跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(100.26.196.222) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/02/27 16:28
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳科仁
論文名稱:高職學生技術創造力培訓與競賽活動指導教師對創造力教育觀點之研究
指導教授:吳明雄吳明雄引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:工業教育學系
學門:教育學門
學類:專業科目教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:168
中文關鍵詞:創造力創造力教育全國高職學生技術創造力培訓與競賽活動
外文關鍵詞:creativitycreativity educationthe technique creativity training and the competition activities for the national senior high vocational school
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:808
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:250
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
中文摘要

本研究以參與「全國高職學生技術創造力培訓與競賽活動」指導教師為對象,旨在探究參與活動之教師對創造力教育之觀點,研究目的:一、探討指導教師對學生參與本活動之觀點;二、探討指導教師培訓參賽學生之過程內涵;三、探討指導教師對創造力評量之觀點;四、探討指導教師將創造力教育於班級教學之運用與學生回饋。
研究採調查研究法,研究工具為自編「全國高職學生技術創造力培訓與競賽活動指導教師對啟發創造力教育觀點」問卷,本問卷經專家會議,項目分析、信效度分析後編製正式問卷,以電子郵件方式寄送100份問卷,回收有效問卷74份。資料處理方式為:描述統計,獨立樣本t考驗,單因子變異數分析;研究結果: 一、指導教師性別以男性居多,學歷半數以上為碩士,任教職年資涵蓋1-25年各階段且學校支持師生參與本活動。二、指導教師認為學生參與本活動對學生創造力啟發及未來發展均有正面助益。三、培訓參賽學生過程中,指導教師會設計與應用具有創意之教材與教法以啟發及提昇學生創造力。四、指導教師對創造力評量之方式與內容有高度共識。五、研究發現,曾參與本活動之教師無論任教學校公私立別、學歷、學校支持態度、任教職年資雖有不同,其對創造力教育之觀點無顯著差異,均願意將創造力教育融入班級教學中,啟發及引導職業學校學生創造力。
最終,研究者依研究結果,針對未來研究方向與創造力競賽辦理單位及創造力教育實務工作者提出建議,俾供參考。
ABSTRACT

The study aimed to explore the views of student advisors on creativity education in the national technological creativity contest for vocational high school students. The purposes of the study are as follows: first, to explore the views from student advisors on students participating in the contest; second, to explore how student advisors trained their students before attending the contest; third, to explore the views of student advisors on the assessment of the creativity; forth, to explore student advisors applying the creativity education to their teaching and students’ feedback.
The researcher took the survey research method and the research tool questionnaire on “The views of student advisors on creativity education in the national technological creativity contest for vocational high school students”. After discussion with professionals, item analysis, reliability and validity analysis, the formal questionnaire was made and sent by e-mail to each advisor. After all these, the researcher received 74 questionnaires feedback. The data was processed by descriptive statistics, independent sample T tests and one-way ANOVA. After analysis of the data, the findings are as follows:
First, the gender of student advisors is mostly male and more than half of those have master degrees and their teaching experiences ranged from 1 to 25 years. Besides, their schools hold positive attitude toward this contest. Second, student advisors assumed students participating in this contest all receive the positive benefit for the inspiration of the creativity and their future development. Third, after training, student advisors would design and apply the creative materials and ways to inspire and increase the creativity. Forth, student advisors have high consensuses regarding the methods and contents of the assessment of the creativity. Fifth, the teachers who had attended the contest were willing to apply the creativity education to their teaching activity, inspire and guide the students in vocational high school to develop their creativity skills, no matter they are from public or private high school, different degrees, different attitude from school background, and different teaching experiences.
To be concluded, according to the results of the study, the researcher offered some advices for those who will do the future research, such as the organizations holding the creativity contest or the instructors to creativity education.
目錄
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………...I
英文摘要………………………………………………………………………..II
目錄………………………………………………………………………….…IV
表目錄………………………………………………………..………………...VI
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………........VII
第一章 緒論…………………………………………….…………………...1
第一節 研究緣起與動機…………………………….…………………...1
第二節 研究目的………………………………………….……………...6
第三節 研究範圍與限制………………………………….……………...7
第四節 名詞釋義………………………………………….…………….10
第二章 文獻探討..…………………………………………………………13
第一節 創造力………..…………………………………………………13
第二節 技術創造力……………………………………………………..26
第三節 創造力相關競賽活動…………………………………………..31
第四節 創造力教育……………………………………………………..44
第三章 研究設計與實施…………………………………………………..57
第一節 研究方法與架構………………………………………………..57
第二節 研究步驟………………………………………………………..61
第三節 研究工具…………………………………………………….….64
第四節 調查實施………………………………………………………..81
第五節 資料處理………………………………………………………..82
第四章 資料分析與討論…………………………………………………..85
第一節 研究樣本描述…………………………………………………..85
第二節 指導教師對創造力教育觀點分析………………………..........91
第三節 公私立學校間指導教師對創造力教育觀點分析……………100
第四節 由參賽動機分析指導教師對創造力教育觀點........................110
第五節 由背景資料推論指導教師對創造力教育觀點........................120
第六節 綜合討論….…………………………………………………...130
第伍章 結論與建議…….………………………………………………...141
第一節 研究結論………………………………………………………141
第二節 研究建議………………………................................................146
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………151
附錄一
「全國高職學生技術創造力培訓與競賽活動指導教師教學信念之研究」預試問卷 …………………………………………………………………………..163
附錄二
「全國高職學生技術創造力培訓與競賽活動指導教師教學信念之研究」問卷 ……………………………………………………………..………..……..166
參考文獻
壹、中文部分
毛連塭 (1989)。實施創造思考教育的參考架構。創造思考教育創刊號,2-9。
毛連塭 (1995)。資優教育:課程與教學 。台北:五南圖書公司。
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。台北:心理出版社。
王文科 (1991)。教育研究法。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
王恭志 (2000)。教師教學信念與教學實務之探析。教育研究資訊,8(2),84-98。
朱采翎 (2008)。教師創造力教學信念與創造力內隱理論之發展及其關係。國立臺北教育大學國民教育系碩士論文。
何益川 (2005)。機械領域工程背景高創造力者之技術能力心智運作歷程研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
吳明雄 (2000)。我國發明人相關能力及性向與發明方法之研究,台北:師大書苑。
吳明雄 (2002)。高職學生機械技術創造力培訓之研究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告NSC 91-2522-S-003-013,未出版。
吳明雄 (2007)。第十六章:技術創造力評量探討。2007年11月9日,取自http://3q.creativity.edu.tw/teach/3/madeg3.htm
吳明雄 (2007)。第四屆全國高職學生技術創造力培訓與競賽活動。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。
吳明雄 (2007)。第五屆全國高職學生技術創造力培訓與競賽活動。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫申請書。
吳明雄 (2008)。第五屆全國高職學生技術創造力培訓與競賽活動辦法。
吳明雄、許碧珊、饒達欽、簡明忠、陳建宏、張中一、黃秀玉 (2008)。高職學生技術創造力指標建構之研究。師大學報,53(3),67-93。
吳明雄、陳科仁、陳鈺琳、陳柏志 (2008)。職業學校專業科目教師啟發學生創造力之探討。2008行動研究學術研討會論文集,台東大學師範學院。
吳明雄、饒達欽 (2007)。高中職學生創造能力指標。台北市:教育部專案研究計畫,未出版。
吳清山 (2002)。創意教學的重要理念與實施策略。台灣教育,614,2-8。
吳靜吉 (2004)。台灣創造力教育實施現況。教育部創造力中程發展計畫。
吳靜吉 (2002)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究,15,17-42。
林幸台 (1998)。傑出科學家之創造力特性及開發創造力模式之研究-子計劃三:歷史角度之探討。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告NSC 87-2511-5-003-063,未出版。
林偉文 (2007) 。教學創新的梅迪奇效應:以英國創意夥伴計畫為例。教育研究月刊, 157,31-41。
林瑞池 (1997)。技術合作策略影響因素之研究。中正大學企業管理學系碩士論文。未出版,嘉義。
邱皓政、葉玉珠 (1998)。技術創造力的定義。技術創造力研討會。國立中山大學,高雄。
查子秀 (1997)。中德兒童技術創造力跨文化研究。人民論壇,12,42-43。
洪文東 (1999)。科學的創造發明與發現。台北:臺灣書店。
胡夢蕾 (2006)。我國創造力與人格特質研究之回顧與探析。教育學刊,26,215-240。
涂君暐 (2005)。內外在動機、創造力工作環境與創造力之相關研究-以第八屆創思設計與製作競賽之參賽學生為例。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
張一蕃 (1998)。技學素養教育研究之規劃與推動。科學發展月刊,26(9), 1153~1158。
張世彗 (2003)。創造力—理論、技術/技法與培育。台北: 張世彗。
張春興 (2000)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北:東華書局。
教育部 (1998)。工業職業學校課程標準暨設備標準。教育部技職司。
教育部 (2001)。創造力教育白皮書。台北:教育部。
教育部 (2004)。2005-2008教育施政主軸。台北:教育部。
許文賢 (1995)。技術來源、技術能力與績效關係之研究。國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
郭有遹 (1983)。創造心理學。台北:正中書局。
陳世程 (2005)。機械領域技術背景高創造力者之技術能力心智運作歷程研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
陳昭儀 (1991)。我國傑出發明家之人格特質、創造歷程及生涯發展之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,7,211-227。
陳昭儀 (2007)。創造力課程授課教師教學信念之研究。資優教育研究2007, 7(1)。
陳昭儀、吳武典、陳智臣 (2005)。我國創造力教育發展史。教育資料集刊,30,97-111。
陳昭儀、陳琦、張素華 (1995)。瞭解創意人。臺北:心理出版社。
陳科仁、吳明雄、陳鈺琳 (2008)。啟發創造力教學融入職業學校本位課程之探討。中國工業職業教育學會97年度學術論文專輯。台北: 中國工業職業教育學會。
陳英豪、吳益裕 (1982)。測驗的編製與應用。台北:偉文圖書公司。
陳龍安 (2000)。 創造思考教學。台北;心理。
陳龍安 (2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際(第六版)。臺北市:心理。
陳霞鄢、王振德(2004)。國小資優班教師創造力教學行為之研究。資優教育研究,4(1),29-50。
葉玉珠(2002)。國小中高年級學童科技創造力發展與其主要影響生態系統之動態關係(NSC 91-2522-S-110-004)。臺北:國科會。
賈馥茗 (1973)。發展創造才能的教師。國立政治大學學報,27,111-117。
歐陽教 (1994)。教育概論。台北市:師大書苑。
鄭昭明 (1997)。創造性思考的原理原則。載於張昭鼎紀念基金會(主編),「張昭鼎紀念研討會」科學創意論文集(pp. 1-6),台北市。



貳、英文部分
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. NY: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Anderson, W. , & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s educational objectives. NY: Longman.
Black, S. (2005). Teaching students to think critically. Education Digest, 70(6), 42–27.
Christensen, D. (1996). The professional knowledge-research base for teacher education.In J. Sikula (Ed.) Handbook of research on teacher education, 38-52.
Churchill, G. A. Jr., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 491-504.
Cole, L. K. (1991). Satisfaction: Theory or Theoretical Construct. Educational Creativity,28-47, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Costa, A. L. (2001). Teaching for, of, and about thinking. In A. L. Costa (Ed.),142 Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking, 354-357, Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Costa, A. L., & Lowery, L. F. (1989). Techniques for teaching thinking .California: Midwest.
Cropley, A. J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A.Runco. (Ed.) Creativity research handbook , 83-114, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality creation. New York: American Library.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. NY: HarperCollins. 杜明城譯(1999)。創造力。台北:時報。
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Social, culture, and person: A system view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity, 325-339, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Dasgupta, S. (1996). Technology and creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Draft et Lengel. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and management design . In Cumings L.L. et Staw B.M., Research in organizational behaviour, 6, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Fisher, R., & William, M. (2004). Unlocking creativity teaching across the curriculum.方德隆譯。(2007)。開啟創造力之門-跨課程領域與教學。臺北市:高等教育。
Flor, M. L., & Oltra, M. J. (2004). Identification of innovating firms through technological innovation indicators: An application to the Spanish ceramic tile industry. Research Policy, 33, 323–336.
Gallagher, J. J. (1985). Teaching the gifted child. (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Garder, H. (1993). Seven creators of the modern era. In J. Brockman (Ed.),
Getzels, J.W., Lipham, J.M. & Campbell, R.P. (1968). Educational administration as a social process. New York: Harper & Row.
Gove, P. B. (1973). Webster’s Third New International Dictionary. 台北市:新月圖書公司.
Gronroos, C. (1990). Service management and marketing:Managing the moments of truth in service competition. Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Haywood-Farmer, J. (1988). A conceptual model of service quality. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 8(6), 19-29.
Helson, H.(1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper and Row.
Hemlina, S. (2006). Creative knowledge environments. Creativity and innovation capacity factors in and around research groups in biotechnology. Paper presented at SPRU 40th Anniversary conference –The future of science, technology and innovation policy: Linking research and practice, Brighton, UK.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The role of the environment in creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity , 11-38, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Howe, R. (1997). Creative problem solving approaches processes for teaching and doing creative activity. Paper presented at the seminar of Instruction for Creative Thinking. Taipei: NTNU.
Howley, A., Howley, C., & Pendarvis, E. (1986). Teaching gifted children: Principles and strategies. Boston:Little, Brown.
Huppertz, J.W., Arenson, S.J., & Evans, R.H. (1978). An application of eguity theory to buyer-seller exchange situations. Journal of Marketing Resarch, 15 (5),250-260.
Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (1987). Creative problem solving: Three components and six specific stages. Instructional handout, Buffalo, NY: Center for Studies in Creativity.
Jane, B., & Robbins, J. (2004). Blockplay as a potential for learning for innovation in technology education inearly childhood classrooms 2. Centre for Learning Research. Gold Coast: Griffith University.
Janssen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(1), 45-94.
Jeffrey, B., & Graft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30, 78-87.
Johnson, M. D., & Fornell, C. (1991). A framework for comparing customer satisfaction across individuals and product categories, Journal of Economic Psychology, 12, 267-286.
Kast, F. E. & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1985). Organization & Management: Contingency Approach.台北市:淡江書局.
Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management: Analysis, planning implementation and control (8th ed.). New York:Prentice-Hall.
Kotler, P.(1993). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Happening Out There. Planning Review, 50-52.
Latour, S. A., & Peat N. C. (1979). Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Consumer Satisfaction Research ( 6th ed.,) William Wilkie, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 431-437.
Lovelock, Christopher H. (2001). Services marketing : people, technology, strategy. Upper Saddle River, NJ :Prentice Hall.
Martin, C. L. (1988). Enhancing Children’s Satisfaction and Participation Using a Predictive Regression Model of Bowling Performance Norms. The Physical Educator, 45 (4),196-209.
Martin, M. W. (2006). Moral creativity in science and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(3), 421-433.
McLeod, J., & Cropley, A. J. (1989). Fostering academic excellence. Oxford: Pergamon.
Mellou, E. (1996). The two-conditions view of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(2), 126-149.
Niu, W. (2007). Individual and environmental influences on Chinese student creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 151-175.
Oliver, R.L.(1981). “Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retailing setting” . Journal of retailing, 57(3), 25-48.
Oliver, Richard L. and W.S. Desarbo, (1988). “Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgment”. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 495-507.
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L.&Zeithaml, V. A. (1985).A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L.,&Zeithaml, V. A.(1988). Communication and control processes in the delivery of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 35-48.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L.&Zeithaml, V. A. (1988).SERVQUAL:A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 14.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A.& Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering quality service: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. New York: Free Press.
Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Porter M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
Price, J. L. (1972). Handbook of organizational measurement. Lexington, D. C.: Health.
Raiziene, S., & Grigaite, B. (2005). Developing child’s thinking skills by semantic mapping strategies. TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences, 9(2), 192–206.
Ram, A., & Leake, D. B. (1995). Goal-driven learning. London: A Bradeford Bood.
Robbins, S. L. (1990). Exploring math, discovering wonder! Perspectives in Education and Deafness, 8 (5),6-8.
Saeki S, Yamamoto M, Iino Y (2001) . Plasticity of chemotaxis revealed by paired presentation of a chemoattractant and starvation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Biol 204:1757–1764.
Sasser, W. E., Olsen, R. P., & Wyckoff, D. D. (1978). Management of service operations: Text, cases and readings. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Schreyer, R.S. & Roggenbuck, J.W.(1978), The Influence of Experience Expectation on crowding Percetiopns and Social-Psychological Carrying capacities. Leisure Science , 1(4),373-394.
Sharif, M. N. (1988). Basis for Techno-Economic Policy Analysis. Science and Policy, 15(4), 217-229.
Shaunghnessy, M. F. (1995). On the theory and measurement of creativity. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED381576.)
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Identifying and developing creative giftedness. Roeper Review,23, 60-64.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006a). Creating a vision of creativity: The first 25 years. Psychology of Aesthetics. Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 2-12.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006b). The Nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 87-98.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I.(1995).Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity .New York: Free press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (1996). Teaching for thinking . American Psychological Association. 李弘善譯。(2000)。思考教學。臺北市:遠流。
Sternberg, R. J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1998). Teaching triarchically improves school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3),374-384
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ferrari, M., & Clinkenbeard, P. (1999). A triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 3-13.
Sternberg, R. J.,&Lubart, T. I. (1997). 不同凡想(洪蘭譯)。臺北:遠流。
Sternberg, R.J. & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). New York: Cambridge University Press.
TAT(Technology Atlas Team)(1987) .Components of Technology for Resources Transformation. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 32,19-35.
Tokoro, M., & Mogi, K. (2007). Creativity and the brain. Singapore: World Scientific.
Udall, A. J., & Daniels, J. E. (1991) . Greeting the thoughtful classroom: strategies of promote student thinking. Tucson, Arizona: Zephyr Press.
Wallas, G. (1926). The arts of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Webster, A., Campbell, C., & Jane, B. (2006). Enhancing the creative process for learning in primary technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 221-235.
Weiner (1985). An Attribution Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573.
Wiles, J. (1985). The mind of invention: Activities to stimulate creative thinking. New York: Freeman Press.
Wilson, V., & Harris, M. (2003). Designing the best: A review of effective teaching and learning of design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 223–241.
Wright, C., & Fesler, L. L. (1990). Nurturing creative potentials: A model early childhood program. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Expanding awareness of creative potentials worldwide (pp. 138-142). Salt Lake, UT : Braib Talent-powers.
Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (1996). Service markering. New York: McGraw-Hill.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 王恭志 (2000)。教師教學信念與教學實務之探析。教育研究資訊,8(2),84-98。
2. 王恭志 (2000)。教師教學信念與教學實務之探析。教育研究資訊,8(2),84-98。
3. 吳靜吉 (2002)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究,15,17-42。
4. 吳靜吉 (2002)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究,15,17-42。
5. 林偉文 (2007) 。教學創新的梅迪奇效應:以英國創意夥伴計畫為例。教育研究月刊, 157,31-41。
6. 林偉文 (2007) 。教學創新的梅迪奇效應:以英國創意夥伴計畫為例。教育研究月刊, 157,31-41。
7. 胡夢蕾 (2006)。我國創造力與人格特質研究之回顧與探析。教育學刊,26,215-240。
8. 胡夢蕾 (2006)。我國創造力與人格特質研究之回顧與探析。教育學刊,26,215-240。
9. 陳昭儀 (1991)。我國傑出發明家之人格特質、創造歷程及生涯發展之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,7,211-227。
10. 陳昭儀 (1991)。我國傑出發明家之人格特質、創造歷程及生涯發展之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,7,211-227。
11. 陳昭儀 (2007)。創造力課程授課教師教學信念之研究。資優教育研究2007, 7(1)。
12. 陳昭儀 (2007)。創造力課程授課教師教學信念之研究。資優教育研究2007, 7(1)。
13. 陳昭儀、吳武典、陳智臣 (2005)。我國創造力教育發展史。教育資料集刊,30,97-111。
14. 陳昭儀、吳武典、陳智臣 (2005)。我國創造力教育發展史。教育資料集刊,30,97-111。
15. 陳霞鄢、王振德(2004)。國小資優班教師創造力教學行為之研究。資優教育研究,4(1),29-50。
 
1. 創造力競賽活動對國中學生創造力與創造性傾向之成效研究
2. 圖畫書教學對國小教師創造力教學及學童創造力表現之影響
3. 國中教師創造力信念、創造力教學自我效能對創造力教學行為影響之研究
4. 學生美感經驗、創意自我效能與創造力之研究:教師創造力教學的多層次調節式中介效果
5. 教師創造力教學信念與創造力內隱理論之發展及其關係
6. 創造力動機歷程模式:未來目標、課室目標結構、自我決定動機、自我調整學習策略與創造力之關係
7. 角色扮演遊戲對臺灣大學生的認知創造力和情緒創造力的影響
8. 大學生修習創造力課程對於創造力與學習狀況影響之研究
9. 創造力訓練教學方案對大學生提升創造力成效之研究
10. 國民小學教師人格特質、工作壓力對創造力影響之研究---創造力工作環境節制效果之驗證
11. 探討資管學生創造力之影響因素-整合Amabile創造力成份模式與理性行為理論觀點之探討
12. 「問想做評」創造力訓練方案對教育人員創造力成效之研究
13. 內外在動機、創造力工作環境與創造力之相關研究-以第八屆創思設計與製作競賽之參賽學生為例
14. 主管對創造力支持與部屬創造力之關係-內在動機的中介效果與開放性的調節效果
15. 創造性問題解決教學對於國民小學低年級學生創造力之影響創造性問題解決教學對於國民小學低年級學生創造力之影響