隨著互動式電子白板及投影機硬體功能不斷的增強，使得它們漸漸地取代傳統黑板，成為現代化教室內必備的教學工具。然而，教學工具需要搭配教師設計的教學活動以及對應的控制軟體，才能顯著地提昇學生的學習成效。
在本篇論文中，我們將傳統的Microsoft PowerPoint教材以電子書的方式重新呈現，透過電子白板及投影機等現代化教學工具的輔助，結合Bloom的精熟學習理論，提出一套創新的系統: Cute Page Writer。藉由此系統，教師可以依照教室硬體設備的不同，自由的選擇使用單螢幕或是雙螢幕來呈現教材內容，且系統可以充分整合各種不同的多媒體教材例如影片、網頁、數位攝影機影像，搭配平板電腦或電子白板進行流暢的手寫教學。學生在課後也可以在個人電腦上使用此系統模擬出和教師上課時相同的環境，來複習學習過的教材內容。

With the continuous development of hardware functionalities of the interactive whiteboard and the projector, it makes them replace the traditional blackboard gradually and become the necessary instructional tools in the modern classroom. However, instructional tools have to cooperate with the activities designed by the teacher and the corresponding control software in order to improve the student’s learning performance.
In this thesis, we make a new presentation method on the traditional Microsoft PowerPoint teaching materials via the e-book like style. By combining the Bloom’s Mastery Learning Theory with the aid of the modern instructional tool such as the interactive whiteboard and the projector, we propose an innovative system named Cute Page Writer. By using this system, teachers can randomly select the presentation style of teaching materials on the single or dual screens depending on the classroom hardware facility. Meanwhile, this system can fully integrate a variety of multiple different multimedia teaching materials such as videos, web contents and digital camera images. Teachers can make smoothly handwriting teaching with the tablet pc or the interactive whiteboard. Students can also use this system on their personal computer after class to simulate the same environment like the teacher doing in the classroom and review what they have learned.

Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Design and Architecture of Cute Page Writer System 5
2.1 Requirements Acquisition 5
2.2 System Architecture 9
2.3 System Design and Implementation 11
Chapter 3 Teaching Strategies for Interactive Whiteboard 35
3.1 Quality Instruction for Mastery Learning 35
3.2 How to Deduce the “Hint” Teaching Strategy 37
3.3 How to Deduce the “Involve” Teaching Strategy 38
3.4 How to Deduce the “Emphasize” Teaching Strategy 39
3.5 How to Deduce the “Feedback” Teaching Strategy 41
3.6 How to Deduce the “Remedy” Teaching Strategy 42
Chapter 4 Method and Teaching Procedure 44
4.1 Participants 44
4.2 Instruments 44
4.3 Procedure 45
4.4 Results and Discussion 47
Chapter 5 Conclusions and Future Works 49
5.1 Conclusions 49
5.2 Future Works 50
Reference 52

[1]J. D. Allen, "Classroom management: Students’ perspectives, goals, and strategies," American Educational Research Journal, vol. 23, pp. 437-459, September, 1986.
[2]A. W. Bates and Gary Poole, Effective teaching with technology in higher education: Foundations for success.: San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2003.
[3] R. E. Mayer, Multimedia learning.: Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[4] J. Roschelle, K. Rafanan, G. Estrella, M. Nussbaum, and S. Claro, "From handheld collaborative tool to effective classroom module: Embedding CSCL in a broader design framework," Computers & Education, vol. 55, pp. 1018-1026, 2010.
[5] S. Zhang and H. Deng, "Perception of learning effectiveness in the multimedia
classroom vs. the traditional classroom: A case study," College & University
Media, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 87-107, 2005.
[6]O. S. López, "The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners' academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology," Computers & Education, vol. 54, pp. 901-915, 2010.
[7]J. W. Belcher. (2005) The TEAL project technology enabled active learning [Online].
http://icampus.mit.edu/projects/Publications/TEAL/TEAL-report-May05.pdf
[8]D. S. Tan, D. Gergle, P. Scupelli, and R. Pausch, "Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks," ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 13, pp. 71-99, 2006.
[9]J. W. Strijbos, R. L. Martens, and W. M. G. Jochems, "Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning," Computers & Education, vol. 42, pp. 403-424, 2004.
[10]H.-M. Huang, U. Rauch, and S.-S. Liaw, "Investigating learners' attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach," Computers & Education, vol. 55, pp. 1171-1182, 2010.
[11]L. Anderson, D. Krathwohl, P. Airasian, K. Cruikshank, R. Mayer, P. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M. Wittrock, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessment: A revision of Blooms＇educational objectives.: New York, NY: Longman, 2001.
[12]B. S. Bloom, All our children learning.: New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
[13]B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of educational objectives.: Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1984.
[14]J. S. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid, "Situated cognition and the culture of learning," Educational Researcher, vol. 18, pp. 32-42, January, 1989.
[15]E. S. Cutrim, "Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the english language classroom," Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 338-356, 2008.
[16]T. R. Guskey, "Benjamin S. Bloom's contributions to curriculum, instruction, and school learning," Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2001.
[17]J. Whiting, "The use of a computer tutorial as a replacement for human tuition in a mastery learning strategy," Computers & Education, vol. 9, pp. 101-109, 1985.
[18]J. P. Gall, M. D. Gall, and W. R. Borg, Applying educational research: A practical guide, 4th ed.: New York, NY: Longman, 1999.
[19]J. M. Apperson, E. L. Laws, and J. A. Scepansky, "The impact of presentation graphics on students' experience in the classroom," Computers & Education, vol. 47, pp. 116-126, 2006.
[20]J. E. Susskind, "Limits of PowerPoint's power: Enhancing students' self-efficacy and attitudes but not their behavior," Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 1228-1239, 2008.
[21]R. McGhee and R. Kozma, "New teacher and student roles in the technology-supported classroom," Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2001.
[22]R. A. Bartsch and K. M. Cobern, "Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures," Computers & Education, vol. 41, pp. 77-86, 2003.
[23]R. Moreno and R. Mayer, "Interactive multimodal learning environments," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 19, pp. 309-326, 2007.