硝酸鹽為自然界常見之污染物，主要是由農業過度施肥滲透土壤造成地下水污染，硝酸鹽一旦被攝取進人體會在體內還原成亞硝酸鹽，阻礙血液輸送氧氣的能力，嚴重時恐會引發休克。近年來利用化學脫硝與催化脫硝程序去除水中硝酸鹽之新興技術已被證實是有效率且經濟性的處理方式，然而因處理程序中添加部分貴金屬並製備奈米級材料等，致使此類處理技術是否反而替環境帶來負面衝擊成為眾所關切之議題，故本研究之目的是以生命週期評估(Life Cycle Assessment, LCA)結合層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)建立一套環境友善性評價系統，針對五種去除水中硝酸鹽之技術進行盤查，比較處理程序間之環境友善度差異。五種技術分別為：鈀銅批載氧化鈦奈米管(Pd-Cu/TNTs)、鈀銅批載二氧化鈦之加氫系統(H2 + Pd-Cu/TiO2)、鈀銅批載二氧化鈦(Pd-Cu/TiO2)、鈀批載零價鋅(Pd/Zn0)、鈀銅批載零價鐵(Pd-Cu/Fe0)。

本研究利用生命週期評估軟體SimaPro7.1與層級分析法軟體Expert Choice來建立環境友善性評價系統，首先利用Eco-indicator 99做為衝擊評估模式進行生命週期評估，以量化研究案例對環境面之衝擊；接續建立環境友善評價系統之指標，並將總經濟成本與環境衝擊面給予1:1之等權重，再以層級分析法決定環境衝擊面之細部指標權重，即得環境友善評價系統。

研究結果顯示：(1)鈀金屬與電力耗損為貢獻環境衝擊之主要原因；(2)環境友善評價系統之權重，總經濟成本為50%，環境衝擊面為50%，其下之權重為：生態毒性(9.4 %) > 石化燃料(8.9 %) > 致癌物(5.6 %) > 輻射(4.5 %) > 土地利用(4.3 %) > 臭氧層破壞(3.2 %) = 氣候變遷(3.2 %) > 礦物(3.0 %) > 可吸入性有機物(2.9 %) = 酸化與優養化(2.9 %) > 可吸入性無機物(2.2 %)；(3)考量去除相同量之硝酸鹽、去除能力、投入原物料與能源耗損造成環境之衝擊、污染物排放對環境之衝擊、經濟成本等多準則評估下，以Pd-Cu/TiO2做為催化脫硝之技術最為環境友善。本研究所建立的環境廢污處理技術之環境友善性評估雖為實驗室規模，但可了解新興處理技術在物質使用、能源投入、二次污染、經濟成本等多面向之衝擊，故做為未來實務上選用之參考。

Nitrate, one of common contamination in nature, is widespread due to over-fertilization in agriculture. Once taken into the body, nitrates are converted into nitrites, which can interfere with the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood. It will lead to severe shock at the worst. In recent years, catalytic reduction processes applied in the removal of nitrate in water has been proved to be an effective and economical treatment. However, some of the noble metal and nanomaterials will be used in the processes, the potential risks and impacts to the environment with catalytic reduction processes associated are viewed critically. In this study, the main purpose is to establish evaluation system of environmentally friendly by life cycle assessment (LCA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). With this objective a life cycle assessment has been used as a tool for the assessment of the environmental impact of five environmentally friendly processes for the removal of nitrates from water : (1)Pd-Cu/TNTs, (2)H2 + Pd-Cu/TiO2 , (3)Pd-Cu/TiO2 , (4)Pd/Zn0 , (5)Pd-Cu/Fe0.

The inventoried data has been classified considering the potential environmental impacts categories included in the Eco-indicator 99 method of SimaPro 7.1. Evaluation system of environmentally friendly considers the economic and life cycle environmental effects of process, giving these equal weighting. On the other hand, the Expert Choice has been used as an AHP tool to decide the weighting factors of environmental impacts.

Among the five cases considered, Pd-Cu/TiO2 treatment proved to have the lowest environmental impact in all the evaluation system of environmentally friendly due to the lower palladium and electricity consumptions. On the other hand, the weighting factors of environmental impacts were : ecotoxicity (9.4 %) > fossil fuels (8.9 %) > carcinogens (5.6 %) > radiation (4.5 %) > land use (4.3 %) > ozone layer (3.2 %) = climate change (3.2 %) > minerals (3.0%) > respiratory organics (2.9 %) = acidification / eutrophication (2.9 %) > respiratory inorganics (2.2 %). Although the evaluation system of environmentally friendly of the removal of nitrate from water was focused on five bench-scale treatments, it will be valuable on site in the future.

中文摘要 I
Abstract III
目錄 V
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 IX
第一章 前言 1
1.1研究緣起 1
1.2研究目的及內容 2
第二章 文獻回顧 3
2.1硝酸鹽氮之污染與危害 3
2.1.1硝酸鹽氮之污染 3
2.1.2硝酸鹽氮之危害 4
2.2硝酸鹽氮之處理技術 4
2.2.1薄膜逆滲透 5
2.2.2離子交換法 5
2.2.3電透析法 6
2.2.4生物脫硝法 6
2.2.5化學脫硝法 7
2.2.6催化脫硝法 8
2.3環境友善與生命週期評估的應用 8
2.4指標權重決定之方法 12
第三章 研究方法 14
3.1案例說明 15
3.1.1案例A《氧化鈦奈米管負載銅鈀異相催化水中硝酸鹽》 15
3.1.2案例B《選擇性催化加氫技術還原水中硝酸鹽為氮氣之研究》 16
3.1.3案例C《選擇性光催化還原水中硝酸鹽為氮氣之研究》 16
3.1.4案例D《零價鋅及鈀鋅雙金屬對水中硝酸鹽還原脫硝之研究》 17
3.1.5案例E《催化性雙金屬還原水中硝酸鹽之研究》 18
3.2生命週期評估 18
3.2.1目標與範疇界定 18
3.2.2生命週期盤查分析 19
3.2.3生命週期衝擊評估 19
3.2.4結果闡釋 22
3.3層級分析法 23
3.3.1評估尺度 24
3.3.2進行步驟 24
3.3.3專家問卷 27
3.3.4分析工具Expert Choice 27
第四章 結果與討論 28
4.1生命週期評估 28
4.1.1目標與範疇界定 28
4.1.2生命週期盤查分析 29
4.1.3生命週期衝擊評估與結果闡釋 32
4.2層級分析法 43
4.2.1層級擬定 43
4.2.2專家問卷 44
4.2.3共識性權重 49
4.3環境友善度 50
第五章 結論與建議 54
5.1結論 54
5.2建議 56
參考文獻 58
附錄 64

Sa, J. and Anderson, J. A. (2008) FTIR study of aqueous nitrate reduction over Pd/TiO2. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 77(3-4), 409–417

Singleton, P. and Sainsbury, D. (1988) Dictionary of microbiology and molecular biology, 2th, John Wiley and Sons.

Mateju, V., Cizinska, S., Krejci, J. and Janoch, T. (1992) Biological water denitrification － a review. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 14(3), 170–183

Prusse, U., Hahnlein, M., Daum, J. and Vorlop, K.D. (2000) Improving the catalytic nitrate reduction. Catalysis Today 55(1-2), 79–90

Hutchison, J.E. (2008) Greener nanoscience: a proactive approach to advancing applications and reducing implications of nanotechnology. ACS Nano 2(3), 395–402

Helland, A. and Kastenholz, H. (2008) Development of nanotechnology in light of sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(8-9), 885–888

Farre, M., Garcia-Montano, J., Ruiz, N., Munoz, I. Domenech, X. and Peral, J. (2007) Life cycle assessment of the removal of diuron and linuron herbicides from water using three environmentally friendly technologies. Environmental Technology. 28(7), 819–830

Djomo, S.N., Humbert, S. and Blumberga, D. (2008) Life cycle assessment of hydrogen produced from potato steam peels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 33(12), June 2008, 3067–3072

Moss , O.R. (2008) Insights into the health effects of nanoparticles: why numbers matter . International Journal of Nanotechnology 5(1), 3–14

Bauer, C., Buchgeister, J., Hischier, R., Poganietz, W.R., Schebek, L. and Warsen, J. (2008) Towards a framework for life cycle thinking in the assessment of nanotechnology. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(8-9) 910–926

Scharnhorst, W., Hilty, L.M. and Jolliet, O. (2006) Life cycle assessment of second generation (2G) and third generation (3G) mobile phone networks. Environment International 32(5), 656–675

Kunnari, E., Valkama, J., Keskinen, M. and Mansikkamaki, P. (2009) Environmental evaluation of new technology: printed electronics case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 17(9), 791–799

Shonnard, D.R., Kicherer, A. and Saling, P. (2003) Industrial applications using BASF eco-efficiency analysis: perspectives on green engineering principles. Environmental Science & Technology 37(23), 5340–5348

Huang, C.C. and Ma, H.W. (2004) A multidimensional environmental evaluation of packaging materials. Science of the Total Environment 324(1-3) 161–172

Wedding, G.C. and Crawford-Brown, D. (2007) Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: a focus on sustainability and green building. Journal of Environmental Management 85(2), 483–495

Pineda-Henson, R., Culaba, A.B. and Mendoza, G.A. (2008) Evaluating environmental performance of pulp and paper manufacturing using the analytic hierarchy process and life-cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(1), 15–28

Pineda-Henson, R. and Culaba, A.B. (2004)A diagnostic model for green productivity assessment of manufacturing processes. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(6) 379–386

Witoon, A., Pornpote, P., Watts, D.J. and Koetsichai, W. (2008) LCA of spent fluorescent lamps in Thailand at various rates of recycling. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(10), 1046–1061

Rydh, C.J. and Sun, M. (2005) Life cycle inventory data for materials grouped according to environmental and material properties. Journal of Cleaner Production 13(13-14), 1258–1268

Jorgensen, M.S., Andersen, M.M., Hansen, A., Wenze, H., Pedersen, T.T., Jorgensen, U., Falch, M., Rasmussen, B., Olsen, S.I. and Willum, O. (2005) Green Technology Foresight about environmentally friendly products and materials.

The Eco-indicator 99 A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. (1999) Mark Goedkoop and Renilde Spriensma.

Saaty, T.L. (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences 1(1), 83–98

Vaidya, O.S. and Kumar, S. (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 169(1), 1–29

Cheng, C.H.(1997) Evaluating naval tactical missile system by fuzzy AHP based on grade value of membership function. European Journal of Operational Research 96(2), 343–350

Ghodsypour, S.H. and Brien, C.O. (1998) A decision support system for supplier selecting using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics 56–57(1-3), 199–212

Kengpol, A. and Brien, C.O. (2001) The development of a decision support tool for the selection of a advanced technology to achieve rapid product development. International Journal of Production Economics 69(2), 177–191

Kuo, R.J., Chi, S.C. and Kao, S.S. (1999) A decision support system for locating convenience store through fuzzy AHP. Computers and Industrial Engineering 37(1–2), 323–326

Kielhorn, J., Melber, C., Keller, D. and Mangelsdorf, I. (2002) Palladium - a review of exposure and effects to human health. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Heath 205(6), 417–432

劉雅瑄，2006，「零價鐵表面改質對水中硝酸鹽還原脫硝反應之影響」，博士論文，國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所。

陳秀瑜，2009，「氧化鈦奈米管負載銅鈀異相催化水中硝酸鹽」碩士論文，國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所。

陳思穎，2009，「氧化鈦奈米管負載銅鈀異相催化水中硝酸鹽」碩士論文，國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所。

曾雨凡，2007，「選擇性光催化還原水中硝酸鹽為氮氣之研究」碩士論文，國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所。

洪宜君，2006，「零價鋅及鈀鋅雙金屬對水中硝酸鹽還原脫硝之研究」碩士論文，國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所。

曾文裕，2006，「催化性雙金屬還原水中硝酸鹽之研究」碩士論文，國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所。

陳智榮，(2007)，「集水區農村社區永續發展指標系統建構之研究」碩士論文，國立台灣大學環境工程學研究所。

行政院環境保護署，「95年環境水質監測年報-地下水水質篇」。

行政院環境保護署，「98年地下水污染管制標準」。