(3.238.186.43) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/02/28 15:24
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:蕭雅慈
論文名稱:主題式教學法對台灣國小學生英語口說溝通能力之成效研究
論文名稱(外文):The effects of theme-based instruction on oral communicative competence of EFL young learners in Taiwan
指導教授:許炳煌許炳煌引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:英語教學碩士在職專班
學門:教育學門
學類:普通科目教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:99
語文別:英文
論文頁數:98
中文關鍵詞:主題式口語說教學法口說溝通能力
外文關鍵詞:theme-based oral instructionoral communicative competence
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:512
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
本研究在探討主題式教學法對台灣國小學生英語口說溝通能力之成效以及此教學法對學生英語學習態度與動機的影響。此研究以來自雲林縣某國小五年級二個班級學生為研究對象,這兩班級隨機指派為實驗組跟對照組。實驗組實施主題式口語教學法而對照組則實施傳統口語教學法,每週均上課一次。經過12週的教學後,兩組皆進行英語口說能力測驗並施以英語學習態度與動機問卷。研究結果顯示學生受過主題式教學法學習後在口說溝通能力有顯著進步,而且其英語學習態度與動機也有正向的改變。希望本研究結果能為英語老師在教學實務上提供助益。
The present study mainly aimed at investigating the effects of theme-based oral instruction (TBOI) on elementary school students’ oral communicative competence. Meanwhile, this paper also aimed at examining learners’ perceptions of the use of TBOI, and the changes of learners’ attitudes and motivation towards English learning after the implementation of TBOI.
Two fifth-grade classes in a public elementary school in Yunlin County were randomly assigned to be the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group received TBOI, while the control group took the traditional oral instruction once a week. After the 12-week treatment, an English oral proficiency test and an English learning attitudes and motivation questionnaire were administered to examine learners’ oral communicative competence and their learning attitudes and motivation respectively.
The findings showed that TBOI had helped learners gain significant progress on oral communicative competence, and that the learning attitudes and motivation towards English learning had changed positively after the treatment of TBOI. Hopefully, the findings of the study may provide English teachers with some useful pedagogical implications.

Acknowledgement……………………………………………………………………iii
Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………..iv
List of Tables..………………………………………………………………………..vii
List of Figures..……………………………………………………………………...viii
Chinese Abstract………………………………………………………………………ix
English Abstract……………………………………………………………………….x
Chapter One: Introduction………………………..……………………………………1
Background and Motivation……..……………………………………………….1
Purpose of the Study……………...………………………………………………5
Research Questions………………………………......……………………….….6
Significance of the Study………...……………………………………………….6
Definition of Important Terms……………………………………………………7
Chapter Two: Literature Review………..……………………………………………..9
The Origins of Theme-Based Instruction (TBI)………………………………….9
Theoretical Foundations..……………………………………..………………...10
Key Elements of TBI………….………………………………...………………14
The Benefits of TBI………………………………...……………………….…..17
Related Studies on TBI………………………………….……….……………...19
Critiques on the Previous Research……………………….……….……………22
Chapter Three: Methodology……………...…………………………………………24
Subjects…………………………………………….………………….………..24
Instruments………………………………………….…………………….…….25
English Oral Proficiency Test……………………………………………..25
English Learning Attitudes and Motivation Questionnaire………………..27
Procedure……………………………………………………………………..…29
Theme-Based Oral Instruction (TBOI) for EG………………………………....31
Instruction Procedure...……………………………………………………31
Teaching Process……...……………………...……………………………32
Traditional Oral Instruction for CG…………….……….………………………40
Data Analysis…………………….………………….…………………………..41
Chapter Four: Results………………………….……………………………………..42
The Effects of TBOI and Traditional Oral Instruction on Learners’ Communicative Competence……………………………………………….42
The Comparison of the Learners’ Attitudes and Motivation towards English Learning…………………………………………………………………….43
The Results of the Three Components of the Learning Attitudes Factor…45
The Results of the Anxiety Factor…………………………………………53
The Results of Instrumental Factor………………………………………..54
Chapter Five: Discussion…………….…….……..…………………………………57
Research Question 1: What are the Effects of Theme-Based Instruction on oral Communicative Competence for EFL Elementary School Students? ........................................................................................................57
Research Question 2: Are There Any Changes in Learners’ Attitudes and Motivation towards English Learning After the Implementation of Theme-Based Instruction? If Yes, in What Ways? …………………………60
Learning Attitudes Factor…………………………………………………..61
Anxiety Factor………………………………………………………………63
Instrumental Motivation Factor……………………………………………..63
Chapter Six: Conclusion……………………………………………………………...65
Pedagogical Implication of the Study...……………………………..…………..65
Limitation of the Study…………………………………...………….………….66
Suggestions for the Future Research……………………………….…………..67
References……………………………………………………………………………69
Appendixes…………………………………………………………………………...79
Appendix A: English Oral Proficiency Test……………..……………………...79
Appendix B: English Oral Proficiency Test Scoring Criteria……..……………81
Appendix C: English learning Attitudes and Motivation Questionnaire (Chinese Version)……………................................................................82
Appendix D: English learning Attitudes and Motivation Questionnaire (English Version) …………………………………………..………….84
Appendix E: The Categories of Three Factors for the 25 Questionnaire Items..86
Appendix F: Materials of the Pilot Study………………………………………88

Anderson, R. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference. In Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J. & Montague, W. E. (Eds). Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge (pp. 415-431). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Armbruster, B. (1996). Schema theory and the design of content-area textbook. Educational Psychologist, 21, 253-276.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Berry, C. F., & Mindes, G. (1993). Planning a Theme-Based Curriculum: Goals, Themes, Activities, and Planning Guides for 4’s and 5’s. Glenview, IL: Goodyear.
Bowler, B., & Parminter (2002). Mixed-level teaching: Tiered tasks and bias tasks. In Richards, J.C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds) Methodology in Language Teaching (pp. 59-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-Based Second Language Instruction. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language. New York: Norton.
Bruner, J. S. (1985). Models of the learner. Educational Researcher, 14(6), 5-8.
Cadavid, C. (2003). Teaching English in primary school through a spiral thematic curriculum. Ikkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 8(14), 81-97.
Cameron, L. (2008). Teaching Languages to Young Learners (10th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Can, S. (2009). An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Theme-Based Syllabus on the Motivation of Freshman Students at Atilim University. Unpublished master’s thesis, Atilim University, Atilim, Turkey.
Canal, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
Carreira, M. J. (2006). Motivation for learning English as a foreign language in Japanese elementary schools. The Japan Association for Language Teaching Journal, 28(2), 135-158.
Chang, W. Z. (2006). English language education in Taiwan: A comprehensive survey. National Taiwan Normal University. 1-17. Retrieved from August 13, 2009 from http://publish.lihpao.com/Education/2006/10/17/0101/.
Chen, C. Y. (2004). A Study of English Learning Attitudes of Elementary School Students in Taichung City. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taichung University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chung, M. C. (2004). Effects of Three Theme-based Projects on English Learning for a CMC Group and a Non-CMC Group in Junior High School in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Cooper, J. D. (1993). Literacy: Helping Children Construct Meaning (2ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL–A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In Van D. N., & Hornberger, N. H. (Eds), Encyclopedia Language and Education: Second and Foreign Language Education (2nd ed.), (pp. 97-111). New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.
Crawford, J, (2001). Teacher perceptions of the primary English language program in Taiwan: From the outside looking in. Applied Linguistic Association of Australia Annual Conference, Canberra University. 12-24.
Davies, S. (2003). Content based instruction in EFL contexts. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(2). Retrieved from July 13, 2010 from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Davies-CBI.html
De Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46, 529-555.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. Longman: Pearson Education Limited.
Douglas, M. O. (1996). A theme-based approach: curriculum design for teaching an advanced course of Japanese as a foreign language. Japanese Language Lecture, University of California, Los Angeles, U.S.A.
Doye, P. & Hurrell, A. (1997). Foreign Language Education in Primary Schools. Council of Europe Press.
Duenas, M. (2004). The whats, whys, hows and whos of content-based instruction in second/foreign language education. International Journal of English Studies, 4(1), 73-96.
Dupuy, B. C. (2000). Content-based instruction: Can it help ease the transition from beginning to advanced foreign language classes? Foreign Language Annals, 33(2), 205-222.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Enright, D. S., & McCloskey, M. L. (1988). Integrating English. Reading, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
Ernst, G. & Richard, K. (1995). Teacher preparation: Using videotapes in a teaching practicum. FLES News, 8(2), 5-6.
European Commission (2005). European Language Policy and CLIL. Retrieved from August 08, 2009 from http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/education_culture
Finch, A. E. (2001). The non-threatening learning environment. The Korea TESOL Journal, 4(1), 133-158.
Fisher, B. (1991). Joyful Learning: A Whole Language Kindergarten. Portsmouth. N.H.: Heinemann.
Fleurquin, F (2003). Development of a standardized test for young EFL learners. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment, 1, 1-23.
Freeman, D. E., & Freeman, Y. S. (2006). Teaching language through content themes: Viewing our world as a global village. In Young, T. A., & Hadaway, N. L. (Eds.). Supporting the Literacy Development of English Learners: Increasing Success in All Classrooms (pp. 61–78). Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.
Gardner, H. (1991). The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1992). A student’s contributions to second language acquisition. Part 1: Cognitive variables. Language Teaching, 25, 211-220.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Government Information Office (GIO) (2002). Challenge 2008: The six-year National Development Plan. Retrieved from July, 21, 2009 from
http://www.gio.gov.tw/taiwan-website/4-oa/20020521/2002052101.html.
Graddol, D. (2006). English Next. London: British Council.
Heibert, E. H. (1994). Becoming literate through authentic tasks: Evidence and adaptations. In Ruddell, R., & Ruddell, M. R. (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (pp. 391-413). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learner-Centred Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hymes, D. (1967). On Communicative Competence. Unpublished mamuscript, University of Pennsylvania.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride J. B., & Holmes J. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. Baltimore: Penguin.
Jarvinen, H. M. (2005). Language learning in content-based instruction. In Housen, A., & Pierrard, M. (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 433-456). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG.
Juez, M. (2006), Linking Language and Content: ESL Instruction through Legal Topics. Retrieve from August, 20, 2009 from
www.unizar.es/aelfe2006/ALEFE06/2.%20didactics/46.pdf.
Kim, Y. (2008). The effects of integrated language-based instruction in Elementary ESL learning. The Modern Language Journal, 92(30), 431-451.
Kiziltan, N., & Ersanli, C. (2007). The contributions of theme-based CBI to Turkish young learners’ language development in English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 3(1), 133-148.
Krahnke, K. (1987). Approaches to Syllabus Design for Foreign Language Teaching.
Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1984). Immersion: Why it works and what it has taught us. Language and Society, 12, 61-64.
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York and London: Longman.
Krashen, S. D. (2003). Explorations in Language Acquisition and Language Use: The Taipei Lectures. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Krogh, S. (1990). The Integrated Early Childhood Curriculum. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 31-42.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situate Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, E. (2007). How to learn English? Retrieved from Common Ware Magazine (No. 20070615) on May, 2, 2010 from http://www.cw.com.tw/article/index.jsp?id=3070.
Lee, Y. C. (2008). A Case Study of Developing Model of English Oral Proficiency Test for Pupils in Kinmen District. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
Liruso, S. M., & Debat, E. V. (2003). Giving oral instructions to EFL young learners. Encuentro Revista de Investigacion e Innovacion en la Clase de Idiomas, 13(14), 138-147.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C., & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Language
Acquisition: Vol. 2. Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.
Marsh, D. (2008). Language awareness and CLIL. In Cenoz, J., & Hornberger, N. H. (Eds). Encyclopedia of Language and Education: Knowledge about Language (2nd ed.), 6, (pp. 233-246). New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.
Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Publishers Limited.
Mumford, D. (2000). Planning a Theme Based Unit. Toronto, Canada: Pacific Edge Publishing Ltd.
Nakamura, Y. (1996). Assessment of English speaking ability. Journal of
Humantities and Natural Science, 102, 25-53.
Nakamura, Y. (2005). The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 76-91.
Naughton, D. (2006). Cooperative strategy aining and oral interaction: Enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 169-184.
Nikolov, M. (1999). Why do you learn English? Because the teacher is short: A study of Hungarian children’s foreign language learning motivation. Language Teaching Research, 3, 33-56.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Osman, S. F., Ahmad, E. A., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Nurturing writing proficiency through theme-based lnstruction. Computer and Information Science, 2(3), 140-146.
Peregoy, S. F., & Boyle, O. F. (1997). Reading, Writing & Learning in ESL. New York: Longman.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. New York: Basic Books.
Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63–90.
Richards J. C., & Rodgers T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Savignon, S. J. (1983). Comunicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Seefeldt, C., & Galper, A. (1998). Continuing Issues in Early Childhood Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Seo, E. M. (1998). Thematic language instruction for children. Studies in Languge, 14, 111-125.
Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative Learning. (2nd ed.). Bosotn, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Stoller, F. L. , & Grabe, W. (1997). A six-T's approach to content-based instruction. In Snow, M. A., & Brinton, D. M. (Eds.), The Content-Based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, (pp. 78-94). NewYork: Longman.
Stoller, F. (2004). Content-based instruction: perspectives on curriculum planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 261-283.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some rules of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. G. (Eds.). Input and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Trim, J. L. M. (1997). Preface. In Doye, P., & Hurrell, A. (Eds.), Foreign Language Education in Primary Schools (age 5/6 to 10/11), (pp. 5). Council of Europe Press.
Tuula, M. S. (2007). Pupils’ attitudes towards foreign-language learning and the development of literacy skills in bilingual education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 226-235.
Varonis, E., & Gass, S. M. (1985). Miscommunication in native/non-native conversation. Language in Society,14, 327–343.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wachs, S. (1996). Leaving the room: an introduction to theme-based oral English. Retrieved from The Internet TESL Journal, 2(1) on January 11, 2011 from
http://iteslj.org/
Wesche, M. B., & Skehan, P. (2002). Communicative, task-based, and content-based
language instruction. In Kaplan, R. B. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics, (pp. 207–228). New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, J. (2005). Ethical issues in the testing of young learners. Research Notes, 22, 6-7. (This is an extract from Research Notes, published quarterly by University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations, available on-line from www.CambridgeESOL.org).
Wu, S. M. (1996). Content-based ESL at high school level: A case study. Prospect, 11(1), 18-36.
Wu, S. (2007). Effects of group composition in collaborative learning of EFL writing. In Stephanidis, C. (Ed.), Universal HCI. Retrieved from April 18, 2009, from http://www. springerlink.com/index/335330p1107l4657.pdf
Yang, C. C. (2009). Theme-based teaching in an English course for primary ESL students in Hong Kong. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(2), 161-176.
Zheng, D. L. (2008). Krashen’s input hypothesis and English classroom teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 6(9), 53-56.


連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 簡明哲、陳鈺琪,2005,台灣基層農會信用部之經營績效分析:金融重建基金設置前後之比較,存款保險資訊季刊,18卷,2期,55-74。
2. 曾真真,2007,應用資料包絡法及Malmquist生產力指數衡量壽險業之經營效率:利害關係人觀點,中華管理評論國際學報,10卷,1期,1-20。
3. 林書揚、楊志平、彭克仲,2005,台灣地區生物科技公司相對經營績效之研究,中華農學會報,7卷,5期,455-474。
4. 莊忠柱、吳振國,2006,台灣區農會信用部經營效率評估:非意欲因素資料包絡分析法的應用,東吳經濟商學學報,52期,1-25。
5. 李俊毅,2009,高級職業學校經營效率研究-以資料包絡分析法為例,雄工學報,69-97。
6. 顏晃平,2005,臺灣農業生物科技廠商生產技術效率之分析-以四階段資料包絡分析法評估,農業金融論叢,53期,205-224。
7. 盧永祥、傅祖壇,2005,臺灣地區農會信用部經營效率之分析-三階段DEA 模型之應用,臺灣銀行季刊,56卷,3期,174-192。
8. 蔡宏進,2003,信用部被接管後農會的變遷、問題與強化管理監督之研究,農民組織學刊,5期,1-40。
9. 廖坤榮,2004,台灣農會的社會資本形成與政策績效,政治科學論叢,22期,181-220。
10. 林宜幸、蕭景楷、陳立堂,2006,農會整合轉型之研究,農業金融論叢,54期,209-244。
11. 顏建賢,2001,農民組織研究與發展願景,農訓雜誌,18卷,5期,6-13。
12. 葉忠、黃秀玫、賴慶祥,2009,醫院之暫時醫療所災害應變能力評估,澄清醫護管理雜誌,5卷,1期,33-44。
13. 吳榮杰、劉祥熹、黃士榮,2003,臺灣設立全國農業銀行可行方案之分析,臺灣土地金融季刊,40期,1卷,47-66。
14. 余永讚,2008,中國壽險業經營效率動態分析,風險評論,18期,29-44。
15. 王國樑、張美玲、陳麗雪,2009,台灣地方法院管理效率之探討:三階段資料包絡分析法之應用,管理學報,26卷,5期,559-576。
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔