(3.236.231.14) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/15 08:29
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳建文
研究生(外文):Chien-Wen Chen
論文名稱:教室內多人共用一台電腦學習環境之設計與評估
論文名稱(外文):Design and Evaluation of Multiple Mice System Supported Interactive Learning Environment in Classroom
指導教授:張立杰張立杰引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ben Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立嘉義大學
系所名稱:數位學習設計與管理學系研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:教育科技學類
論文種類:學術論文
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:多滑鼠單一顯示器群組軟體競賽系統框架
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:349
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:80
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
教室是學生學習與互動的主要場所,而科技導入教室是改善學習環境的方法之一。因此本研究藉由設計多滑鼠系統來建構一個更多樣化的教室學習環境,以單一顯示器群組軟體結合多滑鼠操作的概念,讓多位學生能在一個共用的大畫面下,操作同一台電腦,共同參與活動,進行評量與競賽。在這個教學環境下,由多位同學共同操作的電腦使用模式有許多應用上的潛力,若能妥善設計,將可開發更多適用於教室中的學習活動。本研究配合目前常見的教學活動評量,以多滑鼠系統設計了二種題型共五種模式的評量方式,分別是選擇題型中的「個別作答」、「搶答」兩種模式,以及配對題型中的「不分組不分區」、「分組不分區」及「分組分區」三種模式,並進行系統的可用性評估。此外,更進一步了解學生在多滑鼠的環境中的操作習慣、反應及喜好,以供後續更多多滑鼠系統的開發與應用。本研究,以72位高一學生為對象,評估系統的可用性並了解學生在這些模式上的喜好程度。結果發現,在可用性方面,學生能很快學會操作方式,並順利進行活動;在專注度方面,學生對此系統非常感興趣,而且專注程度相當高,教室氣氛也變得熱絡。在不同模式的喜好方面,學生喜歡在有分組的情況下進行活動,也有較高比例的學生喜歡搶答模式。
Classroom is the place where students learn and interact with each other. Using technology is considered as a way to improve the students’ interaction. Therefore, the goal of this study is to design and implement a multiple mice system to construct a more diverse learning environment in the classroom. In the environment, the students interact and compete with their peers on a large shared display by using multiple mice technology on one computer simultaneously. Multiple mice system has many potential applications. With proper design, it will be able to develop more suitable classroom learning activities. To facilitate students in performing the system, two types of tests and five modes were designed. The type of multiple choice include individual task competition mode and individual rush competition mode. The type of matching question include group non-competition mode, group rush competition mode, and group competition mode. Seventy-two first year high school students were involved in this study. The usability test indicated that the system was useable and students were very interested in using the system. The evaluation of different modes of preference showed that they prefer group activities and rush competition mode.
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
目次 iii
表次 v
圖次 vi
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 單一顯示器群組軟體 5
第二節 多滑鼠系統 8
第三節 資訊科技應用在教室的情形 10
第四節 競爭的教學策略 17
第三章 研究方法
第一節 多滑鼠系統使用情境 19
第二節 多滑鼠系統需求 21
第三節 多滑鼠系統分析與規劃 21
第四節 多滑鼠系統介面設計 29
第五節 多滑鼠系統之框架化設計 38
第六節 多滑鼠系統評估 47
第四章 研究結果與討論
第一節 實驗目的 49
第二節 前導實驗 49
第三節 正式實驗 52
第四節 研究結果討論 64
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論 69
第二節 建議 70
參考文獻
中文部份 72
外文部份 73
附錄
附錄一 78
中文部份
王全世(2000)。資訊科技融入教學之意義與內涵。資訊與教育,80,23-31。
台灣微軟(2004)。創意教師競賽。台北:微軟教育網。線上檢索日期:2011年6月29日。網址:http://www.microsoft.com/taiwan/education/educators_3.aspx
吳正己(2001)。從英特爾e化教師計畫談資訊融入教學。資訊與教育,85,15-21。
邱貴發(1990)。電腦整合教學的概念與方法。台灣教育,479,1-8。
張立杰、陳建文、陳妍吟(2010)。群體手勢感測競爭教室中氣氛的偏好分析。第14屆全球華人計算機教育應用大會(GCCCE 2010),185-188。
張國恩(2002)。從學習科技的發展看資訊科技融入教學的內涵。台北:思賢國小。線上檢索日期:2011年6月28日。網址:http://163.20.159.3/download/教務處/資訊/資訊融入教育/資訊融入教育/資訊融入教育的內涵/a2761976.doc
教育部(2009)。建置中小學優質化均等數位教育環境計畫。台北:教育部。線上檢索日期:2011年6月29日。網址:http://www.edu.tw/files/list/B0039/附件-14建置中小學優質化均等數位教育.pdf
梁宗賀、黃雅貴、杜叔娟、陳煥彬、陳雅麗(2007,5月)。以互動式電子白板為基礎之ICT教學環境建置。論文發表於2007年台灣數位學習發展研討會,台中。
陳偉文、高琡媄(2007)。資訊教育發展現況初探。研習資訊,24(4),125-134。
陳惠邦(2006,12月)。互動白板導入教室教學的現況與思考。論文發表於2006年臺北市全球華人資訊教育創新論壇,淡江大學蘭陽校區。
陳德懷(2009)。一對一數位學習的研究。數位學習科技期刊,1(2),106-111。
蕭惠君、邱貴發(1998)。歐亞地區中小學資訊教育之概況。台灣教育,572,37-45。
韓善民(2001)。我國資訊教育發展現況與展望。資訊與教育,81,7-12。

外文部份
Abowd, G. D. (1999). Classroom 2000: An experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment. IBM Systems Journal, 38(4), 508-530.
Bederson, B., & Hourcade, J. (1999). Architecture and implementation of a java package for multiple input devices (MID). Tech Report HCIL-99-08, CS-TR-4018, UMIACS-TR-99-26. Computer Science Department, University of Maryland.
Bier, E., & FreeMan, S. (1991). MMM: A user interface architecture for shared editors on a single screen. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 1991, 79-86.
Chang, B., Chen, C. W., & Ho, S. (2010). Students' competitive preferences on multiple mice classroom interactive environment.In S. L. Wong et al (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 577-579). Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., Sheu, J. P., & Chiang, C. Y. (2003). A mobile scaffolding-aid-based bird-watching learning system. Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'02), 2002, 15-22.
Davis, G., & Rimm, S. (1985). Education of the gifted and talented. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Deci, E. L., Beley, G., Kahle, J., Abrams, L., & Porac, J. (1981). When trying to win: Competition and intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 79-83.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th Ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Julian, J., & Perry, F. (1967). Cooperation contrasted with intra-group and inter-group competition. Sociometry, 30, 79-90.
Kohn, A. (1992). No contest: the case against competition. New York: Houghton Mifflin
Liang, J. K., Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Chang, B., Deng, Y. C., Yang, J. C., Chou, C. Y., Ko, H. W., Yang, S., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A few design perspectives on one-on-one digital classroom environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 181-189.
Liu, T. C., Liang, J. K., Wang, H. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2003). The features and potential of interactive response system. Proceedings of International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE), 2003, 315-322.
Liu, T. C., Liang, J. K., Wang, H. Y., Chan, T. W., & Wei, L. H. (2003). Embedding EduClick in classroom to enhance interaction. Proceedings of International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE), 2003, 117-125.
Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Liang, J. K., Chan, T. W., & Yang, J. C. (2002). Applying wireless technologies to build a highly interactive learning environment. In M. Milrad, U. Hoppe & Kinshuk (Eds.), Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Mobile and Wireless Technologies in Education(WMTE 2002) (pp. 63–70). Los Alamitos, CA.
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 3. Conative and affective process analysis (pp. 223-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Moed, A., Otto, O., Pal, J., Pawar, U. S., Kam, M., & Toyama, K. (2009). Reducing dominance in multiple-mouse learning activities. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 2009, 360-364.
Moraveji, N., Inkpen, K., Cutrell, E., & Balakrishnan, R. (2009). A mischief of mice: Examining children’s performance in single display groupware systems with 1 to 32 mice. Proceedings of ACM CHI2009 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2009 , 2157-2166.
Morris, M.R., Morris, D., & Winograd, T. (2004). Individual audio channels with single display groupware: Effects on communication and task strategy. Proceedings of CSCW 2004, 242-251.
Myers, B. A., Stiel, H., & Gargiulo, R. (1998). Collaboration Using Multiple PDAs Connected to a PC. Proceedings CSCW’98, 1998, 285-294.
Patra, R., Pal, J., Nedevshchi, S., Plauche, M., & Pawar, U. (2007). Usage models of classroom computing in developing regions. Proceedings of ICTD 2007, 158-167
Pawar, U. S., Pal, J., & Toyama, K. (2006). Multiple mice for computers in education in developing countries. Proceedings of ICTD 2006, 64-71.
Pawar, U. S., Pal, J., Gupta, R., & Toyama, K. (2007). Multiple mice for retention tasks in disadvantaged schools. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2007, 1581-1590.
Pedersen, E. R., McCall, K., Moran T. P., & Halasz, F. G. (1993). Tivoli: An electronic Whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (InterCHI 93), 1993, 391-398.
Rekimoto, J. (1998). A multiple device approach for supporting whiteboard-based interactions. In Karat, Clare-Marie, Lund, Arnold, Coutaz, Joelle & Karat, John (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM CHI 98 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference (pp. 344-351). Angeles, California.
Roschelle, J., Penuel, B., & Abrahamson, L. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership , 61, 50-54.
Schutz P. A., & Pekrun, R. (2007). Introduction to emotion in education, In P. A. Schutz and R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in Eduction (pp. 1-3). MA: Academic Press.
Scott, S. D., Mandryk, R. L., & Inkpen, K. M. (2003). Understanding children’s collaborative interactions in shared environments. Journal of Computer Assissted Learning, 19(2), 220-228.
Shoemaker, G., & Inkpen, K. (2001). Single display privacyware: Augmenting public displays with private information. In Beaudouin-Lafon, Michael & Jacob, Robert J. K. (Eds.), Proceddings of the AC CHI 2001 Human Factors in Computing SystemsConference (pp. 522-529). Seattle, Washington, USA.
Stewart, J., Bederson, B., & Druin, A. (1999). Single display groupware: A model for co-present collalboration. In Altom, Mark W. & Williams G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM CHI 99 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference (pp. 286-293). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Tse, E., & Greenberg, S. (2002, November). SDGToolkit: A toolkit for rapidly prototyping single display groupware. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, USA.
Tse, E., Histon, J., Scott, S.D., & Greenberg, S. (2004). Avoiding interference: How people use spatial separation and partitioning in SDG workspaces. Proceedings of CSCW, 2004, 252-261.
Vallerand, R. J., Gauvin, L. I., & Halliwell, W. R. (1986). Negative effects of competition on children's instrinsic motivation. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 649-656.
Weinberg. R. S., & Ragan. J. (1979). Effects of competition, success/failure, and sex on instrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly, 50, 503-510.
Yu, F. Y., Chang, L. J., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2002). Learning preferences towards computerised competitive modes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 241-250.
Yatani, K., Sugimoto, M., & Kusunoki, F. (2004). Musex: A system for supporting children's collaborative learning in a museum with PDAs. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technology in Education (WMTE), 2004, 109-113.
Zanella, A., & Greenberg, S. (2000). A single display groupware widget set. Proceedings of the Western Computer Graphics Symposium, 2000, 26-29.
Zanella, A., & Greenberg, S. (2001). Reducing interference in single display groupware through transparency. Proceedings of ECSCW’01, 2001, 339-358.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔