以往有關自我評價或自尊的研究中，大多是由「價性」的角度，來瞭解個體在自我評價好壞上的個別差異，並發現個體在此方面的個別差異可以預測許多重要心理特質、行為及生活適應變項。在此研究基礎下，本研究主要有以下兩個研究目的：首先，由自我評價波動歷程的角度，將個體在有關自我評價方面的個別差異變項區分為價性、正向評價敏感性、負向評價敏感性、正向評價回復性與負向評價回復性等五個向度，並依據五個向度的相關情形提出「自我評價歷程五向度模式」。其次，瞭解自我評價歷程的五個向度對於幸福感的預測效果。本研究使用的工具包含自編的「自我評價歷程五向度量表」與「幸福感量表」，預試與正式研究對象分別為139和489位國中生，資料則先透過LISREL程式進行結構方程模式分析，檢驗「自我評價歷程五向度模式」相關概念，再透過多元迴歸分析瞭解自我評價歷程五個向度對於整體與分向度幸福感的預測效果。結果發現：
一、「自我評價歷程五向度模式」的檢驗結果
自我評價歷程五向度是彼此有所區別的概念，且「自我評價歷程五向度模式」具有理想的整體適配度與內在品質，大致獲得觀察資料的支持。
二、自我評價歷程五向度對整體幸福感與分向度幸福感（生活滿意度、身心健康、整體情緒、正向情緒、負向情緒）的預測效果
（一）自我評價價性對於整體幸福感，及生活滿意度、身心健康、整體情緒、正向情緒等分向度幸福感皆有正向預測效果，對於負向情緒則有負向預測效果，且預測力皆高於其他四個自我評價歷程向度。
（二）正向評價敏感性對於正向情緒有正向的預測效果，對於整體情緒與生活滿意度則有臨界的正向預測效果。
（三）負向評價敏感性對於負向情緒有正向的預測效果，對整體情緒則有臨界的負向預測效果。
（四）正向評價回復性對於生活滿意度有正向的預測效果。
（五）負向評價回復性對於整體幸福感、生活滿意度、整體情緒、正向情緒有正向的預測效果，對於身心健康有臨界的正向預測效果，對於負向情緒有負向的預測效果。
最後，本研究根據研究結果在理論與實務上的涵義進行討論，並提出結果應用及未來研究的建議。

In the studies of self-evaluation or self-esteem, it almost focused on the valence dimension to realize individual differences in self-evaluation, and found the valence dimension could predict many important variables of psychological traits, behaviors, and life adaptation. On the basis of these studies, the purposes of this study were: First, to propose the Five Dimensions Model of Self-evaluation Process (FDMSP) which distinguish the self-evaluation into five dimensions of valence, sensibility of positive evaluation, sensibility of negative evaluation, restitution of positive evaluation, and restitution of negative evaluation from the viewpoint of fluctuating process of self-evaluation and delineate the relationships among the five dimensions. Second, to realize the predicted effects of the five dimensions on well-being. The instruments applied were the Five Dimensions of Self-evaluation Scale, and the Well-being Scale. The subjects for pretest and formal research were 139 and 489 junior high school students respectively. Structural Equation Model (SEM) were employed to test the model and multiple regression analysis were employed to realize the predicted effects of the five dimensions on well-being. The conclusions were as follows: 1. The FDMSP fitted the observed data well and the results from the discriminant validity analysis showed that the five dimensions are distinctive components. 2. The results of the predicted effects of the five dimensions on the overall or specific well-being (life satisfaction, psycho-physical health, entire emotion, positive emotion, and negative emotion) were: (1) The valence dimension was a better predictor than the other four dimensions which positively predicted the overall well-being, life satisfaction, psycho-physical health, entire emotion, positive emotion and negatively predicted negative emotion. (2) The sensibility of positive evaluation dimension positively predicted the positive emotion and the positive predictions for entire emotion and life satisfaction are marginal. (3)The prediction of sensibility of negative evaluation for negative emotion is positive, and the negative prediction for entire emotion is marginal. (4)The restitution of positive evaluation dimension positively predicted the life satisfaction. (5)The predictions of restitution of negative evaluation for overall well-belling, life satisfaction entire emotion, positive emotion are positive, and the positive prediction for psycho-physical health is marginal. However, the prediction for negative emotion is negative. Finally, possible implications for educators and suggestions for future research are discussed by the researcher.

緒論………………………………………………………………………… 1
自我評價的價性（valence）與分類方式………………………………………… 2
自我評價價性的定義………………………………………………………… 2
自我評價的分類與值得延伸之處 ………………………………………… 4
自我評價敏感性…………………………………………………………………… 5
自我評價敏感性的定義……………………………………………………… 5
「正向評價敏感性」與「負向評價敏感性」………………………………… 7
「正向評價敏感性」與「負向評價敏感性」之相關………………………… 8
自我評價敏感性的測量來源………………………………………………… 9
自我評價回復性 ………………………………………………………………… 10
自我評價回復性的定義……………………………………………………… 10
「正向評價回復性」與「負向評價回復性」………………………………… 12
「正向評價回復性」與「負向評價回復性」之相關………………………… 14
自我評價回復性的測量來源………………………………………………… 15
五向度之間的關聯性……………………………………………………………… 16
自我評價價性與自我評價敏感性的相關…………………………………… 16
自我評價價性與自我評價回復性的相關…………………………………… 17
自我評價敏感性與自我評價回復性的相關………………………………… 19
自我評價歷程五向度模式……………………………………………………… 22
自我評價歷程五向度對幸福感的預測效果…………………………………… 23
幸福感的定義與本研究分類………………………………………………… 23
自我評價歷程五向度對幸福感的預測效果………………………………… 25
小結…………………………………………………………………………… 29
文獻總結………………………………………………………………………… 29
研究方法…………………………………………………………………………… 31
研究架構………………………………………………………………………… 31
自我評價歷程五向度模式…………………………………………………… 31
自我評價歷程五向度對幸福感的預測……………………………………… 33
研究對象……………………………………………………………………… 35


研究工具………………………………………………………………………… 36
自我評價歷程五向度模式量表……………………………………………… 36
幸福感量表…………………………………………………………………… 45
研究結果…………………………………………………………………………… 49
「自我評價歷程五向度模式」之驗證性因素分析……………………………… 49
自我評價歷程五向度對幸福感的預測效果……………………………………… 54
研究討論…………………………………………………………………………… 67
研究結果與意涵…………………………………………………………………… 67
自我評價歷程可以區分成五個有所區別的向度……………………… 67
自我評價歷程五個向度的相關情形………………………………………… 68
自我評價歷程五向度對幸福感的預測效果………………………………… 72
研究特色與貢獻……………………………………………………………… 72
研究結論…………………………………………………………………………… 75
自我評價歷程五向度模式獲得支持……………………………………………… 76
自我評價歷程的五個向度對幸福感有一定的預測效果………………………… 76
研究建議……………………………………………………………………………… 77
研究結果應用的建議……………………………………………………………… 77
未來研究的建議…………………………………………………………………… 77
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………… 79
附錄一：自我評價歷程五向度量表之題目、題數與向度對照表…………………… 84
附錄二：幸福感預試量表之題目、題數與向度對照表……………………………… 87
附錄三：預試量表…………………………………………………………………… 88
附錄四：正式量表………………………………………………………………… 93

毛國楠、劉政宏、彭淑玲、李維光與陳慧娟（2008）。能力信念、學業自我價值後效與學業成就對國小學生學習動機與學習情緒之影響。教育心理學報，39(4)，569-588。
吳相儀、林耀南、陳學志、邱發忠與徐芝君（2008）樂觀就不悲觀嗎？樂觀與悲觀的雙向度理論驗證及量表的發展。測驗學刊，55(3)，559-589。
林文聰（2003）。國中學生之家庭功能、學校適應與幸福感之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所博士論文。彰化，未出版。
林杏足（2003）。青少年自尊量表編製報告。測驗年刊，50(2)，223-256。
施建彬（1995）。幸福感來源與相關因素之探討。高雄醫學院行為科學研究所碩士論文。高雄，未出版。
徐嫚淳（2006）。國中生生活壓力、自尊與其幸福感之相關研究:以復原力的觀點探討。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學研究所碩士論文。彰化，未出版。
陳密桃、陳玲婉（2006）。國小學童母親的人格特質與親職壓力、幸福感之相關研究。高雄師大學報，20，1-20。
張菁文（2006）。高雄縣某國中學生休閒滿意度、情緒調整與幸福感之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育學研究所碩士論文。台北，未出版。
程炳林、林清山（2002）。學習歷程前決策與後決策階段中行動控制的中介角色。教育心理學報，34（1），43-60。
黃芳銘（2009）。結構方程式－理論與應用。台北：五南。
黃淑芬（1998）。國小兒童自尊發展之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。台南，未出版。
楊中芳等譯（1997）。性格與社會心理測量總覽（上冊）：信念、態度及特質篇。台北，遠流。
楊國樞（2004）。「華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究：社會取向與個人取向的觀點」。本土心理學研究，22，11-80。
簡晉龍（2003）。自我建構與主觀幸福感：自尊與相融和諧的角色。國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文。台北，未出版。
蕭瑞玲（2002）。國小學童情緒調整及相關因素之研究。國立屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。屏東，未出版。
Andrews, F. A., Withey, S.B.(1976), Social Indicators of Well-being in America: The Development and Measurement of Perceptual Indicators, New York: Plenum Press.
Aronson, J., Blanton, H., & Cooper, J. (1995). From dissonance to disidentification: Selectivity in the self-affirmation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 986-996.
Beevers, C. G.(2005). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: A dual process model. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(7), 975-1002.
Bradburn, N. M., & Caplovitz, D. (1965). Reports on happiness: A pilot study of behavior related to mental health. Chicago: Aldine.
Branden, N. (1990). What is self-esteem? (Ed 325783)
Brown, J. D., & McGill, K. L. (1989.) The cost of good fortune: When positive life events produce negative health consequences. Journal of Personality and Socia Psychology, 57, 1103-1110.
Butler, A. C., Hokanson, J. E., & Flynn, H. A. (1994). A comparison of selfesteem lability and low trait self-esteem as vulnerability factors for depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 166-177.
Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 31, 117-124.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Coopersmith, S. (1981). SEI: Self-esteem Inventories. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108, 593-623.
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Cooper, M.L., &Bouvrette, S.A. (2003). Contingencies of self-contingencies of self-worth in college students: Measurement and theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 894-908.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
Dodgson, P. G., & Wood, J. V.(1998). Self-esteem and the cognitive accessibility of strengths and weaknesses after failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 178-197.
Duval, S., & Wicklund, R.A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press
Greenier, K. D., Kernis, M. H., & Waschull, S. B. (1995). Not all high (or low) self-esteem people are the same: Theory and research on stability of self-esteem. In Kernis, M. H. (Ed.) (1995). Efficacy, agency, and self -esteem, (pp. 51-71). New York: Plenum.
Greenier, K. D., Kernis, M. H., McNamara, C. W., Waschull, S. B. Berry, A. J. Herlocker, C. E. & Abend, T. A. (1999). Individual differences in reactivity to daily events: Examining the roles of stability and level of self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 67, 185-208.
Grob, A. (1995). Berne questionnaire of subjective well-being (Youth form). University Berne, Bern.
Grolnick, W. S., Weiss, L., McKenzie, L. & Wrightmen, J. (1996). Contextual, cognitive and adolescent factors associated with parenting in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 33-54.
Guindon, M. H. (2002). Toward accountability in the use of the self-esteem constrct. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80(2), 204-214.
Hair, J., Jr., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. 1998. Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hatrer, S. (1983). Developmental perspectives on the self-system. In Paul H. Mussen (ED.), Handbook of child psychology (pp.275-468). N. Y. : John Wiley & Sons.
Hoyle, R. H., Kernis, M. H., Leary, M. R., & Baldwin, M. W. (1999). Selfhood: Identity, esteem, regulation. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 and PRELIS 2: Comprehensive analysis of linear relationships in multivariate data. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2002). Stability and variability in self-concept and self-esteem. In M. Leary & J. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity: Guilford Press.
Kernis, M. H., & Paradise, A. W. (2002). Distinguishing between fragile and secure forms of high self-esteem. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Self-determination: Theoretical issues and practical applications. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Linville, P. W. (1985). Self-complexity and affective extremity: Don’t put all your eggs in one cognitive basket. Social Cognition, 3, 94-120.
Masten, A. S., & Reed, M-G. J. (2005). Resilience in development. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 74-88). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mruk, C. (1999). Self-esteem: Research, theory, and practice. New York: Springer.
Norem-Hebeisen, A. A. (1976). A multidimensional construct of self-esteem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 559-565.
Pope, A. W., McHale, S. M., & Craighead, W. E. (1988). Self-esteem enhancement with children and adolescents. New York: Pergamon Press.
Rosenberg, M (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Priceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York : Basic Books.
Shrauger, J. S., and Rosenberg, S. E. (1970), Self-esteem and the effects of success and failure feedback on performance, Journal of Personality, 38, 404-417.
Steel, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (ED.), Advances in experimental psychology, 21, 261-302). New York: Academic Press.
Steele, C., M, Spencer, S. J, & Lynch, M. (1993). Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 885-896.
Swann, W. B., Jr. (1983) Self-varification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In J.suls & A. G. Greenwald(Eds.), Social psychology personality (Vol. 2, pp. 33-66). Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
Tafarodi, R. W., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (1995). Self-liking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: initial validation of a measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65(2), 322-342.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
Taylor, S. E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). Effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 213-226.
Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait? Test of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier. Social Indicators Research, 32, 101-160.
Wells ,L. E., & Marwell, G. (1976). Self-esteem: Its conceptualization and measurement. CA: Sage Publication.
Wood, J. V., Heimpel, S. A., & Michela, J. L. (2003). Savoring versus dampening: Self-esteem differences in regulating positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 566-580.