跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.194.255) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/07/14 23:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:李秀珍
研究生(外文):LI, Hsiu-Chen
論文名稱:醫師對網路健康資訊之可信度判斷研究
指導教授:卜小蝶卜小蝶引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:圖書資訊學研究所
學門:傳播學門
學類:圖書資訊檔案學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:160
中文關鍵詞:網路健康資訊可信度醫師
外文關鍵詞:Internet health informationCredibilityPhysicians
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:2777
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:279
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:8
隨著網際網路的高度發展與國民健康意識之抬頭,網路已成為社會大眾獲取健康醫療相關資訊的最重要管道之一,而如何正確判斷網路健康資訊可信度之議題也愈形重要。本研究針對專家觀點,邀請十三位各專科主治醫師,採用實驗觀察、問卷調查及訪談等方法,以瞭解醫師對網路健康資訊之需求與評價,並進一步探討網路健康資訊對醫病關係所帶來的影響。此外,本研究也深入探究醫師用以判斷網路健康資訊可信度之準則與線索。
本研究主要結果包括:1.醫師網路健康資訊需求多來自於臨床診治問題,而同儕與領域專家為最常使用之資訊驗證來源;2.網路健康資訊品質良莠不齊,受訪醫師多建議應由國家最高衛生機關主導品質控管;3.網路資訊的來源為受訪醫師認定品質的主要關鍵;4.網路造就新型態病患之產生,網路健康資訊已成為僅次於醫師之另一健康資訊媒介;5.病患健康素養為影響醫病關係之重要指標,病患對健康資訊之認知若愈正確,醫病就更易產生互信;6.健康資訊網站之來源專家度、收錄範圍與網站穩定度為影響醫師判斷網站可信度之主要因素;7.來源專家度為醫師對健康資訊可信度之首要判斷準則,實際判斷時則常以經驗為導向,判斷歷程中所運用之線索則顯得多樣化,資訊來源、內容與醫師本身會不斷進行交互影響。
Because of the great advance of Internet and the arising consciousness of public health, Internet has become one of the efficient ways for obtaining health information along with a comprehensive reading. Distinguishing the credibility on receiving health information is therefore of great importance. The main objective of this research is to discuss different opinions based on experts’ viewpoints and the researcher interview thirteen attending physicians who work at various faculties.
The experimental observation, survey and interview contribute to a better understanding of physicians’ demand and evaluation on Internet health information. In addition, a further discussion on the influence between Internet and physician-patient relationship is addressed. Particularly, this research also gives a wild survey to investigate what the physicians’ rules and clues toward the credibility of Internet health information are.
The main results are as following. First, the questions of the clinical diagnoses and therapies are physicians’ primary demand of Internet health information, and they usually ask peers and experts to verify the information. Second, because of the uneven quality of the Internet health information, most of the interviewees suggest that the information should be monitored by the government highest health department. Third, the origin of the Internet information is the main key for physicians to identify the quality. Fourth, Internet creates a new kind of patient who considers that the Internet health information is the secondary medium except physicians. Fifth, the health literacy of patient is the main physician-patient relationship indicator. The more correct health knowledge the patient has, the more trust the physician and patient have. Sixth, the level of the expert source, the including scope and the stability of the healthy information websites affect physicians to judge the credibility of websites. Eventually, the level of the expert source for physicians is the most important judgment on the credibility of health information. The physicians often depend on their own experience when they diagnose. During diagnosing, there are many kinds of resources applied, the internet information, the content and the physicians themselves affect each other continually.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與背景 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 3
第三節 研究範圍與限制 4
第四節 名詞解釋 4
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 資訊可信度 7
第二節 網路健康資訊使用研究 19
第三節 網路健康資訊可信度判斷研究 35
第三章 研究設計 45
第一節 研究方法 45
第二節 研究工具 45
第三節 研究對象 50
第四節 研究實施與資料蒐集 51
第五節 資料處理與分析 52
第四章 研究結果與分析 55
第一節 受訪者之背景資料分析 55
第二節 醫師對網路健康資訊之需求行為與品質認知 60
第三節 網路健康資訊與醫病關係 78
第四節 醫師對網路健康資訊可信度之判斷方式 88
第五節 醫師認知之病患可信度判斷能力與培養 112
第六節 綜合討論 115
第五章 結論與建議 123
第一節 結論 123
第二節 建議 130
參考文獻 133
附錄A 研究網站建構PART 3-4 145
附錄B 研究訪談大綱 153
附錄C 網站受試者填答語料與類別分析 155
中文部份
吳昭新(2000)。台灣網上醫學教育資訊的內容品質-現況與建議。上網日期:2008年5月20日檢自:http://www.tmn.idv.tw/tmw-guide/critic-1.htm
吳昭新(2005)。台灣醫學(衛生)教育資訊網站評論。上網日期:2008年5月20日。檢自:http://olddoc.tmu.edu.tw/chiaungo/article/medinform-2.htm
吳昭新、李友專、簡文山(1999)。台灣大眾健康資訊網站網頁評論。上網日期:2008年5月20日。檢自:http://olddoc.tmu.edu.tw/tmw-guide/introd.htm
李廣均(2001)。初探網路醫療的發展和限制-以醫療資訊網站為例。醫護科技學刊,3(2),頁200-214。
林宜靜(2007)。Kingnet國家網路醫院線上免費問診逾60萬人受惠!。上網日期:2008年5月20日。檢自:http://hospital.kingnet.com.tw/essay/essay.html?category=%E9%86%AB%E8%97%A5%E7%96%BE%E7%97%85&pid=16389
紀櫻珍、紀琍琍、吳振龍、黃松元(2006)。醫學倫理與醫病關係。北市醫學雜誌,3(12),1144-1154。
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2008)。九十七年度台灣寬頻網路使用調查報告。上網日期:2008年5月20日。檢自:http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/200307index.shtml
陳雪華(1995)。網路資源選擇與資訊評鑑。圖書館學刊,10,41-49。
傅雅秀(1995)。從科學傳播的觀點探討中央研究院生命科學專家的資訊尋求行為。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
曾淑芬、張良銘(1998)。醫療資訊網站之內容分析與使用者調查。醫療資訊雜誌,8,54-72。
黃尚志(2006)。從臨床人員觀點探討使用者資訊尋求行為。第28屆醫學圖書館年會,台中市。
黃惠鈴(2000)。上網搜尋健康。康健,18。
楊雅惠(2000)。網路上就醫選擇資訊之內容分析與使用者調查。國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃瀅芳(2006)。大學教師與學生網路學術性資訊品質判斷研究。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
葉乃靜(2007)。癌症網站資訊需求研究。圖書資訊學研究,1(2),71-89。
資策會FIND/經濟部技術處「創新資訊應用研究計畫」(2005a)。2004歐洲消費者線上搜尋醫療資訊 比例成長一倍。上網日期:2008年5月20日。檢自:http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=news&id=3859
資策會FIND/經濟部技術處「創新資訊應用研究計畫」(2005b)。網路已成美國消費者心中最可靠的醫療資訊媒介。上網日期:2008年5月20日。檢自:http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=news&id=3762
資策會FIND/經濟部技術處「創新資訊應用研究計畫」(2007)。2007年7月連網主機觀測報告。上網日期:2008年3月23日。檢自:http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=186
資策會FIND/經濟部技術處「創新資訊應用研究計畫」(2009)。2009年9月底止台灣上網人口。上網日期:2009年12月23日。檢自:http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=246
蕃薯籐(2005)。2005台灣網路使用調查。上網日期:2008年5月20日。檢自:http://survey.yam.com/survey2005/chart/index.php
蕭湘文(2001)。網際網路醫療保健網站內容與廣告分析。中華傳播學會編著,中華傳播學會2001年年會。
闕瑞紋(2001)。台灣網路族群醫療保健網站使用行為初探。國立陽明大學衛生福利研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
蘇諼(2003)。醫學網路資源的使用與評鑑。臺北市:文華圖書館管理。
英文部份
Andrus, M. R., & Roth, M. T. (2002). Health literacy: A review. Pharmacotherapy, 22(3), 282-302.
Baker, L., Wagner, T. H., Singer, S., & Bundorf, M. K. (2003). Use of the Internet and E-mail for Health Care Information: Results From a National Survey. JAMA, 289(18), 2400-2406.
Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218-259.
Berland, G. K., Elliott, M. N., Morales, L. S., Algazy, J. I., Kravitz, R. L., Broder, M. S., et al. (2001). Health information on the internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(20), 2612-2621.
Blanch, D., Sciamanna, C., Lawless, H., & Diaz, J. (2005). Effect of the internet on the doctor-patient relationship: A review of the literature. Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare, 3(3), 179-201.
Bremner, J. D., Quinn, J., Quinn, W., & Veledar, E. (2006). Surfing the Net for medical information about psychological trauma: An empirical study of the quality and accuracy of trauma-related websites. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 31(3), 227-236.
Brotherton, J. M. L., Clarke, S. J., & Quine, S. (2002). Use of the Internet by oncology patients: Its effect on the doctor-patient relationship. Medical Journal of Australia, 177(7), 395.
Campbell, M. K., Bernhardt, J. M., Waldmiller, M., Jackson, B., Potenziani, D., Weathers, B., et al. (1999). Varying the message source in computer-tailored nutrition education. Patient Education and Counseling, 36(2), 157-169.
CAPHIS/MLA. (1996). The librarian's role in the provision of consumer health information and patient education. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 84(2), 238-239.
Chen, X., & Siu, L. L. (2001). Impact of the media and the Internet on oncology: Survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19(23), 4291-4297.
Cortes, C. E. (1992). Media literacy: An educational basic for the information age. Education and Urban Society, 24, 489-497.
Cullen, R. (2006). Health information on the internet : a study of providers, quality, and users. Westport: Praeger.
Cullen, R. J. (2002). In search of evidence: Family practitioners' use of the Internet for clinical information. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90(4), 370-379.
Culver, J. D., Gerr, F., Frumkin, H. (1997). Medical Information on the InternetA Study of an Electronic Bulletin Board. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12(8), 466-470.
Davies, K. (2007). The information-seeking behaviour of doctors: A review of the evidence. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24(2), 78-94.
Deering, M. J., & Harris, J. (1996). Consumer health information demand and delivery: implications for libraries. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 84(2), 209-216.
Diaz, J. A., Griffith, R. A., Ng, J. J., Reinert, S. E., Friedmann, P. D., & Moulton, A. W. (2002). Patients' use of the Internet for medical information. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17(3), 180-185.
Doney, L., Barlow, H., & West, J. (2005). Use of libraries and electronic information resources by primary care staff: outcomes from a survey. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 22(3), 182-188.
Dorsey, M. J., & Detlefsen, E. (2005). Investigating information-seeking behaviors of primary care physicians who care for older depressed patients and their family caregivers:a pilot study. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 26(4), 111-116.
Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2003). Trusted online sources of health information: Differences in demographics, health beliefs, and health-information orientation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5(3), 54-63.
Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2004). The impact of completeness and web use motivation on the credibility of e-health information. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 253-269.
Eastin, M. S. (2001). Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(4).
Eberhart-Phillips, J., Hall, K., Herbison, G. P., Jenkins, S., Lambert, J., Ng, R., et al. (2000). Internet use amongst New Zealand general practitioners. New Zealand Medical Journal, 113(1108), 135-137.
Eisenberg, M. B., & Lee, H.-L. (1999). New Perspectives on Learning and Teaching:The Big6 Approach to Information Literacy Instruction. Paper presented at the the Conference on Information Literacy Education and Lifelong Learning. Retrieved Mar. 23, 2008, from http://www.lib.pu.edu.tw/~jiang/1999/4-5.htm
Eysenbach, G., Diepgen, T. L., Gray, J. A. M., Bonati, M., Impicciatore, P., Pandolfini, C., et al. (1998). Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. British Medical Journal, 317(7171), 1496-1502.
Eysenbach, G., & Köhler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal, 324(7337), 573-577.
Ferguson, T. (1998). Digital Doctoring-Opportunities and Challenges in Electronic Patient-Physician Communication. JAMA, 280(15), 1361-1362.
Ferguson, T. (2000). Online patient-helpers and physicians working together: A new partnership for high quality health care. British Medical Journal, 321(7269), 1129-1132.
Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of internet information credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quaterly, 77(3), 515-540.
Fogg, B. J. (2002). Stanford Guidelines for Web Credibility. A Research Summary. Report from the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab.
Fogg, B. J., Kameda, T., Boyd, J., Marshall, J., Sethi, R., & Sockol, M. (2002). Stanford-Makovsky web credibility study 2002: Investigating what makes web sites credible today. Report from the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab.
Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2002). How do people evaluate a web site's credibility? Results from a large study. Report from the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab.
Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2003). How do users evaluate the credibility of web sites? A study with over 2,500 participants. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences, 1-15.
Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999). The elements of computer credibility. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 80-87.
Fox, S. (2006). Online health search 2006: Most Internet users start at a search engine when looking for health information online. Very few check the source and date of the information they find. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Fox, S., Rainie, L., & Horrigan, J. (2000). The online health care revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Freeman, K. S., & Spyridakis, J. H. (2004). An examination of factors that affect the credibility of online health information. Technical Communication, 51(2), 239-263.
Gorman, P. N. (1995). Information needs of physicians. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(10), 729-736.
Gove, P. B. (2002). Webster's third new international dictionary of the English language, unabridged. U.S.A. : Merriam-Webster.
Gray, N. J., Klein, J. D., Noyce, P. R., Sesselberg, T. S., & Cantrill, J. A. (2005). The Internet: A window on adolescent health literacy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(3), 243..
Groot, D., Riet, G. T., Khan, K. S., & Misso, K. (2001). Comparison of search strategies and quality of medical information of the internet: A study relating to ankle sprain. Injury, 32(6), 473-476.
Gunther, A. C. (1992). Biased Press or Biased Public? Attitudes toward Media Coverage of Social Groups. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 147-167.
Hart, A., Henwood, F., & Wyatt, S. (2004). The role of the internet in patient-practitioner relationships: Findings from a qualitative research study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), e36.
HITI. (1997). Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the internet. Retrieved Mar. 23, 2008, from http://hitiweb.mitretek.org/docs/criteria.html
Hoffman-Goetz, L., & Clarke, J. N. (2000). Quality of breast cancer sites on the World Wide Web. Canadian Journal of Public Health. Revue Canadienne de Sante Publique, 91(4), 281-284.
HON. (2003). Excerpt of the 8th HON's Survey of Health and Medical Internet Users Retrieved Mar. 23, 2008, from http://www.hon.ch/Survey/8th_HON_results.html
Howard, G. S., & Weinroth, G. J. (1987). Users' Complaints: Information System Problems from the User's Perspective. Journal of Systems Management, 38(5), 30-34.
Impicciatore, P., Pandolfini, C., Casella, N., & Bonati, M. (1997). Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: Systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. British Medical Journal, 314(7098), 1875-1879.
Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing?: Comparing internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quaterly, 75(2), 325-340.
Johnson, T. J., Kaye, B. K., Bichard, S. L., & Wong, W. J. (2007). Every blog has its day: Politically-interested internet users' perceptions of blog credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 100-122.
Kerse, N., Arroll, B., Lloyd, T., Young, J., & Ward, J. (2001). Evidence databases, the Internet, and general practitioners: The New Zealand story. New Zealand Medical Journal, 114(1127), 89-91.
Koller, M., Gru?tter, R., Peltenburg, M., Fischer, J. E., & Steurer, J. (2001). Use of the internet by medical doctors in Switzerland. Swiss Medical Weekly, 131(17-18), 251-254.
Kouris-Blazos, A., Setter, T. L., & Wahlqvist, M. L. (2001). Nutrition and health informatics. Nutrition Research, 21(1-2), 269-278.
Kunst, H., Groot, D., Latthe, P. M., Latthe, M., & Khan, K. S. (2002). Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: Survey of five common health topics. British Medical Journal, 324(7337), 581-582.
Liu, Z. (2004). Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on the Web. Information Processing and Management, 40(6), 1027-1038.
Liu, Z., & Huang, X. (2005). Evaluating the credibility of scholarly information on the web: A cross cultural study. International Information and Library Review, 37(2), 99-106.
McKinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. (2002). The measurement of Web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296-315.
McKnight, D. H., & Kacmar, C. J. (2007). Factors and effects of information credibility. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Minneapolis, MN.
Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078-2091.
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers and Education, 41(3), 271-290.
Monnier, J., Laken, M., & Carter, C. L. (2002). Patient and caregiver interest in Internet-based cancer services. Cancer Practice, 10(6), 305-310.
Murray, E., Lo, B., Pollack, L., Donelan, K., Catania, J., White, M., et al. (2003). The impact of health information on the Internet on the physician-patient relationship: Patient perceptions. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(14), 1727-1734.
Quintana, Y., Feightner, J. W., Wathen, C. N., Sangster, M., & Marshall, J. N. (2001). Preventive health information on the Internet. Qualitative study of consumers' perspectives. Canadian Family Physician, 47(9), 1759-1765.
Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 145-161.
Rieh, S. Y., & Belkin, N. J. (1998). Understanding judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the WWW. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 35, 279-289.
Rieh, S. Y., & Belkin, N. J. (2000). Interaction on the web: Scholars' judgment of information quality and cognitive authority. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 37, 25-38.
Rieh, S. Y., & Danielson, D. R. (2007). Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 307-364.
Rucinski, D. (2004). Community boundedness, personal relevance, and the knowledge gap. Communication Research, 31(4), 472-495.
Sangl, J. A., & Wolf, L. F. (1996). Role of consumer information in today's health care system. Health Care Financing Review, 18(1), 1-8.
Self, C. S. (1996). Credibility. In M. B. Salwen & D. W. Stacks (Eds.), An Integrated approach to communication theory and research. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Singletary, M. W. (1976). Components of Credibility of a Favorable News Source. Journalism Quarterly, 53(2), 316-319.
Smith, R. (1996). What clinical information do doctors need? British Medical Journal, 313(7064), 1062-1068.
Stanford, J., Tauber, E. R., Fogg, B. J., & Marable, L. (2002). Experts vs. online consumers: A comparative credibility study of health and finance web sites. Report from the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab.
Sundar, S. S. (1998). Effect of source attribution on perception of online news stories. Journalism and Mass Communication Quaterly, 75(1), 55-68.
Tseng, S., & Fogg, B. J. (1999). Credibility and computing technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 39-44.
Wathen, C. N., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 134-144.
West, M. D. (1994). Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure modeling approach. Journalism Quarterly, 71(1), 159-168.
Williams, M. V., Parker, R. M., Baker, D. W., Parikh, N. S., Pitkin, K., Coates, W. C., et al. (1995). Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274(21), 1677-1682.
Wilson, A. S., Kitas, G. D., Llewellyn, P., Carruthers, D. M., Cheseldine, D. C., Harris, S., et al. (2001). Provision of Internet-based rheumatology education. Rheumatology, 40(6), 645-651.
Wilson, E. J., & Sherrell, D. L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), 101-112.
Yang, K. C. C. (2007). Factors influencing Internet users' perceived credibility of news-related blogs in Taiwan. Telematics and Informatics, 24(2), 69-85.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top