跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.90) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/21 20:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳以林
研究生(外文):Chen, I-Lin
論文名稱:投資機會、會計穩健性與投資效率
指導教授:姜家訓姜家訓引用關係
口試委員:劉嘉雯金成隆
口試日期:中華民國99年6月23日
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:輔仁大學
系所名稱:會計學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:76
中文關鍵詞:條件性穩健投資效率資產負債表穩健投資機會
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:1384
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
資產負債表穩健與條件性穩健係兩項重要會計盈餘屬性(Francis 2004; Watts 2003a, 2003b),過去研究發現條件性穩健能夠提升投資效率(Lara et al. 2009; Bushman et al. 2006),除了能夠抑制過度投資,同時亦能夠減輕投資不足。本研究以1996至2007年台灣上市櫃公司為樣本,進一步探討條件性穩健提升投資效率之功能是否會受到資產負債表穩健程度之影響。本研究預期,對於投資機會缺乏之公司,當資產負債表穩健程度較低,則未來須認列資產價值減損之可能性較高,因此條件性穩健愈高,則愈有助於股東監督經理人決策,進而降低代理問題,故條件性穩健抑制過度投資之效果較明顯;對於投資機會較多之公司,當資產負債表穩健程度較低,則未來須認列資產價值減損之可能性較高,因此條件性穩健愈高,則愈有助於債權人降低公司融資成本,進而減少反向選擇現象,故條件性穩健減輕投資不足之效果較明顯。本研究發現,對於缺乏投資機會之公司,其條件性穩健程度愈高則過度投資之可能性愈低。再者,相較於資產負債表穩健程度較高者,資產負債表穩健較低之公司,其條件性穩健抑制過度投資之效果更強。此外,對於投資機會較多之公司,其條件性穩健程度愈低則投資不足之可能性愈低。然而,相較於資產負債表穩健較高者,資產負債表穩健較低者其條件性穩健能更加減輕投資不足效果並未得到支持。整體而言,本研究為資產負債表穩健對條件性穩健提升投資效率之影響提供了額外證據。研究結果顯示,未來從事有關條件性穩健與投資效率之研究有必要考量資產負債表穩健所扮演之角色。
Balance sheet conservatism and conditional conservatism are two primary earnings attributes(Francis 2004; Watts 2003a, 2003b), and previous studies suggests that conditional conservatism could enhance investment efficiency by curbing over-investment and mitigating under-investment(Lara et al. 2009; Bushman et al. 2006). In this study, I extend related studies by exploring whether the effect of conditional conservatism on investment efficiency depends on the level of balance sheet conservatism. I expect that for firms without investment opportunities, when balance sheet conservatism is low, the likelihood of future recognizing economic losses is higher; therefore, the effect of conditional conservatism on curbing over-investment is more prominent. For firms with abundant investment opportunities, when balance sheet conservatism is low, the likelihood of future recognizing economic losses is higher; therefore, the effect of conditional conservatism on mitigating under-investment is more prominent. The sample consists of observations selected from listed and over-the-counter companies in Taiwan from 1996 to 2007. The main findings are summarized as follows. First, for firms without investment opportunities, the likelihood of over-investment decreases as conditional conservatism increases. Besides, relative to firms with high balance sheet conservatism, the likelihood of over-investment decreases more as conditional conservatism increases for firms with low balance sheet conservatism. Second, for firms with abundant investment opportunities, the likelihood of under-investment decreases as conditional conservatism increases. However, relative to firms with high balance sheet conservatism, the effect of conditional conservatism on mitigating under-investment for firms with low balance sheet conservatism is not supported by the evidence. To sum up, this study provides evidence that balance sheet conservatism would influence the effect of conditional conservatism on enhancing investment efficiency. The findings of study show that it would be necessary to take the role of balance sheet conservatism into consideration for future study in the effect of conditional conservatism on enhancing investment efficiency.
目 錄
頁次
表次 vii
圖次 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 6
第三節 論文架構 8
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 會計穩健性與代理問題 9
第二節 會計資訊提升投資效率之功能 17
第三章 研究方法 28
第一節 研究假說之發展 28
第二節 實證模式之建立 33
第三節 樣本選取 44
第四章 實證結果 47
第一節 敘述性統計 47
第二節 單變量檢定 51
第三節 多元迴歸分析結果 55
第四節 敏感性分析 59
第五章 研究結論、限制與建議 64
第一節 研究結論 64
第二節 研究限制 66
第三節 研究建議 67
參考文獻 68

參考文獻
中文文獻
王勝杰,2007,財務報表品質與公司投資效率,私立靜宜大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙及黃怡縈,2010,穩健會計與銀行借款利率,會計理論與實務研討會論文集:頁1825-1848,新北。
林惠玲,2006,代理成本、盈餘屬性與資金成本之關係,私立天主教輔仁大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
林嬋娟、潘昭容及王大維,2010,從家族企業與產業特性論析自由現金流量對投資決策之影響,會計理論與實務研討會論文集:頁1225-1248,新北。
林豐正,1997,財務槓桿、投資機會與公司成長關聯性之實證研究─以台灣股票上市公司為例,私立天主教輔仁大學管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
曹千榆,2010,融資型態與財務報表品質對投資效率之影響,私立天主教輔仁大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
陳瑾慧,2010,會計穩健性與融資型態對投資效率之影響,私立天主教輔仁大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
彭鴻欽,2009, 財務報表品質與投資效能關聯性之研究,私立天主教輔仁大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。


英文文獻
Abel, A. and J. Eberly. 2002. Investment and q with fixed costs: An empirical analysis. Working paper, Northwestern University.
Ahmed, A., B. Billings, R. Morton, M. Harris. 2002. The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflict over dividend policy and in reducing debt cost. The Accounting Review 77: 867-890.
Ahmed, A. and S. Duellman. 2007. Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: an empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43:411-437.
Ahmed, A. and S. Duellman. 2009. Evidence on the role of accounting conservatism in monitoring managers’ investment decisions. Working Paper, Texas A & M University and State University of New York at Binghamton.
Alti, A. 2003. How sensitive is investment to cash flow when financing is frictionless? The Journal of Finance 58: 707-722.
Asquith, P., A. Beatty, and J. Weber. 2005. Performance pricing in debt contracts. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40: 101–128.
Ball, R. and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6: 159-178.
Ball, R. and L. Shivakumar. 2005. Earnings quality in U.K. private firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 83-128.
Ball, R. and L. Shivakumar. 2006. Earnings quality at initial public offerings: managerial opportunism or public-firm conservatism? Working paper, University of Chicago.

Barton, J. and P. Simko. 2002. The balance sheet as an earnings management constraint. The Accounting Review 77: 1-27.
Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24: 3-37.
Basu, S., 2001. Discussion of on the asymmetric recognition of good and bad news in France,Germany and the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 28: 1333-1349.
Basu, S. 2005. Discussion of: Conditional and unconditional conservatism: Concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies 10: 311–321
Beatty, A., S. Liao, and J. Weber. 2008. Financial reporting quality, private information, monitoring and the lease-versus-buy decision. Working Paper, Ohio State University, University of Toronto and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Beatty, A., W. S. Liao, and J. Weber. 2010. The effect of private information and monitoring on the role of accounting quality in investment decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (Spring): 17-47.
Beatty, A., J. Weber, and J. Yu. 2008. Conservatism and debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45: 154-174.
Beaver, W.H., R. Lambert, D. Morse. 1980. The information content of security prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2: 3-28.
Beaver, W. and S. Ryan. 2005. Conditional and unconditional conservatism: concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies 10: 269-309.
Bens, D. and S. Monahan. 2004. Disclosure quality and the excess value of diversification. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (4): 691-730.
Bharath, S., J. Sunder, and S. Sunder. 2008. Accounting quality and debt contracting. The Accounting Review 83: 1-28.
Bhojraj, S. and P. Sengupta. 2003. Effects of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: the role of institutional investors and outside directors. Journal of Business 76: 455-476.
Biddle, G., and G. Hilary. 2006. Accounting quality and firm-level capital investment. The Accounting Review 81: 963–982.
Biddle, G. C., G. Hilary, and R. S. Verdi. 2009. How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management.
Bliss, J.H. 1924. Management through accounts. New York, NY: The Ronald Press Co.
Brennan, M. and E. Schwartz. 1988. The case for convertibles. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 1: 55-64.
Burgstahler, D. and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings, Adaptation and Equity Value. The Accounting Review 72 (April): 187–216.
Bushman, J. Piotroski, and A. Smith. 2006. Capital allocation and timely accounting recognition of economic losses. Working paper, University of North Carolina and University of Chicago.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112.
Dechow, P., and I. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77: 35-59.
Easterbrook, F. H. 1984. Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review 74, 650.
Faccio, Mara., Larry H. P. Lang, and L. Young. 2001. Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review 91:54-78.
Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2004. Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79 (4): 967-1010.
Francis, R. and X. Martin. 2008. Timely loss recognition and acquisition profitability. WorkingPaper, University of Missouri.
Gassen J., R. U. Fulbier, and T. Sellhorn. 2006. International differences in conditional conservatism -The role of unconditional conservatism and income smoothing. European Accounting Review 15: 527-564
Givoly, D. and C. Hayn. 2000. The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (3): 287-320.
Givoly, D., C. Hayn and A. Natarajan. 2007. Measuring reporting conservatism. The Accounting Review 82: 65-106.
Hayashi, F. 1982. Tobin’s marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50: 213–224.
Healy, P. and K. Palepu. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 405-440.
Hubbard, R. G. 1998. Capital-market imperfections and investment. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 193–225.
Hope, O. and W. Thomas. 2008. Managerial empire building and firm disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 46: 591-626.
Jensen, M. and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
Jensen, M.C. 1986. Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76 (2): 323-329.
Jiang, J.X. 2009. The role of agency costs and financial reporting conservatism in the security issue decision. Working paper, Fu-Jen Catholic University.
Jiang, J.X. 2010. Does accruals quality dominate conditional conservatism in enhancing investment efficiency? Evidence from listed and unlisted firms in Taiwan. Working paper, Fu-Jen Catholic University.
Kaplan, S., and L. Zingales. 1997. Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1): 169-215.
Khan, M. and R.L. Watts. 2007. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of conservatism. Working Paper, MIT Sloan of Management 4640.
Khan, M. and R.L. Watts. 2009. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of conservatism. Working Paper, MIT Sloan of Management 4640.
Kothari, S. P.; A. J. Leone; and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 163-197.
Kothari, S.P. and R. Sloan. 1992. Information in prices about future earnings: implications for earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics 15: 143-172.
LaFond, R. and R. Watts. 2008. The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review 83 (2): 447-478.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54: 471-517.
Lara, J.M.G., B.G. Osma, and F. Penalva. 2009. Conditional conservatism and firm investment efficiency. Working paper, University Carlos III de Madrid.
Lemmon, M.L. and K.V. Lin. 2003. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Finance 58:1445-1468.
Liu, M. and P. Wysocki. 2007. Cross-sectional determinants of information quality proxies and cost of capital measures. Working Paper, MIT Sloan School of Management.
McNichols, M.F. and S.R. Stubben. 2008. Does earnings management affect firms’ investment decisions? The Accounting Review 83(6): 1571-1603.
Miller, M. and F. Modigliani. 1962. Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business 34: 411-433
Modigliani, F. and M. Miller. 1958. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review 48: 261–297.
Moerman, R. W. 2008. The role of information asymmetry and financial reporting quality in debt trading: evidence from the secondary loan market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 46: 240-260.
Myers, S. C. 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5: 147–175.
Myers, S. and N. Majluf. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13: 187−222.
Nikolaev, V. 2007. Debt covenants and accounting conservatism. Working paper, University of Chicago.
Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11: 661-687.
Pae, J., D. B. Thornton, and M. Welker. 2005. The link between earnings conservatism and the price-to-book ratio. Contemporary Accounting Research 22: 693-717.
Penman, S. and X. Zhang. 2002. Accounting Conservatism, the Quality of Earnings,and Stock Returns. The Accounting Review 77(2): 237-264.
Poterba, M. 1988. Comment: Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 200–206.
Qiang, Xinrong. 2007. The Effects of Contracting, Litigation, Regulation, and Tax Costs on Conditional and Unconditional Conservatism: Cross-Sectional Evidence at the Firm Level. The Accounting Review 82(3): 759-796.
Richardson, S. 2006. Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies 11: 159-189.
Roychowdhury, S. and R.L. Watts. 2007. Asymmetric timeliness of earnings, market-to-book and conservatism in financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 44: 2-31.
Ryan, S. 2006. Identifying conditional conservatism. European Accounting Review 15: 511-525.
Schleifer, A. and R.W. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94: 461-488.
Smith, M.J. 2007. Accounting conservatism and real options. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 22(3): 449-497
Sunder, J., S. Sunder, and J. Zhang. 2009a. Borrower conservatism and debt contracting. Working paper, Northwestern University.
Sunder, J., S. Sunder, and J. Zhang. 2009b. Balance sheet conservatism and debt contracting. Working paper, Northwestern University.
Tobin, James. 1969. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 1: 15-29.
Venugopalan, R. 2001. Conservatism in accounting: good or bad? Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Verdi, R. 2006. Financial reporting quality and investment efficiency. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Watts, R. 2003a. Conservatism in accounting Part I: explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17: 207-221.
Watts, R. 2003b. Conservatism in accounting Part II: evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons 17: 287-301.
Watts, R.L. and J.L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive accounting theory Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
Whited, T.M. and G. Wu. 2004. Financial constraints risk. Working paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Michigan.
Wysocki, P. 2008. Assessing earnings and accruals quality: U.S. and international evidence.Working Paper, MIT Sloan School of Management.
Zhang, J. 2008. The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45: 27-54.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊