Development International, 8(3), 311-326.
Westwood, R.I., & Kirkbride, P.S. (1998). International strategies of corporate culture
change: emulation, consumption and hybridit. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 11(6), 554-577.
Yang, B., Zheng, W., & Li, M. (2006, August). Confucian view of learning and
implications for developing human resources. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(3), 346-354.
Yee, A. (1989), Cross cultural perspectives on higher education in East Asia:
psychological effects upon Asian students, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 10(3), 213-232.
YP Huo, MA Glinow. (1995). On Transplanting Human Resource Practices to China.
International Journal of Manpower, 16(9), 3 -15.