跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.201.99.222) 您好!臺灣時間:2022/12/09 13:15
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:董紀緯
研究生(外文):Chi-Wei Tung
論文名稱:從社會網絡觀點探討全球半導體產業的創新網絡與創新能力關係之研究
論文名稱(外文):Investigate the Relation between Innovation Network and Innovation Capability in the Global Semiconductor Industry from Social Network Perspective
指導教授:曾俊堯曾俊堯引用關係林盛程林盛程引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chun-Yao TsengSheng-Cheng Lin
口試委員:賴其勛白大昌
口試委員(外文):Chi-Shiun LaiTa-Chiang Bai
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:81
中文關鍵詞:創新網絡創新能力專利引用分析社會網絡分析
外文關鍵詞:Innovation network、Innovation capability、Patent citation analysis、Social network analysis
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:1268
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:442
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:6
自半導體產業發展以來,半導體產業與全球經濟發展有著密不可分的關係,透過半導體的發展歷史發現,每一次產業發展的高峰都會帶動全球GDP的大幅成長,當然半導體產業低潮期也將衝擊GDP成長,半導體產業發展趨勢,儼然成為全球經濟復甦一個重要的先行指標。因此,主要研究目的為針對全球半導體產業,利用公司間專利引用分析,探討創新網絡與創新能力關係。
相關文獻多認為知識的流動會使企業知識存量增加,進而引發創新,而創新能力則直接反應在專利數上。故本研究採用社會網絡觀點,以中心性(程度中心性及中介中心性)、凝聚性與密度,結合動態與量化的數據,分析半導體產業在四個時間階段內佔據技術關鍵地位公司的地位移轉情形。研究樣本為全球半導體產業廠商、並將研究期間依據半導體產業變革分為四階段探討,資料來源為USPTO專利資料庫。實證研究結果為,在某一階段佔據關鍵地位的半導體廠商,由於其在網絡中的中心性、凝聚性與密度指標皆顯示該廠商位於創新網絡中關鍵的位置,但隨時間的變化,其關鍵性地位被其他廠商取代。並且發現公司在網絡中的集中及擴散程度、公司在網絡中的知識傳遞程度及子群集間的互動程度越高對公司的創新能力有正向且顯著的影響,然而子群集間的連結關係越緊密,卻導致公司的創新能力呈現負向的效果。

Since the development from the semiconductor industry, semiconductor industry and global economic development has a close relationship. According to the analysis of relevant literature, the semiconductor industry has highly relevant networks. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the company of semiconductor industry, patents cited by the formation of inter-firm innovation networks.
Relevant literatures indicate that the flow of enterprise knowledge will increase the enterprise’s knowledge stock, and thus lead to innovation, and innovation is directly reflected in the number of the patent. Therefore, this study used the social network perspective “centrality, cohesion and density”, combined with dynamic and quantitative data, the semiconductor industry in the three phase occupy a key position technique the company's technology transfer cases. The research samples are the global semiconductor industry, and will be divided into three phases during the study period to explore sources of information for the USPTO patent database. The research results, occupy a key position at a certain stage of semiconductor manufacturers, because of its centrality in the network, cohesion and density targets are revealed that the vendor is located in a key position in the innovation network, but the change over time, the key position of being replaced by other manufacturers.

摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝詞 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 V
圖目錄 VI
第一章 導論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 2
第三節 研究目的 3
第四節 研究範圍與限制 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 半導體產業發展歷程與產業特性 5
第二節 社會網絡分析(Social Network Analysis) 8
第三節 創新網絡(Innovation Network) 13
第四節 專利引用分析 16
第三章 研究設計 20
第一節 研究架構 20
第二節 研究假說 21
第三節 研究模式與變數定義 23
第四節 研究方法及流程 26
第四章 實證分析與結果 30
第一節 初步專利分析 30
第二節 社會網絡分析結果 35
第三節 創新網絡與創新能力關係之實證結果 48
第五章 結論與建議 51
第一節 研究結論 51
第二節 研究貢獻及實務意涵 56
第三節 研究建議與未來研究方向 58
參考文獻 59
附錄一 各階段專利權人專利數排名 64

一、中文文獻
1.翁順裕、賴奎魁、陳孟棋(民97)。將專利組合鑲嵌至技術規劃中。管理與系統,2,323-354。
2.曾俊堯(民92)。創新資本對經營績效與公司價值影響之研究。國立台北大學企業管理學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。
3.熊瑞梅(民88年5月)。核心網絡的性別特質,台灣社會的個人網絡:第三次社會變遷基本調查研討會論文。台北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。
4.蔡勇美、王德睦與李美玲(民87),「社會變遷、社會網絡與生命經驗:以臺灣婦女為例」,臺灣社會的個人網絡:第三次社會變遷基本調查研討會,(頁l~25)。

二、英文文獻
1.Badaracco, J. L. (1991). The knowledge Link, Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
2.Blau, P. M. and Schwartz, J. E. (1984). Cross-cutting social circles: Testing a macrosociological theory of intergroup relations. New York: Academic Press.
3.Brandes, U. (2001). A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25, 163–177.
4.Buchel, B. and Raub, S. (2002). Building knowledge-creating value networks. European Management Journal, 20(6), 587-96.
5.Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.Cabral, R. and Leiblein, M. (2001). Adoption of a Process Innovation with Learning-By-Doing : Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49, 269-280.
7.Cantner, U. and Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy, 35, 463-480.
8.Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
9.Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
10.Freeman, L. (1979). Centrality in social network: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
11.Friedman, T. L. (2005). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. St Martins Pr
12.Gemünden, H. G., Ritter, T. and Heydebreck, P. (1996). Network configuration and innovation success: An empirical analysis in German high-tech industries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 449-462.
13.Griches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as a economic indicators: A survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707.
14.Grilliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707.
15.Gupta, B. M. and Bhattacharya, S. (2004). A bibliometric approach towards mapping the dynamics of science and technology. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology, 24, 3-8.
16.Hall, B., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Market value and patent citations: A first book. NBER Working Paper Series, Cambridge, MA.
17.Hao, T. and John, A. M. (2007). Cyclical Dynamics in Three Industries, DRUID-DIME Academy, 25, 853-866
18.Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., and Vopel, K. (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 511-515.
19.Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577-598.
20.Johanson, J. and Mattson, L. G. (1988). International in Industrial System-A Network Approach. In N. Hood and J.E. Vahlue.(Eds.), Strategies in Global Competition. London: Croom Helm.
21.Klepper, S. (1996). Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle. American Economic Review, 86(3), 562-83
22.Lai, K. K., and Weng C. S. (2009), The isomorphic development of insurance - the perspective of social network analysis. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 12, 85-104.
23.Lewis, J. D. (1990). Making Strategic Alliance Work. Research Technology Management, 33, 12-15
24.Mogee, M. E. (1997). Patent analysis methods in support of licensing. Proceeding On Technology Transfer Society Annual Conference.
25.Narin, F., Noma, E., and Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16, 143-155.
26.Newman, N.E.J. (2004). Detecting community structure in networks. The European Physical Journal B, 38, 321-330.
27.Otte, E., and Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network anlaysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441-453.
28.Podolny, M., Stuart, T. E., and Michael T. H. (1996). Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991. American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 659-689.
29.Robert, A. B. (1994). Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 24-57.
30.Scott, J. (2000). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, Sage Publications, London, 2nd ed.
31.Seidman, S., and Foster, B. (1979). SONET-1. Social Networks, 2, 85-90.
32.Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network position and Propensities to Collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 668-698.
33.Stuart, T. E., and Podolny, J. M. (1996). Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 21-38.
34.Su, H. N. and Lee, P. C. (2009). Dynamic and Quantitative Exploration on Technology Evolution Mechanism: The Case of Electrical Conducting Polymer Nanocomposite, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2433-2440.
35.Thompson, P. (2006). Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from Inventor- and Examiner-added Citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 383-388.
36.Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovation. Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172-187.
37.Tseng, Chun-Yao (2009). Technological Innovation and Knowledge Network in Asia: Evidence from Comparison of Information and Communication Technologies among Six Countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(5), 654-663.
38.Wassermann, S., and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39.Wellman, B. (1990). Different Strokes From Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 275-302.
40.Yin, L.C., Kretschmer, H., Hanneman, R.A. and Liu, Z.Y. (2006). Connection and stratisfaction in research collaboration: An analysis of the COLLNET network. Information Processing and Management, 42, 1599-1613.
41.Yoon, B. and Park Y. (2004). A text-mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high-technology trend. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15, 37-50.
42.Zahra, A. S. and George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊