臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

生物科技為21 世紀最具潛力之產業之一，生物科技產業具有大
量發展專利權以進行專利佈局(patent mining)來提升獲利的特色，本
研究選定在生物科技產業與專利發展上具領先地位的美國生物科技
產業做為研究對象，探討專利對生物科技產業的影響。本研究發現專
利帶來的效果，反應在新產品的品質、成本或銷售上。透過新產品的
上市，投入研發專利的資源才開始得以回收。生技產業之產品與一般
商品不同，一般專利在銷售額有2 到3 年的遞延效果，然生技產業之
產品需經過政府相關機構的審核，故上市時間的延遲會較一般產品久。
另透過專利的累積，是否可以將之視為公司資源之一，引起本研究的
動機。本研究就專利權與公司資源與組織績效間的關係進行探討，期
望能達到下列目的：
一、 實證專利權與組織績效間具有關連性。
二、 實證專利權與公司資源間具有關連性。
三、 實證公司資源與組織績效間具有關連性。
本研究以迴歸分析，就專利資料、公司資源與組織績效進行分析，
並加入時間遞延效果探討專利對組織績效與公司資源能力之影響。研
究結果顯示，專利不單單對組織績效有正向影響，同時也會對公司資
源之配置具有正向的影響力。

Biotechnology is one of the most potential industries in 21st century. Biotechnology industry has the characteristic of developing large number of patents for patent mining in order to improve the profit. This study identified USA biotechnology industry, a leadership in the field of biotechnology industry and patent development, as the object of this study. Also this study discussed the impact of patent to USA biotechnology industry. This study found that the impact of patents would eventually be revealed on qualities, cost, or sales of new products. And the cost of developing patent can be covered by going to the market. The product of biotechnology industry is different from the normal merchandise. One previous literature found 2 to 3 years time-lag in sales revenue for normal patent. Because that patent in biotechnology industry has to pass the investigation by Government to get a license of going to the market. So the time-lag of the biotechnological product would be longer than other common products.
The follows are the purposes in this study:
1. Prove that there is a relationship between the effect of patents and Corporate Resources.
2. Prove that there is a relationship between the effect of patents and Organizational Performance.
3. Prove that there is a relationship between the effect of Corporate Resources and Organizational Performance.
This study would use regression analysis to analyze the patent data, company resources and organizational performance, and add a time-lag effect of the patents on the organizational performance and corporate resources. The study concluded that, a patent has positive effect not only on organizational performance but also on company resources.

摘 要 I
Abstract III
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景和動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程 3
第二章 生物科技產業介紹 4
第一節 生物科技產業概述 4
第二節 生物科技產業發展歷程 6
第三節 生物技術產業特性 7
第四節 美國生物科技產業概述 10
第三章 文獻探討 15
第一節 資源基礎理論（Resource Based View；RBV） 15
第二節 核心資源的特性 24
第三節 專利（Patent） 31
第四節 組織績效（Organizational Performance） 40
第四章 研究設計 49
第一節 研究對象 49
第二節 變數操作型定義與衡量 50
第三節 研究架構與假設 51
第四節 樣本選取流程及資料來源 55
第五節 資料庫介紹 56
第五章 實證分析 57
第一節 專利、公司資源與組織績效之迴歸分析 57
第二節 假設檢定結果 64
第六章 結論與研究建議 67
第一節 研究結論 67
第二節 研究建議 68
參考文獻 71
中文參考文獻 71
英文參考文獻 73

中文參考文獻
1.Robert M. Grant(2000)。現代策略管理。民國91年出版 科大文化事業股份有限公司
2.方至民(2000)。企業競爭優勢。台北：前程企管出版
3.王湧水、黃同圳、呂傳吉(2005)。事業策略、人力資源管理策略與組織績效關係之探討。人力資源管理學報2005夏季號，第五卷第二期頁001-018。
4.司徒達賢(1995)。資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係之探討。行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，國立中山大學圖書館
5.池文海、張書豪、邱奕盛(2009)影響台灣高科技電子產業組織績效之研究。企業管理學報98年3月份，第80期，頁001-030。
6.池文海、黃庭鍾、魏國洲(2007)。領導型態、組織學習、全面品質冠李對於組織績效之影響─以台灣資訊電子產業為例。 明新學報33卷,
7.吳思華(1996)。策略九說─策略思考的本質。麥田出版社
8.辛雲光(2002)。影響非營利組織經營績效因素之探討－以救國團青年活動中心為個案分析。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文。
9.林渝寰(2004)。研究機構創新研發成果衡量指標之建立。2004科技創新競爭力與研發成果指標論壇論文集。台北。
10.高淑芬(1995)。資源特性與合作策略關係之研究─以資源基礎觀點。國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
11.張世佳(1995)。製造策略與事業策略之配適分析─高科技廠商之實證。 台灣大學 商學研究所博士論文。
12.連世銘(2001)。服務業導入ISO-9000系列品保制度對經營績效之影響模式研究。大葉大學工業工程學系碩士論文，未出版，彰化。
13.陳忠仁、張陽隆(2006)。產業群聚對廠商行為及組織績效之研究─以台灣高科技產業為例。中山管理評論第14捲第2期， 頁315-338。
14.陳達仁、黃慕萱、劉江彬、楊牧民(2004)。從美國專利看台灣企業科技創新競爭力。2004科技創新競爭力與研發成果指標論壇論文集。台北。
15.生物科技白皮書(2007)，經濟部工業局。
16.劉江彬、耿筠(2004)。專利運用與授權評估指標系統之研究。2004科技創新競爭力與研發成果指標論壇論文集。台北。
17.蘇友珊、張朝惟(2008)。創新導向與公司能力之調和作用對新產品開發績效之影響：台灣生物科技產業之實證研究。長榮大學經營管理所碩士論文。
18.耿筠、廖本哲、李主平(2005)。專利在公司獲利能力之遞延效果的研究─以美國製藥業為例─。中原大學企業管理所碩士論文。
英文參考文獻
1.Afuah, A. (1999). Strategies to Turn Adversity into Profits. Sloan Management Review, winter, pp.99-109
2.Amit, R. and P. J. H. Schoemaker(1993). Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal,14(1), PP.33-46.
3.Ausitn, D. H., (1993). An event-study approach to measuring innovative output: the case of biotechnology. American Economic Review, pp.253-258
4.Austin, D. H.,(1993). An event-study approach to measuring innovative output: the case of biotechnology. American Economic Review, pp.253-258.
5.Barney, (1991). Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management Science, 17, pp.19-120
6.Barney, J. B. and E. J.Zajac(1994). Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward and Organizationlly-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp.5-10.
7.Barney, J.B. (2001). Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. The Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), pp.41-56.
8.Barney, J.B. (2003). Resources, capabilities, core competencies, invisible assets and knowledge assets: label proliferation and theory development in the field of strategic management. In Helfat, C.E. (Eds),The SMS Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Capabilities, Blackwell, pp.422-6.
9.Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain toinclude elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, andAssociates (Eds.) Personnel Selection in organizations. (pp. 71-98). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Inc.
10.Brown, R.(1992). Managing the “S” Curves of Innovation, The Journal of Consumer Marketing, Business Journal 9(1), pp.61-72.
11.Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal(1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp.128-152.
12.Collins, D.J. and Montgomery, C.A. (1995). Competing on resources: strategy in the 1990s’,in: Harvard Business Review on Corporate strategy, Harvard Business School Press,Boston, pp.33-62. (originally published in HBR, July-August,1995).
13.Collins, D.J. and Montgomery, C.A. (1998). Creating corporate advantage’, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp.71-83.
14.Collis , D. J. & Montgomery, C. A., (1995). Competing on resources: strategy in the 1990s’. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), pp.110-135.
15.Collis, D. J. and C. A. Montgomery(1995). Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, Jul-Aug, pp.118-128
16.Collis, K. R., (1991). A Resource-base Analysis of Global Competition: The Case of the Bearings Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Summer), pp.66-72.
17.Collis, K.R., (1991). A Resource-base Analysis of Global Competition: The Case of the Bearings Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Summer) , pp.66-72
18.Comanor, W. S., Scherer, F. M., (1969). Patent statistics as a measure of technical change. Journal of Political Economy, 77: 392-398.
19.Coulter, K.S., Coulter, R.A. (2002). Determinants of trust in a service provider: the moderating role of length of relationship. Journal of Service Marketing, 16 (1), pp.35-50.
20.De Carolis, D. M. D.(2003). Competences and Limitability in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of Their Relationship with Firm Performance. Journal of Management, 29(1), pp.27-50
21.Ernst, H., (1995). Patenting strategies in the German mechanical engineering industry and their relationship to firm performance. Technovation, pp.225-240.
22.Ernst, H., (1998). Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, pp.279-308.
23.Ernst, H., (2001). Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level. Research Policy, 30, pp.143-157.
24.Ernst, H., (2003). Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management. World Patent Information, 25(3), pp.233-242
25.Gallon, M. R., H. M. Stillman and D. Coats. (1995). Putting Core Competency Thinking to Practice. Technology Management, May-June,pp.20-28
26.Grant, Robert M., (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33, Iss. 3.
27.Greene, J. R., Scotchmer, S., (1995). On the division of profits in sequential innovation. RAND Journal of Economics,26(1), pp.20-33
28.Griliches, Z.; Hall, B. H.; Pakes, A.,(1991). R&D, patents, and market value revisited: is there a second (technological opportunity) factor? Economies of Innovation and New Technology, pp.183-201.
29.Hames, M.(1998). Balance Your Innovation Strategy. Electronic Business, May, pp.8.
30.Harrison, J., M. Hitt, R. Hoskisson and R. Ireland(1991). Synergies and Post Acquisition Performance: Differences versus Similarities in Resource Allocation. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp.173-190
31.Henderson, R. M. and I. Cockburn (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp.63-84
32.Hill, C. W. L. and G. R. Jones(2004).Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach. Houghton Mifflin Company.
33.Klemperer, P., (1990). How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be? RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), pp.113-130.
34.Kogut, B. and U. Zander(1995). Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test. Organization Science, 16(1), pp.76-92.
35.Liebeskind, J. P., (1996). Knowledge, Strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(special issue), pp.93-108.
36.Markides, C. C. and P. J. Williamson.(1994). Related Diversification, Core Competences and Corporate Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15(special issue, summer), pp.149-165
37.Marques, D. P. And Simon, F.J. (2006). The Effect of Knowledge Management Practices on Firm Performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3), pp. 143-156.
38.Narin, F.; Noma, E.; Perry, R., (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy. pp.143-155.
39.Nkomo, S.N. (1987). Human resource planning and organization performance : An exploratory analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 8 July/Aug, pp.387-392
40.Nonoka, I. and K. Hirotaka(1995). The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for knowledge Creation. 40(3), pp.40-55.
41.Oakley, R. P., (1993). Predatory networking: the role of small firms
42.Penrose, Edith T., (1959). The Theory of the Growth of firm. John Wiley, New York.
43.Peteraf, M. A., (1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), pp.179-191.
44.Peteraf, M. A.,(1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), pp.179-191.
45.Pitt, M, and K. Clarke(1999). Competing on Competence: A Knowledge Perspective on the Management of Strategic Innovation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11(3), pp.301-316.
46.Porter, M. E.(1990).The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York, The Free Press, 1990.
47.Prahalad, C.K. and G. Hamel (1990. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, pp.79-91.
48.Puntam, J., (1996). The Value of International Patent Rights. Yale University, New Haven.
49.Reed, R., & Defillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15, pp.88-102.
50.Robbins & Coulter (2002). Management. Prenhall. New Jersey, USA.
51.Robbins, S.P.(1996). Organizational Behavior.7th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
52.Robert, E. B. & Mizouchi, R., (1989). Inter-firm technological collaboration: the case of Japanese biotechnology. International Journal of Technology Management, 4(1), pp.43-61.
53.Schankerman, M., Pakes, A., (1986). Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. The Economic Journal, 96:pp.1052-1076
54.Scherer, F. M., (1965). Corporate inventive output, profits and growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 73(3), pp.290-297
55.Schmoch, U., (1995). Evaluation of technology strategies of companies by means of MDS maps. International Journal of Technology Management,10, pp.426-427
56.Shane, H., (1993). Patent citations as an indicator of the value of intangible assets in the semiconductor industry. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
57.Spalding, B. J., (1986). How biotechnology is farming as a industry. Chemical Week, 139(23), pp.9-13.
58.Steers R.M., (1975). Problems in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, pp. 546-557.
59.Subbanarasimha P. N., S. Ahmad and S.N. Mallya(2003). Technological Knowledge and Firm Performance of Pharmaceutical Firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(1), pp.20-33
60.Szilagyi A.D. M.J. Wallace(1983). Organizational behavior and performance. (3rded), U.S.A. : Scott, Forman and Company.
61.Thomas, P. and G. S. McMillan(2001). Using Science and Technology Indicators to Manage R&D As a Business. Engineering Management Journal, 13(3), pp.9-14.
62.Tippins, M. J. and Sohi, R. S. (2003). IT Competency and Firm Performance: Is Organizational Learning a Missing Link. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), pp.745-761.
63.Trajtenberg, M., (1989). The welfare analysis of product innovations, with an application to computed tomography scanners. Journal of Political Economy, 97(2), pp.445-479.
64.Venkartraman, N. & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measure of business performance in strategy research : A comparision of approach. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), pp.801-814
65.Walsh, S. and D. Linton(2002). The Measurement of Technical Competences. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13, pp.63-86
66.Wernerfelt Birger, (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Managament Journal, 5, pp.171-180.
67.Winter, (1988). On Coase, Competence, and Corporation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4, pp.163-180.