臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來隨著網際網路快速發展，網路購物市場不斷增加，了解消費者需求有助於網路經營者的永續經營，因此消費者類型量表對於網路經營者占有重要的地位，然而，目前有許多國外學者針對其消費者進行分類，但是國外的生活型態與國內有所不同，因此，消費者類型套用在國內並不一定適用，在大環境之下的改變，現今消費者購買產品時會比過去消費者在決策時更為複雜，而消費者的類型也必須隨著環境不斷的變化持續下去。
藉由消費者型態作為探討基礎，本研究將探討消費者類型與網路購物之關係，樣本以企業、政府單位與在職專班的各個不同行業別來分散樣本數，並且以滾雪球的方式進行，而研究對象主要以國內具有實際消費能力的上班族。本研究經過驗證修改過後分別提出八個影響構面：品質導向，品牌新穎，休閒娛樂、價格導向、人際型、專家型、參考群體導向、習慣型，由以上八個構面對網路購物傾向探討不同消費者類型對網路購物傾向是否有顯著差異，並且將網路購物程序作為變數，來探討消費者類型對網路購物程序是否有間接影響。
本研究驗證結果顯示：(1) 不同顧客類型在網路購物傾向會產生不同影響；(2) 參考群體消費者對網路購物程序具有間接影響；(3) 顧客類型傾向於品質導向消費者。

With rapid development of Internet and increasing online markets in recent years, understanding consumer demand will help network operators to reach operating sustainability. Therefore, scale of consumer types plays an important role for network operators. However, consumer types classified by foreign scholars are different from domestic lifestyle. Hence, applying the types of consumer is not appropriate in the country. With changes in the environment, consumer behavior nowadays in decision-making process on buying products is more complex than the past. Also, the types of consumer must be constantly changed as far as environment changes.
The study explores the relationship between consumer types and online shopping using consumer types as the basis. Samples are mainly from enterprises, government agencies and part-time students in all different industries to diversify the number of samples for snowball method. The main object of study focuses on domestic workers who have actual power of expenditure. Eight dimensions were further proposed as follow after validation: quality-oriented, brand new, entertainment, price-oriented, interpersonal, expert reference group orientation, habit-based. This study utilizes these eight dimensions to confer if there are significant differences among different types of consumers and Online shopping tendency. Simultaneously, we regard the process of online shopping as a variable in order to explore if consumer types indirectly affects the process of online shopping
Verifying the results of this study indicate that: (1) different types of customer shop online will produce different effects; (2) refer to groups of consumers for online shopping program has indirect effects; (3) types of customer tend to be quality-oriented consumers.

第一章　緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究對象 2
第四節 研究步驟 3
第二章　文獻探討 4
第一節 消費者行為 4
第二節 電子商務與網路購物 9
第三節 消費者型態 14
第三章　研究方法 20
第一節 研究架構 20
第二節 研究假說 21
第三節 變數定義與衡量 24
第四節 研究設計 30
第五節 資料分析方法 31
第四章　資料分析 32
第一節 問卷資料分析 32
第二節 量表品質檢測 36
第三節 研究假說檢定 45
第五章　結論與建議 47
第一節 研究結果 47
第二節 研究貢獻 49
第三節 研究限制與未來發展 49
參考文獻 51
附錄、研究問卷 55

中文參考文獻
[1]經濟部商業司，2000，2000中華民國電子商務年鑑，經濟部商業司。
[2]吳俊彥，2006，「消費者行」，二版，高立，台北。
[3]榮泰生，2007，「消費者行為」，二版，五南，台北。
[4]張國雄，2008，「行銷管理」，二版，雙葉書廊，台北。
[5]張魁峯，林靈宏，2009，「消費者行為學」，三版，五南，台北。
[6]方文昌，2010，「網路行銷概論」，五版，華泰，台北。
[7]台灣財團法人資訊工業策進會，2009，「寬頻網路使用調查」，台灣財團法人資訊工業策進會，台北。
[8]台灣財團法人資訊工業策進會，2010，「寬頻網路使用調查」，台灣財團法人資訊工業策進會，台北。
[9]台灣財團法人資訊工業策進會，2011，「寬頻網路使用調查」，台灣財團法人資訊工業策進會，台北。

英文參考文獻
[1]Alba, Joseph, John Lynch, Barton Weitz, Chris Janiszewski, Richard Lutz, Alan Sawyer & Stacy Wood, (1997), “Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacture Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplace.”, Journal of Marketing, vol.61, P.38-53.

[2]Bagozzi, R.P., and Y. Yi, (1988), “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models”, Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), pp.272-277.

[3]Brown, M., Pope, N. & Voges, K., (2003), “Buying or browsing? An exploration of shopping orientations and online purchase intention.”, European Journal Of Marketing, 37.

[4]Cheung, C. M. K., Chan, G. W. W. & Limayem, M., (2005), “A Critical Review of Online Consumer Behavior: Empirical Research”, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 3(4), 1-19.

[5]Darden, William R. and Dub Ashton, (1974-75), “Psychographic Profiles of Patronage Preference Groups”, Journal of Retailing, 50(Winter): 99-112.

[6]Donthu, N. & Garcia, A., (1999), “The Internet shopper.”, Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 52–58.

[7]Engel, J. F., Kollat, D. J., and Blackwell, R. D., (1984), “Consumer behavior”, 4th ed, New York: Dryden Press.

[8]Engel J. F., Blackwell R.D., Kollat D.T., (1993), “Consumer Behavior”, 7thed, New York: Dryden Press.

[9]Gaski, J., (1986), “Interrelations among A Channel Entity’s Power Sources: Impact on The Exercise of Reward and Coercion on Expert, Referent, and Legitimate Power Sources”, Journal of Marketing Research, 23,pp.62-77.


[10]Girard, T., R. Silverblatt and P. Korgankoar, (2002), “Influence of Product Class on Preference for Shopping on the Internet”, Journal of Computer Mediated Communications, Vol. 8, No. 1.

[11]Girard, Tulay, Pradeep Korgaonkar, and Ronnie Silverblatt, (2003), “Relationship of Type of Product, Shopping Orientations, and Demographics with Preference for Shopping on the Internet.”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 18 (1), 101-120.

[12]Gulati, R. and J. Garino, (2000), “Get the right mix of bricks and clicks.”, Harvard Business Review, pp. 107-114.

[13]Hanson, W., (2000), “Principles of Internet Marketing”, South-Western College Publishing.

[14]Kalakota, R. and Whinston, A. B., (996). “Frontiers of Electronic Commerce”, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1-3.

[15]Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G, (2006), Principle of Marketing(9th ed), New Jersey:Pearson Education.

[16]Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G, (2010), Principle of Marketing(13th ed), New Jersey:Pearson Education, pp.160-175.

[17]Koufaris, M.; Kambil, A.; and LaBarbera, P. A., ( 2001-2002) ,”Consumer Behavior in Web-Based Commerce: An Empirical Study”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Volume 6, pp. 115-138.

[18]Li, H., C. Kuo, and M. G. Russell, (1999), “The impact of Perceived channel utilities, shopping orientations, and demographics on the consumer’s online buying behavior.”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 5, No. 2.

[19]Maignan,I., and Lukas, B.A., (1997), “The nature and social uses of the Internet: A qualitative investigation.”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, pp.346-371.

[20]Moschis, George P., (1976), ”Shopping orientations and consumer uses of information”, Journal of Retailing, vol 52(2), p.61.

[21]Schiffman, Leon G. and Leslie Laslie Lazar Kanuk, (1991), ”Communication and Consumer Behavior”, in Consumer Behavior,4th edition, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc. 268-306.

[22]Seock, Yoo-Kyoung and Lauren R. Bailey, (2008), “The Influence of College Students’ Shopping Orientations and Gender Differences on Online Information Searches and Purchase Behaviours.”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32, 113–21.

[23]Stephenson, P. Ronald and Ronald P. Willett, (1969), “Analysis of Consumers’ Retail Patronage Strategies”, in Marketing Involvement in Society and the Economy, P. R. McDonald (ed.), Chicago: American Marketing Association: 316-22.

[24]Stone; Gregory P., (1954), “City and urban identification: observations on the social psychology of city life”, American Journal of Sociology, University of Chicago , pp.39-40.

[25]Su, H. J., Comer, L. B., and Lee s., (2008), “The Effect of Expertise on Consumers’ Satisfaction with the Use of Interactive Recommendation Agents”, Psychology and Marketing, 25(9), 859–880.

[26]Sproles and Kendall., (1986), “A Methodology for Profiling Consumers’ Decision-Making Styles”, The Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol.20（2）, pp.267-279.