|
1. Abdulla, R. A., Garrison, B., Salwen, M., Driscoll, P., & Casey, D. (2002). The Credibility of Newspapers, Television News and Online News. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. 2. Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Tormala, Z. L. (2004). The self-validation of cognitive responses to advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 559-573. 3. Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473. 4. Chaplin, N., & John, D. R. (2005). The Development of Self-Brand Connections in Children and Adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 119-129. 5. Collins, N. L. (1996). Working Models of Attachment: Implications for Explanation, Emotion, and Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 810-832. 6. DeBono, K. G., & Harnish, R. J. (1988). Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(541-546). 7. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes: Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 8. Escalas, J. E. (2004). Narrative Processing: Building Consumer Connections to Brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 168-179. 9. Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421-435. 10. Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), 889-906. 11. Greer, J. D. (2003). Evaluating the Credibility of Online Information: A Test of Source and Advertising Influence. Mass Communication and Society 6(1), 11-28. 12. Heesacker, M. H., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1983). Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking. Journal of Personality, 51, 653-666. 13. Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility and Diagnosticity Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454-462. 14. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L. ,& Kelley, H. H. . (1953). Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Obvious Change: New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 15. Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650. 16. Johar, G. V., Birk, M. M., & Einwiller, S. A. (2010). How to Save Your Brand In the Face of Crisis. MIT Management Review, 51(4). 17. Kaufman, D. Q., Stasson, M. F., & Hart, J. W. (1999). Are the tabloids always wrong or is that just what we think? Need for cognition and perceptions of articles in print media. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1984-1997. 18. Keller, P. A., & Block, L. G. . (1996). Increasing the Persuasiveness of Fear Appeais: The Effect of Arousal and Elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 448-461. 19. Kelman, H. C., & Hovland, C. I. (1953). "Reinstatement" of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 327-335. 20. Klein, J. G. (1996). Negativity in Impression of Presidential Candidates Revisited: The 1992 Election. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 289-296. 21. Kroloff, G. (1988). At Home and Abroad: Weighing In. Public Relations Joumal, 44(October), 8. 22. Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 83-109. 23. Lord, C. R., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109. 24. MacKenzie, A., & Evans, S. (2010). The Toyota Recall Crisis. Retrieved 05/13, 2011 25. Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(August), 361-367. 26. Marconi, J. (1997). Crisis Marketing: When Bad Things Happen to Good Companies: Chicago: American Marketing Association. 27. Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment Working Models and the Sense of Trust: An Exploration of Interaction Goals and Affect Regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1209-1224. 28. Milberg, S. J., Park, C. W., & McCarthy, M. S. (1997). Managing Negative Feedback Effects Associated with Brand Extensions: The Impact of Alternative Branding Strategies. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6(2), 119-140. 29. Mills, J., & Jellison, J. M. (1967). Effect on opinion change of how desirable the communication is to the audience the communicator addressed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 98-101. 30. Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A. B., & Lacobucci, D. (2010). Brand Attachment and Brand Attitude Strength: Conceptual and Empirical Differentiation ofTwo Critical Brand Equity Drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74, 1-17. 31. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change: New York: Springer-Verlag. 32. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855. 33. Rhine, R., & Severance, L. (1970). Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 175-190. 34. Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and Physiological Processes in Fear Appeals and Attitude Change: A Revised Theory of Protection Motivation: New York: Guilford. 35. Romeo, J. B. (1991). The Effect of Negative Information on the Evaluations of Brand Extensions and the Family Brand (Vol. 18): UT : Association for Consumer Research. 36. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. . (1987). Social Judgment and Social Memory: The Role of Cue Diagnosticity in Negativity, Positivity, and Extremity Biases. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 689-699. 37. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and Extremity in Impression Formation: A Review of Explanation. Psychological Bulletin,, 105, 131-142. 38. Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence: Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 39. Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock Random House. 40. Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2004). Source Credibility and Attitude Certainty: A Metacognitive Analysis of Resistance to Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 427-442. 41. Zanna, M. P. (1993). Advertising Exposure, Memory, and Choice New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|