(3.236.118.225) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/14 12:03
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:葉宗顯
研究生(外文):Tsung-Hsian Yeh
論文名稱:普遍與殊異:AndrewLinklater之國際關係批判理論的初探與重建
論文名稱(外文):Universalism and Particularity: The Study and Reconstruction of Andrew Linklater''s Critical Theory in International Relations
指導教授:黃競涓黃競涓引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ching-Chane Hwang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:政治學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:195
中文關鍵詞:後西發利亞普遍性殊異性國際關係批判理論政治社群
外文關鍵詞:critical theory in international relationsparticularityuniversalismpolitical communitypost-Westphalia
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:371
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
普遍性與殊異性之間的對立長久以來便是倫理學中重要的議題之一,而這樣的思維也對國際關係理論產生了深遠影響,甚至是構成國際關係運作的重要基礎。在過去國際關係理論受到實證主義籠罩之時,國際關係中的倫理問題雖非不具重要性,但卻非國際關係「理論」可以多加著墨的範疇。但對此種觀點抱持懷疑的看法不但未曾消失過,在1980年代左右開始,國際關係理論更經歷了一波批判的轉向。現在這樣的轉向已經不僅僅停留在知識論的議題上打轉,更進一步地深入探討國際關係較為實質的倫理議題,而道德原則所具有和所應有之普遍性與殊異性自然也就成為關注焦點,Andrew Linklater國際關係批判理論中的主題之一便是在於探究此一問題意識如何影響政治社群的發展。
然而Linklater本人的著作一來基本上是沿著其方法學,即規範層面、社會學、實踐學等三個面向上逐步展開鋪陳,二來其國際關係批判理論之建構又牽涉到與不少其他國際關係理論如現實主義和英國學派等進行對話和整合,因此對於普遍性和殊異性的議題的關注乃是散落在這些不同的討論之中,而非是對此進行系統性的論述。
在這樣的前提下,本文便是希望能夠以普遍和殊異此一重要倫理學議題作為探索Linklater國際關係批判理論的角度,一方面釐清他如何慢慢地發展出一種能夠尊重差異的普遍性而打破這兩者看似對立的關係,以及體現此一普遍性所要求之後西發利亞政治社群對現代主權國家有何影響;另一方面筆者也希望這樣的角度依然能夠整理和呈現出Linklater方法學三面向的實質內涵,以及其國際關係批判理論與其他理論之間的關係,以期達到初步了解Linklater理論的獨特之處。
目 錄
第一章 導 論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 文獻回顧 10
第四節 研究架構和章節安排 13
第五節 研究限制 18
第二章 Linklater 國際關係批判理論的架構 20
第一節 國際政治理論 22
第二節 批判轉向 31
第三節 理論與實踐 39
第四節 理論間的辯證與對話 45
第五節 小結 50
第三章 邁向世界主義 51
第一節 世界主義與社群主義之爭 54
第二節 理性主義與倫理普遍性 61
第三節 歷史主義與歷史哲學 73
第四節 Linklater的歷史社會學 82
第五節 小結 94
第四章 英國學派與傷害問題 99
第一節 英國學派的綱要性介紹 101
第二節 國際關係中的傷害問題 108
第三節 對英國學派理論的激進化 114
第四節 一個好的國際公民 119
第五節 小結 126
第五章 現代性與後西發利亞時代 129
第一節 現代與後現代之爭 131
第二節 普遍性與差異性的調和 143
第三節 主權國家的現代性 155
第四節 公民資格與後西發利亞時代 160
第五節 小結 166
第六章 結 論 168
參考書目 176
丘宏達,2006,《現代國際法》,台北:三民。
余寬賜,2002,《國際法新論》,台北:啟英文化。
林遠澤,2005,「真理何為?從哈伯瑪斯真理共識理論的實用轉向論真理的規範
性涵義」,《歐美研究》,第35卷第2期,頁1-43。
倪世雄,2003,《當代國際關係理論》,台北:五南圖書。
黃旻華,1998,「國際關係批判理論的重建與評論:科學實存論的觀點」,國立中
山大學政治學研究所論文。
張亞中編,2003,《國際關係總論》,台北:揚智文化。
賴俊雄,2007,「倫理回歸:列維納斯的倫理政治」,《中外文學》,第36卷第4
期,頁11-38。
Adorno, Theodor W., 1973. Negative Dialectics, translated by E. B. Ashton. New York:
The Continuum Publishing Company.
Arendt, Hannah, 1998. The Human Condition (2nd.). Chicago: The Chicago University
Press.
Aristotle著,2003a,《倫理學》,苗力田、徐開來譯,台北:昭明。
Aristotle著,2003b,《政治學》,顏一、秦典華譯,台北:昭明。
Ashley, Richard K., 1981. “Political Realism and Human Interests,” International
Studies Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 204-246.
Ashley, Richard K., & R. B. J. Walker, 1990. “Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 367-416.
Bank, Michael, 1985. “The Inter-Paradigm Debate,” in M. Light & A. J. R. Groom eds., International Relations: A Handbook of Current Theory. London: Frances Pinter.
Baumen, Zygmunt, 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Beck, Ulrich, 1992. Risk Society: Towards A New Modernity. London: Sage.
Beitz, Charles R., 1999. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Benhabib, Seyla, 1993. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in
Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge.
Benhabib, Seyla, 2002. The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bernstein, Richard J., 1976. The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bernstein, Richard J., 1988. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bernstein, Richard J., 1991. The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of
Modernity/Postmodernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Best, Steven & Douglas Kellner著,2005,《後現代理論:批判的質疑》,朱元鴻等
譯,台北;巨流圖書。
Booth, Ken ed., 2005. Critical Security Studies and World Politics. London:
Lynne-Rienner Publishers.
Boucher, David, 1997. “Political Theory, International Theory, and the Political Theory
of International Relations,” in Andrew Vincent ed., Political Theory: Tradition
and Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boyle, Joseph, 1992. “Natural Law and International Ethics,” in Terry Nardin & David
R. Mapel eds., Traditions of International Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Brown, Chris, 1988. “The Modern Requirement? Reflections on Normative
International Theory in a Post-Western World,” Millennium: Journal of
International Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 339-348.
Brown, Chris, 1992. International Relations Theory. New York: Columbia University
Press.
Brown, Chris, Terry Nardin, & Nicholas Rengger eds., 2002. International Relations
in Political Thought: Texts from the Ancient Greeks to the First World War.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bull, Hedley, 1966a. “The Grotian Conception of International Society,” in Herbert
Butterfield & Martin Wight eds., Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory
of International Politics. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Bull, Hedley, 1966b. “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach,” World
Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 361-377.
Bull, Hedley, & Adam Watson eds., 1984. The Expansion of International Society.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bull, Hedley, 1995. “The Theory of International Politics, 1919-1969,” in James Der
Derian ed., International Theory: Critical Investigations. New York: New York
University Press.
Bull, Hedley, 2002. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. (3rd.).
New York: Palgrave.
Butterfield, Herbert, & Martin Wight, 1966. Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the
Theory of International Politics. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Buzan, Barry, 1993. “From International Society to International Society: Structural
Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School,” International Organization. Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 327-352.
Buzan, Barry, 2005. “International Political Economy and Globalization,” in Alex J.
Bellamy ed., International Society and Its Critics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carr, E. H., 1945. Nationalism and After. London: Macmillan.
Carr, E. H., 2001. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939. New York: Palgrave.
Chase-Dunn, Christopher, 1981. “Interstate System and Capitalist World Economy:
One Logic or Two?” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 19-42.
Cochran, Molly, 1999. Normative Theory in International Relations: A Pragmatic
Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Robert, 1981. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International
Relations Theory,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2,
pp. 126-155.
Cox, Robert, 1987. Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Shaping
of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
Devetak, Richard, 2005a. “Critical Theory,” in Scott Burchill et al., Theories of
International Relations (3rd.), pp. 137-160.
Devetak, Richard, 2005b. “Postmodernism,” in Scott Burchill et al., Theories of
International Relations (3rd.), pp. 161-187.
Diez, Thomas, and Jill Steans, 2005. “A Useful Dialogue? Habermas and International
Relations,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 31, pp. 127-140.
Donaldson, Thomas, 1993. “Kant’s Global Rationalism,” in Terry Nardin & David R.
Mapel eds., Traditions of International Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Dunne, Tim, and Nicholas Wheeler eds., 1999. Human Rights in Global Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke, 1995. “International Politics and Political Theory,” in Ken Booth
& Steve Smith eds., International Relations Theory Today. Pennsylvania: The
Pennsylvania State University Press.
Faulks, Keith著, 2003,《公民身分》,黃俊龍譯,台北:巨流圖書。
Frank, Andre G., 1967. Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin American: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Fraser, Nancy, 1989. Unruly Practices: power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fraser, Nancy, & Axel Honneth, 2003. Redistribution or Recognition: A Political-
Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.
Frost, Mervyn, 1996. Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory.
Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Foot, Rosemary, John Gaddis, & Andrew Hurrell eds., 2003. Order and Justice in
International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foucault, Michel, 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings,
1972-1977, edited by Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel著,1990,《性史》,謝石、沈力譯,台北:結構群。
Foucault, Michel著,1992,《規訓與懲罰:監獄的誕生》,劉北成、楊遠嬰譯,
台北:桂冠。
Foucault, Michel, 1994. “Two lectures,” in Michael Kelly ed., Critique and Power:
Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Foucault, Michel, 2007. The Politics of Truth, translated by Lysa Hochroth &
Catherine Porter. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Gellner, Ernest著,2001,《國族與國族主義》,李金梅、黃俊龍譯,台北:聯經。
George, Jim, 1989. “International Relations and the Search for Thinking Space:
Another View of the Third Debate,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 33, No.
2, pp. 269-279.
George, Jim, & David Campbell, 1990. “Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of
Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations,” International
Studies Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 269-293.
Haacke, Jürgen, 2005. “The Frankfurt School and International Relations: on the
Centrality of Recognition,” Review of International studies, Vol. 31, pp. 181-194.
Haas, Ernst, 1964. Beyond the Nations-States. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Habermas, Jürgen, 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests, translated by Jeremy J.
Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen, 1973. Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen, 1984a. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the
Rationalization of Society, Vol. 1, translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston:
Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen, 1984b. Communication and the Evolution of Society. London:
Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen, 1985. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures,
translated by Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen, 1987. Toward a Rational Society. London: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen, 1989a. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An
Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen, 1989b. The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate, edited by Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen, 1998. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory,
edited by Ciaran Cronin and Pablo De Greif. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen, 2001. On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies
in the Theory of Communicative Action, translated by Barbara Fultner. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen, 2001. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, edited by
Max Pensky. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hassan, Ihab著,1993,《後現代的轉向:後現代理論與文化論文集》,劉象禹譯,
台北:時報文化。
Heater, D., 1996. World Citizenship and Government: Cosmopolitan Ideas in the
History of Political Thought. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Hegel, G. W. F., 1995. Lectures on the history of philosophy. Lincoln: University of
Nebraska Press.
Held, David, 1980. Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkley:
University of California Press.
Held, David, 2005. “Principles of Cosmopolitan Order,” in Gillian Brock and Harry
Brighouse eds., The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobden, Stephen, 1998. International Relations and Historical Sociology: Breaking
Down Boundaries. New York: Routledge.
Hobden, Stephen, and R. W. Jones, “Marxist Theories of International Relations,” in
John Baylis & Steve Smith eds., The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations (3rd.), pp. 225-249.
Hobson, John M., 2002. “What’s at Stake in ‘Bringing Historical Sociology Back into
International Relations’? Transcending ‘Chronofetishism’ and ‘Tempocentrism’
in International Relations,” in Stephen Honden & John M. Hobson eds., Histori-
cal Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Hobson, John M.著,2003,《國家與國際關係》,周邵彥譯,台北:弘智。
Hobson, John M., 2007. “Is Critical Theory always for the White West and for
Western Imperialism: Beyond Westphilian towards a Post-racist Critical IR,”
Review of International Studies, Vol. 33, pp. 91-116.
Hoffman, Mark, 1987. “Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate,” Millennium:
Journal of International Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 231-249.
Honneth, Axel, 1995. The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and
Political Philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press.
Honneth, Axel, 2007. Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno, 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment:
Philosophical Fragments, translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hurrell, Andrew, 2003. “Order and Justice in International Relations: What is at
Stake?” in Rosemary Foot, John Lewis Gaddis, & Andrew Hurrell eds., Order and
Justice in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hutchings, Kimberly, 1999. International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a
Global Era. London: Sage Publications.
Hutchings, Kimberly, 2005. “Speaking and Hearing: Habermasian Discourse Ethics,
Feminism and IR,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 155-165.
Jay, Martin, 1992. “The Debate over Performative Contradiction: Habermas versus the Poststructuralists,” in Axel Honneth et al. eds., Cultural-political Interventions in the Unfinidhed Project of Enlightenment. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kant, Immanuel著,1990,《道德底形上學基礎》,李明輝譯,台北:聯經。
Kant, Immanuel, 1991. Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel, 1998. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel著,2002,《康德歷史哲學論文集》,李明輝譯,台北:聯經。
Kelly, Michael ed., 1994. Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas
Debate. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Keohane, Robert O., & Josesh S. Nye, 1977. Power and independence: World Politics
in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.
Kymlicka, Will著,2003,《當代政治哲學導論》,劉莘譯,台北:聯經。
Linklater, Andrew, 1986. “Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory,” Review
of International Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 301-312.
Linklater, Andrew, 1990a. Men and Citizens in the Theory of International relations.
(2nd.). London: The Macmillan Press.
Linklater, Andrew, 1990b. Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and
International Relations. London: The Macmillan Press.
Linklater, Andrew, 1990c. “The Problem of Community in International Relations,”
Alternatives, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 135-153.
Linklater, Andrew, 1992. “The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations
Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View,” Millennium: Journal of
International Studies, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 77-98.
Linklater, Andrew, 1994. “Dialogue, Dialectic and Emancipation in International
Relations at the End of the Post-War Age,” Millennium: Journal of International
Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 119-131.
Linklater, Andrew, 1995. “Neo-Realism in Theory and Practice,” in Ken Booth & Steve
Smith eds., International Relations Theory Today. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Linklater, Andrew, 1996. “Citizenship and Sovereignty in the post-Westphalian State,”
European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 77-103.
Linklater, Andrew, 1998. The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical
Foundations of the post-Westphalian Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Linklater, Andrew, 2001. “Citizenship, Humanity, and Cosmopolitan Harm
Conventions,” International Political Science Review. Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 261-277.
Linklater, Andrew, 2002a. “The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Implications for
the Sociology of States-systems,” International Affairs. Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 319-338.
Linklater, Andrew, 2002b. “Unnecessary Suffering,” in Ken Booth & Tim Dunne
eds., World in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Linklater, Andrew, 2005a. “Rationalism,” in Scott Burchill et al. eds., Theories of
International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Linklater, Andrew, 2005b. “Dialogic Politics and the Civilizing Process,” Review of
International Studies, Vol. 31, pp. 141-154.
Linklater, Andrew, & Hidemi Suganami, 2006. The English School of International
Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Linklater, Andrew, 2007. Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty
and Humanity. London: Routledge.
Little, Richard, 1998, “International System, International Society and World Society,”
in B. A. Roberson ed., International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. London: Continuum.
Lyotard, Jean-Francois, 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge,
translated by Geoff Bennington & Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
MacIntyre, Alasdair, 1984. After Virtue (2nd.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame
Press.
MacMillan, John, & Andrew Linklater, 1995. Boundaries in Question: New Directions
in International Relations. London: Pinter Publishers.
Mann, Michael, 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Mann, Michael, 1988. States, War, and Capitalism: Studies in Political Sociology.
Oxford: Blackwell.
Marsh, David, & Gerry Stoker著,2007,《政治學方法與途徑》,陳義彥等譯,台北:
韋伯文化。
Marshall, T. H., 1973. Class, Citizenship, and Social Development. Westport:
Greenwood Press
McCarthy, Thomas, 1978. The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: MIT
Press.
McCarthy, Thomas, 1991. Ideals and Illusions: On Reconstruction and Deconstruction
in Contemporary Critical Theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Mitrany, David, 1975. The Functional Theory of Politics. London: London School of
Economics & Political Science.
Morrice, David, 2000. “The Liberal-Communitarianism Debate in Contemporary
Political Philosophy and Its Significance for International Relations,” Review of
International Studies, Vol. 26, pp. 233-251.
Murphy, Craig N., and Roger Tooze eds.,1991. The New International Political
Economy. Boulder: Lynne-Rienner Publishers.
Nardin, Terry, & David R. Mapel eds., 1992. Traditions of International Ethics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neufeld, Mark A., 1995. The Restructuring of International Relations theory.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nye, Joseph, 1998. “Neorealism and Neoliberalism,” World Politics, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp.
235-251.
Oakeshott, Michael, 1991. “Rationalism in Politics,” in Rationalism in Politics and
Other Essays. Indianapolis: LibertyPress.
O’Hagan, Jacinta, 2005. “The Question of Culture,” in Alex J. Bellamy ed.,
International Society and Its Critics. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Neill, Onora, 1991. “Transnational Justice,” in David Held ed., Political Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Popper, Karl, 1979. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Pufendorf, Samuel von, 1991. On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural
Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, John, 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John著,2005,《萬民法》,李國維、珂洛緹、汪慶華譯,台北:聯經。
Rengger, Nicholas, 2000. “Political Theory and International Relations: Promised Land
or Exit from Eden?” International Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 755-770.
Rorty, Richard, 1985. “Habermas and Lyortard on Postmodernity,” in Richard J.
Bernstein ed., Habermas and Modernity, pp. 161-175.
Rorty, Richard, 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Rosen, Michael, 2004. “Benjamin, Adorno, and the Decline of the Aura,” in Fred Rush
ed., The Cambridge Companion to Philosophy, pp. 40-56.
Rush, Fred, 2004. “Introduction to Critical Theory,” The Cambridge Companion to
Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scheffler, Samuel, 1999. “Conceptions of Cosmopolitanism,” Utilitas, Vol. 11, No. 3,
pp. 255-276.
Shaw, Karena, 2003. “Whose Knowledge for What Politics,” Review of International
Studies, Vol. 29, pp. 199-221.
Sheehan, Paul, 2004. “Postmodernism and Philosophy,” in Steven Connor ed., The
Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Smith, Steve, 1992. “The Forty Years’ Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in
International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 489-506。
Steinman, Clay, 2005. “Beyond Eurocentrism: The Frankfurt School and Whiteness
Theory,” in Max Pensky ed., Globlizing Critical Theory. Lanham: Rowman
&Littlefield Publishers.
Taylor, Charles, 1994. “The Politics of Recognition,” in Multiculturalism: Examining
the Politics of Recognition, pp. 25-73.
Taylor, Charles, 1985. “Atomism,” Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical
Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vincent, Andrew, 2002. Nationalism and Particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Waever, Ole, 1996. “The Rise and Fall of the Inter-paradigm Debate,” in Steve Smith
et al. eds., International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Walker, R. B. J., 1999. “The Hierarchicalization of Political Community,” Review of
International Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 151-156.
Walzer, Michael, 2006. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical
Illustrations. New York: Basic Books.
Wight, Martin, 1966. “Why is There No International Theory,” in Herbert Butterfield
& Martin Wight eds., Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of
International Politics. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Wight, Martin, 1994. “The Three Traditions of International Theory,” in Gabriele
Wight & Brian Porter eds., International Theory: The Three Traditions. London:
Leicester University Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel, 1974. The Modern World System. New York: Academic Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel, 1979. The Capitalist World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N., 1959. Man, the State and War. New York: Columbia University
Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N., 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Walzer, Michael, 2006. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical
Illustrations. New York: Basic Books
Wendt, Alexander, 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction
of Power Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 391-425.
Wendt, Alexander, 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
White, Stephen K., 1989. The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and
Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolin, Sheldon S., 2006. Politics and Vision. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Wyn Jones, Richard, 1999. Security, Strategy, and Critical theory. London:
Lynne-Rienner Publishers.
Wyn Jones, Richard, 2001a. ”Locating Critical International Relations Theory,” in
Richard Wyn Jones ed., Critical Theory and World Politics. London: Lynne
Rienner Publishers.
Wyn Jones, Richard, 2001b. “Introduction: Locating Critical International Relations
Theory,” in R. W. Jones ed., Critical Theory and World Politics, pp. 1-19.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔