(3.226.72.118) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/13 07:32
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

: 
twitterline
研究生:徐美芬
研究生(外文):Mei-fen Hsu
論文名稱:電腦輔助單字學習對低成就國中生之助益
論文名稱(外文):An Action Research on Computer-Assisted Vocabulary Learning of Junior High School Low Achievers
指導教授:許麗瑩
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:應用外語系碩士班
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:英文
論文頁數:121
中文關鍵詞:低成就國中生電腦輔助語言教學補救教學
外文關鍵詞:computer-assisted language learningremedial instructionlow achievers
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:637
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:157
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:6
本研究旨在探討電腦輔助單字學習軟體對低成就國中生的助益。研究設計為行動研究,以個案實驗研究為研究方法,研究對象為三個低成就國中一年級生,在為期三個月的單字學習情境中,觀察此三位學生在單字辨識以及英語學習的成長。資料收集包含教室觀察、教師省思、上課不專注的行為紀錄與單字辨識測驗。資料分析包括內容分析與相依樣本T考驗。研究結果顯示在單字學習軟體的輔助下,兩位使用電腦學習單字的低成就生在單字辨識測驗以及英語學習態度上均有良好的表現。本研究之貢獻在於如何將單字學習軟體融入日常英語教學中;然而,因受限於只有三位研究對象,未來對於此研究有興趣者,當以更多的研究對象來增進該類型研究之效度。

關鍵字:電腦輔助語言教學、補救教學、低成就國中生
ABSTRACT


The study investigated the effect of computer-assisted vocabulary software, Qword, on junior high low achievers’ vocabulary learning as well as their inattentive behavior in class. Three 14-year-old junior high school low achievers participated in a 3-month action research, with vocabulary recognition tests as the quantitative data and the field notes as well as the teachers’ reflective journal as the qualitative data. The T-test and content analysis of the data showed that each of the two participants under intervention showed considerable academic improvement and positive attitude toward learning English with the aid of Qword. This study contributes the knowledge of incorporating computer-assisted vocabulary learning into regular English curriculum. Future research can involve more participants for better external validity.

Key words: computer-assisted language learning, remedial instruction, low achievers
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Chinese Abstract……………………………………………………………………i
English Abstract……………………………………………………………………ii
Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………iii
Table of contents……………………………………………………………………iv
List of tables………………………………………………………………………..vii
List of figures……………………………………………………………………...viii
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the study…………………………………….………………..1
1.2 Purpose of the study………………………………………………..…………6
1.3 Research questions………………………………………………………..…..7
1.4 Definition of terms…………………………………………………………….8
1.5 Significance of the study…………………………………………………...…11
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 The status quo of English education in Taiwan………………………….…..13
2.2 The abnormal polarized score distribution of test takers in Junior High School Basic Competence Test……………………………..…………………14
2.3 The status quo of remedial Instruction in Taiwan………………………..…15
2.4 Low achievers’ learning difficulties in an EFL context and the importance of vocabulary instruction in remedial instruction……….………………...16
2.5 Computer-assisted language learning and remedial instruction…………..20
2.6 CALL projects focusing on vocabulary learning…………………………...24

CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHOD

3.1 Research design………………………………………………………………27
3.2 Participants and instruments………………………………………………..29
3.3 Data collection procedures…………………………………………………..33
3.4 Data analysis………………………………………………………………….38
CAPTER FOUR
RESULTS

4.1 The participants’ inattentive behavior……………………….……………..42
4.2 Participants’ motivation toward Qword……………………………………50
4.3 The participants’ attitude toward the English teacher…………………….53
4.4 The individual differences and the use of Qword…………………………..54
4.5 The learners’ perception of the design of Qword…………………………..56
4.6 The effect of Qword incorporated in daily English classroom…………….57
4.7 The outcomes of students’ word recognition before and after the use of Qword………………………………………………………………………….61
CHATPER FIVE
CONCLUSION

5.1 The research findings summarized to answer the research questions……65
5.2 Limitations of the present study……………………………………………..69
5.3 Pedagogical implications……………………………………………………..71
5.4 Recommendations for future research……………………………………...71
REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………...73
Appendix A……………………………………………………………………….80
Appendix B……………………………………………………………………….82
Appendix C……………………………………………………………………….85
Appendix D……………………………………………………………………….89
Appendix E…………………………………………………………………………93
Appendix F…………………………………………………………………………93
Appendix G………………………………………………………………………..102
References

Adams, M.J. (1990) Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge: Ma, MIT Press.
Aguiar, L. & Brady, S. (1991). Vocabulary Acquisition and Reading Ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal ,3 ,413-425.
Balajthy, E. (1996). Using computer technology to aid the disabled reader. In Lillian R. Putnam, How to become a better reading teacher (pp. 331-343). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
Clark, D. & Uhry, J. (1995). Dylexia:Theory and Practice of Remedial Instruction. Baltimore: York Press.
Chen, C. F. (2006). The development of e-mail literacy: from writing to peers to writing to authority figures. Language Learning &Technology, 10, 33-35.
Chen, Y. H. (2004). Elementary and junior high school teachers’ perceptions and implementations toward remedial instruction for underachievers. National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Chen, Y. C. (2006). A Study of Integrating Multimedia into English RemedialInstruction for EFL Elementary School Underachievers. National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi.
Cuellar, A. & Cuellar, M. F. (1990). From Dropout to High Achiever: An Understanding of Academic Excellence through an Analysis of Dropouts and Students-at-Risk. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 322252
Felix, U. (2005). Analysing recent call effectiveness research-towards a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, pp. 1-32.
Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Merrill Prentice Hall: Columbus, OH
Groot, P.J.M. (1994). Tekstdekking, tekstbegrip en woordselectie voor het vreemde-taalonderwijs (with a summary in English) [Lexical coverage, reading comprehension and wordselection in foreign language teaching]. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in artikelen, 3, 111-121.
Groot, P. J. M. (2000). Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 60-81
Hayashi, K. (1999). Reading Strategies and extensive reading in EFL classes. RELC Journal, 30, 114-132.
Hazenberg, S.,& Hulstijn, J.H. (1996). Defining a minimal receptive second language vocabulary for non-native university students: an empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 7, 145-163.
Hirsch, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8, 689-696
Hudson,W.W. (1977). Elementary techniques for assessing single client/single worker interactions. Social Service Review, pp. 311-326
Kail, R. & Leonard L. (1986). Word-finding abilities in language impaired children. ASHA Monographs, 25, Rockland, MD: American Speech-Hearing-Language Association.
Kern, R. & Warschauer, M. (2000). Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 440-464
Krashen, S. (1993). The Power of Reading. Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO.
Kratchowill, T. R. (Ed.) (1978). Single-Subject Research: Strategies for Evaluating Change. New York: Academic Press.
Krishef, C. H.(1991). Fundamental approaches to single subject design and analysis. , Florida: Krieger.
Lai, W. T. (2002). A Study of Phonics as a Method to Enhance Spelling Skills of Remedial EFL Learners in Taiwan. National Tsin Hua University, Hsinchu
Laufer, B., & Sim, D. (1985). Measuring and explaining the reading threshold needed for English for academic purposes texts. Foreign Language Annals, 18, 405-411
Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Lauren & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special Language: from humans thinking to thinking machine (pp. 69-75). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Liaw, M. L. (2006). E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 49-64.
MacCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford :Oxford University Press.
Marturano, E. M. (1987). Classroom behaviors related to academic gains in a group of low achieving children. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 18, 22-35
Meyer, J. (2000) Qualitative research in health care. Using qualitative methods in health related active research. British Medical Journal, 320, 178-181
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). (1997). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sho, H. H. (1998). A study of English individual educational program as a remedial teaching method of junior high school. A Master,s Thesis Submitted to Department of English, National Kaohuiung Normal University.
Sun, Y. C. (2003). Extensive reading online: an overview and evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 19, 438-46.
Vellutino, F. R. & Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Linguistic coding and reading ability. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in Psycholinguistics, (pp. 1-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: LogosInternational.
Wasson, J. B. (2003). Using colored overlays with pupils with severe reading disabilities. Practical Update 7(3), 3-6.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
Williams, M. & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: a social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, Y. M. (2007). Junior High School Low Achievers’English Reading Comprehension Difficulties in Taiwan. A Master,s Thesis Submitted to National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei.
Yeh, C. Y. & Wang, Y. H. (2004). An investigation into vocabulary learning strategies used by senior high school students in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 1, 1-44.
Zapata, G. & Sagarra, N. (2007) Call on hold: The delayed benefits of an online workbook on L2 vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 153-171
王黃隆 (Wang, H. L.) (2003)。電腦輔助教學對國中英語低成就學生實施補救教學之效益分析。 國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文
台東縣教育局 (2006) 。九十五年度全國國中學力測驗統計報告,台東縣:作者
許天威(Hsu, T. W. ) (2003)。個案實驗研究法。台北市:五南
李咏吟(Li, Y. Y.) (2001) (主編) (民90) 。學習輔導。台北市:心理出版社
李家同(Li, C. T.) (2002)。窮孩子一上國中就放棄英文。聯合報,民國9月28日。取自http://www.csie.ncnu.edu.tw/~rctlee/article/910928.htm
李雪莉 (Li, S. L.) (2000) 。 教師運用資訊網路能力調查。天下雜誌:2000年教育特刊。P. 94-102。
林均鞠 (Lin, Y. C.)(2008)。網路多媒體教學對國小高年級英語低成就學生音素覺識能力與英語學業成就之影響。國立台北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士論文。
林富偉 (Lin, F. W.) (2007)。國小遊戲式英語數位學習環境研發暨實施研究。國立清華大學。未出版,新竹。
林靜宜 (Lin, C.Y.) (2003)。『國小英語教學現況民意調查』分析報告。台北:中華民國全國教師會。
吳致秀(Wu, C. S.) (2006) 。 日語低成就學生補救教學模式之探討及相關問題研究。 臺中技術學院人文社會學報,5, 223-239。
吳清山、林天佑 (Wu, C. S.& Lin, T. Y. )(1995)。教育名詞淺釋-教育優先區。教育資料與研究。5, 49。
吳鐵雄 (Wu, T. H.)(1983)。電腦輔助教學之補救教學效果初探。教育心理學報,16, 61-70。
翁榮銅(Wong, R. T.)(2006)。中央、地方與學校在執行教育優先區計畫成效之探討與批判。現代教育論壇,15,322-338。
教育基本法(民88年)。
陳淑麗(Chen, S. L.)(2008)。國小弱勢學生課業輔導現況調查之研究。台東大學教育學報,19(1), 1-32。
陳淑麗、熊同鑫 (Chen, S. L.; Hsong, T. H.)(2007)。台東地區弱勢國中學生課輔現況與困境之研究。教育資料與研究雙月刊,76, 105-130
陳智華(Chen, C. H.)。(2008)。補救教學怎麼救 學校也頭。聯合報。 民國97年11月15日。取自: http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=160314
陳麗如、楊曉芳 (Chen, L. R. & Yang, H. F.)(2002)。資訊科技融入教學-以高雄市鼓山國小柴山分校的推動經驗為例。資訊與教育雜誌。88, 28-46。
張武昌(Chang, W. C.)(2003)。我國的國中英語教育。人文及社會學科教學通訊,14(2),113-130。
張武昌、周中天、陳純音、葉錫南、林正昌、許月貴 (Chang, W. C., Chou, C. T., Chen, C. Y., Yeh, H. N., Lin, C. C., & Hsu, Y. K.)(2003) 。國民中學學生基本學力測驗英語雙峰現象暨改進措施。台北:國立台灣師範大學英語系(教育部委託研究)。
張瓊月 (Chang, C. Y.) (2006)。探討網路多媒體對英語低成就國小學童學習英文字母之效能。國立台北教育大學碩士論文。
黃淑苓 (Huang, S. L. ) (1999) 。補救教學之設計與實施。學習落後學生的補救教學與輔導研討會手冊 (頁53-67)。台中:中興大學教育學程中心。
黃燕芬(Huang, Y. F. ) (2003)。中學教師資訊融入英語教學認知、關注階層、行為及相關因素之研究。國立中山大學碩士論文。高雄,未出版。
曾美惠 (Zeng, M. H. )(1985)。國中英語科低成就學生英語科學習行為之研究。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文。台北,未出版。
詹餘靜、蔣月美(Chan, Y.C. & Chiang, Y.M.)(2002)。彈性分班再國小英語教學之實施:北市龍安國小個案研究。第九屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會論文集 (頁634-643)。台北:文鶴。
瑪麗安.瑟絲-穆西亞(Marianne Celce-Murcia)編著(2006)。英語教學新論。台北:湯姆生。
廖康伶(Liao, 2008)。國中生知覺學習風格,字彙學習策略與字彙學習成就之關研究。雲林科技大學技術與職業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,雲林
劉芳伶 (Liu, F. L.)(2001) 。國小英語教師教育專業能力與專門學科素養之研究。國立屏東師範教育學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
劉顯親、張俊盛(Liou, H. C. & Chang, J. C. )(2005) 前瞻性數位英文學習中心CANDLE之研發:應用(雙語)語料庫及電腦化學習支援 2/3 (Advances in a digital language learning center-CANDLE: bilingual corpora and computational scaffolding), 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,計劃編號:NSC93-2524-S007-001, 2004/5/1-2005/4/30, final report.
盧貞穎(Lu, C. Y.)(1999)。國小英語教師的成長和國小英語教學。人文及社會學科教學通訊10(4) 154-166。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔