跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.184.63) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/08 08:36
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:洪莉媖
研究生(外文):Li-Ying Hong
論文名稱:建構全服務航空與低成本航空之旅客選擇模式
論文名稱(外文):Modeling Passengers’ Choice for Full-service and Low-cost Airlines
指導教授:溫傑華溫傑華引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chieh-Hua Wen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:逢甲大學
系所名稱:運輸科技與管理學系
學門:運輸服務學門
學類:運輸管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:英文
論文頁數:73
中文關鍵詞:服務品質敘述性偏好實驗羅吉特模式低成本航空
外文關鍵詞:Service qualityStated preference experimentLow cost airlinesLogit models
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:967
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
低成本航空始於1947年,其所提供之營運模式全服務航空截然不同。低成本航空強調的是「票價低廉」,全服務航空主要優勢是「票價低廉」,兩種不同經營模式會影響旅客選擇航空公司的行為。低成本航空的引進提供了非常優惠之票價,吸引對於票價較為敏感的旅客,導致傳統航空公司在航線上的市場佔有率顯著受到影響。當顧客的消費行為改變時,評估他們的行為的特質也就越顯得重要。本研究主要探討低成本航空與全服務航空的旅客選擇行為,以及定義會影響旅客選擇航空公司的重要因素。研究主要採用敘述性偏好實驗法,並使用多種羅吉特模式做參數的評估。研究結果顯示潛在群體一般化巢式羅吉特結合誤差成分與隨機參數之混合羅吉特模式的模式解釋能力皆優於潛在類別與隨機參數羅吉特模式。而潛在群體一般化巢式羅吉特則優於混合羅吉特。一般來說,旅客願意支付較高的金額享用較佳的機上懦慾徆鰷掑H員服務。根據上述之結果航空公司可針對關鍵屬性擬定改善策略已提升市場佔有率,並提供差異化之服務水準以獲得競爭優勢。
Since 1947, a new business model has emerged in the airline industry to offer a significantly different service from full-service airlines. Low cost airlines emphasize "low fares" while the main advantage of full-service airline is "service quality". Two different business models provide more choices for passengers. However, the traditional airlines have suffered losses in market shares due to the entrance of low-cost airlines that provide special preferential fares to attract passengers. When consumers’ behavior and circumstances of airlines were competition changed, assessment of their nature becomes important. Therefore, this research explores consumers’ choice behavior between full-service and low cost airlines in Taiwan, and identifies the important variables affecting airline choice. Stated preference data were collected to establish the airline choice model. The results showed that the latent class-generalized nested logit and the random parameters-error component logit models are better than the standard latent class and random parameters models. Generally, passengers are willing to pay more for qualitative attributes such as on-board food and on-board personnel attitude. According to these results, air carriers can increase their market shares by improving key attributes and differentiating their level of services from competitors to gain competitive advantage.
誌謝 I
摘要 II
ABSTRACT III
CONTENTS IV
LIST OF FIGURES VI
LIST OF TABLES VII
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 RESEARCH BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION 1
1.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 4
1.3 RESEARCH METHODS 4
1.4 FLOW CHART 5
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.1 LOW COST AIRLINE 7
2.2 DISCRETE CHOICE MODEL 9
2.3 INDIVIDUAL HETEROGENEITY 10
2.4 SP EXPERIMENT DESIGN 12
2.5 SUMMARY 14
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODS 15
3.1 SP EXPERIMENT METHOD 15
3.2 UTILITY FUNCTION 21
3.3 GNL MODEL 21
3.4 ECL MODEL 23
3.5 LC MODEL 24
3.6 RPL MODEL 25
3.7 LC_GNL MODEL 26
3.8 RP_ECL MODEL 27
CHAPTER 4 EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS 29
4.1 THE DATA 30
4.2 DATA ANALYSIS 32
4.3 RESULTS OF MNL 34
4.4 RESULTS OF NL 37
4.5 RESULTS OF GNL 40
4.6 RESULTS OF ECL 42
4.7 RESULTS OF LCM 44
4.8 RESULTS OF RPL 46
4.9 RESULTS OF LC_GNL 48
4.10 RESULTS OF RP_ECL 51
4.11 WILLINGNESS TO PAY 53
4.12 DISCUSSIONS AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS 54
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS 57
5.1 STUDY RESULTS 57
5.2 CONTRIBUTIONS 58
REFERENCES 59
APPENDIX 62
1.Alamdari, F.E. and Black, I.G. (1992) “Passengers'' choice of airline under competition: the use of the logit model,” Transport Reviews, Vol. 12, pp. 153-170.
2.Balcombe, K., Fraser, I. and Harris, L. (2009) “Consumer willingness to pay for in-flight service and comfort levels: a choice experiment,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 15, pp. 221-226.
3.Bekhor, S. and Freund-Feinstein, U. (2006) “Modeling passengers’ preferences on a short-haul domestic airline with rank-ordered data,” Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1951, pp. 1-6.
4.Bhatnagar, A. and Ghose, S. (2004) “A latent class segmentation analysis of e-shoppers, ” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, pp.758-767.
5.Brownstone, D. and Train, K. (1999) “Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 89, pp. 109-129.
6.Chen, A.H., Peng, N. and Hackley, C. (2008) “Evaluating service marketing in airline industry and ITS influence on student passengers'' purchasing behavior using Taipei-London route as an example,” Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, Vol. 25, pp. 149-160.
7.Chen, C.H. (2003) “A Study of Passengers’ Choice Behavior for Freeway Bus Operators,” National Chiao Tung University, Institute of Traffic and Transportion.
8.Chiou, Y.C. and Chen, Y.H. (2010) “Factors influencing the intentions of passengers regarding full service and low cost carriers: a note” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 16, pp.226-228.
9.Civil Aeronautics Administration (2009)
10.Civil Aeronautics Administration (2010)
11.Coldren, G.M., Koppelman, F.S., Kasturirangana, K. and Mukherjeeb, A. (2003) “Modeling aggregate air-travel itinerary shares: logit model development at a major US airline,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 9, pp. 361-369.
12.Espino, R., Martin, J.C. and Roman, C. (2008) “Analyzing the effect of preference heterogeneity on willingness to pay for improving service quality in an airline choice context,” Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 44, pp. 593-606.
13.Forgas, S., Moliner, M.A., Sanchez, J. and Palau, R. (2010) “Antecedents of airline passenger loyalty: low-cost versus traditional airlines,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 16, pp. 229-223.
14.Fu, C. (2008) “A Study for Impacts of Intercity Travel Behaviors after the Operation of High Speed Rail :Case Study for Intercity Passenger Transport of Tainan to Taipei Route,” National Cheng Kung University, Urban Planning.
15.Hess, S. (2008) “Treatment of reference alternatives in stated choice surveys for air travel choice behavior,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 14, pp. 275-279.
16.Hsu, Y. L. and Wang, D.J. (2009) Low cost carriers: operation strategy and management.
17.Huang, W.W (2009) “A latent class generalized nested logit model of passenger airline choice, ” Fang Chia University, Graduate Institute of Traffic and Transportation Engineering and Management.
18.IATA (2010) “Low-cost Carriers”
19.Jiang, H. (2007) “Competitive strategy for low cost airlines,” Proceedings of the 13th Asia Pacific Management Conference, pp. 431–436.
20.Jou, R.C., Liu, Y.H. and Wang, W.C. (2007) “A study international airline choice behavior between LCC and FSC-from Taipei to Singapore,” Transportation Planning Journal, Vol.36, No. 3, pp. 307-332.
21.Koppelman, F.S. and Wen, C.H. (2000) “The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application,” Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 34, pp. 75-89.
22.Martin, J.C., Roman, C. and Espino, R. (2008) “Willingness to pay for airline service quality,” Transport Reviews, Vol. 28, pp. 199-217.
23.Mason, K.J. (2008) “Towards a means of consistently comparing airline business models with an application to the ‘low cost’ airline sector,” Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 75–84
24.Mason, k.J. (2000) “The propensity of business travellers to use low cost airlines,” Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 8, pp. 107-119.
25.Mason, K.J. (2001) “Marketing low-cost airline services to business travellers,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 7, pp. 103-109.
26.McFadden, D. (1978) “Modeling the choice of residential location,” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 672, pp. 72-77.
27.McFadden, D. and K. Train (2000) “Mixed MNL models of discrete response”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol.15, pp. 447-470.
28.O’Connell, J.F. and Williams, G. (2005) “Passengers’ perceptions of low cost airlines and full service carriers: a case study involving Ryanair, Aer Lingus, Air Asia and Malaysia Airlines,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 11, pp. 259-272.
29.Ong, W.L. and Tan, A.K (2010) “A note on the determinants of airline choice: the case of Air Asia and Malaysia Airlines,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 16, pp. 109-212.
30.Oyewole, P., Sankaran, M., and Choudhury, P. (2007) “Consumer Choice of airlines in Malaysia: a synthesis of perspectives from participants in the air travel market,” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 20, pp. 19-31.
31.Pels, E. (2008) “Airline network competition: full-service airlines, low-cost airlines and long-haul markets,” Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 68-74.
32.Pitfield, D.E. (2008) “Some insights into competition between low-cost airlines,” Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 5-14.
33.Phanikumar, C.V. and Maitra, B. (2007) “Willingness-to-pay and preference heterogeneity for Rural Bus Attributes,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 133, pp. 62-69.
34.Proussaloglou, K.E. and Koppelman, F.S. (1995) “Air carrier demand: an analysis of market share determinants,” Transportation, Vol. 22, pp. 371-388.
35.Roman, C., Espino, R. and Martin, J.C. (2007) “Competition of high-speed train with air transport: the case of Madrid–Barcelona,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 13, pp. 277-284.
36.Rose, J.M., Hensher, D.A. and Greene, W.H. (2005) “Recovering costs through price and service differentiation: accounting for exogenous information on attribute processing strategies in airline choice,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 11, pp. 400-407.
37.Teichert, T., Shehu, E. and Wartburg, I.V. (2008) “Customer segmentation revisited: The case of the airline industry,” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 42, pp. 227-242.
38.Wen, C.H. and Koppelman, F.S. (2001) “The generalized nested logit model,” Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 35, pp. 627-641.
39.Wen, C.H. and Lai, S.C. (2010) “Latent class models of international air carrier choice,” Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 46, pp. 211-221.
40.Wen, C.H., Chen, T.N. and Huang, W.W. (2009) “Mixed Logit Analysis of International Airline Choice,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2106, pp. 20-29.
41.Whitaker, B., Soong, E., Terzis, G. and Yeh, W. (2004) “Stated preference as a tool to evaluate airline passenger preferences and priorities,” Transportation Research Record, No. 1915, pp. 55-61.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top