跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(34.204.198.73) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/07/21 16:54
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:梁奕卿
研究生(外文):I-ChingLiang
論文名稱:LCD玻璃供應商之遴選
論文名稱(外文):Choice of Glass supplier for TFT-LCD
指導教授:康信鴻康信鴻引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsin-Hong Kang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:經營管理碩士學位學程
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:58
中文關鍵詞:玻璃供應商層級分析法TFT LCD供應鏈
外文關鍵詞:Glass VenderAnalytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)TFT LCDSupply Chain
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:205
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
在全球經濟環境逐步回溫及中國內需市場勁揚的帶動下,面板的需求從2009年第2季開始呈現噴出的走勢,激勵了面板價格的走揚,面板廠逐漸擺脫財務虧損的窘境。由於市場環境增添許多人為的變數,將使得全年的面板產業變動週期縮短,玻璃基板是TFT LCD面板最關鍵的零組件,尤其因為玻璃基板熔爐廠必須要持續產出才能合乎最大經濟效益,玻璃基板廠商對於擴產的態度均十分保守,也因此玻璃基板是TFT LCD關鍵零組件中,最容易出現短缺的零組件,故面板產業之玻璃供應鏈便成為本文發展重心。
本研究在評估TFT-LCD面板廠商對玻璃供應商的選擇,在研究中主要分為?個階段,第一階段針對專家訪談,藉由文獻探討並?考TFT-LCD玻璃產業特性準則?設計問卷,然後藉由專家之意??決定 AHP 層級的架構,藉由AHP法?衡?各因素構面的權重,以瞭解在選擇供應商時,應採取何種方案及策?。
本研究發現,在TFT-LCD玻璃產業中,「技術」因素和「成本」因素佔有權重的64.21%,以破五成之比?主宰著TFT-LCD 玻璃供應商與否雀屏中選之關鍵因素,藉由此研究可使面板廠商得以較專業而客觀的方式,選出適當的玻璃供應商。而尚未成為TFT-LCD 之玻璃供應商可以?考本研究得出各準則間之權重關係,擬定公司目標之優先順序,先期為成為TFT-LCD玻璃供應商做準備。

Since the Q2 of 2009, the requirement of panels of screen have been showed a bulge, so does the price by the global economic is as a boom and the requirement of interior of China. Many manufacturers of the screen of panel have gotten rid of deficit gradually. As the basics of raw glass panels are the major component of TFT/ LCD, the raw glass panels-melted manufacturers should keep the output to maintain the maximum of economic interest. Unfortunately, they had a faith in conservatism of extending. Being an important role of major component, the supply chain of basics of raw glass panels will be a hot issue of this study.
In order to evaluate how the TFT/ LCD panel manufacturers choose the Glass Vender---there are two sections in this study: One is that interviewing the experts and the other is that questionnaires were designed by bibliographies and the characteristic of TFT/ LCD glass industry. Establish the frame of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) by the suggestions of experts. Then use the AHP to analyze the influence of each factor. As the result comes out, we can understand that which “strategy and plan“ should be involved on the issue of choosing the vender.
Follow the findings of this study, the glass vender could be chosen (or not) by TFT/ LCD glass industry depends on the major factors of technique and prime cost (these two factors seize the majority of all---at the high rate 64.21%) Also, the panel manufacturers could use a professional and objective way to make the decision from cooperating with the glass vender. For those venders not being the cooperation relationship with TFT/ LCD glass industry can regard this study as a reference to emphasis the influence of the factor, and draft the prior goals then get ready to be a glass vender of supply chain for TFT/ LCD glass industry.

摘 要 I
Abstract II
誌 謝 III
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第四節 論文結構 5
第二章 文獻回顧與探討 6
第一節 供應鏈管理之相關文獻 6
第二節 供應商選擇評估之相關文獻 9
第三節 採購策略之相關文獻 12
第四節 文獻探討 14
第五節 本研究未來努力方向 16
第三章 TFT-LCD玻璃基板產業慨況 17
第一節 LCD玻璃基板產業概述與趨勢 17
第二節 LCD玻璃基板製程簡介 21
第三節 LCD玻璃基板的發展與挑戰 24
第四章 研究方法 26
第一節 層級分析法 27
第五章 實證結果與分析 31
第一節 問券設計 31
第二節 問卷施測及專家遴選 33
第三節 AHP權重求取 34
第六章 研究結論與建議 41
第一節 研究結論 43
第二節 作者本人實務心得 45
第三節 後續研究建議 45
第四節 本文貢獻 46

參考文獻 47
附錄 專家問卷 50
一、英文文獻
1. Ernst, R., Kamrad, B. and Ord, K., 2007, “Delivery Performance in Vendor
Selection Decisions, European Journal of Operational Research, 176, pp. 534-541.
2. Wisner, J. D., Leong, G. K. and Tan, K. C., 2005. Principles of Supply Chain Management: A Balanced Approach, Singapore: South Western, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
3. Wadhwa, V. and Ravindran, R., 2007, “Vendor Selection in Outsourcing,
Computes & Operations Research, 34, pp. 3725-3737.
4. Wu, Wann-Yih, Chwan-Yi Chiang, Ya-Jung Wu, and Hui-Ju Tu, 2004, “The
Influencing Factors of Commitments and Business Integration on Supply Chain
Management, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 104(4), pp. 322-323.
5. Dowlatshahi S., 2000, “Designer-buyer-supplier interface: Theory versus
practice,International journal of production economics, 63(2), pp. 111-130.
6. Li, G. D., Yamaguchi, D. and Nagai, M.,2007, “A Grey-Based Decision-Making
Approach to the Supplier Selection Problem, Mathematical and Computer
Modelling, 46, pp. 573-581.
7. Wynstra, F., Weele A.V., and Axelsson, B., 1999, “Purchasing Involvement in
Product Development : a framework, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply
Management, 5, pp. 129-141.
8. Krause, D. R., M. Pagell and S. Curkovic, 2001, “Toward a measure of
competitive priorities for purchasing, Journal of Operations Management, 19(4),
pp. 497-512.
9. Sucky, E., (2007), “A Model for Dynamic Strategic Vendor Selection, Computers & Operations Research, 34, pp. 3638-3651.
10. Matthyssens, P. and C.V. den Bulte, 1994, “Getting closer and nicer: Partnerships in the supply chain, Long Range Planning, 27(1), pp. 72-83.
11. Monczka, R. M., Petersen, K. J., Handfield, E. B. and Ragatz, G. L., 1998,
“Success Factors in Strategic Supplier Alliances: The Buying Company
Perspective,Decision Sciences, 29(3), pp. 553-577..
12. Degraeve, Z., E. Labro and F. Roodhooft, 2000, “An evaluation of vendor
selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective, European Journal
of Operational Research, 125(1), pp. 34-58.
13. Houshyar, A. and David, L., 1992 “A systematic Selection Procedure,
Computers and Industrial Engineering, 23(1), pp. 173-176.
14. Cebi, F., & Bayraktar, D. (2003). “An integrated approach for supplier selection.Logistic Information Management, 16(6), 395-400.
15. Degraeve, Z., E. Labro and F. Roodhooft, 2000, “An evaluation of vendor
selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective, European Journal
of Operational Research, 125(1), pp. 34-58.
16. Thomas, D.J. and P.M. Griffin, 1996, “Coordinated Supply Chain Management, European Journal of Operational Research, 94(1), pp. 1-15.
17. Kulak, O., & Kahraman, C. (2005). “Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among
transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process.
Information Sciences, 170(2-4), 191-210.
18. Berger, P. D., Gerstenfeld, A., & Zeng, A. Z. (2004). “How many suppliers are best?A decision-analysis approach. Omega, 32(1), 9-15.
19. Dulmin, R., & Mininno, V. (2003). “Supplier selection using a multi-criteria
decision aid method. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(4),
177-187.
二、中文文獻
1. 呂執中,(2007),「大眾電腦-協同設計與價值創新」,光華管理策進基金會, 頁1-17。
2. 林清河,(2006) ,「策略管理」,科學發展,399期,頁12-19。
3. 蘇雄義 (1999),「供應鏈整合-觀?性分析架構、整合程序、與個案」,國
際物?研討會?文集,頁 97-106。
4. 施坤壽(2003),「應用資訊系統整合全面品質管?與供應鏈管?建構企
業競爭優勢之結構化模式分析—台灣製造產業之驗證與比較」,管?評
?,22 卷,4 期,頁 1-33。
5. 譚伯群、?清河、施坤壽、張音 (2000),「網際網?應用(價值鏈觀點)
與經營策?及資訊 化成熟?之關係—台灣製造業的實證研究」,管?評
?,頁151-182。
6.畢威寧(2005),「結合AHP與TOPSIS法於供應商績效評估之研究」,科學與工程技術期刊,1卷,1期,頁75-83。
7. 張閔傑(2004),「市場特區-TFT-LCD產業報告」,光電科技/Optotech,76期。
8. 曾俊洲(2005) ,「大尺寸TFT-LCD面板業近期觀察」,台灣經濟發展研究院,產業報導。
9. 陳家?、許吉男、張厚? (1999),「台灣?售通?供應?管?應用特性與
展望」,國際物?研討會?文集,頁 144~151。
10. ?清河、周?星、譚伯群、施坤壽 (1998),「品質管?與組織氣候及績效
之關?性分析」,中山管?評?,6 卷,4 期,頁 1057-1080。
11.林冠州(2004),「TFT-LCD面板廠商對供應商選擇之研究」,國立成功大學工管所碩士論文,頁 20~34。
12. 郭俊麟 (2007),「應用層級分析法與德菲法探討背光源替代技術之選擇評估-以筆記型電腦背光模組為?」,國立成功大學企管所碩士論文,頁 80-83。

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top