(3.239.33.139) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/07 22:24
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳立峰
研究生(外文):Li-Feng Cheng
論文名稱:探討泰國和台灣選擇C2C物流公司之關鍵因素研究
論文名稱(外文):The Study of Key Factors for Selecting C2C LogisticsCompanies between Thailand and Taiwan
指導教授:李宗儒 博士
指導教授(外文):Lee, Tzong-Ru
口試委員:關復勇
口試日期:2011-07-28
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:科技管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:英文
論文頁數:116
中文關鍵詞:關鍵成功要素客戶對客戶物流公司分析層級程序法泰國台灣
外文關鍵詞:KSFsC2C logistics companyAHPThailandTaiwan
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:166
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究旨在探討影響消費者選擇C2C物流公司之行為,並瞭解消費者對於選擇泰國和台灣物流公司之重要趨勢決定因素。第一階段的研究先調查第三方物流提供者,並搜尋相關重要趨勢的文獻,整理出決策合作層級架構之潛在重要因子。
本研究以問卷衡量決策層級架構的因素等級。共蒐集400份有效問卷,來自泰國和台灣的問卷各為200份。本研究採用分析層級程序法Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP),其用以計算三種物流等級在全球各地的要素權重,因此能夠更合理解釋泰國和台灣的物流業要素。
研究結果發現4項對於泰國物流業的關鍵性成功要素(KSFs)為「運價」、「準時交貨」、「服務質量」、「交貨期短」。台灣物流業的關鍵性成功要素則為「運價」、「服務質量」、「準時交貨」、「即時回應要求」。其中「運價」這項關鍵性成功要素對於兩國的重要性層級是相同的。因此泰國和台灣的C2C物流公司與物流業者可以參考本研究結果的關鍵成功要素(KSFs)。


The purpose of this study aims to investigate the factors affecting the behavior of consumers for selecting the C2C Logistics companies and determines the factors which given a better comprehension of the importance trends in decision-making of selecting logistics provider in Thailand and Taiwan. The first step of this research is to investigate of important factor trends of C2C logistics provider and identify relevant factors from important factor trend by searching in the related literature. Then, we can arrange potentially factors cooperate with decision hierarchical structure. The levels of factors in decision hierarchical structure were determined by questionnaire survey. There are 400 valid samples, of which 200 samples belong to Thailand and 200 samples belong to Taiwan. In this research, we apply Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP) method cooperated with the three ranking logic to calculate in the global weight for each factor. From the result of complete independent law, we can claim that the weight in each important factor seems to be more reasonable in both Thailand and Taiwan. Therefore, there are 4 KSFs in each country which in Thailand are: “transport price”, “on-time delivery”, “quality of service” and “short lead time”. While, Taiwan are: “transport price”, “quality of service”, “on-time delivery” and “prompt response to claim”. Interestingly, there is one of KSFs: “transport price” which is first rank and same rank of both countries as well. Thus, based on the result, we proposed these finding and reason for selecting KSFs to C2C logistics companies in both Thailand and Taiwan.

摘 要 I
Abstract II
Table of Contents III
List of Table V
List of Figures VII
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Research Motivation 3
1.3 Research Objective and Research Questions 4
1.4 Research Process 5
Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
2.1. B2B 6
2.2. B2C 7
2.3. C2C 7
2.4. Defining Characteristics of C2C Logistics Companies 8
2.5 Empirical Key Factor List for C2C Logistics Companies Selection 10
Chapter 3 Research Methodology 21
3.1 AHP 21
3.1.1 Step of AHP 23
3.1.2 Strength of AHP 28
3.1.3 Weakness of AHP 29
3.2 The Three Ranking Logic to Calculate the Global Weights 30
3.2.1 Partial Inheritance Law 31
3.2.2 Complete Inheritance Law 32
3.2.3 Complete Independent Law 33
3.3 Establishment of The Research Model 33
3.3.1 Decision Hierarchy Model 34
Chapter 4 Data Analysis and Research Finding 37
4.1 Research Design 37
4.1.1 Questionnaire Design 37
4.1.2 Research Target 38
4.1.3. Population and Sample Size 39
4.1.4. Sample Collecting Method and Time Period 40
4.2 Data Analysis 41
4.2.1. Basic Information of the Subject in Model 41
4.2.2. The Eigen value, the Eigenvector, and the Consistency of Level 2 in Model 44
4.3 The Three Ranking Logic for Model 47
4.3.1 Partial Inheritance Law 47
4.3.2 Complete Inheritance Law 53
4.3.3 Complete Independent Law 56
4.4 Discussion-Model 59
4.4.1 Comparison of Three ranking Logic 59
4.5 Research Findings 75
4.5.1 The Finding and Reason for Selecting KSFs in Case of Thailand 75
4.5.2 The Finding and Reason for Selecting KSFs in Case of Taiwan 77
Chapter 5 Conclusion and Discussion 81
Reference 83
Appendix 94


Books:

1.Jian, Z-F. (2005). Decision analysis and management: A unison framework for total decision quality enhancement. Taipei: Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.

2.Lynch, CF. (2000). Logistics Outsourcing: A management guide. Council of Logistics Management Publications, Chicago, IL.

3.Saaty, T.L. (1980). Multicriteria decision making: The analytic hierarchy process. Mac Graw Hill, New York (2nd impr.1990, RSW Publishing, Pittsburgh).

4.Saaty, T.L. (1990). The analysis hierarchy process: Planning, Priority setting, resource allocation. Pittsburgh, Pa, RWS.

5.Vitalijs, J., Vladimirs, J., Konstantins, D., (2007). Modelling of finance stability in logistics in condition of uncertaty. Proceedings 21st European Conference on Modelling and Simulation Ivan Zelinka, Zuzana Oplatková, Alessandra Orsoni ©ECMS, ISBN 978-0-9553018-2-7, ISBN 978-0-9553018-3-4 (CD).

Journal articles:

1.Aguilar, L.A., Bautista, B.M., Ponsich, A., González, H.M. (2009). An AHP-based decision-making tool for the solution of multiproduct batch plant design problem under imprecise demand. Computers & Operations Research 36, 711– 736.

2.Albayrak, E. (2004). Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: An application of multiple criteria decision making problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 15, 491-503.

3.Al-Subhi A.H.K. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management 19, 19-27.

4.Appelqvist, P., & Gubi, E. (2005). Postponed variety creation: case study in consumer electronics retail. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(10), 734-748.

5.Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, S.F., & Izadbakhsh, H. (2008). Integration of DEA and AHP with computer simulation for railway system improvement and optimization. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 195, 775–785.

6.Badell, M., Pomero, J., Puigjaner, L., (2005). Optimal budgets and cash flow during retrofitting period in batch chemical industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 95(3), 359–372.
7.Bardi, E.J., Bagchi, P.K., & Raghunathan, T.S. (1989). Motor carrier selection in a deregulated nvironment. Transportation Journal, 29 (1), 4-11.

8.Bardi, E.J., Raghunathan, T.S., & Bagchi, P.K. (1994). Logistics information systems: The strategic role of top management. Journal of Business Logistics, 15(1), 71–85.

9.Barua, A., & Lee, B. (1997). An Economic Analysis of the Introduction of an Electronic Data Interchange System. Information System Research, 8, 1047- 7047.

10.Bhatnagar, R., Sohal, A.S. and Millen, R. (1999), “Third party logistics services: a Singapore erspective”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 29 , 569-587.

11.Bone, P.F. & Corey, R.J. (1992) Ethical dilemmas in packaging: beliefs of packaging professionals. Journal of Macro Marketing, Spring, 32–57.

12.Boynton, A., & Zmud, R.W. Information technology planning in the 1990s.MIS Quarterly, 11, 59–71.

13.Boyson, S., Corsi, T., Dresner, M., & Rabinovich, E. (1999). Managing third party logistics relationships: what does it take. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 73–100.

14.Brennemen, W.B., Keys, J.B., & Fulmer, R.M. (1998). Learning Across a Living Company: The Shell Companies’Experience. Organizational Dynamics, 2, 9871.

15.Burt, S. and Sparks, W. (2003) E-commerce and the retail process: a review, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10, 275-286.

16.Buyukozkan, G., Feyzioglu, O., & Nebol, E. (2008). Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain. International Journal Production Economics, 113,148 –158.

17.Carlsson, C., & Walden, P. (1995). AHP in political group decisions: A study in the art of possibilities. Interfaces, 25, 14-29.

18.Chang, H.L., & Yeh, C.C. (2005). Factors affecting the safety performance of bus companies—The experience of Taiwan bus deregulation. Safety Science, 43, 323–344.

19.Comyn-Wattiau, I., & Akoka, J. (1996). Logistics Information System Auditing Using Expert System Technology. Expert Systems with Applications, 11(4), 463-473.

20.Dacin, T., Hitt, M.A., & Levitas, E. (1997). Selecting partners for successful international alliances: Examination of US and Korean firms. Journal of World Business, 32(1), 3–16.

21.Dolan, J. (2008). Shared decision-making – transferring research into practice: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Patient Education and Counseling, 73, 418–425.

22.Dong, Y., Xu, Y., Li, H., & Dai, M. (2008). A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 229–242.

23.Dong, Y., Zhang, G., Hong, W.C., & Xu, Y. (2010). Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decision Support Systems, 49, 281–289.

24.Dubiel, M. (1996). Costing structures of reusable packaging systems. Packaging Technology and Science, 9, 237-254.

25.Duclos, L.K., Vokurka, R.J. & Lummus, R.R. (2003). A conceptual model of supply chain flexibility. Industry management & Data system, 103(6), 446-456.

26.Duclos, L.K., Lummus, R.R., & Vokurka, R.J. (2001). A conceptual model of supply chain flexibility, Proceedings of the Paper Presented at the 32th Decision Science. Institute Annual Meeting, San Francisco, USA, November 17–20.

27.Gefen et al.,( 2003). The online consumer trust construct: A Web Merchant Partition Perspective. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the Southern Association for Information Systems.

28.Grout, (1998). Influencing a supplier using delivery windows: Its effect on the variance of flow time and on-time delivery. Decision Sciences, 29, 30149-5024.

29.Goh, M., & Pinaikul, P. (1998). Research paper: logistics management practices and development in Thailand. Logistics Information Management, 11, 359–369.

30.Gol, H. & Ҫatay, B. (2007). Third-party logistics provider selection: insights from a Turkish automotive company. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12(6), 379–384.

31.Golob, T.F., Regan, A.C., 2001. Impacts of information technology on personal travel and commercial vehicle operations: research challenges and opportunities. Transportation Research Part C, 9, 87–121.

32.Grout, J., & Christy, D. (1993). An inventory model of incentives for on-time delivery in just-in-time purchasing contracts. Naval Research Logistics, 40, 863-877.

33.Gunasekaran, A. et al., (2002). E-commerce and its impact on operations management. International Journal: Production Economics, 75, 185–197.

34.Harker, P., & Vargas, L. (1987). The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 33(11), 1383–1403.

35.Hertz S., Alfredsson M. (2003), Strategic development of third party logistics providers, Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 139-149.

36.Hickson, A. (2006). Motor vehicle insurance rating with pseudo emissions coverage. Ecological Economics, 58,146– 159.

37.Hu, C-Y. (2006). To determine the key factors that influence consumer to join the group purchasing online. National Chung Hsing University.

38.Jenkins, M. (2000). One, two, 3PL: choosing the right third-party logistics provider. Materials Management and Distribution, 45(2), 29.

39.Jharkharia, S., & Shankar, R. (2007). Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. The international journal of management science, Omega, 35, 274 – 289.

40.Joseph, S. (2003), “A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 11,397-409.

41.Kamal, M., & Al-Harbi, A.S. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 19-27.

42.Kannan, G. (2009). Fuzzy approach for the selection of third party reverse logistics provider. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(3), 397-416.

43.Karsak, E. E., & Tolga, E. (2001). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making procedure for evaluating advance manufacturing system in investment. International Journal of Production economics, 69, 49-64.

44.Kearney, A.T. (1994). Achieving customer satisfaction through logistics excellence. Managing Service Quality, 4(2), 47-50.

45.Keskinen, A., Delache, X., Cruddas, J., Lindjord, J.E., Iglesias, C., (2002). A Purchase and a Chain. Impacts of E-commerce on Transport and the Environment. OECD, Paris.

46.Ketikidis, P.H., Koh, S.C.L. Dimitriadis, N., Gunasekaran, Kehajova, A. (2008). The use of information systems for logistics and supply chain management in South East Europe: Current status and future direction. The international journal of management science, Omega, 36, 592 – 599.

47.Kiku, J., Lori N.K., Leonard: Trust in consumer-to-consumer electronic commerce. Information & Management, 45, 88-95.

48.Kurttilaa, M. et al. (2000). “Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process AHP in SWOT analysis. A hybrid method and its application to aforest-certification case”. Forest Poland Economics, 41-52.

49.Kumar, A., & Sharman, G. (1992). We love your product, but where is it?. Sloan Management Review, 33(2), 93-99.

50.Lai, S., Wong, K., & Cheung, W. (2002). Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection. European Journal Research, 137, 134-144.

51.Lee, A.H.I., Chen, W.C., & Chang, C.J. (2008). A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of it department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert systems with Application, 34, 96-107.

52.Lee, M., Pham, H., & Zhang, X. (1999). A methodology for priority setting with application to software development process. European Journal of Operational Research, 118, 375-389.

53.Lee-Partridgea, J.E., Teo, T.S.H., Lim, V.K.G. (2000). Information technology management: the case of the Port of Singapore Authority. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 85-99.

54.Leung, P., Muraoka, J., Nakamoto, S., & Pooley, S. (1998). Evaluating sheries management options in Hawaii using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Fisheries Research, 36, 171-183.

55.Liang, G.S., Chou, T.Y., & Kan, S.F. (2006). Applying fuzzy quality function deployment to identify service management requirements for an ocean freight forwarder. Total Quality Management, 17(5), 539–554.

56.Lieb, R.C. (1992), “The use of third party logistics services by large American manufacturers”, Journal of Business Logistics,13, 29-42.

57.Lin, C.K.Y. (2008). A cooperative strategy for a vehicle routing problem with pickup
and delivery time windows. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55,766–782.

58.Lin, Y., & Su, H. (2003). Strategic analysis of customer relationship management-a field studies on hotel enterprises. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 14(6), 715– 731.

59.Lin, Y., Su, H.Y., Chien, S. (2006). A knowledge-enabled procedure for customer relationship management. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 446 – 456.

60.Liu, H., & Wang, W. (2009). An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4387–4398.

61.Lo, S.H., & Hall, R.W., (2008). The design of real-time logistics information system for trucking industry. Computers & Operations Research, 36, 3439 – 3451.

62.Lu, C. (2003). The impact of carrier service attributes on shipper–carrier partnering relationships: a shipper’s perspective. Transportation Research Part E, 39, 399–415.

63.Martin k., et al. (2008). Early challenges of implementing an e-commerce system in a medical supply company: A case experience from a knowledge transfer partnership (KTP). International Journal of Information Management, 28, 68–75.

64.MartiInez, J.A., & MartiInez, L. (2010). Some insights on conceptualizing and measuring service quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,17 , 29–42.

65.Matear, S.M., & Gray, R. (1993). Factors influencing freight service choice for shippers and freight suppliers. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 23(2), 25–35.

66.Mayer, R.C., Davis J.H., & Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manage Rev, 20(3), 709–34.

67.Mayer, K.j. (2002). Human resource practice and service quality in them parks. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality management, 14(4),169-175.

68.Menon M., McGinnis M., Ackerman K. (1998), Selection criteria for providers of third-party logistics services: an exploratory study, Journal of Business Logistics, 19, 121-137.


69.Mokhtarian, P.L., 2002. Telecommunication and travel: the case for complementarity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 6(2), 43–57.

70.Mokhtarian, P.L., 2004. A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of b2c ecommerce. Transportation, 31(3), 257–284.

71.Murphy, P.R. and D.F. Wood. (2004) Contemporary logistics, 8th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2004.

72.Murtaza, M. B. (2003). Fuzzy-European J. Oper. Res application to country risk assessment. American Business Review, 21(2), 109116.

73.Nash, C., Sansom, T., & Still, B. (2001). Modifying transport prices to internalise externalities: evidence from European case studies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31, 413–431.

74.Ozgener,S., & Iraz, R. (2006). Customer relationship management in small–medium enterprises: The case of Turkish tourism industry. Tourism Management, 27, 1356–1363.

75.Proost, S., Dender, K.V., Courcelle, C., Borger, B.D., Peirson. J., Sharp, D., Vicherman, R., Gibbons, E., O’Mahony, M., Heaney, Q., Bergh, J.V.D., Verhoef, E. (2002). How large is the gap between present and efficient transport prices in Europe? Transport Policy, 9, 41-57.

76.Rahman, Z. (2004). Use of Internet in supply chain management: a study of Indian companies. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 104(1), 31-41.

77.Rahman, Z. & Qureshi, M.N. (2007). Integrating the supply chain flows for business effectiveness. Studies in Business and Economics, 13(1), 5-20.

78.Ramanathan, R. & Ganesh, L.S. (1995). Using AHP for resource allocation problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 80, 410-417.

79.Razzaque, M.A. & Sheng, C.C. (1998). Outsourcing of logistics functions: a literature survey. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 28(2), 89-107.

80.Richard J. Tersine and Edward A. Humming-bird, (1995). Lead-time reduction: the search for competitive advantage. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15, 8-18.

81.Roberts, L. (1996). Improving the environmental performance of firms: the experience of two metal working companies. Journal Clenner Prod, 4(34),175-187.

82.Saaty, T.L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 32, 841-855.

83.Saaty, T L. (1994). How to make a decision: The analysis hierarchy process. Interfaces, 24(6), 19-43.

84.Schary, P.B. (1992). A concept of customer service. Logistics and Transportation Review, 28(4), 341-52.

85.Sheen, G.J. & Tai, C.T. (2006). A study on decision factors and third party selection criterion of logistics. Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(2), 331-37.

86.Skjoett-Larsen, T., (2000). European logistics beyond 2000. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30, 377-387.

87.Speier, C., M. Harvey, and J. Palmer (1998) Virtual management of global marketing relationships. accepted for publication in Journal of World Business, XX-XX.

88.Spencer, M.S., Rogers, D.S. & Daugherty, P.J. (1994). JIT systems and external logistics suppliers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(6), 60-74.

89.Stak, T.P. & Maltz, A.B.(1996). Some propositions on Third Party Choice: domestic vs international logistics providers. Journal of Marketing, Spring, 45- 54.

90.Sheu, J. B. (2004). A hybrid fuzzy-based approach for identifying global logistics strategies. Transportation Research part E, 40, 39-61.

91.Stam, A., Minghe, S., & Haines, M. (1996). Artificial neural network representations for hierarchical preference structure. Computer and Operation Research, 23, 1191-1201.

92.Stank, T.P., & Daugherty, P.J. (1997). The impact of operating environment on the formation of cooperative logistics relationships. Transportation Research-E Logistics and Transportation Review, 33(1), 53–65.

93.Stank, T. P., Goldsby, T. J., Vickery, S. K., & Savitskie, K. (2003). Logistics service performance: Estimating its influence on market share. Journal of Business Logistics, 24(1), 27−55.

94.Szczypinska, A., & Piotrowski, E.W. (2008). Projective market model approach to AHP decision making. Physica A, 387, 3982–3986.

95.Tate, K. (1996). The elements of a successful logistic partnership. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 26(3), 7-13.

96.Tersine, R.J. and Hummingbird, E.A. (1995). Lead-time reduction: the search for competitive advantage. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 15, 2.

97.Treville, D., Shapiro, R.D., & Hameri, AP. (2004). From supply chain to demand chain: the role of lead time reduction in improving demand chain performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 613–627.

98.TM Staff. (1991).You can make the customer-service difference. Traffic Management, 39-43.

99.Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2006). Evaluating intertwined effect in e-leaning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model bases on factor analysis and demote. Expert system with application , 32, 1028-1044.

100.Tzeng, G., Chiang, C., & Li, C., (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 1028–1044.

101.Upton, D. (1994). The management of manufacturing flexibility. California Management Review, 36(1), 72-89.

102.Vaidyanathan, G. (2005). A framework for evaluating third-party logistics. Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 89-94.

103.Van L.P.J.M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Set and Systems, 11, 229-241.

104.Visser, E.J., Lanzendorf, M., 2004. Mobility and accessibility effects of b2c ecommerce: a literature review. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie (TESG) 95(2), 189–205.

105.Wang, X., Cheng, T.C.E. (2009). Logistics scheduling to minimize inventory and transport costs. Inter Journal ProductionEconomics, 121, 266–273.

106.Wang, S.S., Young, V.R., & Panjer, H.H. (1997). Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 21, 173-183.

107.Wang, T.C., & Lin, Y.L. (2009). Accurately predicting the success of B2B e-commerce in small and medium enterprises. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal, 2-36.

108.Wattiau, I.C., & Akoka, J. (1996). Logistics information system auditing using expert system Technology. Expert Systems With Applications, 11(4), 463473.

109.Weltevreden, J.W.J. and Van Rietbergen, T. (2007) E-shopping versus city centre shopping: the role of perceived city centre attractiveness. Journal of Economic & Social Geography (TESG), 98, 68-85.

110.Weltevreden, J.W.J., & Rotem-Mindali, O. (2009). Mobility effects of b2c and c2c e-commerce in the Netherlands: a quantitative assessment. Journal of Transport Geography, 17,83–92. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.

111.Wong, J.K.W., Li, H. (2008). Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems. Building and Environment, 43, 108–125.

112.Wong, J.-Y. & Chou, Y.- C. (2006). Decision analysis: methods and application. Taipei: Hwa Tai Publishing.

113.Wrigley, N., Lowe, M. and Currah, A. (2002) Retailing and e-tailing. Urban Geography, 23, 180-197.

114.Wu, J.H., & Hisa, T.L. (2004). Analysis of E-commerce innovation and impact: a hypercube model. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 389-404.

115.Yan, J., Chaudhry, P.E., & Chaudhry, S.S. (2003). A model of decision support system based on case-based reasoning for third-party logistics evaluation. Expert Systems, 20(4), 196–207.

116.Young, D.E. (2000). Testing and evaluation of transport packaging: a view to the future. Package Technol. Sci,13, 3-6.

117.Yurdakul, M. (2004). AHP as a strategic decision-making tool to justify machine tool selection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 146, 365–376.

118.Zahir, S. (1999). Clusters in a group: Decision making in the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 112, 620-634.

Electronic source:

1.AC Nielsen research company website (2007), the traditional trade both in Thailand and Taiwan, available at: (http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/global/en.html) 20/04/2011.

2.Ministry of Economic Affairs, R.O.C., (2007), e-commerce market value, available at: (http://www.moea.gov.tw/mns/english/home/English.aspx) 03/05/2011.
3.National Electronics and Computer Technology Center (2007), e-commerce market value, available at: (http://www.nectec.or.th/) 03/05/2011.
4.National statistical office of Thailand website (2009), the retailer trend, available at: (http://www.nso.go.th/) 19/04/2011.

Others:

1.Capgemini, (2007). The user challenge benchmarking the supply of online public services. Directorate General for Information Society and Media, September 2007.

2.Corritore et al., (2003). Online trust and health information websites. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS, Montreal, December 8, 2007.

3.Huang, C.C. et al.,(2010). Aripiprazole improves social interaction in Taiwanese.

4.Mohrman, S.A. & Von Glinow, M.A. (1990). High technology organizations:a synthesis, in Von Glinow, M.A. and Mohrman, S.A. (Eds). Managing Complexity in High Technology Organizations, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 278-95.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔