跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.189.51) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/05/18 17:06
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:鄧欣庭
研究生(外文):Shwu-Ting Then
論文名稱:探討影響消費者對平板電腦使用意願因素之研究-結合科技接受模型、理性行為理論、計畫行為理論及美感理論
指導教授:李憶萱李憶萱引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yi-Hsuan Lee
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:96
中文關鍵詞:美感理論計畫行為理論理性行為理論科技接受模型平板電腦
外文關鍵詞:AestheticsTheory of Planned BehaviorTheory of Reasoned ActionTablet PCTechnology Acceptance Model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:949
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
蘋果公司於2010年推出Ipad獲得廣大迴響之後,相續投入平板電腦產業之高科技廠商不計其數,包含宏碁、華碩、優派、三星、戴爾、惠普等等都投入平板電腦產品開發,嘗試創造殺手級應用,以期在平板電腦版圖中奪下市場領導地位。
本研究結合科技接受模型、理性行為理論、計畫行為理論以及美感理論,目的為探討影響消費者對平板電腦使用意願因素。透過釐清影響平板電腦使用者的使用意願之因素為何,以提供科技產品業者在規劃產品時之考量。
本研究對象為擁有平板電腦或是具有使用平板電腦經驗之消費者,有效樣本數為352份,以SPSS19.0以及Amos18.0進行資料分析,分別為敘述性統計分析、信度分析、效度分析、並以結構方程模式(SEM)分析研究架構路徑因果關係及解釋力,研究結果如下:
一、 消費者的個人創新性對其採用平板電腦之行為態度有顯著正向影響
二、 消費者採用平板電腦之愉悅感對行為態度有顯著正向影響
三、 消費者採用平板電腦之知覺有用性對行為態度有顯著正向影響
四、 消費者採用平板電腦之知覺易用性對行為態度有顯著正向影響
五、 消費者採用平板電腦之行為態度對使用意願有顯著正向影響
六、 社會影響對使用意願有顯著正向影響
七、 消費者採用平板電腦之知覺可行動性對使用意願有顯著正向影響
Since the successful release of Apple Ipad in 2010, many other I.T. hardware manufacturers such as Asus, Acer, Viewsonic, Samsung, Dell, and HP have joined the tablet industry through product research and advancement, targeting to obtain a leading position in the market of Tablet PC.
This research is based on the integrated theory of TAM, TRA, TPB and Aesthetics, attempts to identify the factors that promote customers’ acceptance of Tablet PC. The model is tested via survey from 352 consumers who had experienced the Tablet PC or have been using it. The empirical data was analyzed from the aspects of personal information, reliability and validity analysis, followed by using of structural equation model to correlate the several variables. The results of this study were summarized as follows:
1. Personal Innovations had significant and positive effect on the consumer’s attitude toward usage of the Tablet PC.
2. Perceived enjoyment had significant and positive effect on the consumer’s attitude toward usage of the Tablet PC.
3. Perceived usefulness had significant and positive effect on the consumer’s attitude toward usage of the Tablet PC.
4. Perceived ease of use had significant and positive effect on the consumer’s attitude toward usage of the Tablet PC.
5. Attitude had significant and positive effect on the consumer’s intention to usage of the Tablet PC.
6. Social influence had significant and positive effect on the consumer’s intention to usage of the Tablet PC.
7. Perceived Mobility had significant and positive effect on the consumer’s intention to usage of the Tablet PC.
摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝辭 iv
目錄 v
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-2研究目的 5
1-3研究流程 6
1-4平板電腦產品 8
第二章 文獻探討 13
2-1 創新擴散理論 13
2-2理性行為理論 19
2-3計畫行為理論 21
2-4科技接受模型 23
2-5知覺美感 29
第三章 研究方法 31
3-1研究架構與研究模型 31
3-2研究假說及推導 33
3-3研究變數操作性定義與衡量問題 38
3-4資料蒐集與分析方法 41
第四章 資料分析 44
4-1敘述性統計分析 44
4-2信度檢定 54
4-3建構效度分析 55
4-3-1 收斂效度 55
4-3-2區別效度 60
4-3-3 SMC指標 62
4-4結構方程式分析 65
4-4-1研究架構分析 65
4-4-2模型適配度分析 69
4-4-3研究假設驗證 72
4-5效果分析與內生變數解釋能力 76
第五章 結論與建議 77
5-1研究發現與結論 77
5-2研究貢獻與策略意涵 81
5-3研究限制與後續研究建議 83
參考文獻 84
附錄 94
1.王東澤(2006)。電子書市場認知與消費傾向之探討。國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班,碩士論文。
2.朱莉芳(2011)。探討影響電子書使用意圖之因素-計劃性行為理論與科技接受模式觀點。國立成功大學企業管理學系碩博士班,碩士論文。
3.余旻育(2010)。結合科技接受模式與資產專屬性探討消費者對『低價小筆電』之行為意圖。國立彰化師範大學企業管理學系,碩士論文。
4.李永彬(2003)。字跡工整的「好野人」有福了!平板電腦大解析。產業資訊,創刊號,45-48。
5.李思佳(2010)。探討大學生使用數位學習系統持續使用意圖之研究-結合接受後資訊系統持續使用模式、整合性科技接受理論(UTAUT)及資訊成功模型。國立中央大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
6.吳婉菁(2006)。MOD早期採用者特性之研究。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所,碩士論文。
7.吳萬益(2000),企業研究方法,台北:華泰文化事業。
8.吳凱琳,陳紹謙(2011)。平板電腦族 八成在玩遊戲。天下雜誌,470期。
9.林彥均(2010)。行動加值服務採用因素分析。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所,碩士論文。
10.林建煌(2008),行銷管理,四版。台北:華泰文化
11.科技產業資訊室。2011年平板電腦上用之觸控螢幕出貨量達6千萬片。2011年3月22日。取自http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/techroom/market/eedisplay/2011/eedisplay_11_015.htm
12.柯孫超(2009)。整合TAM與TRA理論探討消費者對綠建築接受態度之研究。國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班,碩士論文。
13.徐于婷(2011)。認知風險、認知可信賴度、信任、認知易用性、認知有用性對線上拍賣消費者購買意圖之影響。國立成功大學企業管理學系專班,碩士論文。
14.夏蓉(2010)。數位閱讀服務體驗-以電子書閱讀器、智慧型手機、平板電腦三種裝置探討使用者採用之意願與偏好之研究。臺灣大學資訊管理學研究所,碩士論文。
15.曹英堃(2010)。智慧型手機廠商進入平板電腦產業的策略分析。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程,碩士論文。
16.黃彥達(2005)。《當科技變身時尚-16%的科技行銷密碼》
17.陳其生(2007)。智慧型手機之消費者行為研究—以商務人士為例。銘傳大學管理學院高階經理碩士學程,碩士論文。
18.陳俊智,莊明振(2006)。以行動電話為例探討灰色田口方法於產品美感品質最佳化設計之研究。交通大學應用藝術研究所,設計學報,第11卷第1期,65-84。
19.陳曉莉(2011)。Nielsen:平板電腦減少PC及其他裝置的使用。2011年5月6日,取自http://www.ithome.com.tw/itadm/article.php?c=67455
20.黃敏峰(2006)。影響使用第三代行動電話服務之因素。國立成功大學交通管理學系碩博士班,碩士論文。
21.陳順宇(民94),多變量分析,四版。台北:華泰文化
22.陳毅瑋(2008)。消費者預購便利商店商品預購之研究-理性行動理論之應用。崑山科技大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
23.梁聖璋(2011)。蘋果平板電腦iPad競爭策略分析─來自於過去三個案例之教訓。立德大學科技管理研究所,碩士論文。
24.張忠本(2011)。台灣產業的ICT商機。2010年3月1日,取自http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/8826
25.楊淑貞(2002)。創新特質與網路購物採用之研究。國立交通大學傳播研究所,碩士論文。
26.葉紋君(2010)。科技準備度與科技接受模式之整合與延伸—以智慧型手機為例。國立彰化師範大學企業管理學系,碩士論文。
27.楊敦質(2008)。以科技接受模型分析數位有線電視之使用者採用行為。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所,碩士論文。
28.楊雅婷(2009)。以理性行為理論和科技接受模型來探討消費者對創新科技智慧型手機的購買意願行為之研究。南華大學企業管理系管理科學碩博士班,碩士論文。
29.鄒仁淳(2009)。時尚科技接受之研究 – 娛樂導向與實用導向產品之比較。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系,博士論文。
30.劉威志(2003)。網路負面虛擬經驗呈現特性對消費者產品態度之影響—以網路留言板為例。國立中央大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
31.榮泰生(2007)。AMOS與研究方法,初版。台北:五南圖書
32.賴英豪(2005)。網路電話使用行為初探—創新特質、使用動機與滿足程度之研究。國立交通大學傳播研究所,碩士論文。
33.霍淑湄(2008)。平板電腦在台灣國中英語單字教學的應用。國立臺灣師範大學英語學系在職進修碩士班,碩士論文。
34.鍾瑞芳(2004)。從創新傳播理論探討寬頻網路使用者特質及行為研究。元智大學資訊傳播學系,碩士論文。

英文部份:
1.Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215.
2.Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 11–39.
3.Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
4.Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitude. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27–58.
5.Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Science, 13, 185–204.
6.Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitude and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal directed behavior : Attitudes, intention, and Perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
8.Anderson, E.W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms. Marketing Science, 12, 125-143.
9.Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structure equations models. Marketing Science, 16(1), 76-94
10.Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
11.Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.
12.Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the Ideal Form:Product Design and Consumer Response. Journal of Marketing, 59, 16-29.
13.Chang, S. E., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, Y. H. (2009). A user study of accessing web applications via voice cellular phone: a model comparison approach. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(5), 471–484.
14.Charters, S. (2006). Aesthetic Products and Aesthetic Consumption: A Review'', Consumption Markets & Culture, 9(3), 235-255.
15.Daneels, E., & Kleinsmith, E. J. (2001). Product innovativeness from the firm’s perspective: its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance. Journalof Product Innovation Management, 18(6), 357–373.
16.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
17.Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
18.Dixit, N., & Datta, S. K. (2010). Acceptance of E-banking among Adult Customers: An Empirical Investigation in India. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 15(2),1-17.
19.Eysenck, H. J. (1983). Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity and its Measurement, Pergamon Press.
20.Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research, Addsion-Wesley, Reading MA.
21.Frondizi, R. (1971). What is Value? , Lasalle, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.
22.Goldsmith, R. E., Freiden, J. B., & Eastman, J. K. (1995). The generality/specificity issue in consumer innovativeness research. Technovation, 15(10), 601– 613.
23.Ha, S., & Stoel, L. (2009). Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 565-571.
24.Hair, J. R., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th Edition. Macmillan, New York.
25.Hall, R. H., & Hanna, P. (2004). The impact of web page text-background colour combinations on readability, retention, aesthetics and behavioural intention. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(3), 183–195.
26.Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. R. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.Holbrook, M. B., & Moore, W. L. (1981). Feature Interactions in Consumer. Judgments of Verbal Versus Pictorial Presentation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 103-113.
28.Holbrook, M. B. (1999). “Introduction to Consumer Value,” in Morris B. Holbrook (eds) Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research, Routl edge, New York, 1-28.
29.Hollins, B., & Pugh, S. (1990). Successful product design: what to do and when. Butterworths, London, UK.
30.Hong, S. J., Thong, Y. L., Moon, J. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (2008). Understanding the Behavior of Mobile Data Services Consumers. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 431–445.
31.Hsu, C. L., & Lin, J. C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45(1), 65–74.
32.Hurt, H. Y., Joseph K., & Cook., C. D. (1977). Scales for the Measurement of Innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4, 58–65.
33.Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G. B. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87-114.
34.Im, S., Bayus, B. L., & Mason, C. H. (2003). An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 31(1), 61–73.
35.Jahangir, N., & Begum, N. (2007). Effect of perceived usefulness, ease of use, security and privacy on customer attitude and adaptation in the context of E-Banking. Journal of Management Research, 7(3), 147-157.
36.Jennings, M. (2000). Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive e-commerce websites. Proceedings of the ACM Computer Personnel Conference, 77–85.
37.Jones, S. S., & Chin, W. (2002). Factors leading to sales force automation use: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 22(3), 145–156.
38.Kim, Y., & Han, H. (2010). Intention to pay conventional-hotel prices at a green hotel – a modification of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(8), 997–1014.
39.Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental Design Procedures for the Behavior Sciences, 3th ed., Pacific Grove, C. A.: Brooks/Cole.
40.Kohn, C. A., & Jacoby, J. (1973). Operationally defining the consumer innovator. Proceedings, 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 8(2), 837-838.
41.Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
42.Lee, H. Y., Qu, H., & Kim, Y. S. (2007). A study of the impact of personal innovativeness on online travel shopping behavior—A case study of Korean travelers. Tourism Management, 28(3), 886-897.
43.Leung, L., & Wei, R. (2000). More than just talk on the move: Uses and gratifications of cellular phone. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 308-320.
44.Lin, C. A. (1998). Exploring personal computer adoption dynamics. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42 (1), 95-112.
45.Matheieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
46.Michael, T. E., & Frank, Q. F. (2008). Consumer Acceptance of Technology Products: The Impact Of Tactical Selling Approaches. Marketing Management Journal, 18(2), 47-64.
47.Midgley, D., & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: the concept and its measurement. Journal Consumer Research, 4, 229–242.
48.Neil, J., Raubenheimer, J., & Bounagui, M. (2009). Gender differences in purchase intention of music downloads. Management Dynamics Volume, 18(3), 25-36.
49.Nistor, N., & Heymann, J. O. (2010). Reconsidering the role of attitude in the TAM: An answer to Teo (2009a). British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 142-145.
50.Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
51.O’Cass, A., & Fenech, T. (2003). Web retailing adoption: Exploring the nature of Internet users web retailing behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10(2), 81–94.
52.Pearson, P. H. (1970). Relationships between global and specific measures of novelty seeking. Journal Consulting Clinal Psychology, 34, 199–204.
53.Pedersen, P. E., & Nysveen, H. (2003).Using the theory of planned behavior to explain teenagers'' adoption of text messaging services. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.
54.Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative Word-of-Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: A Pilot Study. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 68-78.
55.Roehrich, G. (2004). Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 671–677.
56.Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
57.Rogers, E. M. (1983). The Diffusion of Innovations, New York: Free Press.
58.Shang, R., Chen, Y., & Shen, L. (2005). Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Information & Management, 42(3), 401-413.
59.Steenkamp, J. B., Hofstede, F., & Wedel, M. (1999). A cross-national comparison into the national and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. Journal Marketing, 63(2), 55– 69.
60.Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.
61.Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
62.Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
63.Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1),71-102
64.Veryzer, R. W. J. (1993). Aesthetic Response and the Influence of Design Principles on Product Preferences. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 224-228.
65.Veryzer, R. W. J. (1995). The Place of Product Design and Aesthetics in Consumer Research. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 641-645.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top