跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.91) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/19 20:36
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:鄭潔云
研究生(外文):Cheng chieh-yun
論文名稱:公司治理與經營短視關係之研究-以台灣上市公司為例
論文名稱(外文):Corporate Governance and Managerial Myopia-Evidence from Taiwan
指導教授:詹家昌詹家昌引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chan Chia-Chung
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:40
中文關鍵詞:投資短視固守職位公司治理分析師壓力
外文關鍵詞:MyopiaEntrenchmentCorporate GovernanceAnalyst Pressure
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:475
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
過去許多有關經營短視的文獻指出代理問題會造成公司的短視決策,其中大部份歸因於股東與經理人間的目標或利益不一致所導致。而本文除了觀察代理問題對投資決策之影響外,並觀察影響經理人決策的內外部因素如何影響短視問題,在公司內部因素方面,本文檢視國內的監理機制是否能監督並改善經營短視的問題;外部因素方面,驗證分析師預測盈餘所產生的壓力是否會影響經理人的決策。實證結果發現國內的監督機制會強化經理人產生短視投資之行為,即可能在董事會重視公司短期會計績效的壓力下,不利公司從事長期投資決策,也是造成公司短視的原因之ㄧ。另外,本文結果亦指出分析師壓力會使公司產生短視投資決策,若與董事會監督機制的共存下,經理人的經營短視效果則更趨明顯。
In the past, there were many comments about myopia, which point the agency problems could result in myopic investment, and most papers are attributed the agency problem to the difference in goal or benefit between shareholders and managers. Therefore, this paper examines not only how the investment decisions could be affected by the agency problem, but also observes the inside and outside factors of affecting managerial decisions. About the inside factors, we examine whether the corporate governance in Taiwan would improve the myopia or not, and confirm whether the analyst pressure is the outside factors of managerial investment decisions. Evidences show the corporate governance would strengthen the myopia, which means the managers delay or reduce the long term investments when the board of director pay much attention to the accounting profitability; meanwhile, taking the supervisal pressure of analyst for managers also cause the myopia.
壹、緒論 ........................................................ 1
貳、文獻回顧 .................................................... 4
一、固守職位 ................................................. 4
二、治理機制 ................................................. 6
三、分析師預測 ............................................... 7
叁、研究方法 .................................................... 9
一、樣本選取 ................................................. 9
二、固守職位經理人之衡量 ....................................... 9
三、公司治理之衡量 ............................................ 10
四、投資短視之實證模型 ........................................ 10
五、公司治理與績效之關聯性 ..................................... 11
六、分析師壓力之實證模型 ....................................... 12
肆、實證結果與分析 ............................................... 14
伍、結論 ........................................................ 18
參考文獻 ........................................................ 33

圖表目錄

表一 敘述統計量 ................................................. 20
表二 固守職位、治理機制與公司長期投資之關聯性 ...................... 21
表三 治理機制下固守職位經理人與公司長期投資之關聯性 ................. 22
表四 治理機制與會計績效之關聯性 ................................... 25
表五 分析師壓力與公司長期投資之關聯性 ............................. 26
表六 董事持股機制與分析師壓力下固守職位經理人與公司
長期投資之關聯性 ........................................... 27
表七 是否存在大股東機制與分析師壓力下固守職位經理人
與公司長期投資之關聯性 ...................................... 30
1.柯承恩,2000,我國公司治理體系之問題與改進建議,會計研究月刊,第173期,頁75-81。
2.詹家昌,1998,訊息、固守職位與投資決策,亞太經濟管理評論,第二卷,第一期,頁31-45。
3.詹家昌、許月瑜,1999,經理人固守職位對融資決策影響之研究,亞太管理評論,第四卷,第三期,頁289-303。
4.莊嘉建與呂佩蓉,2008,股權結構、關係人交易與公司財務績效關聯性之研究,蘭陽學報,第七期,頁86-91。
5.葉銀華及邱顯比,1996,資本結構、股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究:代理成本理論,台大管理論叢,第七卷,第二期,頁57-90。
6.葉銀華、李存修及柯承恩,2000,公司治理與評等系統,商智文化。
7.Agrawal, A. and C. Knoeber, 1996, “Firm Performance and Mechanism to Control Agency Problem between Managers and Shareholders,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, 377-397.
8.Barber, B. M., and J. D. Lyon., 1996, “Detecting Abnormal Operating Performance: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics,” Journal of Financial Economics 41, 359-400.
9.Baysinger, B. D., R. D. Kosnik and T. A. Turk, 1991, “Effect of Board and Ownership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy,” Academy of Management Journal 34, 205-214.
10.Bartov, E., D. Givoly, and C. Hayn, 2002, “The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 33, 173–204.
11.Bebchuk, L. A., L. A. Stole, 1993, “Do short run objectives lead to under or over investment in the long-term project? ,” Journal of Finance 48, 719– 729.
12.Bhojraj, S. and R. Libby, 2005, “Capital Market Pressure, Disclosure Frequency-Induced Earnings/ Cash Flow Conflicts, and Managerial Myopia,” The Accounting Review 80, 1-20.
13.Binz, H. L. and D. Czarnitzki, 2008, “Financial Constraints: Routine Versus Cutting Edge R&D Investment,” Discussion Paper.
14.Brown, L. and M. Caylor, 2005, “A Temporal Analysis of Quarterly Earnings Thresholds: Propensities and Valuation Consequences,” The Accounting Review 80, 423–440.
15.Bushee, B. J., 1998, “The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior,” The Accounting Review 73, 305-333.
16.Chaganti, R. and F. Damanpour, 1991, “Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure, and Firm Perform,” Strategic Management Journal 12, 479-591.
17.Chandler, A. D. Jr., 1990, “ Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism,” Harvard University, Working Paper.
18.Chen, L., J. Lakonishok and T. Sougiannis, 2001, “The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures,” Journal of Finance 56, 2431-2456.
19.Cheng, M., K. R. Subramanyam and Y. Zhang, 2007, “Earnings Guidance and Managerial Myopia,” Working Paper.
20.Chidambaran, N. K., D. Palia and Y. Zheng, 2007, “Does Better Corporate Governance “Cause” Better Firm Performance?,” Rutgers Business School, Working Paper.
21.Cho, M. H., 1998, “Ownership Structure, Investment, and The Corporate Value: An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Financial Economics 47, 103-121.
22.Core, J. E., W. Guay and T. Rusticus, 2006, “Does Weak Governance Cause Weak Stock Returns? An Examination of Firm Operating Performance and Investors’ Expectations,” Journal of Finance 61, 655-687.
23.Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, 1991, “Executive incentives and the horizon problem,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 14, 51– 89.
24.Devos, E., U. Dhillon, M. Jagannathan, S Krishnamurthy, 2008, “Does Managerial Entrenchment Explain the “Low Leverage” Puzzle? Evidence from Zero-Debt Firms and Debt Initiations,” Working Paper.
25.Doukas, J. A., C. F. Kim and C. Pantzalis, 2008, “Do Analyst Influence Corporate Financing and Investment?,” Financial Management, 303-339.
26.Fama, E. F., 1980, “Agency Problems and The Theory of The Firm,” Journal of Political Economy 88, 288-307.
27.Fazzari, S. M., R. G. Hubbard and B. C. Petersen, 1988, “Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment,” Brookings Papers on Economics 19, 141-195.
28.Filatotchev I., Y. C. Lien and J. Piesse, 2005, “Corporate Governance and Performance in Publicly Listed, Family-Controlled Firms: Evidence from Taiwan,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 22, 257-283.
29.Gilson, S. C., 1989, “Management Turnover and Financial Distress,” Journal of Financial Economics 25, 241-262.
30.Gilson, S. C., K. John, L. H. P. Lang, 1990, “Troubled Debt Restructurings: An Empirical Study of Private Reorganization of Firms in Default,” Journal of Financial Economics 26, 315-53.
31.Gompers, P., J. Ishii, and A., Metrick, 2003, “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 107-155.
32.Goyal, V. K., C. W. Park, 2002, “Board Leadership Structure and CEO Turnover,” Journal of Corporate Finance 8, 49-66.
33.Graham, J., C. Harvey and S. Rajgopal, 2005, “The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 40, 3-73.
34.Hall, B. H., 1992, “Investment and Research and Development at the Firm Level: Does the Source of Financing Matter? ,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, 21.
35.Holden, C. W. and L. L. Lundstrum, 2009, “Costly trade, managerial myopia, and long-term investment,” Journal of Empirical Finance 16, 126-135.
36.Jensen, M. C., and W. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
37.Jensen, M. C., 2005, “Agency Costs of Overvalued Equity,” Financial Management 34, 5-19.
38.Jin, L. and L. Kogan, 2008, “Managerial Career Concern and Mutual Fund Short-termism,” Working Paper.
39.Kaplan, S. N., and L. Zingales, 1997, “Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints?,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 12, 169-215.
40.Kasznik, R. and M. McNichols, 2002, “Does meeting earnings expectations matter? Evidence from analyst forecast revisions and share prices,” Journal of Accounting Research 40, 727–759.
41.Lundstrum, L. L., 2002, “Corporate investment myopia: a horserace of the theories”, Journal of Corporate Finance 8, 353-371.
42.McConnell, J. J. and H. Servaes, 1990, “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value,” Journal of Financial Economics 27, 595-612.
43.McVay, S., V. Nagar and V. W. Tang, 2006, “Trading incentives to meet the analyst forecast,” Review of Accounting Studies 11, 575-598.
44.Michenaud, S., 2007, “Corporate Investment and Analyst Pressure”, Working Paper.
45.Mizik, N. and R. Jacobson, 2003, “Trading Off Between Value Creation and Value Appropriation,” The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis 59, 63-76.
46.Nagarajan, N. J., K. Stvaramakrishnan and S. S. Sridhar, 1995, “Managerial Entrenchment, Reputation and Corporate Investment Myopia,” Journal of Accounting and Finance 10, 565-585.
47.Nam, J., R. Ottoo, and J. Thornton., 2003, “The Effect of Managerial Incentives to Bear Risk on Corporate Capital Structure and R&D Investment,” The Financial Review 38, 77-101.
48.Noe, T. H., M. J. Rebello, 1997, “Renegotiation, investment horizons and managerial discretion,” Journal of Business 70, 385– 407.
49.Pan, C., 2007, “Why Are Firms with Entrenched Managers More Likely to Pay Dividends?,” Working Paper.
50.Patton, A. and J. C. Baker, 1987, “Why Won’t Directors Rock theBoat,” Harvard Business Review, 10-18.
51.Porter, M. E., 1992, “Capital Disadvantage: America’s Failing Capital Investment System,” Harvard Business Review 70, 65-82.
52.Ruckes, M., 1998, “Too Little, too Late: How Career Concerns of Managers Result in Lost Opportunities,” University Mannheim, Working Paper.
53.Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny, 1989, “Management entrenchment: The case of manager specific investments,” Journal of financial Economics 25, 123-140.
54.Skinner, D. and R. Sloan, 2002, “Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns or don’t let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio,” Review of Accounting Studies 7, 289–312.
55.Stein, J., 1988, “Takeover threats and managerial myopia,” Journal of Political Economy 96, 61-80.
56.Stein, J., 1989, “Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 655– 669.
57.Wahal, S. and J. J. McConnell, 2000, “Do Institutional Investor Exacerbate Managerial Myopia?,” Journal of Corporate Finance 6, 307-329.
58.Weir, C., D. Laing, and P. J. McKnight, 2002, “Internal and External Governance Mechanisms: Their Impact on the Performance of Large UK Public Companies,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 29, 579-611.
59.Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee and T. Woidtke, 2001, “Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence for Taiwan,” International Review of Finance 2, 21-48.
60.Yeh, Y. H. and T. S. Lee, 2004, “Corporate Governance and Financial Distress: Evidence from Taiwan,” Corporate Governance: An International Review 12, 378-388.
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20260929)
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top