跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(35.175.191.36) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/08/02 13:03
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳柏均
研究生(外文):Bo-Jiun Chen
論文名稱:根柱材料與長度於根管治療後上頷正中門齒之應力分佈影響
論文名稱(外文):Influence of post materials and length on stress distribution of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors
指導教授:許明倫許明倫引用關係陳振昇陳振昇引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ming-Lun HsuChen-Sheng Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立陽明大學
系所名稱:臨床牙醫學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:牙醫學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:95
中文關鍵詞:玻璃纖維根柱有限元素分析法根柱長度根柱材料應力分佈von Mises 應力樹脂黏著劑一體理論
外文關鍵詞:glass fiber postfinite element analysispost lengthpost materialstress distributionvon Mises stressadhesive resin cementmonoblock concept
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:220
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:46
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
實驗目的
本實驗的主要目的在探究,當使用不同材料的根柱搭配具黏著性的樹脂黏著劑時,根柱的長短與應力分佈的關係。藉此,可瞭解當使用這些材料的根柱與樹脂黏著劑時,對於根柱長度之取捨。

實驗材料與方法
建立一個三維的上頷正中門齒有限元素模型,使用三種不同根柱長度:7mm,10mm,13mm三種不同根柱材料:玻璃纖維根柱與樹脂冠心、鎳鉻合金鑄造根柱與冠心、不�袗�根柱與樹脂冠心。模型網格化後,施予300牛頓的靜態施力於氧化鋯牙冠顎側切端1/3與中心1/3之間,施力方向與牙根長軸呈45度。在有限元素模型的分析後處理,以von Mises 應力探討應力大小,並在三個區域從唇側至顎側(from labial to palatal side)將應力數值擷取出來並以分佈曲線圖相互比較。三個區域分別為:沿根柱根尖處(along the apical extent of the post)、沿環箍牙本質底部(along the base of the ferrule)、沿環箍牙本質頂部(along the top of the ferrule)。

實驗結果
當根柱長度變短時,無論何種材料的根柱組別,均有von Mises 應力增加的趨勢,然而,此現象在玻璃纖維根柱的表現程度較微弱。沿根柱根尖處觀察,當根柱長度由13mm變為7mm時,牙本質內von Mises 應力的最大值在纖維根柱組只有些微增加,然而,在鎳鉻合金鑄造冠心根柱組與不�袗�根柱組,牙本質內von Mises 應力最大值明顯增加。沿著環箍牙本質底部與頂部觀察,在玻璃纖維根柱的三種長度組別,應力分佈均為平緩且均勻的分佈曲線,然而,在鎳鉻鑄造冠心根柱與不�袗�根柱組則發現有高低峰的應力曲線分佈。

結論
根管治療後之正中門齒以玻璃纖維根柱與樹脂冠心復形,相較於鎳鉻鑄造冠心根柱與不�袗�根柱搭配樹脂冠心有較均勻的應力分佈表現,較少應力集中的現象產生。若使用的根柱為金屬根柱,則根柱長度應越長越理想,但需保留4-5mm的馬來膠根尖封閉為原則。若使用玻璃纖維根柱與樹脂黏著劑,則應力的分佈狀況將與根柱長度較無關連性,因此,在可以得到足夠支撐冠心且適當根管內黏著力的情況下,或許可使用較短的玻璃纖維根柱。
Statement of problem
Due to some shortcomings of long posts, shorter posts are preferred in clinical practice. It is unclear if a shorter post length can be applied when a light translucent glass-fiber post and adhesive resin cement are used.

Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three post materials of glass fiber, stainless steel, and cast nickel-chromium and cores of different lengths of 7, 10 , and 13 mm.

Material and methods
3D finite element models of a maxillary central incisor were constructed. An occlusal load of 300 N was applied 45° to the long axis of the tooth, on a node at the palatal surface of the crown. von Mises stress analyses were carried out in three regions: along the apical extent of the post, and along the base and top of the ferrule from the labial to the palatal side.

Results
Results showed that when the post length was changed from 13 to 7 mm, the stress pattern curves were even and flat in all fiber post groups. However, stress pattern curves of the stainless steel and cast nickel-chromium posts and core groups showed an M-shaped peak and trough.

Conclusions
Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that when a metal post is used, the length should be as long as possible. A glass-fiber post combined with a composite resin core provided a biomechanical performance that was less sensitive to post length, hence a shorter post could be applied.

Clinical implications
The length of a glass-fiber post may be shortened in restored tooth with sufficient coronal tooth structure. Clinical advantages of a shorter post include more-conservative preparation of the post space, more-complete setting of the dual curing adhesive resin cement as a result of greater transmission of curing light, and greater ease in removing the post if endodontic retreatment is required.
中文摘要 ……………………………………………………………1
英文摘要 ……………………………………………………………3
目錄 …………………………………………………………………5
圖表目錄 ……………………………………………………………7
序論 …………………………………………………………………9
文獻回顧 ……………………………………………………………10
壹、影響根管治療後牙根強度的因子 …………………………10
貳、影響冠心與根柱復形之牙齒其抗斷裂能力之因素………12
一、根柱與冠心之材料……………………………………12
二、根柱之長度……………………………………………13
三、根柱之寬度……………………………………………14
四、根柱之硬度與抗彎曲強度……………………………15
五、抗裂強度………………………………………………16
六、冠端所餘齒質的多寡-環箍效應(ferrule effect)…17
七、黏著劑對根柱於根管中固位力(retention)之影響…18
i.根柱於根管中之固位力………………………………18
ii.電子顯微鏡之觀察……………………………………18
iii.微滲漏(microleakage)………………………………18
iv.樹脂黏著劑硬化轉化程度(degree of conversion)…19
八、臨床追蹤報告……………………………………………21
參、冠心與根柱復形後牙齒的應力分析…………………………23
一、光彈分析…………………………………………………24
二、有限元素分析……………………………………………25
研究動機與目的 ………………………………………………………35
實驗材料與方法 ………………………………………………………37
實驗結果 ………………………………………………………………40
綜合討論 ………………………………………………………………44
結論 ……………………………………………………………………59
附圖 ……………………………………………………………………60
附表 ……………………………………………………………………75
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………77
1. Helfer AR, Melnick S, Schilder H. Determination of the moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;34:661-70.
2. Stanford JW, Weigel KV, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT. Compressive properties of hard tooth tissues and some restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1960;60:746-56.
3. Huang TJ, Schilder H, Nathanson D. Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin. J Endod 1992;18:209-15.
4. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15:512-6.
5. Mannocci F, Innocenti M, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Confocal and scanning electron microscopic study of teeth restored with fiber posts, metal posts, and composite resins. J Endod 1999;25:789-94.
6. Galhano GA, Valandro LF, de Melo RM, Scotti R, Bottino MA. Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts. J Endod 2005;31:209-11.
7. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-8.
8. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:28-35.
9. Isidor F, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth with tapered, individually cast or prefabricated, parallel-sided posts. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:257-61.
10. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Up to 17-year controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns. J Dent 2007;35:778-86.
11. Martinez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527-32.
12. Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Patterns of vertical root fracture: factors affecting stress distribution in the root canal. J Endod 2003;29:523-8.
13. Eskitascioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod 2002;28:629-33.
14. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:5-9.
15. Ho MH, Lee SY, Chen HH, Lee MC. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effects of posts on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:367-72.
16. Albuquerque Rde C, Polleto LT, Fontana RH, Cimini CA. Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:936-43.
17. Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:442-8.
18. Davy DT, Dilley GL, Krejci RF. Determination of stress patterns in root-filled teeth incorporating various dowel designs. J Dent Res 1981;60:1301-10.
19. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Collard EW, Pollack MH. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:952-60.
20. Neagley RL. The effect of dowel preparation on the apical seal of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969;28:739-45.
21. Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:380-5.
22. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part III. Tooth preparation considerations. J Prosthodont 1995;4:122-8.
23. Stern N, Hirshfeld Z. Principles of preparing endodontically treated teeth for dowel and core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:162-5.
24. Halle EB, Nicholls JI, Van Hassel HJ. An in vitro comparison of retention between a hollow post and core and a custom hollow post and core. J Endod 1984;10:96-100.
25. Pilo R, Tamse A. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:617-23.
26. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:400-5.
27. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:360-7.
28. Boschian Pest L, Guidotti S, Pietrabissa R, Gagliani M. Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:690-7.
29. Genovese K, Lamberti L, Pappalettere C. Finite element analysis of a new customized composite post system for endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 2005;38:2375-89.
30. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:476-82.
31. Isidor F, Odman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:131-6.
32. Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF. Three-point bending test of fiber posts. J Endod 2001;27:758-61.
33. Yang HS, Lang LA, Guckes AD, Felton DA. The effect of thermal change on various dowel-and-core restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:74-80.
34. Drummond JL, Toepke TR, King TJ. Thermal and cyclic loading of endodontic posts. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:220-4.
35. Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson DL. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:141-5.
36. Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber post. J Endod 1998;24:807-10.
37. McDonald AV, King PA, Setchell DJ. In vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root-treated teeth. Int Endod J 1990;23:304-12.
38. Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dent Mater 2006;22:477-85.
39. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-7.
40. Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001;10:26-36.
41. Varvara G, Perinetti G, Di Iorio D, Murmura G, Caputi S. In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance and failure mode of internally restored endodontically treated maxillary incisors with differing heights of residual dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:365-72.
42. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:153-8.
43. Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:78-82.
44. Stankiewicz NR, Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J 2002;35:575-81.
45. Zhi-Yue L, Yu-Xing Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:368-73.
46. Barkhordar RA, Radke R, Abbasi J. Effect of metal collars on resistance of endodontically treated teeth to root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:676-8.
47. Milot P, Stein RS. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:428-35.
48. Rovatti L, Mason PN, Dallari A. [New research on endodontic carbon-fiber posts]. Minerva Stomatol 1994;43:557-63.
49. Bell AM, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Bonding of fibre-reinforced composite post to root canal dentin. J Dent 2005;33:533-9.
50. Bitter K, Priehn K, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strengths of various luting agents to tooth-colored posts. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:302-10.
51. Katebzadeh N, Dalton BC, Trope M. Strengthening immature teeth during and after apexification. J Endod 1998;24:256-9.
52. Mezzomo E, Massa F, Libera SD. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post-and-core designs cemented with two different cements: an in vitro study. Part I. Quintessence Int 2003;34:301-6.
53. Nissan J, Dmitry Y, Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:304-8.
54. Vichi A, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Comparison between two clinical procedures for bonding fiber posts into a root canal: a microscopic investigation. J Endod 2002;28:355-60.
55. Ferrari M, Mannocci F. A 'one-bottle' adhesive system for bonding a fibre post into a root canal: an SEM evaluation of the post-resin interface. Int Endod J 2000;33:397-400.
56. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dent Mater 2001;17:422-9.
57. Bachicha WS, DiFiore PM, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod 1998;24:703-8.
58. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:284-91.
59. Yoldas O, Alacam T. Microhardness of composites in simulated root canals cured with light transmitting posts and glass-fiber reinforced composite posts. J Endod 2005;31:104-6.
60. Faria e Silva AL, Arias VG, Soares LE, Martin AA, Martins LR. Influence of fiber-post translucency on the degree of conversion of a dual-cured resin cement. J Endod 2007;33:303-5.
61. dos Santos Alves Morgan LF, Peixoto RT, de Castro Albuquerque R, Santos Correa MF, de Abreu Poletto LT, Pinotti MB. Light transmission through a translucent fiber post. J Endod 2008;34:299-302.
62. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:780-4.
63. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:439-44.
64. Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: Part 2. Modes of failure and influence of various clinical characteristics. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:177-82.
65. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15B-8B.
66. Greenfeld RS, Marshall FJ. Factors affecting dowel (post) selection and use in endodontically treated teeth. J Can Dent Assoc 1983;49:777-83.
67. Eshelman EG, Jr., Sayegh FS. Dowel materials and root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:342-4.
68. Burns DA, Krause WR, Douglas HB, Burns DR. Stress distribution surrounding endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:412-8.
69. Hunter AJ, Feiglin B, Williams JF. Effects of post placement on endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:166-72.
70. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:535-43.
71. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002;23:2667-82.
72. Farah JW, Craig RG, Sikarskie DL. Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis of a restored axisymmetric first molar. J Biomech 1973;6:511-20.
73. Thresher RW, Saito GE. The stress analysis of human teeth. J Biomech 1973;6:443-9.
74. Reinhardt RA, Krejci RF, Pao YC, Stannard JG. Dentin stresses in post-reconstructed teeth with diminishing bone support. J Dent Res 1983;62:1002-8.
75. Williams KR, Edmundson JT. A finite element stress analysis of an endodontically restored tooth. Eng Med 1984;13:167-73.
76. Williams KR, Edmundson JT, Rees JS. Finite element stress analysis of restored teeth. Dent Mater 1987;3:200-6.
77. Pao YC, Reinhardt RA, Krejci RF. Root stresses with tapered-end post design in periodontally compromised teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:281-6.
78. Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, Lee MC. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:421-7.
79. Cailleteau JG, Rieger MR, Akin JE. A comparison of intracanal stresses in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element method. J Endod 1992;18:540-4.
80. Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:140-7.
81. Ukon S, Moroi H, Okimoto K, Fujita M, Ishikawa M, Terada Y, et al. Influence of different elastic moduli of dowel and core on stress distribution in root. Dent Mater J 2000;19:50-64.
82. Toparli M. Stress analysis in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:470-6.
83. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:321-9.
84. Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater 2005;21:709-15.
85. Barjau-Escribano A, Sancho-Bru JL, Forner-Navarro L, Rodriguez-Cervantes PJ, Perez-Gonzalez A, Sanchez-Marin FT. Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: fracture strength and stress distribution. Oper Dent 2006;31:47-54.
86. Toksavul S, Zor M, Toman M, Gungor MA, Nergiz I, Artunc C. Analysis of dentinal stress distribution of maxillary central incisors subjected to various post-and-core applications. Oper Dent 2006;31:89-96.
87. Ichim I, Kuzmanovic DV, Love RM. A finite element analysis of ferrule design on restoration resistance and distribution of stress within a root. Int Endod J 2006;39:443-52.
88. Kishen A, Kumar GV, Chen NN. Stress-strain response in human dentine: rethinking fracture predilection in postcore restored teeth. Dent Traumatol 2004;20:90-100.
89. Rosenstiel SF, Land, M.F., Fujimoto, J. Restoration of the Endodontically Treated Tooth. In: Dolan J (ed). Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2006:336-78.
90. Yaman SD, Alacam T, Yaman Y. Analysis of stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor subjected to various post and core applications. J Endod 1998;24:107-11.
91. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75:871-8.
92. Romeed SA, Fok SL, Wilson NH. A comparison of 2D and 3D finite element analysis of a restored tooth. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:209-15.
93. Rodriguez-Cervantes PJ, Sancho-Bru JL, Barjau-Escribano A, Forner-Navarro L, Perez-Gonzalez A, Sanchez-Marin FT. Influence of prefabricated post dimensions on restored maxillary central incisors. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:141-52.
94. Waltimo A, Kemppainen P, Kononen M. Maximal contraction force and endurance of human jaw-closing muscles in isometric clenching. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:416-21.
95. Waltimo A, Kononen M. Bite force on single as opposed to all maxillary front teeth. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:372-5.
96. Yu WJ, Kwon TY, Kyung HM, Kim KH. An evaluation of localized debonding between fibre post and root canal wall by finite element simulation. Int Endod J 2006;39:959-67.
97. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod 2007;33:391-8.
98. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C. Efficacy of a self-curing adhesive-resin cement system on luting glass-fiber posts into root canals: an SEM investigation. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:543-9.
99. Akgungor G, Akkayan B. Influence of dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fiber posts and three dentin regions within a post space. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:368-78.
100. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater 2003;19:199-205.
101. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-9.
102. Sadek FT, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Grandini S, Cury AH, Tay F, et al. Immediate and 24-hour evaluation of the interfacial strengths of fiber posts. J Endod 2006;32:1174-7.
103. Le Bell AM, Tanner J, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Depth of light-initiated polymerization of glass fiber-reinforced composite in a simulated root canal. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:403-8.
104. Nikaido T, Takano Y, Sasafuchi Y, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Bond strengths to endodontically-treated teeth. Am J Dent 1999;12:177-80.
105. Ari H, Yasar E, Belli S. Effects of NaOCl on bond strengths of resin cements to root canal dentin. J Endod 2003;29:248-51.
106. Erdemir A, Ari H, Gungunes H, Belli S. Effect of medications for root canal treatment on bonding to root canal dentin. J Endod 2004;30:113-6.
107. Yiu CK, Garcia-Godoy F, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Imazato S, King NM, et al. A nanoleakage perspective on bonding to oxidized dentin. J Dent Res 2002;81:628-32.
108. Calt S, Serper A. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. J Endod 2002;28:17-9.
109. Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Hirai M, Iwami Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Effect of endodontic irrigation on bonding of resin cement to radicular dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:70-6.
110. Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Regional bond strength of four self-etching primer/adhesive systems to root canal dentin. Dent Mater J 2005;24:261-7.
111. Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of prolonged photo-irradiation time of three self-etch systems on the bonding to root canal dentine. J Dent 2006;34:389-97.
112. Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Mechanical properties and bond strength of dual-cure resin composites to root canal dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:226-34.
113. Aksornmuang J, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. J Dent 2004;32:443-50.
114. Mohan B, Kandaswamy D. A confocal microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface using adhesive systems with three different solvents bonded to dry and moist dentinan in vitro study. Quintessence Int 2005;36:511-21.
115. D'Arcangelo C, D'Amario M, Prosperi GD, Cinelli M, Giannoni M, Caputi S. Effect of surface treatments on tensile bond strength and on morphology of quartz-fiber posts. J Endod 2007;33:264-7.
116. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Cury AH, Coniglio I, Vulicevic ZR, et al. The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dual-cured resin composite to methacrylic fiber posts: microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation. J Dent 2007;35:496-502.
117. Kececi AD, Ureyen Kaya B, Adanir N. Micro push-out bond strengths of four fiber-reinforced composite post systems and 2 luting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:121-8.
118. De Munck J, Braem M, Wevers M, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K, et al. Micro-rotary fatigue of tooth-biomaterial interfaces. Biomaterials 2005;26:1145-53.
119. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-32.
120. Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater 2002;18:495-502.
121. Schwartz RS, Fransman R. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics: materials, clinical strategies and procedures for restoration of access cavities: a review. J Endod 2005;31:151-65.
122. Teixeira CS, Silva-Sousa YC, Sousa-Neto MD. Effects of light exposure time on composite resin hardness after root reinforcement using translucent fibre post. J Dent 2008;36:520-8.
123. De Jager N, de Kler M, van der Zel JM. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns. Dent Mater 2006;22:234-42.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊