跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.168) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/13 10:13
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:謝佳君
研究生(外文):Chia-chun Hsieh
論文名稱:股權結構、董事會組成與審計品質對財務報表重編關聯性之研究
論文名稱(外文):Owner structure,Board of Director composition and audit quality Affiliated with fianacial statement restatement
指導教授:張瑞當張瑞當引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ruey-Dang Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:60
中文關鍵詞:審計品質董事會組成股權結構公司治理
外文關鍵詞:corporate governanceboard of director compositionownership structureaudit quality
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:785
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
財務報表品質的優劣,會直接影響投資大眾對市場的信心,健全制度下的公司治理有助於提升企業財務報表的品質,政府為提升企業對公司治理的重視,近年來不斷修正相關法規,期望透過制度上的修正,加強企業公司治理的績效,以避免因企業財務舞弊而造成投資人的巨額財物損失。而企業發生財務弊案最主要的因素來自於財務報表的不實表達,財務報表重編更可能是財務不實表達的起源。本研究主要目的在探討公司治理中股權結構、董事會組成與審計品質,是否會影響財務報表重編,實證結果顯示股權結構中機構投資人持股比率愈高,財務報表重編機率愈高,符合利益衝突假說;審計品質中企業委託4大會計師事務所查核財務報表較不易發生財務報表重編,而當會計師事務所查核企業的非審計服務公費愈具重大性者,財務報表發生重編的機率愈高。
Financial statement quality can directly affect investor confidence. Corporate governance in well-functioning mechanisms can improve Financial statement quality. Recently, in order to enhance corporate governance performance, avoid financial fraud, and protect investors, the government constantly amend the related rules. Financial fraud is most through misstated financial reports, and even fraudulent misstatement may result from financial statement restatement. The purpose of the study is to examine whether ownership structure, board of director composition, and audit quality in corporate governance are associated with financial statement restatement. Empirical results show that in ownership structure the higher stock proportion of the institutional investors, the probability of financial statement restatement is higher. It is consistent with conflict of interest hypothesis. In audit quality, the enterprises have lower occurrence rates of financial statement restatement while they hire the big 4 accounting firms to audit their financial statements. Furthermore, when accounting firms provide non-audit services to their audit clients, the higher significance of non-audit fees, occurrence rates of financial statement restatement are higher.
目 錄
致謝詞………………………………………………………………………………Ⅰ
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………Ⅱ
英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………Ⅲ
目錄…………………………………………………………………………………Ⅳ
圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………Ⅵ
表目錄………………………………………………………………………………Ⅵ
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景……………………………………………………………1
第二節 研究動機及目的……………………………………………………2
第三節 研究架構……………………………………………………………6
第四節 研究流程……………………………………………………………7
第二章 文獻探討與研究假說……………………………………………………8
第一節 公司治理……………………………………………………………8
第二節 股權結構………………………………………………………… 12
第三節 董事會組成……………………………………………………… 15
第四節 審計品質………………………………………………………… 17
第三章 研究設計……………………………………………………………… 21
第一節 研究架構………………………………………………………… 21
第二節 研究樣本………………………………………………………… 22
第三節 變數衡量………………………………………………………… 23
第四節 驗證方式………………………………………………………… 27
第四章 實證結果與方析……………………………………………………… 29
第一節 樣本敘述性統計………………………………………………… 29
第二節 Pearson 相關係數……………………………………………… 34
第三節 Mann-Whitney 檢定………………………………………………37
第四節 Logistic 迴歸分析………………………………………………38
第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………… 43
第一節 研究結論與貢獻………………………………………………… 43
第二節 研究限制與建議………………………………………………… 45
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………… 46
中文部分 …………………………………………………………………… 46
英文部分 ………………………………………………………………… 47
參考文獻
中文部分
丁秀儀,2004,上市公司公司治理、經營績效與機構投資人投資行為關聯性之研究,國立政治大學企業管理學系博士論文。
方俊儒、莊勝傑與蔡宛婷,2008,公司治理機制對財務報表盈餘品質的影響-以管理者使用應計項目的動機來看,今日會計,第111期(6月):68-74。
李建然、許書偉與陳政芳,2003,非審計服務與異常應計數之關聯性研究,會計評論,第37期(7月):1-30。
李建然與陳政芳,2004,審計客戶重要性與盈餘管理:以五大事務所組別為觀察標的,會計評論,第38期(1月):59-80。
李建然、廖秀梅與吳祥華,2006,董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響,東吳經濟商業學報,第54期(9月):117-160。
李春安、吳欽杉與葉麗玉,2003,所有權結構與公司非法行為關係之研究-以台灣股票上市公司為例,證券市場發展季刊,第14卷第4期(1月):75-138。
吳祥福,2003,財務報表重編與董監獨立性/專業性之研究,國立政治大學會計系研究所。
林嬋娟與張哲嘉,2008,董監事異常變動、家族企業與企業舞弊之關聯性,會計評論,第48期(1月):1-33。
陳惠玲,2002,由財報重編看財報可性度及CPA簽證品質-財務透明度評估之一,貨幣觀測與信用評等,第37期:77-86。
張瑞當、方俊儒與曾玉琦,2007,核心代理問題與盈餘管理:董事會結構與外部監督機制之探討,管理學報,第24卷1期:17-39。
張漢傑,2007,破解財務危機,梅霖文化出版:171。
張漢傑,2008,股權控制行為對公司價值的影響力,會計研究月刊,第275期:88-97。
楊炎杰與官月緞,2006,客戶重要性與非審計服務是否影響審計品質?Enron後的觀察,會計評論,第43期(7月):27-61。
薛敏正、林嬋娟與林秀鳳,2008,董事會特性與財務報告重編,交大管理學報,第28卷第2期:73-103。
薛健宏,2008,董監事持股、盈餘平穩化與企業風險之關聯性研究,會計評論,第46期(1月):107-130。
英文部分
Abbott, L.J., S. Parker and G.F. Peters, 2002.Audit Committee Characteristics and Financial Misstatement:A Study of the Efficacy of Certain Blue Ribbon Committee Recommendations, Working paper, University of Memphis.
Agrawal,A. and G. Mandelker,1990.Large Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers: The Case of Antitakeover Charter Amendment,Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(2):143-161.
Agrawal,A. and S.Chadha,2005. Corporate Governance and accounting scandals.Journal of Law and Economics,October,148(2):371-406.
Ahmed, A. S. and S. Duellman, 2007. Accounting conservatism and board of directors’characteristics:An empirical analysis.Journal of Accounting and Economic, 43(2-3):411—437.
Almazam, A., J. Hartzell, and L. Starks, 2004.Conflicts of Interest and Monitoring Costs of Institutional Investors: Evidence from Executive Compensation, Working Paper, University of Texas at Austin.
Antle, R.,1984. Auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22: 1-20.
Antle, R., P. A. Griffen, D. J. Teece and O. E. Williamson,1997. An economic analysis of auditor independence for a multi-client, multi-service public accounting firm. Reportprepared for the AICPA by The Law & Economics Consulting Group,Inc.
Arrunada, B.,1999. The Economics of Audit Quality: Private Incentives and the Regulation of Audit and Non-Audit Services. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Baysinger, B. D. and R. E. Hoskisson,1990.The Composition of Board of Directors and Strategic Control: Effect on Corporate Strategy,Academy of Management Review 15:72–87.
Beasley,M.S., 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud, The Accounting Review, 71(4):443-465.
Beck, P. J., T. J. Frecka, and I. Solomon, 1988. An empirical analysis of the relationship between MAS involvement and auditor tenure: implications for auditor independence,Journal of Accounting Literature 7: 65-84.
Black,BS., 1992 .Institutional investor and corporate governance:The case for institutional voice, Bank of America journal of applied corporate finance 5:19-32.
Bonner, S. E., Palmrose,and S. M. Young,1998. Fraud type and auditor litigation an analysis of SEC accounting and auditing enforcement releases.The Accounting Review 73:503-532.
Brickley, J. A., R. C. Lease and C.W. Smith,1988. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments, Journal of Finance economics, 20(1-2):267-291.
Bushman, R.M. and A.J. Smith, 2003.Transparency ,Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance, Economic Policy Review April:65-87.
Chen, G., M. Firth, D. N. Gao and O. M. Rui,2006.Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China.Journal of Corporate Finance12(3):424-448.
Chung, R., M. Firth and J. B. Kim, 2002. Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management, Journal of Corporate Finance 8: 29-48.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov and L.H.P. Lang, 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1-2): 81-112.
Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan and A.P.Sweeney,1996.Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation:An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC, Contemporary Accounting Research,13(1):1-36.
DeFond, M. L., R. N. Hann and X .Hu, 2005. Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research 43:153-194.
DeAngelo,L.E.,1981.Auditor Size and Audit Quality,Journal of Accounting and Economics,3(3):193-225.
Desai, H., C. E. Hogan and M.S., 2006. The Reputational Penalty for Aggressive Accounting Earning Restatements and Management Turnover, The Accounting Review,81(1):83-112.
Dopuch, N., R, King and R. Schwartz, 2001. Auditors’ independence: appearance vs. fact.Working paper, Washington University.
Dopuch, N., R. King and R. Schwartz,2003 .Independence in Appearance and Fact: An Experimental Investigation, Contemporary Accounting Research 20 : 79–114.
Dye, R., 1993. Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth. Journal of Political Economy 101(5): 887-914.
Engel, E.,2005. Discussion of: Does the Market Value Financial Expertise on Audit Committees of Boards of Directors, Journal of Accounting Research 43:195–204.
Fama, E. F., 1980. Agency Problems and Residual Claims, Journal of Law and Economics, 26:301-326.
Fama, E. F. and M.C. Jensen, 1983. Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics,June:301-325.
Fan, P. H. and T. J. Wong, 2002. Corporate Ownership Structures and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia, Journal of Accounting and Economics 33:401–425.
Farber,D.B., 2005. Restroing trust after fraud:Does corporate governance matter?The Accounting Review 80(2):539–561.
Firth, M. ,1997. The provision of nonaudit services by accounting firms to their audit clients , Contemporary Accounting Research 14: 1-21.
Forker, J., 1992. Corporate Governance and disclosure quality ,Accounting and Business Research,22:111-124.
Hermalin, B. E. and M. S. Weisbach,1988. The determinants of board composition, The Rand Journal of Economics 19(4)Winter:589-606.
Jensen, M. C., 1993, The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control system, Journal of Finance 148:831-880.
Jensen, M. C. and R. S. Ruback, 1983. The market for corporate control:The scientific evidence, Journal of Financial Economics 11(April):5-50.
Jensen, M .C. and W. H. Meckling ,1976. Theory of the firm managerial behavior agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economic 3(4):305-360.
Geiger, M. A. and D.S. North, 2006. Does Hiring a New CFO Change Things ? An Investigation of Changes in Discretionary Accruals, The Accounting Review 81(4):781-809
Gore, P., P. F. Pope and A. K. Singh, 2001. Non-audit services, auditor independence, and earnings management, Working paper, Lancaster University.
Griffin, P. A., 2003. A league of their own ? Financial analysts’ responses to restatements and corrective disclosures, Journal of Accounting, Auditing, & Finance, Forthcoming 18:479-518.
Kahn, C. and A. Winton ,1998. Ownership structure,speculation and shareholder intervention,The Journal of Finance.53(1):99-129.
Klein, A.,2002. Audit C0mmittee,Board of Director Characteristics,and Earnings Management,Journal of Accounting and Economics,33(3):375-400.
Loebbecke J.K., M. M. Eining and J. J. Wlillingham, 1989. Auditors’experience with material irregularities, Frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing,A Journal of Practice & Theory.l9(1):1-28.
Mangel, R. and H. Singh, 1993. Ownership Structure, Board Relationship and CEO Compensation in Large U.S. Corporations, Accounting and Business Research, 23, 339-350.
Mian, S., 2001. On the choice and replacement of chief financial officers, Journal of Financial Economics 60: 143-175.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1999. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.
Oviatt,B.M.,1998. Agency and Transaction Cost Perspectives on the Manager-Shareholder Relationship : Incentive for Congruent Interests, Academy of Management Review,13(2):214-225.
Palmrose, Z-V., J. Richardson and S. Scholz, 2004.Determinants of Marker Reactions to Restatement Announcements, Journal of Accounting and Economics,37(1):59-89.
Palmrose, Z-V and S.Scholz,2004.The Circumstances and Legal Consequences of Non-GAAP Reporting:Evidence from Restatements ,Contemporary Accounting Research,21(1):139-180.
Palmrose,Z-V,1988.An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality ,The Accounting Review 63(1):55-73.
Parkash, M. and C. F. Venable, 1993. Auditee incentives for auditor independence: the case of nonaudit services, The Accounting Review 68: 113-133.
Park, Y.W., H.H. Shin , 2004.Board composition and earnings management in Canada, Journal of Corporate Finance, 10:431–457.
Patton, A., J. C. Baker,1987 .Why won’t Directors Rock the Boat, Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec,:10-18.
Peasnell, K.V., P. F. Pope and S. Young, 2000. Accrual management to meet earnings targets: U.K. evidence pre- and post-Cadbury,British Accounting Review ,32:415– 445.
Peasnell, K. V., P. F.Pope and S.Young,2005.Board Monitoring and Earnings Management:Do Outside Directors Influence Abnormal Accruals?Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,32(7/8):1311-1346.
Pitt, H. L. and D. E. Birenbaum, 1997. Serving the Public interest: A New Conceptual Framework for Auditor Independence. New York: NY: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Pound, J., 1988. Proxy Contests and The Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight, Journal of Financial Economics,20:237-265.
Pound, J., 1992, Beyond takeovers, politics comes to corporate control, Harvard Business Review, January :83-92.
Rajgopal, S. and M. Venkatachalam, 1997. The Role of Institutional Investors in Corporate Governance: An Empirical Investigation, Working paper, University of Washington.
Rechner, P. L., C. Sundaramurthy and D. R. Dalton,1993.Corporate Governance Predictors of Adoption of Anti-Takeover Amendments: An Empirical Analysis’,Journal of Business Ethics 12, 371–378.
Rezaee, Z., 2002. Financial Statement Fraud:prevention and detection, New York:Wiley.
Reynolds,J.k.and J.R.Francis,2001.Does Size Matter?The Influence of Large Clients on Office-Level Auditor Reporting Decisions,Journal of Accounting and Economics,30(3):375-400.
Rosenstein, S. and J.G .Wyatt, 1990. Outside director,board independence,and shareholder wealth, Journal of Financial Economics 26:175-191.
Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny,1986. Large shareholders and corporate control, Journal of Political Economy,94:461-488.
Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny,1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance, Journal of finance,52(2):737—783.
Simunic, D., 1984. Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence, Journal of Accounting Research 22: 679-702.
Teitelman, R., 1993. Wall street and the new economic correctness. Institutional Investor 27(2): 36-42.
U.S.House of Representatives.,2002. Hearings before the Committee on Financial Services (March 13).Washington, D.C.: U.S. House of Representatives.
U.S.Senate.,2002. Oversight Hearing on Accounting and Investor Protection Issues Raised by Enron and Other Public Companies. U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs (February 12,26, and 27; March 5, 6, and 14 2002). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Senate.
Uzun, H., S.H.Szewczyk and R. Varma, 2004. Board composition and corporate fraud. Financial Analysts Journal 60:33–43.
Vafeas, N., 2000. Board Structure and the Informativeness of Earnings,Journal
of Accounting and Public Policy, 19:139-160.
Wallman, S. M .H.,1996. The future of accounting, part III: Reliability and auditor independence, Accounting Horizons 10: 76-97.
Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman,1983. Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: Some evidence,Journal of Law & Economics 26:613-633.
Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman,1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
World Bank, 1999. Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation- Overview, The World Bank, Washington D. C.
Xie, B.,W. N. Davidson III and P. J. DaDalt,2003. Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Role of The Board and The Audit Committee, Journal of Corporate Finance 9(3):295-316.
Zajac, E. J. and J. D. Westphal,1994. The Costs and Benefits of Managerial Incentives and Monitoring in Large U.S. Corporations When Is More Not Better? ,Strategic Management Journal ,15:121–142.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 方俊儒、莊勝傑與蔡宛婷,2008,公司治理機制對財務報表盈餘品質的影響-以管理者使用應計項目的動機來看,今日會計,第111期(6月):68-74。
2. 方俊儒、莊勝傑與蔡宛婷,2008,公司治理機制對財務報表盈餘品質的影響-以管理者使用應計項目的動機來看,今日會計,第111期(6月):68-74。
3. 李建然、許書偉與陳政芳,2003,非審計服務與異常應計數之關聯性研究,會計評論,第37期(7月):1-30。
4. 李建然、許書偉與陳政芳,2003,非審計服務與異常應計數之關聯性研究,會計評論,第37期(7月):1-30。
5. 張瑞當、方俊儒與曾玉琦,2007,核心代理問題與盈餘管理:董事會結構與外部監督機制之探討,管理學報,第24卷1期:17-39。
6. 張瑞當、方俊儒與曾玉琦,2007,核心代理問題與盈餘管理:董事會結構與外部監督機制之探討,管理學報,第24卷1期:17-39。
7. 張漢傑,2008,股權控制行為對公司價值的影響力,會計研究月刊,第275期:88-97。
8. 張漢傑,2008,股權控制行為對公司價值的影響力,會計研究月刊,第275期:88-97。
9. 薛敏正、林嬋娟與林秀鳳,2008,董事會特性與財務報告重編,交大管理學報,第28卷第2期:73-103。
10. 薛敏正、林嬋娟與林秀鳳,2008,董事會特性與財務報告重編,交大管理學報,第28卷第2期:73-103。
11. 薛健宏,2008,董監事持股、盈餘平穩化與企業風險之關聯性研究,會計評論,第46期(1月):107-130。
12. 薛健宏,2008,董監事持股、盈餘平穩化與企業風險之關聯性研究,會計評論,第46期(1月):107-130。