燕鷗在繁殖期時會大量聚集在同一繁殖區，築巢於岩石、岩壁、短草叢、灌叢或沙洲上，巢構造簡陋。燕鷗卵上頭的花紋經常與背景顏色融為ㄧ體，對親鳥而言，利用視覺辨識卵就顯得重要，特別是高密度聚集的種類。本實驗於2007及2008年5月至8月在澎湖三個無人島活龍灘、小白沙嶼與積善嶼進行。實驗操作分為移蛋實驗、破壞巢型實驗與兩巢蛋互換實驗，兩種燕鷗在實驗操作下，尋找巢位的時間皆顯著性變長，且行為模式與對照組相比，有顯著性地改變。在2007年移蛋實驗中，69.7％ (n = 33)蒼燕鷗選擇原來的巢位，儘管巢中的卵已被移除，親鳥仍會安穩的坐巢 ; 紅燕鷗則有52.0％ (n = 25)的親鳥會安穩的坐在無卵的原巢上，在2008年則有29.6 %的紅燕鷗親鳥有同樣的行為。在破壞巢型實驗中，兩種燕鷗都呈現高度不安的行為模式，但是辨識行為受到不同程度的干擾，其中巢周遭的植被存在與否紅燕鷗有著截然不同的行為模式，但石牆的存在與否卻有著相似的行為模式。21.1% (n = 19)蒼燕鷗在兩巢蛋互換實驗中，選擇他種鷗類的卵並且安穩的坐巢。燕鷗擁有低能力的辨識卵的行為，但是高度辨識巢位週邊環境的能力，例如利用周遭石牆當路標。

Terns usually will aggregate in the same reproduction area during breeding season. The color pattern of eggs may match the background, and it is important for breeding adults to distinguish their own eggs, especially in colonies with high density. This research was carried out at three islands, Huolung Shoal, Baisha and Jishan Islets of Penghu from May to August of 2007 and 2008. The experiment was divided into three parts, egg moving (EM) experiment, nest modification (NM) experiment and egg switching (ES) experiment. Terns spent more time for searching their own nests of each of the experiment situation. In the EM experiment 69.7% Black-naped Tern adults settled on original nests without eggs in 2007; 52.0% Roseate Tern in 2007 and 29.6 % in 2008 did the same. In the NM experiment, the behavior patterns of returning adults were significantly different between each operation and the control group. Adults were confused by the interference of the experimental conditions. In some occasions, adults settled on incorrect eggs quietly in ES experiment. In conclusion, terns have low ability of egg recognition but high ability of nest recognition. Terns presumably can recognize nests with the nearby environmental landmarks, but not be able to recognize eggs.

Introduction.................................1
Methods and Materials.............5
Results.......................................12
Discussion ................................17
Literature Cited.........................24
Figures.......................................29
Tables........................................38

Baerends, G. P. and A. J. Hogan-Warburg. 1982. The external morphology of the egg and its variability. Behaviour 82: 1-32.
Bamford, A. R. S., J. Edavies and R. Ande. 1990. The effects of model power boats on waterbirds at Herdsman Lake. Western Aralias 90:260-265.
Beer, C. G. 1966. Adaptations to nesting habitat in the reproductive behaviour of the Black-billed Gull Larus bulleri. Ibis 108: 394-410.
Beer, C. G. 1970a. Individual recognition of voice in the social behavior of birds. Advances in the Study of Behavior 3:17-74.
Beer, C. G. 1970b. On the responses of laughing gull chicks, Larus atricilla, to the calls of adults. I. Recognition of voice of the parents. Animal Behaviour 18: 652-660.
Beer, C. G. 1970c. On the responses of laughing gull chicks, Larus atricilla, to the calls of adults. II. Age changes and responses to different types of call. Animal Behaviour 18: 661-667.
Beer, C. G. 1979. Vocal communication between laughing gull parents and chicks. Behaviour 70: 118-146.
Birkhead, T. R. 1987. Behaviour adaptation to high density nesting in the common guillemot Uria aagle. Animal Behaviour 25: 321-331.
Buckley, F. G. and P. A. Buckley. 1972a. The breeding ecology of royal terns (Sterna maxima maxima). Ibis 114: 344-359.
Buckley, P. A. and F. G. Buckley. 1970. Color variation in the soft parts and down of royal tern chicks. Auk 87: 1-13.
Buckley, P. A. and F. G. Buckley. 1972b. Individual egg and chick recognition by adult royal terns (Sterna maxima maxima). Animal Behaviour 20:457-462.
Burger, J. 1985. Habitat selection in temperate marsh-nesting birds. Pages 253-281 in M. L. Cody, ed. Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, New York.
Burger, J. and M. Gochfeld. 1991. The Common Tern: It’s Breeding Biology and Social Behavior. Columbia University, New York.
Charrier, I., N. Mathevon, P. Jouven and T. Aubin. 2001. Acoustic communication in a black-headed gull colony: how do chicks identify their parents? Ethology 107:961-974.
Cheng, C. H. 2006. Nest Sites Selection and Breeding Biology of Terns at Jishan Islet, Penghu Islands, Taiwan. Master’s thesis. National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan, R. O. C.
Colgan, P. W. 1983. Comparative Social Recognition. John Wiley, New York.
Coulson, J. C. and J. Horobin. 1976. The influence of age on the breeding biology and survival of the Arctic Tern (Sterna paradisaea). Journal of Zoology 178: 247-260.
Cramp, S. and K. E. L. Simmons. 1983. Handbook of Birds of Europe the Middle East and North Africa. The Birds of the Western Pale Arctic III. Oxford University Press, Oxford, London.
Davies, S. J. J. F. and F. Carrick. 1962. On the ability of Crested Terns, Sterna bergii, to recognize their own chicks. Australian Journal of Zoology 10:171-177.
Del Hoyo, J., A. Elliott and J. Sargatal. 1996. Hoatzin to Auks. Pages 624-667 in L. Edicions and Barcelona, eds. Handbook of the Birds of the World, Volume3. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.
El Halawani, M. E., S. Fehrer, B. Hargis and T. Porter. 1988. Incubation behavior in the domestic turkey: physiological correlates. Poultry Biology 1:285-314.
Emlen, J. T., JR. 1941. An experimental analysis of the breeding cycle of the Tricolored Redwing. Condor 43: 209-219.
Evans, R. M. 1966. The Development of Mobility and Approach Responses in Young Ring-billed Gulls. Doctoral Dissertation, Madison, University Wisconsin.
Evans, R. M. 1970a. Imprinting and mobility in young ring-billed gulls, Larus delawarensis. Animal Behaviour Monographs 3: 193-248.
Evans, R. M. 1970b. Parental recognition and the ‘new call’ in Black-billed Gulls (Larus Bulleri). The Auk 87: 503-513.
Goethe, F. 1937. Beobachtungen und Untersuchungen zur Biologie der Silbermöwe auf der Vogelinsel Memmerstrand. Journal of Ornithology 85: 1-119.
Halpin, Z. T. 1991. Kin recognition cues of vertebrates. Pages 220-258 in P. G. Hepper, ed. Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Harrison, P. 1985. Seabirds, an Identification Guide. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York.
Harrington, B. A. 1974. Colony visitation behavior and breeding ages of Sooty Terns (Sterna fuscata). Bird-Banding 45: 115-144.
Hays, H. 1978. Timing and breeding success in three- to seven-year-old Common Terns. Ibis 120: 127-128.
Hilton, G. M., M. H. Hansell, G. D. Ruxton and J. M. Reid. 2004. Using artificial nests to test importance of nesting material and nest shelter for incubation energetics. The Auk 121: 777-787.
Hutchinson, R. E., J. G. Stevenson and W. H. Thorpe. 1968. The basis for individual recognition by voice in the Sandwich Tern (Sterna sandvicensis). Behaviour 32: 150-157.
Lack, D. and J. T. Emlen. 1939. Observations on breeding behavior in tricolored red-wings. Condor 41:225-230.
Langham, N. P. E. and K. Hulsman. 1986. The breeding biology of the Crested Tern Sterna bergii. Emu 86: 23-32.
Lin, Y. C. 2006. Nest-site selection and hatching success of three Tern species breeding in Baisha Islet, Penghu Island, Taiwan. Master’s thesis. National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan, R. O. C.
Massaro, M., A. N. Setiawan and L. S. Davis. 2007. Effects of artificial eggs on prolactin secretion, steroid levels, brood patch development, incubation onset and clutch size in the yellow-eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes). General and Comparative Endocrinology 151: 220–229.
Miller, D. E. and S. T. Emlen. 1975. Individual chick recognition and family integrity in the Ring-billed Gull (Larus delawarensis). Behaviour 52: 124-144.
Moseley, L. J. 1979. Individual auditory recognition in the Least Terns (Sterna albifrons). The Auk 96: 31-39.
Palestis, B. G. and J. Burger. 1999. Individual sibling recognition in experimental broods of common tern chicks. Animal Behaviour 58: 375-381.
Palmer, R. S. 1941. A behavior study of the Common Tern (Sterna hirundo hirundo L.). Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History 42: 1-119.
Peek, F. W., E. Franks and D. Case. 1972. Recognition of nest, eggs nest site, and young in female red-winged blackbirds. The Wilson Bulletin 84: 243-249.
Ramsay, A. O. 1951. Familial recognition in domestic birds. The Auk 68: 1-16.
Rodgers, J. A. and H. T. Smith. 1995. Set-back distances to protect nesting bird colonies from human disturbance in Florida. Conservation Biology 9:89-99.
Shugart, G. W. 1987. Individual clutch recognition by Caspian Terns, Sterna Caspia. Animal Behaviour 35: 1563-1565.
Shugart, G. W. 1990. A cue-isolation experiment to determine if Caspian Tern parents learn their offspring’s down color. Ethology 84: 155-161.
Tinbergen, N. 1931. Zur Paarungsbiotogied er Ftusseeschwalbe (Sterna hirundo hirundo). Ardea 21: 1-18.
Tinbergen, N. 1953. The Herring Gull''s World. Collins, London.
Tschanz, B. 1959. Zur Brutbiologie der Trottellumme (Uria aagle aagle Pont.). Behaviour 14: 1-100.
van Tuinen, M., D.Waterhouse and G. J. Dyke. 2004: Avian molecular systematics on the rebound: a fresh look at modern shorebird phylogenetic relationships. Journal of Avian Biology 35: 191-194.
Watson, J. B. and K. S. Lashley. 1915. An historical and experimental study of homing. Department of Marine Biology of the Carnegie Institution of Washington 7: 7-60.
Youngen, O. M., M. E. el Halawani, J. L. Silsby and R. E. Phillips. 1991. Intracranial prolactin perfusion induces incubation behavior in turkey hens. Biology of Reproduction 44: 425-431.