( 您好!臺灣時間:2021/08/06 02:03
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::


研究生(外文):Lin-Yu Wu
論文名稱(外文):An antecedent study on microblogging use
指導教授(外文):Ying-Jiun Hsieh
外文關鍵詞:microblogginguses and gratificationsflowpathological Internet use (PIU)
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:214
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究套用Uses and gratifications(使用與滿足)理論,此理論是用於探討人們如何使用媒介,及使用媒介的動機以滿足其心理和社會需求。本研究引用Stafford &; Stafford (2004)所提出的內容滿足(content)、流程滿足(process)、社會滿足(social)動機。並套用心流(flow)理論來說明當人們完全沉迷在一項活動時所產生的心理狀態,本研究並藉由心流理論將使用者分類之。

The microblogging sites provide a light-weight, easy type of communication that empowers users to share information about their activities and opinions. Twitter has been around since 2006, which is the first microblogging site lets you broadcast 140-character (English) messages to anyone who choose to become your follower. Some social network websites such as Facebook also have their own microblogging feature.

Uses and gratifications (U&G) is a media use theory to understand consumer motivations for media use, such as Internet. For understanding the reasons why people use microblogging to share their thinking, the study chooses U&G theory. On the other hand, when people in the flow state, not related thoughts are filtered out and the customer focuses on the interaction. Therefore, the study wants to know whether using microblogging will create flow state or not.

Therefore, the objective of the study is to investigate the intentions to use microblogging though the uses and gratifications theory (U&G) and flow. We separated users into two groups: hedonic users and utilitarian users. Finally, we will research what reason will cause pathological microblogging use (PMBU).

Table of Contents iii
Lists of Tables iv
Lists of Figures iv
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Background and Theory Development 5
2.1. Uses and Gratifications 5
2.2. The Concept of Flow 8
2.3. Intentions to Use Microblogging 14
2.4. Pathological Microblogging Use 16
Chapter 3 Methodology 20
3.1. Instrument Design 20
3.2. Data Collection and Sample 23
Chapter 4 Analysis and Result 26
4.1. Descriptive Statistics 26
4.2. Measurement Model 26
4.3. The Structural Model 31
4.4. Mediation Effects 34
Chapter 5 Discussions and Conclusions 36
5.1. Conclusion 36
5.2. Limitations and Future Research 38
References 40
Appendix 46
Table 3-1 Demographic profile 25
Table 4-1 Descriptive statistics 26
Table 4-2 Reliability 28
Table 4-3 Squared Correlations between Constructs versus Variances Extracted 30
Table 4-4 Overall fits of models 31
Figure 2-1 Hypothesized model 19
Figure 4-1 Results of structural modeling analysis. 31

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach.” Psychological Bulletin 103:411-423
Babin BJ, Attaway JS. 1995. “Atmospheric affect as a tool for creating value and gaining share of customer.” Journal of Business Research 49(2):91-9.
Babin BJ, Darden WR, Griffin M. 1994. “Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value.” Journal of Consumer Research 20(4):644-56.
Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G.. 1989. “Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.” Psychological Bulletin 88:588-606.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D.A. 1986. “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social pathological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:1173-1182.
Betra, Rajeev and Olli T. Ahtola 1991 “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Source of Consumer Attitudes.” Marketing Letters 2:159-170
Bloch and Marsha L. Richins. 1983. “A Theoretical Model for the Study of Product Importance Perceptions” Journal of Marketing 47:69-81
Bridges E, Florsheim R. 2007. “Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: The online experience.” Journal of Business Research 61:309-314.
Byrne BM. 1998. “Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications and programming.” Mahwah NJ: L. Erlbaum associates.
Chen Q, Wells WD. 1999. “Attitude toward the site.” J Advert Res 39(5):27-37.
Claudia W, Enrico M. 2009 “Data republishing on the social semantic web.” Joanneum Research
Csikszentmihalyi M. 1997. “Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention.” New York: Harper Collins.
Cutler, N. E., & Danowski, J. A. 1980. “Process gratification in aging cohorts.” Journalism Quarterly 57:269-277
Davis, R. A. 1999. “Internet addiction: is it real?” Catalyst. Available at: http://www.victoriapoint.com/internetaddiction.htm.
Davis RA. 2001. “Cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use.” Computer Human Behavior 17(2):187-95.
Ducoffe RH. 1996. “Advertising value and advertising on the web.” Journal of Advertising Research 36(5):21-35.
Ferguson, D. A., & Perse, M. E. 2000. “The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44(2): 155-174
Fornell, C.R., & Larcker, D.F. 1981. “Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18:39-50
Ghani JA, Desphande SP. 1994. “Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction” Journal of Psychological Research 128(4): 381-91
Hausman AV, Siekpe JS. 2009 “The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions.” Journal of Business Research 62:5-13.
Hoffman DL, Novak TP. 1996. “Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations.” Journal of Marketing 60(3):50-68.
Holmbeck, G. N. 1997. “Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures.” Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology 65:599-610.
Holbrook, Morris B. & Elizabeth C. Hirschman 1982. “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun.” Journal of Consumer Research 9:132-140
Hsu CL, Lin CC. 2008. “Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation.” Information & Management 45:65-74.
Hsu C.L., Lu H.P. 2004. “Why do people play online games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience Information & Management” 41(7):853-868
Java A., Song X., Finin T., & Tseng B. 2007. “Why we Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities.”
Katz E, Gurevitch M, Haas H. 1973. “On the use of the mass media for important things.” American Sociological Review 38:164-81.
Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. 2001. “A Web for all reasons: The uses and gratifications of Internet resources for political information.” Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington DC.
Kargaonkar, K. Pradeep, & Lori Wolin, D. 1999. “A multivariate analysis of web usage.” Journal of Advertising 53-68
Ko HJ, Cho CH, Robert MS. 2005. “Internet uses and gratifications: a structural equation model of interactive advertising.” Computers in Human Behavior 34(2):57-70.
Korgaonkar, P. K., & Wolin, L. D. 1999. “A multivariate analysis of Web usage.” Journal of Advertising Research 38(2):53-68.
Koufaris M. 2002. “Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior.” Information Systems Research 13(2):205-224
Liebowitz S. 2002. “Re-thinking the network economy: the true forces that drive the digital marketplaces.” New York, NY: AMACOM.
Likert R. 1932. “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes.” Archives of Psychology 140:1-55.
Lin, Carolyn A. 1996. “Looking back: The Contribution of Blumler and Katz’s Uses of Mass Communication Research.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 40:574-582
Lin, C. 1999. “Online service adoption likelihood.” Journal of Advertising Research 39:79-89
Mannell RC, Jiri Z. 1988. “Leisure states and ‘Flow'' experiences: testing perceived freedom and intrinsic motivation hypotheses.” J Leis Res 20(4):289-304
Maxham Ⅲ, J. G. & Netemeyer, R. G. 2002. “Modeling customer perceptions of complaint handling over time: the effects of perceived justice on satisfaction and intent.” Journal of Retailing 78:239-252
McLeod, J. M., & Becker, L. B. 1981. “The uses and gratifications approach.” Handbook of political communication 67-99
Morahan-Martin J, Schumacher P. 2000. “Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students.” Computers in Human Behavior 16(1):13-29.
Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Yung YF. 2000. “Measuring the customer experience in online environments: a structural modeling approach.” Marketing Science 19(1):22-42.
Nunnally, J.C. 1967. “Psychometric Theory.” New York: McGraw-Hill
Nysveen H, Pedersen P. E., Thorbjornsen H. 2005. “Intentions to use mobile services: Antecedents and cross0service comparisons.” Academy of Marketing Science 33(3):330-346.
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, M. A. 2000. “Predictors of Internet use.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44(2):175-196
Peters Cara. Amato, C. H. & Hollenbeck C.R. 2007. “ An exploratory investigation of consumers’ perceptions of wireless advertising.” Journal of Advertising 36(4):129-145
Pratarelli, M., Browne, B., & Johnson, K. 1999. “The bits and bytes of computer/Internet addiction: a factor analytic approach.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 54(9):781-782
Rubin, A. M. 1994. “An examination of television viewing motives.” Journal of Communication 8(3):141-165
Ruggiero, T. E. 2000. “uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century.” Mass Communication and Society 3(1):3-37
Sanjit K. R. 2009. “Internet uses and gratifications: A survey in the Indian context.” Computers in Human Behavior 25:878-886.
Segars, A.H. & Grover, V. 1993. “Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis.” MIS Quarterly 17:517-525
Severin, W. J., & Taknard, W. J. 1997. “Communication theories origins, methods, and uses in the mass media (4th ed.)” White Plains, NY: Longman
Snider, J. G., and Osgood, C. E. 1969. “Semantic Differential Technique: A Sourcebook.” Chicago: Aldine.
Smith DN, Sivakumar K. 2004. “Flow and internet shopping behavior: a conceptual model and research proposition.” Journal of Business Research 57:1199-208.
Stafford, F. T. 2008. “Social and Usage-Process Motivations for Consumer Internet Access.” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 20(3):1-21
Stafford, F. T., Stfford, R. M., & Schkade, L. L. 2004. “Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet.” Decision Sciences 35(2):259-288.
Trevino, Linda Klebe, Jane Webster. 1992. “Flow in computer-mediated communication.” Communication Research. 19(5):539-573
Webster, J., L. K. Trevino, and L. Ryan 1993. “The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human Computer Interactions” Computers in Human Behavior 9(4):411-426
Wolfinbarger M, Gilly MC. 2001. “Shopping online for freedom, control and fun.” Calf Manage Rev 43(2):34-55.
Young, K. 1997. “What makes online usage simulating: potential explanations for pathological Internet use.” Annual Conversation of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL
Young, K. 2004. “Internet addiction: a new clinical phenomenon and its consequences.” American Behavior Science 48(4):402-15.

第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 33. 陳毓文,以社會工作的角度來看少年犯罪之預防與處遇,月旦法學雜誌,74期,2001年7月。
2. 35. 彭南元,美國少年法庭之百年回顧與前瞻,法學叢刊,171期,87年7月。
3. 41. 黎文德,少年保護事件之協商審理與處遇,月旦法學雜誌,74期,2001年7月。
4. 32. 陳祖輝,少年司法新典範的轉移:論復歸式正義觀點的轉向制度,社區發展季刊, 110 期,94年6月。
5. 43. 賴碧怡,『安置輔導』的定位對犯罪少年自主權益與重返家庭的影響,兒童及少年福利期刊,14期,2008年12月。
6. 39. 雷文玫,國家、父母與兒童少年權益間的拉鋸-兒童及少年福利法修法評析,月旦法學雜誌,102期,2003年11月。
7. 31. 陳孟瑩,青少年違法事件之處理與保護輔導-上,司法周刊,49期,民88.10.06。
8. 30. 郭靜晃,運用社工專業規範(SWIP)之社工處遇於犯罪少年安置輔導,社區發展季刊,120其,96年12月。
9. 38. 黃翰義,從日本少年法之理論與實務析論我國少年事件處理法關於少年保護事件之修正,法官協會雜誌,第9卷第2期,2007年12月。
10. 37. 黃俐婷,探討青少年接受到的社會支持,社區發展季刊,103期,92年9月。
11. 36. 曾華源,少年觀護工作的社會福利屬性與困境,犯罪與刑事司法研究,8期,2007年4月。
12. 45. 蘇益志,少年司法處遇場域中的臨床論述與實務呈現-以一妨害性自主少年個案為例,犯罪與刑事司法研究,10期,2008年4月。
13. 29. 郭靜晃、黃志成、劉秀娟、胡中宜,少年福利機構因應少年事件處理法轉向制度之策略初探,社區發展季刊,82期,87年6月。
14. 28. 郭豫珍,擺盪在少年司法與社會福利體系之間-警察在少年犯罪預防機制上功能定位的新思考,中央警察大學警學叢刊,94年5月。
15. 27. 高金桂,少年事件處理法相關問題之探討,月旦法學雜誌,40期,1998年9月。