臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

Simon Effect為刺激的空間屬性與反應的空間屬性，兩者的一致性所造成，如刺激呈現在左側，用左手反應會比右手快，相對亦然。SNARC為數字隱含的空間屬性與反應的空間屬性連結所造成，如小數(1，2)用左手反應會比用右手快，或大數(8，9)用右手反應會比左手快。兩者都跟空間表徵有關係。Notebaert(2006)使用雙路徑模型研究外在空間位置引發的Simon Effect與SNARC兩現象，進而支持兩者屬於共享空間表徵。本研究改成以「文字」引發的Simon Effect，研究與SNARC的關係。實驗一驗證可以藉由操弄數字大小(大於5，小於5)與反應位置(左側，右側)的連結，改變SNARC的方向性。實驗二操弄文字(左，右)引發的Simon Effect方向(左側，右側)，雖然對SNARC的方向無顯著影響，但卻使SNARC效果消失。如果兩者共享空間表徵，那SNARC的方向也會影響Simon Effect，因此實驗三操弄SNARC的方向，結果對Simon Effect無顯著影響。因此，本研究得到的結果是「文字」與數字的空間表徵並不共享，處理歷程互為獨立。

Simon Effect is when you present spatial sign toward left, then left hand or foot response will faster than use right hand or foot. This is a kind of stimulus and response spatial correspondence or consistent effect. Also SNARC (Spatial Numerical Association of Response Code) effect means use left hand to response to small number (eg. 1, 2) is faster than use right hand. And right hand is faster on larger number (eg. 8, 9) response. Notebaert (2006) use double path model to explain both Simon Effect and SNARC effect, and they all relate with the spatial mapping and sharing the overlapping spatial representation. Our studies want to know the relationship between Simon Effect and SNARC effect through the Chinese spatial word (left / right) mediation. In experiment one, we make new rule to let subject practice if number is bigger than 5, then press left key. The result is we can reverse the direction of SNARC effect. In experiment two we present the Chinese word of spatial naming (eg. left, right) and successfully induced the Simon Effect. But it was not influence the SNARC effect. In experiment three we manipulate the spatial line direction of SNARC effect, to see if it will influence the Chinese spatial word Simon Effect. And the result is no influence. And we explain the results support that Chinese spatial word and spatial mental numeric line might be independent and parallel, and not share the same mental spatial representation.

序論 1
The Simon Effect 1
古典的Simon作業 1
Simon Effect的彈性 1
刺激物屬性 2
生理機制 4
時間因素對Simon Effect的影響 5
短期記憶的影響 6
受動器 7
文字的歷程 8
SNARC Effect 9
古典的SNARC作業 9
影響SNARC的因素 10
Simon Effect 與SNARC 11
Dual task與雙路徑模型 14
本研究目的 17
實驗一 20
實驗方法 21
受試者 21
實驗環境與材料 21
實驗程序 22
實驗結果 24
相關作業 24
無相關作業 25
實驗二 27
實驗方法 28
受試者 28
實驗環境與材料 28
實驗程序 28
實驗結果 31
相關作業 31
無相關作業 31
實驗三 33
實驗方法 33
受試者 33
實驗環境與材料 33
實驗程序 34
實驗結果 36
相關作業 36
無相關作業 36
綜合討論 38
參考文獻 41

Ansorge, U. (2003). Spatial Simon effects and compatibility effects induced by observed gaze direction. Visual Cognition, 10(3), 363-383.
Ansorge, U., & Wuhr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30(2), 365-377.
Bae, G. Y., Choi, J. M., Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC Effect for parity Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35(6), 1506-1521.
Baron-Cohen, S., & Cross, P. (1992). Reading the eyes: Evidence for the role of perception in the development of a theory of mind. Mind & Language, 7(1-2), 172-186.
Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., & Ward, R. (2001). Environmentally defined frames of reference: Their time course and sensitivity to spatial cues and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 494-503.
De Houwer, J. (2004). Spatial Simon effects with nonspatial responses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 49-53.
De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20(4), 731-750.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371-396.
Farroni, T., Johnson, M. H., & Csibra, G. (2004). Mechanisms of eye gaze perception during infancy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(8), 1320-1326.
Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2(1), 95-110.
Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12(3), 415-423.
Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44(4), 386-392.
Gevers, W., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2005). Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 659-673.
Gevers, W., Ratinckx, E., De Baene, W., & Fias, W. (2006). Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Experimental Psychology, 53(1), 58-68.
Gibson, B. S., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Visual Attention and the Semantics of Space: Beyond Central and Peripheral Cues. Psychological Science, 17(7), 622-627.
Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39(6), 427-439.
Hiroaki, M., Noriyoshi, T., & Katuo, Y. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm: Errata. Psychophysiology, 39(5), 684.
Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56(4), 261-268.
Hung, Y.-h., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J., & Wu, D. H. (2008). Flexible spatial mapping of different notations of numbers in Chinese readers. Cognition, 106(3), 1441-1450.
Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory and Cognition, 32, 662-673.
Klapp, S. T., Greim, D. M., Mendicino, C. M., & Koenig, S. (1979). Anatomic and environmental dimensions of stimulus-response compatibility: Implication for theories of memory coding. Acta Psychologica, 43(5), 367-379.
Lammertyn, J., Fias, W., & Lauwereyns, J. (2002). Semantic influences on feature-based attention due to overlap of neural circuits. Cortex, 38(5), 878-882.
Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16(1), 149-157.
Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 174-207.
Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). Shared spatial representations for numbers and space: the reversal of the SNARC and the Simon Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32(5), 1197-1207.
Pellicano, A., Lugli, L., Baroni, G., & Nicoletti, R. (2009). The Simon effect with conventional signals: A Time-Course analysis. Experimental Psychology, 56(4), 219-227.
Proctor, R. W., & Lu, C.-H. (1999). Processing irrelevant location information: Practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks. Memory & Cognition, 27(1), 63-77.
Proctor, R. W., Marble, J. G., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2000). Mixing incompatibly mapped location-relevant trials with location-irrelevant trials: Effects of stimulus mode on the reverse Simon effect. Psychological Research, 64, 11-24.
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 446-461.
Ricciardelli, P., Bonfiglioli, C., Iani, C., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2007). Spatial Coding and Central Patterns: Is There Something Special About the Eyes? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(2), 79-90.
Rubichi, S., & Pellicano, A. (2004). Does the Simon effect affect movement execution? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(6), 825-840.
Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers--A cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition, 108(2), 590-599.
Simon, J. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 174-176.
Simon, J. R. (1990). The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional Cue on Human Information Processing. Oxford, England: North-Holland.
Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umilta, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The Role of Long-Term-Memory and Short-Term-Memory Links in the Simon Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26(2), 648-670.
Valle-Inclan, F., & Redondo, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35(4), 366-371.
Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27(3), 731-751.
Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of Stimulus-Response correspondence: Evidence for two Mechanisms involved in the Simon Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31(3), 453-464.
Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2006). Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: A failure to replicate Denhaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993). Cortex, 42(8), 1060-1079.
Zorzi, M., Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., & Umilta, C. (2003). Automatic spatial coding of perceived gaze direction is revealed by the Simon effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(2), 423-429.
Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umilta, C. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417(6885), 138-139.