臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

儘管已經有許多關於產業聚落、海外直接投資、研發強度及外國資本投入的相關文獻，協助並增進本研究對於創新績效決定因素的了解，然而很少有研究將以上這些因素連結在一起進行研究。因此，本研究將整合這些因素的理論發展，目的是為了能夠從更多面向來建立觀念架構，以期更完整的解釋影響新興工業化國家創新績效的決定因素。本研究以台灣半導體產業為探討對象，並經實證分析顯示產業聚落、海外直接投資、研發強度及外國資本投入對於創新績效有顯著的解釋能力，然而，本研究也發現這些因素並不是一直對創新績效有顯著的影響，因為這些因素對創新績效的影響效果會受到科技機會(technological opportunities)、外資持股程度(the level of foreign presence)和產業聚落(cluster)所影響，意味著之前針對於產業聚落、海外直接投資、研發強度及外國資本投入的整合性研究結果可能並不完整，本研究則進一步再以科技機會、外資持股程度及產業聚落的分群下，來探討這些因素與創新績效的關係。

Although the literatures on cluster, foreign direct investment, R&D intensity and
foreign capital have assisted significantly in improving our understanding regarding the determinants of innovation performance, there has been little research concerning the way in which each informs the other. Integrating theoretical developments from all four literatures, we propose and test a multidimensional conceptual framework that allows us to explain more fully what determines innovation performance in newly industrializing economies. Take semiconductor industry-level dataset in Taiwan for example, the empirical analysis indicates that it has significant power in explaining variations in innovation performance. Nevertheless, our findings also show that factors such as cluster, foreign direct investment, R&D intensity and foreign capital do not always have positive consequences. However, they indicate that their effects are moderated by technological opportunities、the level of foreign presence and cluster, implying that previous mixed findings regarding the role of cluster, foreign direct investment, R&D intensity and foreign capital may be the result of incomplete theorizing about the factors that moderate the relationship between innovation performance and these factors.

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 1
第二節 研究目的．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 4
第三節 研究流程．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 5
第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 創新績效．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 6
第二節 產業聚落與創新績效的關聯性．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 9
第三節 海外直接投資與創新績效的關聯性．．．．．．．．．．．．．12
第四節 研發強度與創新績效的關聯性．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．18
第五節 外國資本投入與創新績效的關聯性．．．．．．．．．．．．．20
第六節 以科技機會、外資持股程度及產業聚落來分群下衡量各因素對
創新績效的影響．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．22
第七節 公司規模及公司成立年資與創新績效的關係．．．．．．．．．25
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．26
第二節 研究假說．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．27
第三節 研究設計．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．28
第四章 研究結果與分析
第一節 敘述性統計．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．33
第二節 各因素與創新績效的關聯性分析．．．．．．．．．．．．．．34
第三節 分群下衡量各因素對創新績效的影響分析．．．．．．．．．．38
第四節 假設驗證結果．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．48
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 49
第二節 研究建議與限制．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 52
第六章 參考文獻
英文文獻．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．55
中文文獻．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．65

>英文文獻
1. Allie, K.L., A.Q.Khan and G.G. Ramirez (1993). “ The Pecking order hypothesis: Australian evidence”, Finance Economics, 3, 101-112.
2. Archibugi, D, Pianta, M. (1996). “Measuring Technological Change through Patents and Innovation Surveys”. Technovatio., 19(9),451-68.
3. Audretsch, D. B. & Feldman, M.P.(1996). “R&D Spillovers and Geography of Innovation and Production”, American Economic Review, 83(3), 630-645.
4. Baseberg, B.L. (1987). “Patents and the Measurement of Technological Change: A Survey of the Literature”, Research Policy, 16, 131-141.
5. Blind, K. and Grupp, H. (1999). “Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequence”, Research Policy, 28,451-468.
6. Blomstrom, M., & Kokko, A. (1998). “Multinational corporations and spillovers”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3), 247-277.
7. Buckley, J. P., Wang, C., & Clegg, J. (2007b). “ The impact of foreign ownership, local ownership and industry characteristics on spillover benefits from foreign direct investment in China”, International Business Review, 16(2), 142–158.
8. Cantwell, J., Fai, F. (1999). “Firms as the Source of Innovation and Growth: the Evolution of Technological Competence”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics,9 (3), 331-366.
9. Castellani, D. and Zanfei, A. (2006).“Multinational firms, innovation and productivity”, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
10. Caves, R. E.(1985).“International Trade and Industrial Organization：Problems, Solved and Unsolved”, European Economic Review, 28, 377-395.
11. Chakrabarti, Alok K. (1991). “Competition in High Technology: Analysis of Patents of U.S., Japan, U.K., France, West Germany, and Canada”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(1), 78-84.
12. Clark, B., & Griliches, Z. (1984). “Productivity and R&D at the firm level in French manufacturing. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents, and productivity”, University of Chicago Press, 393-416.
13. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
14. Cohen, W. M. and S. Klepper (1996).“A Reprise of Size and R&D”, Economic Journal, 106, 925-951.
15. Collins, J. M. (1990). “A Market Performance Comparison of U.S. Firms Active in Domestic, Developed and Developing Countries”, Journal of International Business Studies, 21(2), 271-287.
16. Cooper, R.G. (1985). “Industrial Firms’New Product Strategies”, Journal of Business Research, 13(2), 107-121,
17. Chengqi Wang & Mario I. Kafouros (2009). “What factors determine innovation performance in emerging economies? Evidence from China”, International Business Review, 18, 606-616.
18. Damijan, J. P., Knell, M., Majcen, B., & Rojec, M. (2003). “The role of FDI, R&D accumulation and trade in transferring technology to transition countries: Evidence from firm panel data for eight transition countries”, Economic System, 27, 189–204.
19. Davis, L. N., & Meyer, K. E. (2004). “Subsidiary research and development, and the local environment”, International Business Review, 13, 359–382.
20. De Bondt, R. (1996). “Spillovers and innovative activities”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(1), 1–28.
21. Delios, A. and P. W. Beamish (1999). “Geographic Scope, Product Diversification, and the Corporate Performance of Japanese Firms”, Strategic Management Journal, 20(8), 711-727.
22. Dosi, G., C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete (1988). “Technical change and economic theory”, London: Pinter Publishers.
23. Drucker, P.F. (1986). “Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles”, N.Y.: Harper Business.
24. Dunning, J. H. (1980).“Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests”, Journal of International Business Studies, 11, 9-31.
25. Falvey, R., Foster, N., & Greenaway, D. (2004). “Imports, exports, knowledge spillovers and growth”, Economics Letters, 85, 209–213.
26. Feinberg, E. S., & Majumdar, K. S. (2001). “Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry”. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 421–437.
27. Feser, E. J., & Bergman, E. M. (2000). “National industry cluster templates: A framework for applied regional cluster analysis”. Regional Studies, 34 (1): 1-19.
28. Fitzgerald, L. and R.Johnston (1991). “A guide to performance Measurement and non-financial indicators”, performance measurement in service business, 8.
29. Foss, N. (1997). “Resources and Strategy: A Brief Overview of Themes and Contributions.” in N. J. Foss ed., Resources, Firms, and Strategies, Oxford University Press, NY, 3-18.
30. Girma, S., D. Greenaway and K. Wakelin (2001). “Who Benefits from Foreign Direct Investment in the UK?”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(2), 119-133.
31. Go¨rg, H. & Greenaway, D. (2002). “Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign Direct investment?”, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3485, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
32. Goerzen, A. and P. W. Beamish, (2003). “Geographic Scope and Multinational Enterprise Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1289-1306.
33. Grant, R. (1991). “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, 33 (3 /Spring), 114-135.
34. Griliches, Z. (1990). “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1797.
35. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). “Innovation and growth in the world economy”, Cambridge: MIT Press.
36. Haddad, M., & Harrison, A. (1993). “ Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco”, Journal of Development Economics, 42(1), 51–74.
37. Hagedoom, J. & Cloodt, M.(2002).“Measuring Innovative Performance: Is There An Advantage in Using Multiple Indicators?”, Research Policy, 32, 1364-1379.
38. Hall, H. B. & Mairesse, J. (1995). “Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms”, NBER Working Papers 3956, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
39. Harrison, B., Kelly, M. and Gant, J. (1996). “Innovative firm behaviors and local milieu: exploring the intersection of agglomeration, firm effects, and technological change”, Economic Geography, 72, 233-258.
40. Hennart, J. F. and Park, Y. R., (1993). “Greenfield vs. Acquisition: The Strategy of Japanese Investors in the United States”, Management Science, 39, 1054-1070.
41. Hultink, E.J. and H.S.J. Robben(1995). “ Measuring new product success: The difference that time perspective makes”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(2), 392-405.
42. Hussey, D.E., (1997).“ The Innovation Challenge”, In John-Wiley & Sons Eds., 216-218.
43. Hymer, S., (1960). “The International Operation of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment”, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge: MIT Press.
44. Kafouros, M. I., & Buckley, P. J. (2008). “Under what conditions do firms benefit from the research efforts of other organizations?” ,Research Policy, 37(2), 225–239.
45. Kennel, J. S. (2007). “Foreign direct investment and local linkages: An empirical investigation”, Management International Review, 47(1), 51–77.
46. Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1995). “On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities”, Research Policy, 24(2), 185–205.
47. Knickerbocker, F. T., (1973). “Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise”, Boston: Harvard University Press.
48. Kojima, K., (1973). “A Macroeconomic Approach to Foreign Direct Investment”, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 14, 1-21.
49. Krafft, J., (2004).“Entry, exit and knowledge: evidence from a cluster in the info- communications industry”, Research Policy, 33(10), 1687-1706.
50. Krugman, P., (1991). “Geography and Trade”, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
51. Kumar, N., & Aggarwal, A. (2005). “Liberalization, outward orientation and in-house R&D activity of multinational and local firms: A quantitative exploration for Indian manufacturing “, Research Policy, 34, 441–460.
52. Sanjaya Lall, (1992).“Technological Capabilities and Industrialization”, World Development, 20(2), 165-186.
53. Lawrence, R. Z. & Weinstein, D. E. (1999). “ Trade and growth: import led or export led? Evidence from Japan and Korea”, Working Paper No. 165, Working Paper Series, Center on Japanese Economy and Business, Columbia Business School.
54. Li, Y. and J-L. Hu(2004).“R&D, FDI, and Efficiencies of Small and Medium-sized Firms”, working paper.
55. Link, A. (1981). “Research and development activity in US manufacturing”, New York: Praeger.
56. Liu, X., & Buck, T. (2007). “Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries”, Research Policy, 36, 355–366.
57. Liu, X., P. Siler, C. Wang and Y. Wei (2000). “Productivity Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from UK Industry Level Panel Data”, Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), 407-425.
58. Lunn, J. and S. Martin (1986).“Market Structure, Firm Structure, and Research and Development”, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 26, 31-34.
59. Makino, S., P. W. Beamish and N. B. Zhao( 2004). “The Characteristics and Performance of Japanese FDI in Less Developed and Developed Countries”, Journal of World Business, 39(4), 377-392.
60. Marshall, A. (1920). “Principles of Economics: An introductory volume”, New York: free press.
61. Miller, D. J., Fern, M. J., & Cardinal, L. B. (2007). “The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms”, The Academy of Management Journal,50(2), 308–326.
62. Morck, R. and B. Yeung, (1991). “Why Investors Value Multinationality”, The Journal of Business, 64(2), 165-187.
63. Nelson, R. (1982). “ The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(3), 453–470.
64. Newlands, D. (2003). “Competition and Cooperation in Industrial Clusters: The Implications for Public Policy”, European Planning Studies, 11(5), 521-532.
65. OECD (1994). “The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Using Patent Data as Science and Technology Indicators (Patent Manual)”, Paris: OECD.
66. Pavitt K. (1985). “ Patent Statistics as Indicators of Innovative Activities: Possibilities and Problems”, Scientometrics, 7 (1-2), 77-99.
67. Perez, T. (1997). “Multinational Enterprises and Technological Spillovers: An Evolutionary Model”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 7(2), 169-192.
68. Pla-Barber, J., & Alegre, J. (2007). “ Analysing the link between export intensity, innovation and firm size in a science-based industry”, International Business Review, 16, 275–293.
69. Porter, M. E. (1990). “The competitive advantage of nations”, Detroit: Free Press.
70. Pradhan, J. P., (2004). “The Determinants of Outward Foreign Direct Investment: A Firm-Level Analysis of Indian Manufacturing”, Oxford Development Studies, 32(4), 619-639.
71. Pugel, T. A.(1980).“Foreign Trade and US Market Performance”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 29, 119-129.
72. Rao, S., M. Legault and A. Ahmad, (1994). “Canadian-Based Multinationals: An
Analysis of Activities and Performance”, Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
73. Rindfleisch, A. and J. B. Heide, (1997). “Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications”, Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 30-54.
74. Rodriguez, J. L., & Rodriguez, R. M. G. (2005). “Technology and export behaviour: A resource-based view approach”, International Business Review, 14, 539–557.
75. Henny Romijn and Manuel Albaladejo, (2002).“Determinants of Innovation Capability in Small Electronics and Software Firms in Southeast England”, Research Policy, 31(7), 1053-1067.
76. Rugman, A. M. and A. Verbeke, (2004). “A Perspective on Regional and Global Strategies of Multinational Enterprises”, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 3-18.
77. Sabourin, V. & Pinsonneault, I.(1997). “Strategic Formation of Competitive High Technology Cluster”, International Journal of Technology Management, 13(2), 165-178.
78. Salomon, R. M., & Shaver, M. J. (2005). “ Learning by exporting: New insights from examining firm innovation”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14, 431–460.
79. Saxenian, A. (1994). “Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128”, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80. Schmookler, J. (1966). “Invention and Economic Growth”, Cambridge: Harvard UP.
81. Siler, P., Wang, C., & Liu, X. (2003). “ Technology transfer within multinational enterprises: Panel data evidence from US subsidiaries in Scotland”, Regional Studies,37(1), 15–25.
82. Sjöholm, F. (1999). “Technology Gap, Competition and Spillovers from Direct Foreign Investment: Evidence from Establishment Data”, The Journal of Development Studies, 36(1), 53-73.
83. Souder, W.E., (1987). “Managing New Product Innovations”, Lexington Books, 217-220.
84. Tang, L., & Koveos, P. E. (2008). “Embodied and disembodied R&D spillovers to developed and developing countries”, International Business Review, 17(5), 546–558.
85. Teece, D. J. (1977). “Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How”, The Economic Journal, 87(346), 242-261.
86. Thomas, D. E. and L. Eden, (2004). “What is the Shape of the Multinationality- Performance Relationship?”, The Multinational Business Review, 12(1), 89-110.
87. Venkatraman, N. and V. Ramanujam(1986). “Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches”, The academy of management review, 1(4), 801-814
88. Vernon, R., (1966).“International Investment and International Trade in Product Cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.
89. Walker, O. C., & Ruekert, R. W. (1987). “Marketing’s Role in the Implementation of Business Strategies: A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework”, Journal of Marketing, 5, 15-33.
90. Walz, U.(1997).“Innovation, Foreign Direct Investment and Growth”, Economics, 64, 63-79.
91. Wang, C., & Yu, L. (2006). “Do spillover benefits grow with rising foreign direct investment? An empirical examination of the case of China”, Applied Economics, 39, 397–405.
92. Xiaohui Liu, Jiangyong Lu, Lgor Filatotchev, Trevor Buck & Mike Wright (2010). “Returnee entrepreneurs, knowledge spillovers and innovation in high-tech firms in emerging economies”, Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1183-1197.
93. Yeung, H. W. (1997). “Cooperative strategies and Chinese business networks: A study of Hong Kong transnational corporations in the ASEAN region”, In P. W. Beamish & J. P. Killing (Eds.), Cooperative strategies: Asian Pacific perspectives, San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
94. Zahra, S. A., R. D. Ireland and M. A. Hitt (2000). “ International Expansion by New Venture Firms: International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Technological Learning and Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925-950.
95. Zander, I. (1997). “ Technological Diversification in the Multinational Corporation- Historical Evolution and Future Prospects”, Research Policy, 26, 209-227
96. Zhou, D., Li, S., & Tse, D. (2002). “The impact of FDI on the productivity of domestic firms: The case of China”, International Business Review, 11(4), 465–484.

>中文文獻
1. 馬維揚、林卓民和楊永列，(2003)，「決定高科技產業研究發展支出因素之探討」，產業論壇，第五卷第二期，193-221。
2. 陳建隆，徐芳霞，(2003)，「防禦型對外直接投資與內生化研發水準」，經濟論文，第三十一卷第四期，577-603。
3. 曹壽民及陳光政，(2009)，「創新活動、國際化與公司績效：以台灣上市公司之國外直接投資檢測」，管理學報，第二十七卷第三期，205-224
4. 鄒孟文、劉錦添，(1997)，「外人直接投資對台灣製造業波及效果之實證」，經濟論文叢刊，第二十五卷第二期，155-181。
5. 蔡明田、莊立民、盧嘉振，(2004)，「台灣中小企業CEO 外部環境認知對技術策略、創新績效與組織績效關係影響之研究」，科技管理學刊，第九卷第三期：1-32。
6. 劉孟俊，陳信宏，(2007)，「跨國研發網絡與研發國際化：海外子公司的分析觀點」，臺大管理論叢，第十八卷第一期，211-237。
7. 蔡宜臻，邱俊榮，(2007)，「對外直接投資與研究發展」，經濟論文，第三十五卷第一期，53-82。