臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

現代戰爭講求速度，後勤支援優勢決定戰爭之勝負。美軍於波灣戰爭後，即以優勢資訊及科技創新為核心，從「聯戰願景2010」提出聚焦後勤、效益後勤，進而導引出軍事後勤革新之創新作為。國軍目前物料獲得與採購，仍沿用舊有傳統思維，無法如民間供應鏈管理機制具迅速敏捷的反應，以致需求無法適時有效獲得。因此為本研究之目的乃是如何「精準」地提供部隊需求，運用有限預算，適時適量採購，降低後勤成本，進而達到精實後勤作業的理想。本研究就以往國軍器材籌補流程，透過系統動態學模擬軟體Vensim，建構模型分析導入PBL之補保效益。在採購需求延遲等不同情境下，探討整體變化情況，希以系統動態學之可視模式，就國軍後勤策略規劃發展提出相關建議。動態模式通過結構確認、數據一致性測試及範圍與適當性等測試後，模擬導入PBL效益，可有效支援現行戰機器材籌補作業，提高整體採購作業效能，適時適量的完成採購，進而支援戰機修復出廠，滿足部隊戰演訓任務。整體而言，導入PBL效益對國軍採購及維修作業將有所助益。美軍效益後勤己證實對於作業成本降低及後勤支援提升成效卓著，而國軍在人力精簡及有限的國防資源限制條件下，如何導入PBL效益，以有效運用國防作業維持費，應為決策者考量當務之急。

The modern war depends on the speed, and the logistics support advantage will determine the war winner. After the Gulf war, the U.S. troops regard the advanced information technology and technology innovation as the core. The Joint Vision 2010 proposes the focused logistics (FL), Performance Based Logistics (PBL), and then leads to the US military logistics improvement''s act. The Chinese Armed Force''s material supplies and purchase still follows the traditional ways of thinking, and it is not like the practice of business supply chain management that has quick response. Hence, the demand of the Armed Forces can’t be acquired effectively at the right time. The purpose of this study was to provide the Armed Force''s demand accuracy at the limited budget, and then purchased the optimum parts in right time and then reduced the logistic cost. This research reviewed the current Armed Force''s supply chain process and then utilized PBL analysis by the System Dynamics simulation software Vensim. To evaluate the changes of the system dynamics of purchase parts delay and different scenarios in the simulate model, the simulation trend will provide important recommendations to the logistic strategies of the Ministry of National Defense (MND). The dynamic model had verified the structure test, unit consistency test, and also simulated the PBL benefit that could support the current fighter parts supply requirement and improved the purchase''s efficiency. This model also supported the fighter maintenance, met the mission requirements, raised supply chain''s efficiency, and then supported the fighter plane. The entirety comments of the PBL can enhance the Armed Force''s purchase and maintenance acts. The PBL already reduced the total cost and enhanced the logistics support for the U.S. troop. Likewise, The Armed Force still face the manpower simplification and under the limited military funding resource. This PBL concept should be considered as the top priority for the MND''s policymakers to use the military budget more effectively.

目 錄
中文摘要 ......................................................................................................i
ABSTRACT..................................................................................................ii
誌謝............................................................................................................. iv
目錄...............................................................................................................v
圖目錄..........................................................................................................vi
表目錄.........................................................................................................vii
第一章 緒論.................................................................................................1
1.1 研究背景與動機..........................................................................1
1.2 研究目的......................................................................................2
1.3 研究流程與章節架構..................................................................3
第二章 文獻探討.........................................................................................5
2.1 供應鏈管理理論..........................................................................5
2.2 效益後勤計畫............................................................................13
2.3 系統動態學................................................................................19
第三章 模式建立.......................................................................................25
3.1 模式概念說明............................................................................25
3.2 模式分析....................................................................................29
3.2.1 積量變數..........................................................................32
3.2.2 率量變數..........................................................................33
3.2.3 輔助變數..........................................................................34
3.3 系統模擬測試............................................................................37
第四章 研究結果與討論...........................................................................39
4.1 導入PBL效益對採購作業之政策可行性分析.......................39
4.1.1 導入PBL效益對採購完成數量影響..............................39
4.1.2 採購時間變動情境下PBL效益......................................42
4.2 導入PBL效益對維修作業之政策可行性分析.......................44
4.2.1 導入PBL效益對支援修護出廠飛機數變化..................44
4.2.2 飛行時數變動時導入PBL效益對支援修護出廠飛機
數變化.............................................................................45
第五章 結論...............................................................................................48
5.1結論與建議.................................................................................48
5.2 後續研究建議........................................................................... 50
參考文獻.....................................................................................................51
附錄一：本研究之基模方程式...................................................................56

林明德，「從供應鏈管理看製造業快速回應策略解決方案」，製造業快速回應專案—解決方案錦囊資訊應用導航，財團法人資訊工業策進會，民國85年。
李思儀，國軍精進案完成編現合一，中央日報，民國94年2月23日。
許紹軒，缺人缺錢部分幻象經國戰機將封存，自由時報，民國94年1月3日。
黃敬平，戰機變相封存空優受損，蘋果日報，民國94年1月24日。
吳明杰，軍方也要大裁員，中國時報，民國98年1月19日。
胡修武，「21世紀產業競爭力的起點－供應鏈Supply Chain管理」，資訊應用導航，資策會推廣服務處，民國86年。
翟志剛，「商業快速回應輔導案例－供應商管理存貨」，經濟部商業司，民國87年。
石裕川，鄭光偉，「從物流角度探討國軍呆料庫儲品之因素」，第七屆國防管理學術暨實務研討會，民國88年。
徐健評，「企業導入供應鏈管理系統之研究」，臺灣大學碩士論文，民國89年。
黎漢林等，供應鏈管理與研究-最佳化方法之運用，儒林圖書公司，台北，民國89年。
空軍總部，空軍補給手冊，台北:空軍總部核頒，民國89年。
鄧瀛培，「我國國防預算規劃策略之研究－系統動態學之應用」，國防管理學院碩士論文，民國89年。
陶在樸，系統動態學—直擊「第五項修練」，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，台北，民國89年，頁63。
韓釗，系統動力學探索動態複雜之鑰，華泰文化事業股份有限公司，台北，民國91年。
鄭穎聰，「供應鏈長鞭效應因應政策之研究」，台北科技大學生產系統工程與管理研究所碩士論文，民國89年。
John Dumond等著，速度管理：促成美國陸軍後勤轉型的商業典範，高一中譯，國防部史政編譯室，台北，民國91年。
萬文豪，「海軍後勤補給制度之興革」，國防大學軍事學院海軍學部教官學術研究論文，民國93年。
高凌雲，「機密決算報告軍方呆料嚴重」，聯合報，民國92年9月17日。
吳鴻志，「運用VMI管理模式對機務妥善整體綜效之研究」，義守大學碩士論文，民國92年。
伍光華，「從供應鏈觀點建構國防研製單位存貨模式之研究」，中正理工學院碩士論文，民國93年。
王增榮，「效力後勤之發展與武器系統整備之研究」，聯合後勤季刊第二期，民國94年，頁12-19。
蔡源成等，「新世代戰機焦點式後勤概述與實證性研究」，空軍學術月刊557期，民國93年，頁76-88。
徐蘭國，「空軍航材零附件需求規劃之研究」，元智大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文，民國94年。
許明弘，「應用系統動力學模型於軍用發動機後勤策略之動態性研究」，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文，民國94年。
譚海林，「從供應鏈觀點探討修補零附件供補流程模式建構之研究」，海軍學術月刊，第三十八卷第十二期，民國93年，頁76-87。
葉招麟，「戰機使用時數與修護維持費關係之研究」，南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文，民國96年。
英文部分
Adamides, E. D., Stamboulis, Y. A. and Varelis, A. G., "Model-based Assessment of Military Aircraft Engine Maintenance Systems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 55, No. 9, pp. 957-967, 2004.
Beamon, B. M., "Supply Chain Design and Analysis: Models and Methods, " International Journal on Production Economics, Vol. 55, pp. 281-294, 1998.
Benedit, C., Margeridis, H., " Chain Reaction," Charter, Vol. 43, pp. 46-49, 1999.
Blackstone, J. et al., APICS Dictionary, Eleventh Edition, 2005.
Bowersox, D. J. and Closs, D. J., Logistical Management—The Integrated Supply Chain Process, McGraw-Hill, 1996.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Vision 2010, 5126 Joint Staff, Pentagon, Washington, 1996.
Clark, T., Hammond J., "Reengineering channel reordering processes to improve total supply chain performance," Journal of Production and Operation Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 248-265, 1997.
Cothran, Jerry., "A PBL Blueprint Implementing Performance Based Logistics," Defense Acquisition University, 2004.
Coyle, J. M., et al., "System dynamics in defence analysis : some case studies," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 50, pp. 372-382, 1999.
Department of Defense USA, "The Denfense Acquisition System", DoD D5000.1, 2003.
Dornier, et al., Global Operations and Logistics, John Wiley and Son, 1998.
Forrester, J.W., Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, 1961.
Forrester, J. W., and Senge, P. M., Test for Building Confidence in System Dynamics Models, in A. Legasto et al. (eds), TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences (System Dynamics), North-Holland, The Netherlands, 1980.
Gansler, Jacques S. and Lucyshyn, William., "Evaluation of Performance Based Logistics," Center for Public Policy and Private Enterprise, School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, 2006.
Lee, H., et al., "The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chain," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, Iss 3, pp. 93-102. 1997.
Oliver, D., Performance Based Logistics, Program Brief, 4 June 2004.
Randy Fowler., "What is this thing called PBL," Defense Acquisition University, 2004.
Sterman, J. D., "Instructions for running the Beer Distribution Game," Working paper D-3679, Systems Dynamics Group, MIT, available from E52-562, Sloan School of management, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. 1984.
Sterman, J. D., "Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment," Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 321-339, 1989.
Sterman, J. D., Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Chicago, IL: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 2000.
Vensim, http://www.vensim.com/software.html.
Xu, K, Y Dong. and PT Evers., " Towards better coordination of the supply chain," Transportation Research, Part E, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 35-54, 2001.