臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

台灣電子商務自2002年開始，每年成長都超過60%，至2007年根據資策會的調查已超過1800億的市場規模，網路商店也躍升成為國人最常使用購買商品的通路之一，僅次於便利商店、超市和量販店。然而在B2C的市場中旅遊票券的支付佔了近60%的市場規模，其次是3C、書籍與服飾等類別的商品，在前幾名的電子商務業者中不難發現消費者的購買習慣受到Yahoo、Pchome、博客來等業者的影響最深，這也突顯出台灣電子商務的多元性仍受限主要的電子商務平台的影響。
統一超商為國最大的零售業者，轄下的關係企業達40多家，其中不乏具有知名通路品牌，如統一超商、無印良品、康是美、星巴克、多拿滋等，對於電子商務的經營除了博客來與Unimall的經營外，2007年時也自與日本引進購物網站樂天市場平台樂天市場，對於台灣的網路生態來看，立即受到社會大眾的矚目。
本研究是探討2007年統一超商在選擇與日本最大購物商城樂天市場合作的過程中，探討統一超商評估的電子商務經營模式的選擇方式，從電子商務經營模式的探討，界定出電子商務在傳遞給消費者的服務過程中，統一超商可以扮演的角色與所具備的資源條件有哪些?藉以探討為何統一超商最後會選擇以合作的方式與從日本引進樂天市場平台進入台灣，提供台灣傳統產業可以快速的上網經營與傳遞服務給末端的消費者，期使能合理解釋統一超商在選擇電子商務模式的評估方式。
在研究的過程中從個案資料的整理發現，統一超商在電子商務的服務流程中早已具備在電子商務中關鍵性角色，例如•全省7-ELEVEN門市提供電子商務業者的取貨付款的服務，與提供宅配的統一速達。透過與業者的接洽與訪談，更可以了解到統一超商在與日本樂天市場合作前的評估內容與進入電子商務領域的評估內容。

Since 2002, the annual growth of Taiwan e-commerce has getting more than 60 percent. According to a survey of III(Institute for Information Industry), market size of e-commerce has more than 180 billion till 2007. Online store also becomes one of the most frequently place to buy goods, just secondary to convenience stores, supermarkets and discount stores. However, in the B2C market, the payment of travel tickets accounted for nearly 60% of the market size, followed by 3C, books and clothes. We are not difficult to find the consumer purchasing habits are deeply influenced by Yahoo, Pchome, books, etc., which also highlighted the diversity of Taiwan e-commerce is still restricted by the major e-commerce platform.
President Chain Store for the country''s largest retailers, its affiliated companies up to more than 40, many of them have a well-known brands, such as President Chain Store, Muji, Cosmed, Starbucks, and Mister Donut. For e-commerce, in addition to Books and Unimall, in 2007, President Chain Store also started to cooperate with Rakuten, the biggest shopping website in Japan. It must give an impact to Taiwan''s e-commerce industry.
The purpose of this study was to make a reasonable explanation and clarify that in the process of cooperation between President Chain Store and Rakuten, the largest website market in Japan, What kind of resources that President Chain Store has? What kind of role that it can play? Examining why the President Chain Store eventually chose to cooperate with Rakuten platform to enter the Taiwan market. It will provide Taiwan''s traditional industries with fast internet access management and will deliver services to the end consumers.
In the course of this case study, we found that President Chain Store already have a crucial role in e-commerce for a long time. For example, 7-ELEVEN stores across the province provide e-commerce owners services that buyer can get the goods and pay at the same time. Besides, T-Cat Delivery Company(黑貓宅急便) provides a speed up delivery to the place buyers ask. Through contact and interview with the industries, we can also understand the evaluation prior to President Chain Store in cooperation with Japan''s Rakuten market and the evaluation of entering the field of electronic commerce.

目 次

摘要 ii
誌謝 vi
目次 iv
表目錄 ix
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究動機與背景 1
1.2研究目的 2
1.3研究流程與架構 2
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1 電子商務經營模式 4
2.1.1電子商務的定義 4
2.1.2電子商務的發展軌跡 6
2.1.3電子商務的類型 7
2.1.4電子商務的相關研究 10
2.1.5台灣電子商務發展趨勢 11
2.2組織生態學 12
2.2.1組織演化的觀點 15
第三章 研究方法 17
3.1研究方法 17
3.1.1次級資料分析 17
3.1.2個案分析 18
3.1.3深度訪談 19
3.2研究設計 20
3.3組織生態學的推演模式 22
第四章 個案研究與訪談資料分析 24
4.1個案研究分析 24
4.1.1台灣主要電子商務平台經營模式 24
4.1.2統一超商發展的歷程 26
4.1.3統一超商旗下事業型態的彙整 29
4.1.4個案電子商務相關的經營範圍 30
4.2訪談資料整理 33
4.2.1受訪者對台灣電子商務的看法 33
4.2.2受訪者對於電子商務評估條件的選擇與看法 35
4.3個案電子商務型態的演進與背景 39
4.4綜合性的分析 42
4.4.1個案經營模式的要因彙整 44
4.5小結 46
第五章 研究結論與建議 48
5.1 研究結論 48
5.2 研究貢獻 50
5.3後續的研究建議 50
參考文獻 52














表目錄
表2.1 電子商務學者研究的面向 10
表2.2 自然界與組織間共生關係之比較 13
表2.3 嘗試以生態學觀點探究組織變化的研究 13
表2.4 平台共構的演進概略 15
表3.1 受訪者背景 20
表4.1 台灣主要電子商務平台的經營模式 23
表4.2 電子商務經營模式倉庫管理模式的優缺點整理 24
表4.3 統一超商發展的重大歷程 25
表4.4 統一超商轄下關係企業的彙整表 28
表4.5 統一超商評估電子商務所會評估的條件 35
表4.6 統一超商內部評估的條件彙整 35
表4.7 從生態學的觀點對照統一超商電子商務的演進 39
表4.8 統一超商經營電子商務所具備的條件 42

[1] 王瑞之、戴鴻邦、林素儀著，“電子商務發展趨勢與我國業者研究機會”，財團法人資訊工業策進會資訊市場情報中心（MIC），1997。
[2] 尚榮安，個案研究，(Robert K.Yin，Case Study Research，1994)，弘智文化，2001。
[3] 吳順興(2003)
[4] 洪婉喻，《台灣地區B2C線上零售網站經營模式分析》，國立台灣科技大學碩士論文，2005。
[5] 郭淑雲，《消費者特性與網際網路購物意願關係之研究--以生鮮食品為例》，國立中興大學行銷學系碩士論文，2001。
[6] 黃俊雄，最新生物學，台北：藝軒出版，1987。
[7] 黃俊英，SAS精析與實例，華泰文化，1994。
[8] 張志偉，Amazon.com：亞馬遜網路書店發跡傳奇。台北：商周，1999。
[9] 張福德，電子商務總論，大陸：科學技術出版社，2001。
[10] 經濟部商業司，商業e化輔導績效評估報告，2007。
[11] 資策會MIC情報顧問產業研究報告,2008。
[12] 蔡桂芳、萬洪濤，e-marketplace—B2B 電子商場完全經營手冊，商智文化事業股份有限公司，2000。
[13] 潘明宏、陳志瑋譯。Nachmias, Chava Frankfort & David Nachmias 原著，社會科學研究方法，台北：巨流出版社，1999。
[14] Aldrich, H.E. ”Organizations and Environments” New Jersy: Prentice-Hall.
Englewood Cliffs,1979.
[15] Bloch, Michael & Pigneur, Yves & Segev, Arie On the Road of Electronic Commerce-a Business Value Framework, Gaining Competitive Advantage and Some Research Issues, pp.2, 1996.
[16] Boone, C. & Witteloostuijn, Arjen van. .Industrial organization and organizational ecology: the potentials for cross-fertilization. Organization Studies. 16(2),265-298, 1995.
[17] Cheung, C.M.K., Chan, G.W.W. and Limayem, M.,”Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations”, Vol.3, No.4, pp.1-19, 2005.
[18] Granovetter, Mark “Economic action and social structure：The problem of embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp.481-510, 1985.
[19] Greenstein, M., & Feinman, T. M., “Electronic commerce: security, risk management, and control,” McGraw-Hill, 2000.
[20] Hardesty, David "DigitalSignatures Act becomes law”, 2000.
[21] Haynes, T., The Electronic Commerce Dictionary, Robleda Company, Menlo Park, CA, 1995.
[22] Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J., Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press,1989.
[23] Kalakota, R. & Whinston, A. B. Electronic Commerce: A Manager’s Guide, New York, Addison-Wesley publishing Company, 1997.
[24] Marx, Karl ”Capital,” New York: International Publisher. Lipset, Seymour Martin,1967.
[25] Kim, S., Stoel, L., “Apparel retailers: web site quality dimensions and satisfaction,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp.109-117, 2004.
[26] Liu, C. and Arnett, K. P. “Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce,” Information & Management, 38(2000), pp. 23-33, 2000.
[27] Liu, X and Wei, K K, “An Empirical Study of Product Differences in Consumers'' E-commerce Adoption Behavior”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 2(3), pp. 229-239, 2003.
[28] Lofland, John Analyzing Social Settings. A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, Calif., Wadsworth Pub.co.,1971.
[29] McFarlan, F. W. and Massoni, Valerie (MBA’ 03),Harvard Business School Case No. 305-050, 2004.
[30] Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. MA: Harvard University Press
[31] Phillips, Charles and Meeker, Mary, “The State of B2B Commerce,” The B2B Internet Report, Morgan Stanley, April 2000.
[32] Pouder, R. and St. John, “Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation”, Academy of Management Review, 21, pp.192-225, 1996.
[33] Ranganathan, C. and Ganapathy, S., “Key Dimensions of Business-to-Consumer Web Sites,” Information and Management, Vol.39, pp. 457-465, 2002.
[34] Segev, Arie & Wan, Dadong & Beam, Carrie “Designing Electronic Catalogs for Business Value: Results of thee CommerceNet Pilot”, The Fisher Center for Information Technology & Management Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley, pp.6-15, 1995.
[35] Singleton, R. A. and Straits, B. C. Approached to social research (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press,1999.
[36] Turban, E. & Lee, Jae K. & King, David Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 2000.
[37] Weick, K.E., The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.