臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在行銷學中的STP指的區隔 (segmentation)、目標 (targeting) 以及定位 (positioning)，是在研究與處理不同產品或服務之間的差異化，並以這些差異化有效區隔市場，利用滿足目標市場顧客為廠商創造利潤的一個研究議程 (research agenda)。傳統的行銷策略都是以消費者的角度去制定行銷策略，在這樣的過程中廠商需要不斷的摸索消費者的喜好以及偏好。而這樣的過程中即容易發生定位失敗的情形。主流的文獻中，將產品定位失敗都歸咎於因資訊不對稱所導致的反向選擇。
而本研究卻在精品產業發現不同的現象。在精品產業中，傳統的印象是高價、炫耀等，雖然消費者對精品真正的意義難以明確掌握，但顧客仍願意出高價購買。即廠商的資訊傳達雖然不清楚，亦即，精品的銷售卻不再需要傳訊來證明其品質與價值。
本研究從廠商的行銷策略來理解廠商如何認識消費者的需求、改變消費者的價值認知，特別是由認識消費者的偏好、消費者的需求來影響廠商的行銷決策。本研究發現「第三需求法則」和「搭售」能改變相對價格，讓消費者覺得購買精品是相當值得。
本研究透過質性研究中的個案研究法分析做出了以下結論：（一）精品的跨期替代性高，和精品的定義密切相關。（二）使用相對價格的行銷方式改變消費者的認知，使其相對價格較低，讓消費者在購買時有物超所值的感受，是成功經營精品銷售的必要條件。（三）搭售可以改變相對價格，及改變產品定位，亦即對產品重定位，成功的精品銷售，需要適當的利用搭售來改變相對價格，並對產品進行定位。

According to marketing’s STP, firms will divide the market, positioning their products or service and confirm their target customers. It's researched and deals with the differentiation between the different products or services and use the differentiation to segment the market effectively. Traditional marketing strategies are based on the consumer's view to develop marketing strategies. In this process, firms need to constantly explore consumer preferences. And in this process is prone to failure to positioning due to information asymmetry.

In this study found that the different phenomena in luxury industry. In luxury industry, the traditional image is expensive, and show off to others, etc. Although consumers don't understand the real meaning of luxury, consumers are still willing to pay to buy the luxury. It means firms don’t convey the information clearly and luxury sales are no longer needed to use signaling to prove the quality and value.

In this study, by firm's marketing strategies to understand how firms understand consumer's demand, and change the consumer's perceived-value, especially by understanding consumer's preferences, consumer's demand to influence the firm's marketing decisions. Therefore, the study found that the "third law of demand" and "bundling" can change the relative prices, and let consumers feel that buying luxury is worthy.

Through the qualitative research, summarized the conclusions as following：
(1) Luxury’s inter-temporal substitution is high, and the definition of luxury is closely related. (2) Sale luxury goods the most success key is to combine the relative price with marketing strategies to change customers’ awareness and let customers understand the value of the luxury. (3) Bundling can change the relative price and the product positioning. It means re- positioning of the product and sale the luxury goods successfully. Therefore, it needs to use bundling appropriately to change the relative price and positioning the product.

目錄
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
致謝辭 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 精品 4
2-1-1 精品的定義 4
2-1-2 精品之特性 5
2-1-3 精品產業之範圍 6
2-1-4 精品之產品層級 7
2-1-5 精品消費者之分類 9
2-1-6 精品銷售通路之比較 10
第二節 資訊不對稱及其延伸問題 - 反向選擇 12
第三節 傳訊 13
第四節 第三需求法則 15
第五節 搭售 16
2-5-1搭售的定義 16
2-5-2 搭售的分類 17
2-5-3搭售的應用 19
2-5-4搭售的社會爭議 19
第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 質化研究 21
第二節 個案研究法 22
第三節 研究對象 25
第四章 研究分析 26
第一節 精品的需求彈性 26
第二節 精品定位模式 30
第三節 精品市場上的相對價格 33
第四節 傳訊以及相對價格在精品市場上的比較 35
第五節 應用-精品產品層級之延伸討論 37
第五章 結論與建議 54
第一節 研究結論 54
第二節 研究限制與建議 55
參考文獻 56
附錄一、訪談逐字稿 59


圖目錄
圖 1 精品產品層級 7
圖 2 研究流程 24
圖 3 Rolex、金價與通膨率之價格趨勢變化 27
圖 4 Rolex116200 與 Rolex116234之價格趨勢變化 28
圖 5 精品分類 38


表目錄
表 1 認知屬性、認知構面的衡量項目 10
表 2 精品之銷售通路 11
表 3 高低品質企業提供信號與否 13
表 4 行銷信號的特徵 15
表 5 第三需求法則實例 16
表 6 雙因子理論各因子說明表 36
表 7 國內文獻之產品層級 38
表 8 國內文獻之獨特性特色 50

參考文獻
中文部分
游淨茹(2007)。國際精品品牌在台灣經營模式之比較。東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士班論文。
王蓉莉(2001)。消費者對組合產品的知覺評估-以產品知識、產品涉入為調節變數。義守大學碩士論文。
歐陽柏彥(2003)。組合商品知覺評估與購買意願之研究－以手機搭門號為例。國立成功大學碩士論文。
蘇俊杰(2001)。搭售行為在寬頻整合時代的適法性分析。元智大學碩士論文。
鄭茜純 (2003)。 搭售行為之分析 。中原大學碩士論文。
徐宗國（1994）。紮根理論研究法：淵源、原則、技術與涵義。香港社會科學學報。第四期，194-221。
Babbie, Earl原著，李美華等譯，1998，《社會科學研究方法》，臺北：時英。
黃俊英（ 1997 ），行銷學。台北市：華泰。


英文部分
Alleres, D. (1990), “Luxe - Strategies Marketing,” Economica, l (1).
Alchian, A. A., and W. R. Allen. University Economics,2d ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1967.
Berry, C.(1994), The Idea of Luxury, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bergen, M., S. Dutta, et al. (1992). "Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories." The Journal of Marketing: 1-24.
Cooper, Donald R. and Pamela S. Schindler (2003), Business Research Methods,
8th, New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Dansby, R. E. and C. Conrad. "Commodity Bundling." American Economic Review
74, (1984): 377-381.
Dubois, B & Doquesne, P. (1993),“ The market for luxury goods: income versus
culture.” European Journal of Marketing, 27(1), 35-45.
Dubois, B., Laurent, G., and Czellar, S. (2001), "Consumer Rapport to Luxury: Analyzing Complex and Ambivalent Attitudes", Consumer Research Working Paper, No. 736, HEC, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Dubois, B., and Czellar, S.( 2002), “Prestige Brands or Luxury Brands: An Exploratory Inquiry on Consumer Perceptions”, 31st European Marketing Academy Conference Proceedings, Braga Portugal: European Marketing Academy.
Dubois, B., and Laurent, G.(1995), “Luxury Possessions and Practices: An Empirical Scale”, European Advances in Consumer Research, Vol 2, pp. 69-77.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management review, 14(4), 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989). Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of
Management Review, 14(1): 57-74
Eppen, G. D., W. A. Hanson, and R. K. Martin. "Bundling-New Products, New
Markets, Low Risk." Sloan Management Review 32, (1991): 7-14.
Guiltinan, J. P. "The Price Bundling of Services: A Normative Framework." Journal
of Marketing 51, April (1987): 74-85.
Heil, O. P., and A. W. Langvardt, 1994, The Interface between Competitive Market Signaling and Antitrust Law, Journal of Marketing 58, 81-96.
Harlam, B. A., A. Krishna, D. R. Lehmann, and C. Mela. "Impact of Bundle Type,
Price Framing and Familiarity on Purchase Intention for the Bundle." Journal of
Marketing Research 27, no.4, November (1995): 390-401.
Kapferer, J. N. (2006). The two business cultures of luxury brands. In J. E. Schroeder
& M. Salzer-Mörling (Eds.), Brand culture (pp. 67-76). New York & London: Routledge.
Kirmani, A. and A. R. Rao (2000). "No pain, no gain: A critical review of the
literature on signaling unobservable product quality." Journal of Marketing
64(2): 66-79.
Kapferer, J.-N. (1997), “Managing Luxury Brands”, Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 251-260.
Lipsey, R. G. (1989), “An Introduction to Positive Economics, 7th ed., Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.
Maykut, P. and R. Morehouse (1994). Beginning Qualitative Research-A
Philosophic and Practical Guide. PA: The Falmer Press.
Mishra, Debi Prasad, Jan B. Heide, & Stanton G. Cort (1998), “Information
Asymmetry and Levels of Agency Relationships,” Journal of Marketing
Research, 35(2): 277-295.
Nueno, J.L. and Quelch, J.(1998),“The mass marketing of luxury”, Business Horizons, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 61-9
Patton M.Q.,1990,Qualitative evaluation and research methods，London:Sage
Publication Inc.
Rothschild, M. and J. E. Stiglitz, 1976, Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90（4）: 629-649.
Rindfleisch, A. and Heide, J. B. (1997). “Transaction cost analysis: Past, present,
and future applications.” Journal of Marketing. 61(4), 30.
Spence, M. (1973). "Job marketing signaling." Quarterly Journal of Economics
87(3): 355–374.
Stump, Rodney L. and Heide, Jan B. (1996), “Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relationship
Strauss, A. & Corbin,J.(1990). Basic of Qualitation Research: Grounded theory procedures & techniques. Thous &s Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schultz, Don E. and William A. Robinson. (1982), Sales Promotion Management, Chicago, IL: Crain Book.
Stremersch, S. and G. J. Tellis (2002). "Strategic bundling of products and
prices: A new synthesis for marketing." The Journal of Marketing 66(1): 55-72.
Vickers, J.S. and Renand, F.(2003), “The Marketing of Luxury Goods: An Exploratory Study - Three Conceptual Dimensions”, The Marketing Review, Vol. 3 (4), pp.459-478.
Vickers, J. S. & Renand, F. (2003), “The Marketing of Luxury Goods: An
exploratory study: three conceptual dimensions”, The Marketing Review, 3,459-478.
Vigneron, F. & Johnson,L.W.(1999),“ A review and a conceptual framework of
prestige-seeking consumer behavior.” Journal of Marketing Science Review
Vigneron, F., and Johnson, L.W.(2004), “Measuring perceptions of brand luxury”, Journal of Brand Management, London: July, Vol. 11, Iss. 6, pp. 484-506.
Yin, R. (1994). "Case study research: Design and methods . Beverly Hills."