臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本文的目的在於闡明左派放任自由主義的新近理論，即Michael Otsuka的分配正義觀。Otsuka的理論旨在論證有一種平等主義分配原則，可以與個人的自我所有權調和，他以此反駁長久以來許多學者所認為的，自我所有權與平等必然衝突之見。筆者分別就Otsuka對自我所有權的看法、世界資源的平等主義所有權之建構、以及自願結合的政治社會框架之構想進行討論，說明其理論中可取的觀點，並質疑其中的不合理之處。

In this article, I want to explain Michael Otsuka’s idea of distributive justice, the latest theory of the left-libertarianism. Otsuka argued that self-ownership can be combined with a kind of egalitarian ownership principle and he critics that the conflict between self-ownership and equality is an illusion. I will examine Otsuka’s theory about self-ownership, egalitarian proviso and the framework of political societies of voluntarism. And I will point out what is the wrong and right in his theory.

第一章 導論
第一節 研究動機與範圍 1
第二節 文獻回顧 14
第三節 章節安排 17
第二章 Otsuka論自我所有權
第一節 對完全的自我所有權之批評 21
第二節 自我所有權與徵稅 25
第三節 自我所有權與原初權利 27
第四節 自我所有權的明確性 31
第五節 小結 42
第三章 調和自我所有權與平等
第一節 從Locke 的但書到Otsuka的平等主義但書 43
第二節 調和自我所有權與平等的工作 49
第三節 跨世代的財產遺贈與繼承問題 55
第四節 Otsuka的調和工作之融貫問題 59
第五節 小結 71
第四章 自願結合的政治社會
第一節 正當的政治權威與政治社會 73
第二節 政治自願主義 75
第三節 孤領地的代價及賠償問題 79
第四節 多元選擇的諸政治社會之理想 81
第五節 非自願主義的跨政治統治體 84
第六節 對自願結合的政治社會架構之批評 84
結論 92
參考文獻 96

Arneson, Richard
2000 “Lockean Self-Ownership: Towards a Demolition.” In Hillel Steiner and Peter Vallentyne (eds.) Left-Libertarianism and its Critics: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Palgrave.
Brody, Baruch
2000
“Redistribution without Egalitarianism.” In Hillel Steiner and Peter
Vallentyne (eds.) Left-Libertarianism and its Critics: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Palgrave.
Cater, Ian
2004 “Libertarianism without Equality.” <http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=1418> Accessed 9 January 2009.
Christman, John
2000 “Self-Ownership, Equality, and the Structure of Property Rights.”
In Hillel Steiner and Peter Vallentyne (eds.) Left-Libertarianism and its Critics: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Palgrave.
Cohen, G.A.
1995
Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald
1983
“Rights as Trumps.” in Jeremy Waldron (ed.) Theories of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fabre, Cécile
2002
“Justice, Fairness, and World Ownership.” Law and Philosophy 21 :249-273.
Feser, Edward
2004 On Nozick. Toronto: Wadsworth.
Fried, Barbara H.
2004 “Left-Libertarianism: A Review Essay.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 32: 66-92.
2005 “Left-Libertarianism, Once More: A Rejoinder to Vallentyne, Steiner, and Otsuka.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33: 216-222.
Gibbard, Allan
2000 “Natural Property Rights.” In Hillel Steiner and Peter Vallentyne (eds.) Left-Libertarianism and its Critics: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Palgrave.
Grosseries, Axel P.
2004 “Book Review.” Ethics 115: 158-160.
Inoue, Akira
2007 “Can a Right of Self-Ownership be Robust?” Law and Philosophy 26 : 575-587.
Locke, John
1988 Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nozick, Robert
1974 Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Otsuka, Michael
2003 Libertarianism without Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2005 “Equality, Ambition and Insurance.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supplementary 78: 151-66.
Risse, Mathias
2004 “Does Left-libertarian have Coherent Foundation?” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 3: 337-364.
Steiner, Hillel
1994 An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.
2000 “Original Rights and Just Redistribution.” In Hillel Steiner and Peter Vallentyne (eds.) Left-Libertarianism and its Critics: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Palgrave.
Vallentyne, Peter, and Steiner, Hillel (eds.)
2000 Left-Libertarianism and its Critics: The Contemporary Debate. New York:
Palgrave.
Vallentyne, Peter, Steiner, Hillel, and Otsuka, Michael
2005 “Why Left-Libertarianism is not Incoherent, Indeterminate, or Irrelevant: A Reply to Fried.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33: 201-215.