參考資料
一、中文部分：
朱柔若（譯）（2000）。社會硏究方法 : 質化與量化取向。臺北市：揚智文化。(
Neuman, W., L. 1997)
吳乃仁 （1988）。理性人的非理性社會？-檢討理性抉擇模型在社會科學中的應
用。思.與言，26（2），185-194。
吳榮義、江啟臣（2003）。WTO架構下的國際貿易與台灣的因應策略。國家政策刊，2（2），1-28。
李茂興（譯）（1996）。合作：社會合作的礎石。台北市：巨流。(Argyle, M., 1991)
李樹人（2009年6月8日）。葉金川不鬆口 嚴格把關？審醫師法修正案 立委立
場也兩極，台籍波蘭醫師 要考學歷認證。聯合晚報，A6。
線上檢索日期：2009 年7 月20 日。網址：
http://udndata.com.ezproxy.lib.nsysu.edu.tw:8080/library/
何應欽、范良禎（2009）。夥伴關係型態對企業的能力、績效及機會之調節效果
－以台灣資訊代工產業爲研究對象。商管科技季刊，10（2），225-253。
林哲全（2009）。從審議式民主原則論台北市大龍峒文化園區爭議。未出版博
士論文，東海大學，台中市。
林秀霞（2005）。組織相依性、信任、機會主義與組織合作關係影響之研究。未
出版博碩士論文，國立臺北大學，台北市。
林繼文 （2005）。虛擬霸權：台灣政治學研究中的理性選擇。政治科學論叢，25，67-104。
林毅璋（2009年7月21日）台灣醫學生 抗議國考放寬。自由時報。線上檢索日期：
2009 年7 月22 日。網址：http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2009/new/jul/21/today-life1.htm
徐麗振 （2003）。過去行為可觀察下隨機配對對實驗對象合作行為的影響：聲譽
效果的實驗驗證。經濟論文叢刊，31(4)，507-529。
許耿銘（2008）。全球治理對國家公共政策影響指標之建構。公共行政學報，29，1-28。
許健華（2006）。內部行銷、情緒智力、情緒勞務、工作滿足與顧客導向間關係
之研究-以桃園縣不動產經紀人員為例。未出版博碩士論文，國立東華大學，
花蓮縣。
陳澤義、洪廣朋、曾建銘（2008）。從關係的觀點探討企業夥伴的選擇對跨組織
學習成效的影響。交大管理學報，28（2），105-130。
梁家瑜（譯）（2009）。社會心理學。臺北市：心理。(Robert A., Donn B., & Nyla R., 2007)
喬治．雷瑟、道格拉斯．古德曼（2007）。社會學理論（鄭祖邦,柯朝欽,陳巨擎譯）。
台北市：麥格羅希爾。（Ritzer, G & Goodman, D, 2003）
葉偉文（譯）（2007）。隱藏的邏輯。台北市：天下遠見。(Buchman, M., 2007)
董安琪（譯）（1989）。集體行動的邏輯。台北市：遠流。(Olsen, M., 1965)
湯雅雯（2009 年 5月 27日）。波蘭醫學生紛爭 台灣生531上街。聯合報，AA4。
線上檢索日期：2009 年7 月20 日。網址：
http://udndata.com.ezproxy.lib.nsysu.edu.tw:8080/library/
湯雅雯、王宏舜（2009 年 6月 1日）。速修法、要實習、反落日、保健康
上千醫學生 上街頭。聯合報，AA4。
線上檢索日期：2009 年7 月20 日。網址：
http://udndata.com.ezproxy.lib.nsysu.edu.tw:8080/library/
楊棍智（2002）。知識分享之研究 - 以社會交換之觀點。未出版博碩士論文，義守大學，高雄市。
楊建成（2007）。最後通牒賽局理論與研究簡介。社會科學論叢，1(2)，1-21。楊孟麗（譯）（2007）。實驗與類實驗設計：因果擴論。臺北市：心理。(Shadish,
W. D., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T., 1916)
黃裕舜（2003）。相互性對公共財實驗中合作行為的影響 。未出版博碩士論文，國立政治大學，台北市。
黃琡珺（2005）。策略聯盟夥伴之關係（Guanxi）、信任、聯盟績效及未來繼續合
作意願。未出版博士論文，國立中山大學，高雄市。
謝鳳秋（2008）。府際合作治理之研究─以台中縣市聯繫會報為例。為出版碩士論文，東海大學，台中市。
劉仲矩、黃梅君（2007）。由社會交換理論探討勞退新制滿意度對員工績效之影響。公共行政學報，24，29-69。
蔡佩芳（2009 年 7月 20日）。波醫爭議 醫學生監院陳情。聯合晚報，A8。
線上檢索日期：2009 年7 月20 日。網址：
http://udndata.com.ezproxy.lib.nsysu.edu.tw:8080/library/
羅伯特．巴隆（2007）。社會心理學（梁家瑜譯）。台北市： 心理出版社。（原著
出版年，2007）
二、英文部份：
Abele, S., & Ehrhart, K. M. (2005). The timing effect in public good games. Journal of
experimental social psychology, 41(5), 470-481.
Axelrod, R. (2006). Robert Axelrod. 1986. An evolutionary approach to norms.
American Political Science Review 80 (December): 1095–1111. in The American
Political Science Review Citation Classics. The American Political Science
Review,100(4), 682-683.
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation (pp.1-10). New York: Basic
Books.
Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: agent-based models of com
petition and collaboration (pp.45-64). Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Axelrod, R. (2006). Robert Axelrod. 1986. An evolutionary approach to norms.
American Political Science Review 80 (December): 1095–1111. in The American
Political Science Review Citation Classics. The American Political Science
Review,100(4), 682-683.
Bicchieri, E., Xiao, E. (2009). Do the right thing: but only if others do so. Journal of
Behavioral Decision Making, 22(2), 191-208.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2004). The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in
heterogeneous populations. Theoretical population biology, 65(1), 17-28.
Bravo, G., & Tamburino, L. (2008) The evolution of trust in non-simultaneous
exchange situations. Rationality and Society, 20(1), 85-113.
Brandt H, Sigmund K (2005). Indirect reciprocity, image scoring, and moral hazard.
Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The
United States of America, 102(7), 2666-2670.
Burton-Chellew, M. N., Ross-Gillespie, A., & West, S. A. (2010). Cooperation in
humans: competition between groups and proximate emotions. Evolution and
Human Behavior, 31(2), 104-108.
Cheshire, C. (2007). Selective incentives and generalized information exchange.
Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(1), 82-100.
Cheshire, C., & Antin, J. (2008). The social psychological effects of feedback on the
production of internet information pools. Journal of Computer-mediated
Communication, 13(3), 705-727.
Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., & Lupia, Arthur. (2006). The growth and development of experimental research in political science. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 627-635.
Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D., & Nowak, M. A. (2008). Winners do
n''t punish. Nature, 452(7185), 348-351.
Engelmann, D., & Fischbacher, U. (2009). Indirect reciprocity and strategic rep
utation building in an experimental helping game. Games and Economic B
Ehavior, 67(2), 399-407.
Fehr, E., & Gachter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reci
Procity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159-181.
Fischbacher U, Gachter S, Fehr E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative
e? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71(3), 3
97-494.
Fehr, E., & Gachter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6
868), 137-140.
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature,
425(6960), 785-791.
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 185-190.
Fehr, E., & Ginits, H. (2007). Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 43-64.
Fehr, E. & Schneider, F. (2010). Eyes are on us, but nobody cares: are eye cu
es relevant for strong reciprocity? Proceedings of The Royal Society B-Biol
Ogical Sciences, 277(1686), 1315-1323.
Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experi
ments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171-178.
Green D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: a cr
itique of applications in political science (pp.72-97). New Haven: Yale University Press
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). Genetical evolution of social behavior I and II. Journal of
Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.
Janssen, M. A., & Goldstone, R. L. (2006). Dynamic-persistence of cooperation
in public good games when group size is dynamic. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 243(1), 134-142.
Janssen, M. A., & Bushman, C,. (2008). Evolution of cooperation and altruistic
punishment when retaliation is possible. Journal of Theoretical
Biology, 254(3), 541-545.
Keysar, B., Converse B. A., Wang J., & Epley N. (2008). Reciprocity is not give and
take: asymmetric reciprocity to positive and negative acts. Psychological
Science, 19(12), 1280-1286.
Kitts, J. A. (2006). Collective action, rival incentives, and the emergence of
antisocial norms. American Sociological Review, 71, 235-259.
Kiyonari, T., & Barclay, P. (2008). Cooperation in social dilemmas: Free riding may be thwarted by second-order reward rather than by punishment. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 95(4), 826-842.
Kurzban, R., & Houser, D. (2001). Individual differences in cooperation in a ci
rcular public goods game. European Journal of Personality, 15(Sp. Iss. 1), s37-s52.
Kurzban, R., & Houser, D. (2005). Experiments investigating cooperative types in humans: A complement to evolutionary theory and simulations. Procee Dings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of Amer ica, 102(5), 1803-1807.
Kurzban, R., & Descioli, P. (2008), Reciprocity in groups: Information-seeking
in a public goods game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(1), 13
9-158.
Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative watershed management: A view from the gras
sroots. Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), 341-361.
Marwell, G & Ames R. E. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? :
Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV. Journal of Public Economics, 15(3), 295-310.
Messer, K. D., & Zarghamee, H. (2007). New hope for the voluntary contributions mechanism: The effects of context. Journal of Public Economics, 91(9), 1783-1799.
Messer, K. D., Kaiser, H. M., & Poe, G. L. (2007). Voluntary funding for generic advertising using a provision point mechanism: An experimental analysis of option assurance. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(3), 612-631.
McCullough, M. E., Kimeldorh, M. B., & Cohen, A. D. (2008). An adaptation for
altruism? The social causes, social effects, and social evolution of gratitude.
Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 281-285.
Milinski, M., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Human behaviour - Punisher pays. Nature,
452(7185), 297-298.
Molm, L. D., Peterson, G., & Takahashi, N. (2001). The value of exchange. Social
Forces, 80(1), 159-184.
Molm, L., Collett J. L., & Schaefer D.R. (2007). Building solidarity through
generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. American Journal of Sociology,
113(1), 205-242.
Molm, L. D., & Schaefer, D. R. (2009) Fragile and Resilient Trust: Risk and Uncertainty in Negotiated and Reciprocal Exchange. Sociological Theory,
27(1), 1-32.
Ohtsuki, H., & Iwasa, Y. (2004). How should we define goodness? Reputation
dynamics in indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 231(1),
107-120.
Ohtsuki, H., & Iwasa, Y. (2006). The leading eight: Social norms that can maintain
cooperation by indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 239(4),
435-444.
Ostrom, Elinor (2005). Policies that crowd out of reciprocity and collective action. In
Gintis,H., Bowles, S.,Boyd, R. & Fehr,E. (Eds) Moral sentiments and material
interests(pp. 253-276). England: The MIT Press.
Price, M. E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2002). Punitive sentiment as an anti-free
rider psychological device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 203-231.
Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kallgren, C. A. (1993). The transsituational influence
of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 104-112.
Rege, M, & Telle, K. (2004). The impact of social approval and framing on c
ooperation in public good situations. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7-
8),1625-1644.
Ritzer, G. (2008). Modern sociological theory. New York, NY : McGraw-Hill Higher
Education.
Rockenbach, B., & Milinski, M. (2006). The efficient interaction of indirect
reciprocity and costly punishment. Nature, 444(7120), 718-723.
Rosas, A. (2010). Evolutionary game theory meets social science: Is there a unifying
rule for human cooperation? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 264(2), 450-456.
Semmann, D., Krambeck, H. J., & Milinski, M. (2005). Reputation is valuable within
and outside one''s own social group. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57(6), 611-616.
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H. J., Semmann, D., & Milinski, M. (2007) Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(44), 1745-17440.
Shinada, Mizuho & Yamagishia, Toshio (2007), Punishing free riders: direct and
indirect promotion of cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28,
330-330.
Sonderskov, K. M., (2009), Different goods, different effects: exploring the effects of
generalized social trust in large-N collective action. Public Choice, 140(1-2),
145-160.
Suzuki, Shinsuke & Akiyama, Eizo (2005). Reputation and the evolution of
cooperation in sizable groups. Proceedings of The Royal Society
B-Biological Sciences , 272, 1373-1377.
Suzuki, Shinsuke & Akiyama, Eizo (2007a). Evolution of indirect reciprocity in
groups of various sizes and comparison with direct reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 245, 539-552.
Suzuki, Shinsuke & Akiyama, Eizo (2007b). Three-person game facilitates indirect
reciprocity under image scoring. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 249, 93-100.
Suzuki, Shinsuke & Akiyama, Eizo (2008). Reputation and the evolution of
cooperation in sizable groups. Proceedings of The Royal Society
B-Biological Sciences, 272, 1373-1377.
Thye, E. H., Lawler, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2008). Social exchange and micro social order.
American Sociological Review, 73(4), 519-542.
Takezawa, M., & Price, M. E. (2010). Revisiting "The Evolution of Reciprocity in
sizable Groups": Continuous reciprocity in the repeated n-person prisoner''s
dilemma. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 264(2), 188-196.
Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Varieties of altruism in children and
chimpanzees. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(9), 397-402.
Willer, Robb (2009). Groups Reward Individual Sacrifice: The Status Solution to the
Collective Action Problem. American Sociological Review, 74, 23-4