參考文獻
1.林妙芬(民82)，「降低酒醉駕車肇事之政策探討— 台灣之實證研究」，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。2.郭奕妏(民99)，「高速公路實施電子計程收費之駕駛人願付通行費率分析」，運輸計畫季刊，第三十九卷第二期，頁223-225。
3.陳凱俐(民85)，「遊憩區經濟效益評估法之應用與比較-以頭城休閒農場為例」，宜蘭農工學報，第十二期，頁23-39。4.葉寶文(民91年)，「酒後開車行為決策之研究」，東吳大學經濟學系博士論文，未出版，台北市。5.葉寶文(民91)，「酒後開車之願付風險價值研究」，東吳大學經濟學系博士論文，未出版，台北市。
6.趙家皓(民89)，「台灣酒後駕車行為的探討與分析」，輔仁大學經濟學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北縣。7.劉錦添(民89)，「淡水河水質改善的經濟效益評估-封閉式假設市場評估法之應用」，經濟論文，第十八卷第二期，頁99-128。8.鍾宜庭(民94)。淡水漁人碼頭遊客遊憩體驗與願付價格之研究。國立臺灣海洋大學海洋資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北縣。9.交通部 http://www.motc.gov.tw/mocwebGIP/wSite/mp?mp=1
10.內政部警政署 http://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/mp?mp=1
11.行政院主計處 http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1
12.中華民國統計資訊網 http://www1.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=3
13.台北市交通警察大隊 http://www.tpd.gov.tw/no_drink/index-5.htm
14.Becker, G. S., (1968), “Crime and punishment: An economic approach,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 169-217
15.Bruce K., Johson, John C., Whitehead, (2000), “Value of public goods from sports stadiums: the CVM approach”, contemporary economic policy, Vol.18, No.1, pp. 48-58
16.Barreiro, J., Sanchez, M., and Viladrich-Grau, M., (2005), “How much are people willing to pay for silence? A contingent valuation study”, Applied Economics, Vol.37, pp.1233–1246.
17.Bengochea-Morancho, A., Fuertes-Eugenio, A.M., Saz-Salazar, S.D., (2005), “A comparison of empirical models used to infer the willingness to pay in contingent valuation”, Empirical Economics, Vol30, pp.235–244.
18.Balcombe, K., Fraser, I., Harris, L., (2005), “Consumer willingness to pay for in-flight service and comfort levels: A choice experiment”, Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol.15, pp. 221-226
19.Broughton, P.S., Fuller, R., Stradling, S., Gormley, M., Kinnear, N., O’dolan, C., Hannigan, B., (2009), “Conditions for speeding behaviour: A comparison of car drivers and powered two wheeled riders”, Transportation Research Part F, Vol.12, pp. 417–427
20.Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V., (1947), "Capital Returns from Soil-conservation Practices", Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 29, pp. 1181-1196
21.Chu, C.Y., Jiang, N., (1993), “Are fine more efficient than imprisonment?” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 51, pp.115-124
22.Cooper, J. C., Hanemann, M. and Signorello, G, (2002), “One and one-half bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.84, pp. 742–50
23.Chang, J.I., Yoo, S.H., Kwak, S.J., (2007), “An investigation of preference uncertainty in the contingent valuation study”, Applied Economics Letters, Vol.14, pp. 691–695
24.Diener, E., Payne, J., Rose, J., (2005), “Estimating The Non-Market Value Of Sculptures In Municipal Parks”, Uncw
25.Espino, R., Martin, J.C., Roman, C., (2008), “Analyzing the effect of preference heterogeneity on willingness to pay for improving service quality in an airline choice context”, Transportation Research Part E, Vol.44, pp. 593-606
26.Fernandes, R., Hatfield, J., Soames Job, R.F., (2010), “A systematic investigation of the differential predictors for speeding, drink-driving, driving while fatigued, and not wearing a seat belt, among young drivers”, Transportation Research Part F, Vol.13, pp. 179–196
27.Hicks, J., (1943), "The Four Consumer＇s surplus", Economics and Statistics, Vol.11, pp. 31-41
28.Hanemann, W. H., (1984), “Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.66, No. 3, pp.332-341
29.Hanemann, W. H., Loomis, J., Kanninen, B., (1991), “Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.73, pp.1255–1263.
30.Hu. W., (2006), “Use of spike models in measuring consumers’ willingness to pay for Non-GM oil,” Journal of agricultural economics, vol. 38, issue 3, pp.525-538
31.kriström, B., (1990), “A Non-Parametric Approach to the Estimation of Welfare Measures in Discrete Response Valuation Studies”, Land Economics, Vol.66, No. 2, May
32.Kriström, B., (1997), “Spike models in contingent valuation”, American Journal Agricultural Economics, Vol. 79, pp. 1013±23
33.Leandro, S., (2001), “Restoring dockland areas for recreation purposes: A contingent valuation study”, European Real Estate Society Conference
34.Nikoleris, A., Tsamboulas, D.A., (2008), “Passengers’ willingness to pay for airport ground access time savings”, Transportation Research Part A, Vol.42, pp. 1274–1282
35.Polinsky, A. M. and Shavell, S., (1991) “A note on optimal fines when wealth varies among individuals,” American Economic Review, Vol. 81, pp. 618-621
36.Saz-Salazar, S.D., and Garcia-Menendez, L., (2001), “Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in a large city”, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 20, pp.103–112
37.Scott-Parke, B., Watson, B., King, M.J., (2009), “Understanding the psychosocial factors influencing the risky behavior of young drivers”, Transportation Research Part F, Vol.12, pp. 470–482
38.Steg, L., Brussel, A.V., (2009), “Accidents, aberrant behaviours, and speeding of young moped riders”, Transportation Research Part F, Vol.12, pp. 503–511
39.Yoo, S.-H., Kwak, S.-J., (2002), “Using a spike model to deal with zero response data from double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys”, Applied Economics Letters, Vol.9, pp.929-932
40.Yoo, S.-H., Shin, C.-O., and Kwak, S.-J., (2006), “Inconvenience cost of spam mail: a contingent valuation study”, Applied Economics Letters, Vol.13, pp.933–936