跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.86) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/09 04:04
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李書政
研究生(外文):Shu-Cheng Lee
論文名稱:吸收潛力、知識外尋策略、聯盟形式對廠商績效影響之探討
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Absorptive Capacity, Knowledge Sourcing Strategy, Alliance Forms on Firm Performance
指導教授:劉常勇劉常勇引用關係梁慧玫梁慧玫引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chang-Yung LiuHueimei Liang
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:97
語文別:英文
論文頁數:77
中文關鍵詞:研發績效聯盟形式吸收潛力知識外尋策略
外文關鍵詞:R&D performanceabsorptive capacityknowledge sourcing strategyalliance form
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:276
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究主要探討吸收潛力、知識外尋策略、聯盟形式、與廠商績效四者之關係。從文獻探討和個案研究,提出在策略聯盟情境下的”知識外尋策略”(Knowledge sourcing strategy)概念。並將知識外尋策略分成兩類—知識取用策略(Knowledge access strategy)和知識內化策略(Knowledge internalization strategy)。此外,從組織學習的觀點,本研究認為廠商吸收潛力愈高,採用知識內化策略的傾向愈強,因此吸收潛力對知識外尋策略具有正面的影響,繼而,廠商對聯盟形式的選擇也因此受到知識外尋策略的間接影響。同時,為了產生具體的管理意涵,廠商的研發績效也納入理論模式進行探討,並提出假說進行驗證。不同的知識外尋策略搭配不同的聯盟形式,將產生不同的研發績效。為分析驗證理論中的多重相依關係,研究中採用結構方程式(SEM)的統計方法,取代傳統迴歸方法進行路徑分析(Path analysis)。樣本著重在台灣科技廠商與研發或製程知識相關的策略聯盟案件,涵蓋電腦、通訊、光電、半導體等科技產業,總計取得148個策略聯盟樣本。本研究認為廠商應考量自身吸收潛力,搭配適當的知識外尋策略與聯盟形式,以期產生較佳的研發績效。
In this study we explored the relationship between absorptive capacity, knowledge sourcing strategy, alliance forms, and firm performance. Based on the literature and case study, we proposed the concept of knowledge sourcing strategy in alliance contexts, which can be categorized into two types—knowledge internalization strategy and knowledge access strategy. From organizational learning perspective, we argue that a firm’s absorptive capacity has a positive influence on knowledge internalization strategy, and accordingly a firm’s governance choices of alliances are also influenced. Firm’s R&D performance are also included in theoretical model in order to generate further managerial implications. Instead of using conventional regression method, we adopt Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to conduct path-analysis, in that SEM is well suited to verifying causal models. We argue that firms should seek a better alignment between absorptive capacity, knowledge sourcing strategy, alliance forms, and firm performance. Our arguments are supported by empirical analysis of a sample of 148 R&D alliances involving computer, telecommunication, LCD/LED, semiconductor, and electronic machinery industry.
ABSRACT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------- iv
LIST OF TABLES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- v
LIST OF FIGURES --------------------------------------------------------------------------- v
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION------------------------------------------------------------1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation----------------------------------------------1
1.2 Research Objectives-------------------------------------------------------------------4
1.3 Research Procedure------------------------------------------------------------------- 5
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW--------------------------------------------------- 7
2.1 Knowledge sourcing strategy--------------------------------------------------------7
2.2 Knowledge sourcing strategy and alliance form---------------------------------14
2.3 Knowledge sourcing strategy and unilateral contract-based alliances--------15
2.4 Knowledge sourcing strategy and bilateral contract-based alliances----------16
2.5 Knowledge sourcing strategy and equity-based alliances----------------------18
2.6 Equity-based versus bilateral contract-based alliances--------------------------19
2.7 Alliance forms to firm performance ----------------------------------------------20
2.8 Absorptive capacity and knowledge sourcing strategy -------------------------22
2.9 Firm age to performance -----------------------------------------------------------24
CHAPTER 3 REASEARCH METHODOLOGY---------------------------------------26
3.1 The Research Framework-----------------------------------------------------------27
3.2 Data------------------------------------------------------------------------------------27
3.3 Measures------------------------------------------------------------------------------29
CHAPTER 4 CASE STUDY----------------------------------------------------------------33
4.1 Research process---------------------------------------------------------------------33
4.2 CMC Magnetics----------------------------------------------------------------------34
4.3 TSMC----------------------------------------------------------------------------------43
4.4 Concluding remarks-----------------------------------------------------------------52
CHAPTER 5 DATA ANALYSIS-----------------------------------------------------------56
5.1 Data analysis--------------------------------------------------------------------------56
5.2 Concluding remarks-----------------------------------------------------------------60
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION--------------------------------------------------------------61
6.1 Conclusion and Suggestion---------------------------------------------------------61
6.2 Future Research ----------------------------------------------------------------------63
REFERENCES--------------------------------------------------------------------------------65
Arbuckle, J. L. & Wothke, W., 1995, Amos 4.0 User’s guide, Chicago: Smallwaters Corporation.
Badaracco, J. L., 1991, The knowledge link, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Byrne, B. M., 2001, Structural equation modeling with AMOS, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Casselman, R. M. & Samson, D., 2007, Aligning knowledge strategy and knowledge capabilities, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(1): 69-81.
Chen, H. & Chen, T. J., 2003, Governance structures in strategic alliances: Transaction cost versus resourced-based perspective, Journal of World Business, 38: 1-14.
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. , 1990, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
Colombo, M. G., 2003, Alliance form: a test of the contractual and competence perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1209-1229
Christy, R. & Wood, M., 1999, Researching possibilities in marketing, Qualatative Market Research: An International Journa,l, 2(3): 189-197.
Crossan, M. M. & Inkpen, A. C., 1995, The subtle art of learning through alliances. Business Quarterly, 60(2): 68-76.
Das, T. K. & Teng, B. S., 2000, A resource-based theory of strategic alliances, Journal of Management, 26(1): 31-61.
Day, J. D. & Wendler, J. C., 1998, The new economics of organization, The Mckinsey Quarterly, 1: 4-18.
Declercq, D. & Dimov, D., 2008, Internal knowledge development and external knowledge access in venture capital investment performance, Journal of Management Studies, 45(3): 585-612
Dixit, A. K. & Pindyck, R. S., 1994, Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
Dutta, S. & Weiss A. M., 1997, The relationship between a firm''s level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements, Management Science, 43(March): 343-356
Dodgson, M., 1993, Technological collaboration in industry: strategy, policy, and internalization in innovation, London: Routledge.
Dyer, J. H. & Nobeoka, K., 2000, Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 345-367.
Dyer, J. H. & Singh, H., 1998, The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, Academy of Management Journal, 23: 660-679.
Gulati, R., 1995, Does familiarity breed trust? The implication of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances, Academy of Management Journal, 38: 85-112.
Grant, R. M. & Baden-Fuller, C., 2004, A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances, Journal of Management Studies, 41(1): 61-84.
Gray, P. H. & Meister, D.B., 2004, Knowledge sourcing effectiveness, Management Science, 50(6): 821-834.
Hagedoorn, J., 1993, Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 371–385.
Hagedoorn, J. & Narula, R., 1996, Choosing organizational modes of strategic technology partnering: international and sectoral differences, Journal of International Business Studies, 265–284.
Hamel, G., 1991, Competition for competence and inter-partner learning with international strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 12: 83-103.
Helper, S. & Levine, D. I., 1992, Long-term supplier relations and product-market structure, The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 8(3): 561-581.
Hodgson, G. M., 1998, Evolutionary and competence-based theories of the firm, Journal of Economic Studies, 25(1): 25-56.
Inkpen, A. C. & Beamish, P. W., 1997, Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures, Academy of Management Review, 22: 177–202.
Inkpen, A. C. & Currall, S. C., 1998, The nature, antecedents, and consequences of joint venture trust, Journal of International Management, 4(1): 1-20.
Kanter, R. M., 1994, Collaborative advantage, Harvard Business Review, 72(4): 96-108.
Iwasa, T. & Odagiri, H., 2004, Overseas R&D, knowledge sourcing, and patenting: an empirical study of Japanese R&D investment in the US, Research Policy, 33: 807-828.
Khanna, T., Gulati, R. & Nohria, N., 1998, The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope, Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 193-210.
Killing, J. P., 1988, Understanding alliances: The role of task and organizational complexity, In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business: 55–68, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Kinder T., 2003, Go with the flow—A conceptual framework for supply relations in the era of the extended enterprise, Research Policy, 32(3): 503-523.
Kogut, B., 1988, Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 9(4): 319-332.
Koza, M. P. & Lewin, A. Y., 1998, The co-evolution of strategic alliances, Organization Science, 9(3): 255-264.
Li, J. & Kozhikode, R. K., 2008, Knowledge management and innovation strategy: The challenge for latecomers in emerging economies, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3): 429-450.
Lane, P. J. & Lubatkin, M., 1998, Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning, Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 461-477.
Lavie, D., 2006, Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological changes, Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 153-147.
Lei, D. & Slocum, J. W., 1991, Global strategic alliances: payoffs and pitfalls. Organizational Dynamics, 17-29.
Levinthal, D. A. & March, J. G., 1981, A model of adaptive organizational search, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2: 307-333.
Levinthal, D. A. & March, J. G., 1993, The myopia of learning, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95-112.
Liebeskind, J., 1996, Knowledge, strategy and the theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, 17: 93-107.
Loasby, B. J., 1998, The organisation of capabilities, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35: 139-160.
Madhok, A. & Tallman S. B., 1998, Resources, transactions and rents: managing value in interfirm collaborative relationships, Organization Science, 9(3): 326-339.
March, J. G., 1991, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2: 71-87.
March, J. G., 1995, The future, disposalbe organizaitons and the rigidities of imagination. Organizaiton, 2: 427-440.
Mohr, J. J. & Sengupta, S., 2002, Managing the paradox of inter-firm learning: the role of governance mechanisms, Journal of business & Industrial Marketing, 17(4): 282-301.
Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E. & Silverman, B. S., 1996, Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer, Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 77-91.
Nooteboom, B., 1999, Inter-firm alliances, Routledge: London.
Nonaka, I., 1994, A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5(1): 14-37.
Nonaka, I., 2007, The knowledge-creating company, Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8): 162-171.
Nonaka, I. & Toyama, R., 2005, The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(3): 419-436.
O’Dwyer, M. & O’Flynn, E., 2005, MNC-SME strategic alliances-a model framing knowledge value as the primary predictor of governance modal choice, Journal of International Management, 11: 397-416.
Osborn, R. N. & Baughn, C. C., 1990, Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances, Academy of Management Journal, 33(3): 503-519.
Oxley, J. E. & Sampson, R. C., 2004, The scope and governance of international R&D alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 25: 723-749.
Pindyck, R. S., 1988, Irreversible investment, capacity choice, and the value of the firm, American Economic Review, 78: 969-985.
Pindyck, R. S., 1993, A note on competitive investment under uncertainty, American Economic Review, 83: 273-277.
Powell, W., 1990, Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-336.
Powell, W., Koput, K. W. & Smith-Doerr, L., 1996, Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology, Administrative Science Quartly, 41: 116-145.
Quinn, J. B., 1999, Strategic outsourcing: Leverage knowledge capabilities, Sloan Management Review, 40(4): 9-21.
Quinn, J. B., 2000, Outsourcing innovation: the new engine of growth, Sloan Management Review, 41(4): 13-28.
Rangan, U. S. & Yoshino, M. Y., 1995, Strategic Alliances: An Entreprepreurial Approach to Globalization, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press:.
Simonin, B. L., 1997, The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization, Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1150-1174.
Song, J. & Shin, J., 2008, The paradox of technological capabilities: a study of knowledge sourcing form host countries of overseas R&D operations, Journal of International Business Studies, 39: 291-303.
Sorensen, J. B. & Stuart, T. E., 2000, Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 81-112.
Tallman, S. B. & Shenkar, O., 1990, International cooperative venture strategies: Outward investment and small firms from NICs, Management International Review, 30: 299–315.
Tether, B. & Tajar, A., 2008, Beyond industry-university links: sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organizations and the public science-base, Research Policy, 37: 1079-1095.
Tsai, M. T. & Lee, K. W., 2006, A study of knowledge internalization: from the perspective of learning cycle theory, Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3): 57-71.
Tushman, M. L. & Anderson, P., 1986, Technological discontinuities and organizational environment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3): 439-465.
Vilkamo, T. & Keil, T., 2003, Strategic technology partnering in high-velocity environments—lessons from a case study, Technovation, 23: 193-204.
Vrande, V., Lemmens, C. & Vanhaverbeke, W., 2006, Choosing governance modes fro external technology sourcing, R&D Management, 36(3): 347-363.
Want, S. C. &Harris, P. L., 2002, How do children ape? Applying concepts from the study of non-human primates to the developmental study of ''imitation'' in children, Developmental Science, 5(1): 1-41.
Williamson, O. E., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York : Free press.
Yin, R. K., 1994, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Beverly: Sage Publication.
Zack, M. H., 1999, Developing a knowledge strategy, California Management Review, 41(3): 125-145.
Zahra, S. A. & George, G., 2002, Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension, Academy of Management Review, 27: 185–203.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top