(3.92.96.236) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/09 00:16
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳家倫
研究生(外文):Chia-Lun Chen
論文名稱:職業輔導評量專業人員知識領域重要性與準備度探討
論文名稱(外文):The Exploration about Preparedness and Importance of Knowledge area in Vocational evaluator.
指導教授:林幸台
指導教授(外文):Hsin-Tai Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:復健諮商研究所
學門:社會服務學門
學類:身心障礙服務學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:70
中文關鍵詞:職業輔導評量知識領域準備度重要性訓練需求
外文關鍵詞:vocational evaluationknowledge areapreparednessimportancetraining needs
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:414
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:114
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
本研究目的為探討通過職業輔導評量員培訓課程之專業人員,對於職業輔導評量知識領域準備度與重要性之看法,並藉由兩者之間的差距,形成職業輔導評量專業人員之訓練需求,採調查研究法,利用46題職業輔導評量內容變項形成問卷,取得有效樣本123人對職業輔導評量知識領域準備度與重要性問卷之資料,以因素分析將46題內容變項分為6個知識領域向度。
本研究並探討專業人員背景變項是否影響其對於各知識領域準備度、重要性與訓練需求之看法,以提供做為未來職評專業人員訓練課程之參考,並歸納其結論如下:
一、專業人員對各向度準備度與重要性看法之間,皆達到顯著差異,且有半數向度的準備度平均數呈現不充分的情形。
二、專業人員對於重要性看法ㄧ致,在各向度間皆達到接近重要與重要以上的程度,且未受到背景變項影響。可知研究中所抽取之知識領域向度,其重要性獲得研究對象支持。
三、背景變項與各向度準備度與訓練需求有較高的關聯,其中以職業輔導評量人員工作年資與向度關聯性較高,資深者尤其認為自身準備度不足,且訓練需求較高。
四、由本研究可知,目前職評課程所涵蓋廣度雖與知識領域相近,但課程時間不足,所能容納課程之深度不足,故未來課程辦理方式值得主管機關與專業及學術團體進ㄧ步探討,以提高職評人員培訓所能提供之準備度。
Factor analysis was used as research instrument to categorize 46 content variables into 6 knowledge area factors.
The purpose of this study was to explore the professionals’ viewpoints about the preparedness and importance of vocational evaluation knowledge area, and the training needs of vocational evaluators through the difference between these two variables. This study also explore whether the professionals’ background variables made influence on the viewpoints of professionals’ to preparedness, importance and training needs in every knowledge area or not. Survey study method was applied by using the 46 vocational evaluation item questionnaire, which was validated through factor analysis with six knowledge components.
The investigation resulted with 123 respondents of returned questionnaires. Research findings and conclusions were as followed:
1.Professionals’ viewpoints about preparedness and importance were significantly different in every factor. Respondents indicated their insufficient preparation in at least three knowledge components.
2.Professionals’ viewpoints were identical about the importance, and reached the degree of “nearly important” and “more than important” in every factor. This showed the importance of knowledge area factors chosen were supported by study group.
3.Background variables and preparedness of every factor had higher correlation with training needs, and the work seniority of professionals was the highest one. The seniors especially considered the deficiency about preparedness and higher training needs of themselves.
4.Results showed that although vocational evaluator training program content closed to knowledge area, program duration and required hours caused the depth deficiency about its effectiveness. Therefore, the training way needed further exploration and discussion in the future to increase the preparedness that vocational evaluator training can provide.
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機...................................................................1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題...........................................................4
第三節 名詞釋義...............................................................................4
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 職業輔導評量在職業重建領域中的角色...........................6
第二節 訓練與課程對專業人員的重要性.......................................8
第三節 職業輔導評量專業人員培訓..............................................10
第四節 職業輔導評量知識領域......................................................13
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究設計..............................................................................17
第二節 研究對象..............................................................................18
第三節 研究工具..............................................................................20
第四節 研究程序..............................................................................28
第四章 研究結果與討論
第一節 職業輔導評量知識領域的準備度與重要性......................30
第二節 專業人員背景變項與職評準備度及重要性之關聯
..............................................................................................34
第三節 職評訓練需求與背景變項之關聯......................................38
第四節 研究結果討論......................................................................42
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論..............................................................................47
第二節 建議......................................................................................48
參考文獻...................................................................................................52


附錄一 預試問卷.....................................................................................61
附錄二 預試問卷專家意見表.................................................................64
附錄三 正式問卷.....................................................................................68

圖 目 錄
圖3-1 研究設計圖...................................................................................17

表 目 錄
表2-4-1 歷來研究中的復健諮商知識領域............................................13
表2-4-2 職業輔導評量知識領域............................................................14
表2-4-3 職業輔導評量員應具備能力表................................................16
表3-2-1 樣本基本背景資料摘要表.........................................................19
表3-3-1職業輔導評量知識領域因素分析摘要表.................................26
表3-3-2 各因素內部一致性摘要表........................................................28
表4-1-1 專業人員對各因素準備度與重要性的看法............................31
表4-1-2 專業人員對各向度重要性與準備度差距.................................32
表4-2-1 專業人員背景變項差異對因素準備度看法統計考驗結果
....................................................................................................35
表4-2-2 專業人員背景變項差異對因素重要性看法統計考驗結果
....................................................................................................37
表4-3-1 專業人員對各向度訓練需求....................................................39
表4-3-2 專業人員背景變項差異對因素訓練需求統計考驗結果
....................................................................................................41
中部地區身心障礙者職業輔導評量資源服務網http://vercenter.ncue.edu.tw/news.asp
北區身心障礙者職業輔導評量資源中心http://www.vernetwork.org/vw_u/
王敏行、吳明宜、陳靜江、賴淑華、戴富嬌(2003):身心障礙者職業輔導評量工作手冊,行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局發行
王雲東、林幸台、吳明宜(2007):「台北市身心障礙者職業輔導評量服務模式之探討」研究成果報告,台北市政府勞工局,未出版,台北市。
台北市政府勞工局(2001):九十年度職業輔導評量團隊專業訓練計畫。
林幸台(2007):復健諮商專業人員角色定位之研究。復健諮商,1期,頁1~7。台灣職業重建專業協會。
行政院(1997):身心障礙者保護法。
行政院(2009):身心障礙者權益保障法。
行政院勞工委員會(2009):勞工保險條例。
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(1998):身心障礙者職業輔導評量辦法。
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(1999):身心障礙者就業服務機構專業人員遴用暨培訓辦法。
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(2004):職業災害勞工職業重建補助辦法。
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(2008):身心障礙者職業輔導評量實施方式及補助準則。
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(2009):身心障礙者職業重建服務專業人員遴用及培訓準則。
行政院勞工委員會(2004):職業災害勞工職業重建補助辦法。
行政院內政部社會司(2002):身心障礙者生涯轉銜服務整合實施方案身心障礙者生涯轉銜服務整合實施方案。
南區身心障礙者職業輔導評量資源服務網http://www.vercenter.nknu.edu.tw/modules/news/
陳明顯(2004):身心障礙者職業輔導評量之執行與應用結果分析-以高雄市勞工局博愛職業技能訓練中心為例,國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
陳靜江(2005):對國內身心障礙者職業輔導評量現況的省思與展望,就業安全半年刊,第四卷,第二期,91-96頁。
劉彩虹(2005):身心障礙者職業輔導評量執行現況調查研究。國立彰化師範大學復健諮商研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
Breeding, R. R. (2008). Empowerment as a function of contextual self-understanding: The effect of work interest profiling on career decision self-efficacy and work locus of control. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51, 96-106.
Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification (2008). 2008 Salary report: An update on salaries in the rehabilitation counseling profession.. [Data file]. Available from Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification Web site, http://www.crccertification.com/filebin/pdf/CRCC_2008SalaryReport_FINAL.pdf
Chan, F., Leahy, M. J., Saunders, J. L., Tarvydas, V. M., Ferrin, J. M., & Lee, G. (2003). Training needs of certified rehabilitation counselors for contemporary practice. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 46, 82-91.
Commission on Certification of Work Adjustment and Vocational Evaluation Specialists. (2007). Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://www.ccwaves.org/
Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification. (2009). Retrieved May 20, 2009, from http://www.crccertification.com/
Council on Rehabilitation Education (2009). Retrieved May 20, 2009, from http://www.core-rehab.org/
Criteria for certification renewal and continuing education. (2009). [Data file]. Available from Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification Web site, http://www.crccertification.com/filebin/pdf/VAP/CVE_CWA_CCA%20RenewalCriteria200904.pdf
Flett, R., Biggs, H., & Alpss, F. (1994). The effects of professional training on occupational stress and personal affect in rehabilitation practitioners. Journal of Rehabilitation, 3, 39-43.
Folsom-Meek, S. L., Nearing, R. J., & Bock, R. E. (2007). Transitioning children, youths, and young adults with disabilities. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 78, 38-51.
Froehlich, R. J., & Linkowski., D. C. (2002). An assessment of the training needs of state vocational rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 46, 42-50.
Fry, R., & Harrand, G. (1992). Vocational evaluation as a career. American rehabilitation, Retrieved Nov. 20, 2008, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0842/is_n2_v18/ai_12450542/
Glenn, M., Garcia, J., Li, L., & Moore, D. (1998). Preparation of rehabilitation counselors to serve people living with HIV/AIDS. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 41, 190-200.
Graduate School of Education and Human Development in the George Washington University (2007). Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.gwu.edu/~cvet/
Graduate school of Rehabilitation Counseling in the Boston University (2007). Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.bu.edu/sargent/academics/ot-rc/rc-mos/curriculum/
Graduate school of Rehabilitation Counseling in the Southern University and A&M College (2007). Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.subr.edu/science/rehabcounsel/Courses.htm
Graduate school of Rehabilitation Counseling in University of Wisconsin – Stout (2007). Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.uwstout.edu/programs/msvr/online.html
Herbert, J. T., & Trusty, J. (2006). Clinical supervision practices and satisfaction within the public vocational rehabilitation program. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 49, 66-80.
Interdisciplinary Council on Vocational Evaluation and Assessment. (2007). Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.vecap.org/council.html
Leahy, M. J., Szymanski, E. M., & Linkowski, D. C. (1993). Knowledge importance in rehabilitation counseling. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 37, 130-145.
Leahy, M. J., Chan, F., & Saunders, J. L. (2003). Job functions and knowledge requirements of certified rehabilitation counselors in the 21st century. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 46, 66-81.
Leahy, M. J., & Szymanski, E. M. (1995). Rehabilitation counseling: Evalution and current status. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 163-166.
Levinson, E. M. (1994). Current vocational assessment models for students with disabilities. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 94-101.
Lewis, S., & Patterson, J. B. (1998). Training needs of rehabilitation counselors and rehabilitation teachers in state vocational rehabilitation agencies serving individuals with visual disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 64, 46-50.
Lucock, M. P., Hall, P., & Noble, R. (2006). A survey of influences on the practice of psychotherapists and clinical psychologists in training in the UK. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 123-130.
Matrone, K. J., & Leahy, M. J. (2005). The relationship Between vocational rehabilitation client outcomes and rehabilitation counselor multicultural counseling competencies. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 48, 233-244.
Mitus, J. S. (2006). Organizational socialization from a content perspective and its effect on the affective commitment of newly hired rehabilitation counselors. Journal of Rehabilitation, 72, 12-20.
Power. P. W. (2000). A guide to vocational assessment. (3rd ed.). Austin, AX: Pro-Ed.
Power. P. W. (2006). Operationalizing the concept of empowerment during the vocational assessment process. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 37, 21-25.
Roberts, D. F., & Roberts, R. J. (2005). Upgrading knowledge of vocational evaluators: a report of one state’s efforts. Journal of Rehabilitation, 71, 23-29.
Shapson, P. R., Wright, G. N., & Leahy, M. J. (1987). Education and the attainment of rehabilitation competencies. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 31, 131-145.
Szymanski, E. M. (1991). Relationship of level of rehabilitation counselor education to rehabilitation client outcome in the Wisconsin division of vocational rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 35, 23-37.
Szymanski, E. M., Leahy, M. J., & Linkowski, D. C. (1993). Reported preparedness of certified counselors in rehabilitation counseling knowledge areas. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 37, 146-161.
Szymanski, E. M., Linkowski, D. C., Leahy, M. J., Diamond, E. E., & Thoreson, R. W. (1993). Human resource development: an examination of perceived training needs of certified rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 37, 163-181.
The Graduate School of East Carolina University and the Department of Rehabilitation Studies have established Graduate (MS) degree programs (2009). Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://www.ecu.edu/cs-dhs/rehb/grad.cfm#vocational
The Vocational Evaluation and Career Assessment Professionals Association. (2009). Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://vecap.org/index.php?/site/
Thomas, S. W. (1999). Vocational evaluation in the 21st century: Diversification and independence. Journal of Rehabilitation, 65, 10-15.
University of Northern Colorado Master of Arts in Rehabilitation Counseling. (2009). Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://catalog.unco.edu/2008-09/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=WW2003UNC8-9&file=GraduateDegrees.11.24.html
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔