跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(34.204.172.188) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/09/27 19:48
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張雅婷
研究生(外文):Ya-Ting Chang
論文名稱:探討文化創意產業網絡與群聚之研究-以布袋戲產業為主要範圍
論文名稱(外文):The research of cultural and creative industries’ network and cluster- focus on the Hand Puppet industry.
指導教授:黃勝雄黃勝雄引用關係
指導教授(外文):Sheng-Syong Huang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立屏東商業技術學院
系所名稱:休閒遊憩創意產業經營管理研究所
學門:民生學門
學類:觀光休閒學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:123
中文關鍵詞:布袋戲產業產業群聚文化創意產業產業網絡
外文關鍵詞:Cultural and creative industriesIndustrial networkHand Puppet industryIndustrial cluster
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:563
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:8
本研究主要探討國內文化創意產業中布袋戲產業的產業網絡模型建構及其形成要素、類型與特性,並暸解產業群聚空間之分布型態與群聚因素及類型。針對布袋戲產業之產業網絡與群聚現象,本研究分為兩個部份來進行,首先,在產業網絡的探討,為考量受訪對象選擇的明確性及資料取得方便性,本研究將參考文建會所列登記有案之布袋戲團,並從中選擇全台灣布袋戲產業中較具代表性之五家戲團做為研究對象,利用問卷發放及深度訪談為方法,描繪出研究對象之整體網絡關係圖,列出布袋戲產業其網絡形成要素、類型與特性,並了解布袋戲產業網絡內之產業彼此間達到互補與專業分工的特性、共享利益,且與其它的文化創意產業具關聯性。
在產業群聚方面,則依照資料收集與訪談內容,來探討產業及其相關產業在空間群聚特性、群聚因素及群聚位置等,包含該產業中代表的領導戲團,並作為量化研究的分析補述內容,列出布袋戲產業其形成要素與類型。經本研究所調查之布袋戲產業,其群聚以中南部的數量較多,主要是因為早期發展過程中,團體交流較為頻繁、傳徒者眾,名聲傳播較廣,故能匯集氣候,使得中南部的發展較北部地區密集,經由研究結果發現,台灣布袋戲產業的群聚若以縣市分別,則雲林縣居冠。其次,布袋戲產業的群聚型態多集中在都市地區,主要是因為同業及異業聚集便於創意及資訊交流與分工合作以提升服務品質、表演文化氛圍與藝文設施資源充裕、交通便利及人潮聚集,可加速產業的推動與發展及都市地區的文化活動及藝文設施豐富,因而選擇該區域內設置產業。
This research focused on the domestic cultural industries and creative industries in hand puppet construction and industrial network model of the formation of elements, types and characteristics, and understand the industrial clusters also the cluster spatial distribution pattern of the factors and types. This research carried out in two parts, first of all, in the industrial network , respondents choose to consider the clarity of the information obtained and convenience, this study will refer to CCA registered cases listed in the hand puppet troupe, and choose the more representative five troupes of the Taiwan hand puppet industry as research objects, using questionnaires and interviews as the method of payment, describe the overall subject of network diagram, listing the formation of its network elements, types and characteristics, and see how it shows up within hand puppet industrial network with each other industries to achieve complementarity and division of labor characteristics, shared interests, and with a correlation of other cultural and creative industries.
In the industry cluster is concerned, according to data collection and interviews, to explore the related industries in the space of cluster properties, clustering factor and cluster location, including representatives of the industry's leading troupes, also listed the content elements and types of hand puppet industry as a quantitative research complement and its formation. After the research, it shows the hand puppet industrial clusters to a large number in the central and southern, mainly because of its early development process, the group more frequent exchange, transfer a wider reputation spread, it can bring together into the climate and made the development of the south more than the north-intensive. It was found, In terms of Taiwan's counties and cities, the hand puppet industry cluster, respectively the Yunlin County is the top. Second, the hand puppet industry clustering patterns mostly concentrated in urban areas, mainly because the industry and different business ideas and information gathered can be conducive to the exchange and division of labor, to improve service quality, performance culture, arts and cultural facilities and resources together ample, easily accessible the crowds gathered, and in urban areas rich in cultural activities and arts facilities, which set the industry choice in the region can accelerate the promotion and development of industry.
摘要…………………………………………………………………I
Abstract……………………………………………………………II
誌謝…………………………………………………………………III
目錄…………………………………………………………………IV
表目錄………………………………………………………………V
圖目錄………………………………………………………………VI

第一章 緒論………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機與目的…………………………………………1
第二節 研究內容與範圍界定……………………………………5
第三節 研究方法與流程…………………………………………7
第二章 相關文獻回顧與評析……………………………………9
第一節 文化創意產業發展脈絡、定義與範疇…………………9
第二節 產業網絡的形成要素、類型與特性……………………29
第三節 產業群聚的定義、形成要素與類型……………………42
第三章 研究方法與研究架構設立………………………………49
第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………49
第二節 問卷設計…………………………………………………51
第三節 資料分析方法……………………………………………55
第四節 操作設計及執行過程……………………………………57
第四章 布袋戲產業網絡與群聚研究……………………………60
第一節 布袋戲產業互動概況與網絡分析………………………60
第二節 布袋戲產業群聚概況與因素……………………………79
第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………90
第一節 研究成果與發現…………………………………………90
第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向之建議………………………102
參考文獻………………………………………………………………104
附件一、布袋戲構成系統與主要零組件ㄧ覽表……………………112
附件二、布袋戲產業網絡問卷………………………………………116
附件三、訪談逐字稿…………………………………………………120
一、中文文獻
Porter, M. E. (1996),國家競爭優勢(上、下)(李明軒,邱如美譯),台北:天下遠見出版股份有限公司,(原文於1990年出版)。
王志卿(2001),台灣經濟的動力-中小企業的網絡化。頁313-355,收錄於張維安編,台灣的企業組織結構與競爭力,台北:聯經。
文化創意產業發展法(2010)。
台灣經濟研究院(2003),文化創意產業產值調查與推估研究報告,行政院文化建設委員會委託研究,台北。
行政院文化建設委員會(2003),文化創意產業手冊。
行政院文化建設委員會(2003),推動文化創意產業之系統服務規劃研究報告,研究報告,台北市。
沈明展、蔡佩純、邊泰明(2006) 創新系統下的產業網絡行為:以數位遊戲產業為例,科技管理學刊,11(3),p119-148。
吳思華(2000),策略九說-策略思考的本質(2版),台北:臉譜出版社
吳思華(2004),文化創意的產業化思維,。典藏今藝術,136 ,114-117。
邱程瑋(2001),台南科學園區周遭相關產業發展分析。《第五屆國土規劃論壇》國立成功大學。
周麗芳(2002),關係與人際網絡,台北:組織行為在台灣三十年回顧與展望學術研討會。
洪世章(2001),社會結構與國家競爭力-台灣個人電腦工業之價值鏈分析。頁93-188,收錄於張維安編,台灣的企業組織結構與競爭力,台北:聯經。
徐聯恩、樊學良、林建江(2007),產業群聚-文創產業的創新未來:韓國坡州出版城與Heyri藝術村的成功經驗,產業管理評論,1(2),p 29-38。
財團法人國家文化藝術基金會(2002),文化創意產業概況分析調查,行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究,台北。
許仲川(2001),從地方產業網絡觀點檢視高雄多功能經貿園區規劃與推動,國立中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士班碩士論文。
張建華、張淑靜 (2005),産業集群的識別標準、集聚度和績效評價研究,2005 年中國第五屆經濟學年會。
國立台北大學都市計畫研究所(2001),台北市公元2025年文化建設發展藍圖,台北市文化局委託研究,台北。
經濟部文化創意產業推動小組辦公室(2007),2006年台灣文化創意產業發展年報,研究報告,台北市:經濟部工業局。
劉大和(2003),華山藝文特區成為創意園區文化的思考,研究報告,台北市:行政院文化建設委員會。
蔡勇美、郭文雄(1987),都市社會學,巨流圖書公司。
蔡佩純(2003),區域創新系統下數位遊戲產業技術與知識網絡研究,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
潘美玲(2001),技術、社會網絡與全球商品鏈-台灣製造業部門間生產組織的差異。頁187-222,收錄於張維安編,台灣的企業組織結構與競爭力,台北:聯經。
鍾琴、李華夏、呂慧敏、吳明澤(1998)中小企業國際化:現況、問題與展望,經濟部中小企業處委託報告,中華經濟研究院。
羅家德(2001),人際關係連帶、信任與關係金融-以鑲嵌性觀點研究台灣民間借貸。頁223-262,收錄於張維安編,台灣的企業組織結構與競爭力,台北:聯經。
二、英文文獻
Alter, C., and J. Hage, Organizations Working Together, CA: Sage, 1993, Cohen, W. M., and D.A. Levinthal, Innovation and Learning:The Two Faces of R & D., Economic Journal, 99, 1989, pp 569-596.
Amin, A. and N. Thrift, 1992, Neo-Marshallian Nodes in Global Networks., International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16, pp.571-587.
Anderson, G., 1994, Industry Clustering for Economic Development., Economic Development Review12, no.2, pp.26-32.
Baptista, R. and Swann, P., 1998, Do Firms in Clusters Innovate More? Research Policy, Vol.27, No.5, pp.525-540.
Berry, B. J. L., 1963, Geography of Market Centers and Retail Distribution., Chapter 2, p.p.42-58 N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc..
Blau, P. M., 1964, Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Borgatti, S.P., 1998, What Is Social Network Analysis? http://www.analytictech.com/Networks/whatis.htm.
Brusco, S., 1982, The Emiliian Model: Productive Decentralization and Social Integration., Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6, pp.167-184.
Coase, R. H., 1937, “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, 4, pp.386-405.
Coleman, J., 1988, “Social Capital in Creation of Human Capital”, American journal of sociology, 94, pp.95-120.
Contractor, F. J., and P. Lorange., 1988, “Cooperative Strategies in International Business”, MA: Lexington.
Contractor, F. J., and P. Lorange, 1988, Cooperative Strategies in International Business, MA: Lexington.
Cook, G., Pandit, N. R., & Swann, P., 2002, “The dynamics of industrial clustering in British broadcasting”, Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 13(2), pp.351-375.
Czamanski, S. and L. A. Ablas., 1979, “Identification of Industrial Clusters and Complexes:A Comparison of Methods and Findings.”Urban Studies 16, no.1, pp. 61-80.
Davies, R.L., 1976, Marketing Geography: with special reference to retailing, Chapter 5, London: Methuen and Co. Ltd,.
Dicken, P., 2003, Web of Enterprise: The Geography of Transnational Production Networks, In the Global Shift(4th) CH8, ed. Dicken, P., London: Paul Chapman.
Emirbayer, M., and Goodwin, J., 1994, Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1411-1454.
Emerson, R. M., 1962, “Power-dependence Relations”, American Sociological Review, 27, pp.31-41.
Enright, M. J., 1992, Why Local Clusters are the Way to Win the Game, World Link, 5, July/August, 24-5.
Fischer, 1972, Urbanism as a Way of Life: A Review and an Agenda, Sociological Methods and Research 1 (November): 187-242.
Glister, K. W. and P. J. Buckley, 1996, “Strategic Motives for International Alliance Formation”, Journal of Management Studies, 33, pp.301-332.
Hämäläinen, T., 1993, The Organizational Consequences of Increasing Specialization and Division of Labor. GSM Working Paper Series, No. 93-25, Rutgers University Newark, New Jersey.
Helper, S., 1991, “Strategy and Irreversibility in Supplier Relations: The Case of the U. S. Automobile Industry”, Business History Review, 65, pp.781-824.
Herrigel, G. B., 1995, Industrial Constructions: The Sources of German Industrial Power, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hakansson, H. and Johanson, J., 1988, Industrial Functions of Business Relationships. Industrial Networks, 5.
Hakansson, 1989, Corporate Technological Behaviour: Co-operation and Networks. London: Routledge.
Harrigan, K. R., 1985, Strategies for Joint Venture, Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
Hakansson and Snehota, 1989, “Corporate Technological Behavior-Corporation and Network”, London: Routledge.
Hu, T. S., Lin, C. Y., and Chang, S. L., 2005, “Technology-based regional development strategies and the emergence of technological communities: a case study of HSIP, Taiwan”, Technovation, Vol. 25(2), pp.367-380.
Jarillo, J. C., 1993, Strategic Networks: Creating the Borderless Organization, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Joseph, D. Cruz. and M. Rugman Alan., 1993, Business Network for International Competitiveness. Business Quarterly 56, Iss.4, pp.101-107.
Johanson, L. & Mattsson, L. G., 1987, Interorganizational Relations in Industrial System: A Network Approach Compared with the Transaction-Cost Approach. International Studies of Management and Organization, 17, pp. 34-48.
Johanson, J. and Mattsson L. G., 1987, "Internationalisation in Industrial Systems-A Network Approach", In Hood and Vahlue (ed.), Strategies in Global Competition.
Jarillo, J. C., 1988, "On Strategic Networks", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.9, pp.31-41.
Joseph, D’C. and Rugman, 1992, “Busines Network for International Competitiveness,”Business Quarterly, Vol.56, Iss.4, pp.101-107.
Krugman, P., 1991, Geography and Trade, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Krugman, P., 1995, Development, Geography and Economic Theory, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Knoke, David and James H. Kuklinski.(1982),Network Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Landry, Charles, Lesley Greene, Francios Matarasso and Franco Bianchini., 1996, The Art of regeneration-Urban Renewal Through Cultural Activity. Comedia, The Round, Bournes Green, Stroud, Glos GL67NL.
Lazerson, M. H., 1988, “Organizational Growth of Small Firms: An Outcome of Markets and Hierarchies”, American Sociological Review, 53, pp.330-342.
Lazerson, M. H., 1993, “Factory or Putting-Out?Knitting Networks in Modena”, in Grabher G. (Ed.), The Embedded Firm, London:Routledge, pp.203-226.
Lane, C. and R. Bachmann, 1996, “The Social Constitution of Trust: Supplier Relations in Britain and Germany”, Organization Studies, 17, pp.365-393.
Markusen, A., 1996, “Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts.” Economic Geography 72, no.3, pp.93-313.
Mitchell,J.C., 1969, ”The Concept and Use of Social Network “pp20-40 in J.Dlyde Mitchell,(ed) Social Network in Urban Situations Mancheter,England: Mancheter University Press.
Miles, R. E. and Snow, C. C., 1992, Cause of Failure in Network Organization. California Management Review, summer (2).
Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S., 1998, Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp. 242-266.
Nohria, N. and C. Garcia Pont, 1991, “Global Strategic Linkages and Industry Structure”, Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.105-124.
Oliver, C., 1990,”Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions”, Academy of Management Review.
Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978, “The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective”, Social Control of Organization; Haperand Row Publishers.
Porter, M. E., 1990, "The Competitive Advantage of Nations", The Free Press, New York.
Porter, M. E., 1993, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press.
Porter, M. E., 1998, Cluster and the New Economics of Competition, Harvard Business Review, Nov.~Dec., pp.77-90.
Rogers, E. and Kincaid, D. L., 1981, "Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research", Free Press, New York.
Rosenfeld, S. A. 1997. “Bringing business clusters into the mainstream of economic development.” European Planning Studies 5 (1), pp.3-23.
Santagata, W., 2002, Cultural Districts, Property-Rights and Sustainable Economic-rowth. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(1), pp.9-23.
Saxenian, A., 1994, Regional Advantage, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Selznick, P., 1949, TVA and the Grass Roots, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Stigler, G. J.(1951), The Division of Laber is Limited by the Extent of the Market. Journal of Political Economy,59,185-193.
Swann, G. M. P., M. Prevezer and D. Stout., 1998, The Dynamics of Industrial Clusters: International Comparisons in Computing and Biotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simmie,J. and Sennett, J., 1999, Innovative clusters: global or local linkages?, National Institute Economic Review, 170, 87-98.
Thompson, J. D., 1967, Organizations in Action, New York: McGraw Hill.
Thorelli, H. B., 1986, "Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.7(1), pp.37-51.
Weber, 1929, ”A Theory of the Location of Industries,” J. Friend rich, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Wasserman, S., and Faust, K., 1994, Social network analysis: Methods and applications., New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, O. E., 1975, Market and Hierarchies:Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York:Free Press.
Yeh, C. C. and Chang, P. L., 2003, “The Taiwan system of innovation in the tool machine industry: a case study”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 20(3), pp.367-380.
Zald, M. N., 1970, “Political Economy: A Framework for Comparative Analysis” in Nald, M. N.(Ed.), Power in Organizations, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, pp.221-261.
Zajac, E. J. and C. P. Olsen, 1993, “Form Transaction Cost to Transactional Value Analysis: Implications for the Study of Interorganizational Strategies”, Journal of Management Studies, 30, pp131-145.
三、網路文獻
『epili霹靂網』2010.5.13擷取自http://www.pili.com.tw/
文建會文化創意產業發展計劃網站(2010),http://web.cca.gov.tw/creative/page/main_09.htm。
文化創意產業專屬網站http://www.cci.org.tw/
行政院文化建設委員會(1996),全國藝文團體總覽http://park.org/Taiwan/Culture/Resources/cartgroup/index.htm
傳統藝術中心-主題知識網 http://kn.ncfta.gov.tw/NCFTA/palm/show_node_no.jsp?id=1.1.1&rid=1.1
聯合國教科文組織(UNESCO)網站,http://www.unesco.org/culture/industries/
劉大和、黃富娟,(2003),文化園區的空間主題經營之探討,http://homelf.kimo.com.tw/liutaho/2003111001.pdf
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top