跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.205.192.201) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/08/05 09:45
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳建谷
研究生(外文):Chien-Ku Chen
論文名稱:相依性對團隊成員關係品質及個人學習和創造結果之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Impact of Interdependences on Team Members’ Relationship Quality and Personal learning and Creative Outcome
指導教授:劉俞志劉俞志引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:資訊管理學系
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:40
中文關鍵詞:任務相依性結果相依性團隊成員關係品質個人學習創造結果
外文關鍵詞:Task InterdependenceOutcome InterdependenceTeam Members’ Relationship QualityPersonal LearningCreative Outcome
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:141
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
資訊系統專案開發團隊涉及到許多技術性、專業性或人為等相關問題,過去團隊一系列的學術研究學者大多針對團隊所產生的衝突、效能、價值觀及團隊多元化、團隊內的互動關係、信任感與團隊的運作等與績效表現有密不可分的關係等議題進行探討。但在眾多的文獻�堙A關於相依性對於團隊成員關係品質及對於個人學習及創造結果的研究卻甚少,因此本研究針對相依性、團隊成員關係品質及個人學習和創造結果的關係進行探討。
本研究以資訊系統專案團隊成員為抽樣對象,回收有效問卷240份。本研究之資料分析方法包括敘述統計分析、信度分析、效度分析及部分最小平分法。
本研究的成果可以做為資訊系統專案經理瞭解相依性對於團隊成員關係品質及團隊成員關係品質對於成員個人學習和創造結果的參考。後續的學者亦可針對影響創造結果及個人學習的因素繼續加以探討,以使此方面的研究更臻完善。
Information system development teams encounter many technical and professional issues. Most literature concerned with information system development teams has focused on performance-related issues, such as team conflict and values, as well as the relationships between team members and trust, team variety and operation etc.. In response to a gap in current literature, this study investigates the relationships among interdependences, team members’ relationship quality, personal learning and creative outcome.
This study collected 240 valid questionnaires from members of information system project teams. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, validity analysis and the Partial Least Squares method.
Study or analytical results elucidate the relationships among interdependences, team members’ relationship quality, personal learning and creative outcome.
書名頁 i
論文口試委員審定書 ii
授權書 iii
中文摘要 iv
英文摘要 v
誌謝 vi
目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程與論文結構 3
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 個人學習與創造結果 6
第二節 相依性 8
壹、相依性的概念 8
貳、相依性的來源與分類 9
第三節 影響團隊成員間關係品質之因素 10
壹、溝通協調(Communication、Coordination) 10
貳、凝聚力(Cohesion) 11
參、相互支持(Mutual Support) 12
肆、努力(Effort) 12
第三章 研究架構與方法 13
第一節 研究模型圖 13
第二節 研究假設 14
第三節 問卷的設計與衡量 15
第四節 資料分析 16
第四章 研究結果與分析 19
第一節 樣本敘述統計 19
第二節 信度與效度檢驗 21
第三節 問卷資料分析 22
第伍章、結論與貢獻 27
第一節 研究結果 27
第二節 研究貢獻 30
第三節 未來發展 31
參考文獻 32
附錄 問卷 38
中文文獻:
[1] 盧國銘、萬同軒,「團隊內任務相依性與成員人際關係品質對團隊績效影響之研究」,管理思維與實務學術研討會論文集,219~232頁,民國94年。
[2] 李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬,組織行為學編譯,華泰書局,台北,民國91年。
[3] 黃敏萍,「跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能-任務特性與社會系絡之影響」。國立台灣大學,博士論文,民國89年。
[4] 羅清俊,社會科學研究方法—如何做好量化研究,威壁曼文化事業股份有限公司,民國97年。

英文文獻:
[5] Daft R. L., Organization theory and design, 8th ed, South-Western, Oklahoma, 2003.
[6] Shonk J. H., working in Teams:A Practical Manual for Improving Work groups, AMACOM, New York, 1982.
[7] Hackman J. R., Groups that Work (and those that don’t), Jossey-Bass , San Francisco, 1990.
[8] Yeager J. F., “Shaping the culture: Organizational development through team building,” Nova University, 1994.
[9] Mohrman S.A., Cohen S.G., Mohrman A.M., Designing team-based organization:New forms for knowledge work, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1995.
[10] Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coultar, Management, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1996.
[11] Nadler D. A. and Spencer J. L., Executive teams. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1997.
[12] Chien Min-Huei , “A Study to Improve Organizational Performance:A View from SHRM,” The Journal of American Academy of Business, Vol. 4, No.1, pp. 289-291, Mar 2004.
[13] Brian D. Janz , James C. Wetherbe, Gordon B. Davis, Raymond A. Noe, “Reengineering the systems development process: the link between autonomous teams and business process outcomes,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 41-68, Jun 1997.
[14] West M., Farr J., Innovation at work. In M. West & J. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, Wiley, New York, 1990.
[15] Susanne G. Scott, Reginald A. Bruce, “Determinants of Innovative Behavior:A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 580-607, Jun 1994.
[16] Van de Ven A H, Diane L F., Measuring and Assessing Organizations, Wiley, New York, 1980.
[17] Guzzo R. A., Shea G. P., “Group Effectiveness: What Really Matters?,” MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 25-31,Mar 1987.
[18] Johnson D W, Johnson R. T., Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Reserch, Interaction Book Co, Minnesota, 1989.
[19] Mitchell T. R., Silver W. S., “Individual and Group Goals When Workers Are Interdependent: Effects on Task Strategies and Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 185-193, Apr 1990.
[20] Wageman R., “Interdependence and Group Effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 145-180, Mar 1995.
[21] Shaw J. D., Duffy M. K., Stark E. M., “Interdependence and Preference for Group Work: Main and Congruence Effects on the Satisfaction and Performance of Group Members,” Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 259-279, Apr 2000.
[22] Stewart G. L., Barrick M. R., “Team Structure and Performance: Assessing The Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and The Moderating Role of Task Type,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 135-148, Dec 2000.
[23] Van der Vegt, G. Emans B.,Van de Vliert E., “Motivating effects of task and outcome interdependence in work teams,” Group and Organization Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 124-143,Jun1998.
[24] Thompson J D., Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.
[25] Anderson J. C., J. A. Narus, “A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 , pp.42-58, Jan 1990.
[26] March J.G., Simon H.A., Theories of bureaucracy. In J.M. Shafritz & J. S. Ott, Classics of rganization theory, Books/Cole Publishing Co., California , 1958.
[27] Strader T. J., F. R. Lin, M. J. Shaw, “Information Infrastructure for Electronic Virtual Organization,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 23, pp. 75-94, May 1998.
[28] A.V. Carron, W.N. Widmeyer, L.R. Brawley, “The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sports teams: the group environment questionnaire,” Journal of Sport Psychology , pp. 244–266, 1995.
[29] Cartwright D., The nature of group cohesiveness. D. Cartwright and A. Zander, eds. Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 3rd ed, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 91-109, 1968.
[30] P.E. Mudrack, “Group cohesiveness and productivity: a closer look,” Human Relations, Vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 771–785, Sep 1989.
[31] M.S. Granovetter, “The strength of weak ties,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, pp. 1360–1380, May 1973.
[32] W.N. Widmeyer, L.R. Brawley, A.V. Carron, The Measurement of Cohesion in Sport Teams: the Group Environment Questionnaire, Sports Dynamics, London, 1985.
[33] D.J. Beal, R.R. Cohen, M.J. Burke, C.L. McLendon, “Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, No. 6, pp. 989–1004, Dec 2003.
[34] P. Bingi, M.K. Sharma, J.K. Godla, “Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation,” Information Systems Management, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 7-14, Sep 1999.
[35] A.V. Carron, L.R. Brawley, “Cohesion: conceptual and measurement issues,” Small Group Research, Vol. 31, No.1, pp. 89–106, Feb 2000.
[36] K.L. Dion, C.R. Evans, “On cohesiveness: reply to Keyton and other critics of the construct,” Small Group Research, Vol. 23, pp. 242–250, May 1992.
[37] B. Mullen, C. Copper, “The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: an integration,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.115, No.2, pp. 210–227, Feb 1995.
[38] Tjosvold D., “Cooperation theory and organizations,” Human Relations, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 743-767, May 1995.
[39] Levine J. M., R. L. Moreland, “Progress in small group research,” Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 41, pp. 585-634, Jan 1990.
[40] Goodman P. S., E. Ravlin, M. Schminke, “Understanding groups in organizations,” Research in organizational Behavior , Vol. 9, pp. 121-173, 1987.
[41] Hackman J. R., The design of work teams, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp. 67-102, 1987.
[42] Pinto M. B., J. K. Pinto., “Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 7, No.3, pp. 200-212, Sep 1990.
[43] Campion M. A., Medsker G. J., Higgs A. C., “Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups,” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 823-850,Dec 1993.
[44] Kiggundu M N. “Task interdependence and the theory of job design. Academy of Management,” The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 499~508, 1981.
[45] Jehn K.A., “A multi-method examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 256–282, Jun 1995.
[46] Kankanhalli A., Tan B. C. Y., Kwok-Kee W. E. I., “Conflict and performance in global virtual teams,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 237-273, Nov 2006.
[47] Amabile T., Gryskiewicz S., “Creativity in the R&D laboratory,” Center for Creative Leadership, No.30, 1987.
[48] Sethia N., “The evocation of creativity through collaboration,” Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 1991.
[49] Susanne G. Scott, Reginald A. Bruce, “Determinants of Innovative Behavior:A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 580-607, Jun 1994.
[50] Hoegl M., Gemuenden H.G., “Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects,” Organization Science, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 435-449, July 2001.
[51] J.G. Cooprider, J.C. Henderson, “Technology-process fit: perspectives on achieving prototyping effectiveness,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp.68-87, Nov 1991.
[52] C. R. Hinings, D. J. Hickson, J. M. Pennings, R. E. Schneck, “Conditions of Intraorganizational Power,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 22-44, Mar 1974.
[53] Cuieford P., Fundamental Statistical in Psychology and Education, 4th ed, McGraw Hill, New York, 1965.
[54] Chin W.W., The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1998.
[55] Johansson J. K., Yip G. S., “Exploiting Globalization Potential: U.S. and Japanese Strategies,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 8, pp.579-601, 1994.
[56] Bontis N., “Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study That Develops Measures and Models,” Management Decision, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 63-76, 1998.
[57] Wixom B. H., Watson H.J., “An Empirical Investigation Of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp.17-41, Mar 2001.
[58] Fornell C. R., Bookstein F. L., “Two Structural Equation Model: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-voice Theory,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 440-452, Nov 1982.
[59] Wold H., Systems Under Indirect Observation Using PLS”, In C. Fornell(ed.), A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, Praeger, New York, 1982.
[60] Anderson J.C., Gerbing D.W., “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.103, No.3, pp.411-423, May 1988.
[61] Ghiselli E.E., Campbell J.P., Zedeck S., Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences,W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1981.
[62] Nunnally J.C., Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top