跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.134.250) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/07 03:38
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:葉靜怡
研究生(外文):Ching-Yi Yeh
論文名稱:餐旅學群學生大一英文能力分班聽力學習成效之研究-以國立高雄餐旅大學為例
論文名稱(外文):A Case Study on the Listening Effects of Ability Grouping in General English Class-Take Hospitality Students at NKUHT for Example
指導教授:王美蓉王美蓉引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄餐旅大學
系所名稱:餐旅管理研究所在職專班
學門:民生學門
學類:餐旅服務學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:69
中文關鍵詞:能力分班聽力學習成效學習困難
外文關鍵詞:ability groupinglistening effectivenesslearning difficulties
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:656
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:99
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究旨在探討國立高雄餐旅大學餐旅學群學生大一英文能力分班聽力學習之成效,研究對象為98學年度第1學期四技一年級修讀通識英文聽說課程的新生,共計有248位參與。新生於入學時進行前測,再根據其聽力考試成績分成三個不同程度的班級,於18週後施行相同試題的後測,並發放能力分班教學看法問卷進行填答,最後輔以焦點團體訪談進行英文聽說困難的資料收集。
本研究使用相依樣本t檢定及單因子變異數分析進行資料分析,研究結果顯示所有程度班級學生在聽力學習表現上有顯著進步。而且,以低程度班級聽力進步最多。此外,在能力分班教學的看法問卷構面上,不同程度班級僅對於學習成效構面有顯著的差異,學生認為能力分班有助於改善英文聽說、英文口說的能力,並對在使用英文的場合亦較有自信,但對於學習情緒、教材教法及能力分班制度方面則沒有顯著的差異。而在學習困難方面,不分程度班級的學生都認為單字量不足是影響學習英文的最大困難。根據研究發現提出以下建議,學校應審慎進行分班作業,使學生能在適當的班級接受教學,更能提升其學習成效。另針對不同程度班級應給予適當之教材及試題,以達到因材施教的理念,並在教學中納入單字教學加強學生的字彙量有效提高學生之學習成效。


This research sets its main purpose on exploring the listening effectiveness of ability-grouping for hospitality and tourism freshmen students of general English courses at NKUHT. The research subjects are students enrolling in the first year general English listening and speaking courses of the four-year diploma program, and a total of 248 participants took part. The students were tested when entering the school, and were divided into three different levels according to their performances. They were tested again with the same set of questions and asked to answer a questionnaire for their comments on ability grouping and teaching methods. Finally they were interviewed in groups to gather information on the listening and speaking difficulties they had encountered.
The data were analyzed with methods of paired-sample T test and one-way ANOVA. The results indicated great variance in the students’ performances in each of the levels. Classes of lower levels showed the greatest progress. According to the comments collected from the questionnaires, the ability grouping made the students more confident when using English and effectively enhanced their listening and speaking skills. There were no significant differences regarding attitude, material, teaching methods and the ability-based class dividing system. Students of all levels found the lack of vocabulary to be their main problem in learning English. In accordance of the findings of the research, the following suggestions were made. The school should execute the ability grouping procedure to make sure that students are placed in courses most suitable for their proficiency levels and achieve the greatest learning effect. Also, appropriate materials are to be distributed to students of each level so the students’ needs are fulfilled and they can make best of their learning in the courses.


書名頁 i
博碩士論文授權書 ii
論文口試委員審定書 iii
中文摘要 iv
英文摘要 v
誌謝 vii
目錄 viii
表目錄 x
圖目錄 xi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究限制 3
第四節 名詞釋義 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 大學英文教學的現況與困境 5
第二節 能力分班 8
第三節 英語聽說教學 12
第四節 英語學習成效與困難 15
第三章 研究方法 20
第一節 研究架構 20
第二節 研究假設 21
第三節 研究方法 22
第四節 研究對象 28
第五節 研究流程 30
第六節 資料分析處理 32
第四章 資料分析結果與討論 34
第一節 聽力的學習成效 34
第二節 能力分班教學的看法 38
第三節 英文課程學習困難 46
第五章 結論與建議 51
第一節 研究結論 51
第二節 研究建議 53
參考文獻 54
附錄一 前、後測試題範例 64
附錄二 正式問卷 66
附錄三 訪談同意函 68
附錄四 訪談大綱 69


王世平(1998)。大專英語「能力分級」實證教學研究。第十五屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會會議論文集,311-330。
王毓芝 (2004)。新世紀大一英文課程之革新方案,世新人文社會學報,5,119-144。
王星威(2008,11月)。EIL趨勢與台灣英語教學政策之關連性探討。English Career,28,34-39。
王曉慧(2000)。高雄市國小學生家庭文化環境英語學習方法與英語學習成就之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
文庭澍(1996)。從「韓流」談韓國人學英文。敦煌英語教學電子雜誌。
李輝華(2000)。有利於英語教學的學校措施。第十屆國際英語教學研討會論文集,574-584。臺北:文鶴出版有限公司。
李傳彬(2008)。大學英語聽力教學中自主性學習能力的培養,無錫商業職業技術學院學報,8(4),84-86。
李美誼(2004)。多媒體英語歌曲教學對提升國小學童學習動機與學習成效之研究。國立屏東師範大學教育科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
余佳紋(2005)。戲劇表演對臺灣以英語為外語學習者的學習動機的影響與成效:以大一學生為例。私立淡江大學英文研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
吳佳欣(2006)。台灣英語系大學生高程度與低程度聽力理解策略與困難之有聲思考研究。國立彰化師範大學英語學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
吳明隆與涂金堂(2008)。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北:五南。
林茂松(1995)。中華民國高中高職英語教學現況比較。第十二屆中華民國應語文教學研討會論文集,59-79。
林淑玲(1996)。技職教育體系良好閱讀者的理解策略之研究。國立彰化師範大學英國語文學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
林曉彤(2006)。東海大學大一英文教學成效探討。私立東海大學外國語文研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中。
范馨之(2008)。大一共同英文能力分班教學之研究-以朝陽科技大學為例。私立朝陽科技大學應用外語系碩士論文,未出版,台中。
許繼德(2002)。網路輔助教學對不同認知風格的國小學童在英語學習動機與成就之影響。國立屏東師範大學教育科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
童懋慶(1993)。本校大一學生英文學習態度調查。彰化師範大學學報,33-50。
馮景照(2000)。探討分組方式在合作學習應用中的影響與成效。私立淡江大學西洋語文研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
陳超明(2006)。下一波的大學英語通識課程:語文訓練、文化素養與國際視野。實踐大學應用外語學系舉辦之「第一屆實踐大學英語文教學」研討會論文集(頁1-7)。台北:實踐大學。
陳超明(2008,11月)。大學英文課程困境與專業英文:政策與執行的幾點看法。English Career,28,12-16。
陳建中(2006)。非英語系學生對外籍師英語聽講課程的知覺探究。屏東科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
陳英輝(2008,6月)。「全球化時代英語的未來。」國家外語政策專輯-另一項愛台建設。English Career,27, 20-27。
陳柏全(2010)。英語主修生之口說學習特色。南台科技大學應用英語系碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學。台北:東華書局。
張淳惠(2004)。遊學對國中生英語學習態度與學習成效之影響。私立靜宜大學觀光事業學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
曾小媚(2003)。社區成人參與英語自然發音課程之學習成效與學習 態度。國立新竹師範學院職業繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
楊育芬(2008,11月)。大一英文的重新定位。第十七屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會。台北:劍潭。
楊懿麗(1992)。「由需求調查到學習心理-再論大一英文之教學問題」。英語教學,17(1),29-37
楊承謙與陳嘉彌(2001)。新加坡與台灣國民教育比較分析之初探。教育研究月刊,84,49-60。
劉顯親(2003)。大學英文教育之規劃:現狀及願景。英語教育電子月刊。
錢景寗、荊行倫、高儷華。英文能力分班政策實證研究(2002)。2002全國應用英語教學研討會暨工作坊論文集(頁185-198)。台北:文鶴
羅美貞(2000)。高職英文教學面臨的困境與因應,商業職業教育,76,19-28。
蕭玉禎(2006)。能力分組對台灣國中生之英語學習動機與成就之影響。國立高雄師範大學英語研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
鍾筱美(2003)。國民小學兒童英語學習成就與國語識字能力之調查研究-以屏東縣國小一年級及三年級兒童為例。國立屏東師範大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
簡鈴燕(2006)。 大學英語系學生於托福測驗中英語聽力困難及聽力策略之研究。國立彰化師範大學英語學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
謝瓊儀(2002)。小組探究對學習動機及聽說能力的影響與成效:以大一學生為例。私立淡江大學西洋語文研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
Adams, R. J. (2004). Learner-learner interactions: Implications for second language acquisition. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington.
Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Student experiences of ability grouping- dissatisfaction, polarization, and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26, 631-648.
Baines, E., Blatchford. P., & Kutnick, P. (2003). Changes in grouping practices over primary and secondary school. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 9-34.
Cheng, B. Y. (1987). A descriptive case report of TEFL program planning for non-English majors: The Fu-jen experience. In Papers from the fourth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China. (pp. 205-212). Taipei: Crane.
Cheung, C. K., & Rudowicz, E. (2003). Academic outcomes of ability grouping among junior high school students in Hong Kong. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 241-254.
Chen, T. Y. & Chang, B. Y. (2004). The relationship between foreign language anxiety and learning difficulties. Foreign Language Annals, 37(2), 279-289.
Chen, M. H., Lin, Y. C., & Feng, H. C. (2004). Students’ and instructors’ perceptions of ability grouping in English listening learning. Journal of Chang Jung Christian University, 8(1), 107-123.
Cheng, J. C. (2006). An evaluation on ability grouping in the English class: A case study at Song-shan high school of commerce and home economics. The Proceedings of 2006 International Conference and Workshop on TEEL & Applied Linguistics (pp. 86-93). Taoyuan: Ming Chuan University.
Ferris, D. & Tagg, T. (1996). Academic listening/speaking task for ESL students: Problems, suggestions, and implications. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 297-320.
Felmlee, D. & Eder, D. (1983). Contextual effects on the classroom: The impact of ability groups on student attention. Sociology Education, 56, 77-78.
Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berend, M., & LePore, P. C. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 687-715.
Haakenson, P. J., Wang, C. P., Dakin, C. J., Tsan, Y. Y., & Fisher, W. D. (1992). University freshman English in Taiwan: A proposal based on the Tunghai model. In Papers from the ninth conference on English teaching and leaning in the Republic of China. (pp. 320-337). Taipei: Crane.
Hollifield, J. (1987). Ability grouping in elementary schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED290 542)
Hsu, W. H. (2001). How classroom questioning influences second language acquisition. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, USA.
Huang, S. Y. (1996). English programs for Non-English majors at universities in Taiwan. The Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 35-43). Taipei: Crane.
Huang, S. Y. (1997). Changes in freshman English programs for non-English majors at universities in Taiwan. The Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 305-321). Taipei: Crane.
Huang, S. Y. (1998). Freshman English programs for non-English majors at universities in Taiwan: An investigation into the gap between expectations and reality. Tunghai Journal, 39, 129-153.
Ikpia, V. I. (2001). The attitude and perceptions of adult English as a second language students toward explicit grammar instruction. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, New Mexico State University.
Kerkoff, A. (1986). Effects of ability grouping in British secondary schools. American Sociological Review, 51, 842-58.
Kim, S. (2006). Academic oral communication needs of East Asian international graduate students in non-science and non-engineering fields. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 479-489.
Kline, M. W. (2006). The relationship between motivational variables, anxiety, exposure to English, and language learning strategies among adult ESL learners. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Southern California.
Kulik, C. L. & Kulik, J. A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19 (3), 415-428.
Kulik, J. A. & Kulik, C. L. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs, Gifted Child Quarterly, 36 (2), 73-77.
Kim, D. & Hall, J. K. (2002). The role of an interactive book reading program in the development of second language pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 332-348.
Lee, E. A. (2000). A study of the effective multimedia in adult ESL education. Unpublished doctorial dissertation. The State University of New Jersey.
Linchevski, L. & Kutscher, B. (1998). Tell me with whom you''re learning, and I''ll tell you how much you''ve learned: Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29 (5), 533-554.
Liu, H. J. (2008). An analysis of the effects of ability grouping on student learning in university-wide English classes. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 16, 217-249
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & Spence, J. C. (2000). Effects of within-class grouping on student Achievement: An exploratory model. The Journal of Educational Research, 94, 101-112
Luo, B. (2005). Achievement grouping and students’ progress in freshman English classes at Feng Chia university. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11, 253-279.
Marsh, H. W. (1994). Using the national longitudinal study of 1988 to evaluate theoretical modals of self-concept: The self-description questionnaire. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 439-456.
Mendesohn, D. (1984). There ARE strategies for listening. TEAL Occasional Papers, 8, 63-76.
Mendesohn, D. (1999). Learning to listen: A strategy-based approach for the second-language learners. San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 589-613.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Oakes, J. (1992). Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative, and political considerations. Educational Researcher, 24(4), 12- 21.
Ostler, S. E. (1980). A survey of academic needs for advanced ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 489-502.
Otte, J. L. (2006). Real language for real people: A descriptive and exploratory case study of the outcomes of aural authentic texts on the listening comprehension of adult English-as-a-second language students enrolled in an advanced ESL listening course. Unpublished doctorial dissertation. Loyola University Chicago.
Ou, H. C. (1997). A study of university freshmen’s English reading proficiency and learning strategies. The 12th Technological and Uocational Education Conference of Republic of China (pp. 351-360). Taipei: Crane.
Peacock, M. (1996). The motivation of adult EFL learners with authentic materials and artificial materials. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Essex, United Kingdom.
Revesz, A. J. (2007). Focus on form in task-based language teaching: Recasts, task complexity, and L2 learning. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, Columbia University.
Rogers, K. B. (1998). Using current research to make “good” decision about grouping. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 38-46.
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural Studies of Mind (pp. 139-164). N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Seyhan, S. (2000). The impact of anxiety, self-esteem and motivation on the oral communication of German and Japanese adult ESL students. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, United States International University.
Sheu, C. M. & Wang, P. L. (2006). A case study of student perceptions toward between-class ability grouping in freshman practical English class. K.U.A.S. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 111-140.
Sims, J. (2006). A task-based, student-centered university EFL program in Taiwan. Korea Association of Teachers of English KATE 2006 Intentional Conference, Seoul, Korea, 429-435.
Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary school: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57 (3), 293-336.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-490
Slavin, R. E. (1993). Ability grouping in middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives. The Elementary School Journal, 93 (5), 535-552.
Sze, P. (1995). Teaching Conversation in the Second Language Classroom: Problems and Prospects. Educational Journal. 23(2), 229-250.
Teng, H. C. (2002). An investigation of EFL listening difficulties for Taiwanese college students. Paper from the Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching/Fourth Pan-Asian Conference in the Republic of China (pp. 526-533). Taipei: Crane.
Tsai, C. C. (2008). The outcomes and implementation of the ability grouping program of freshman English at the national Kaohsiung marine university. 國立高雄海洋科技大學學報, 22, 169-184.
Underwood, M. (1994). Teaching listening. (4th ed.) New York: Longman.
Wang, Y. C. (1996). Freshman English Curriculum: English language newspapers as a teaching tool. The Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 251-260). Taipei: Crane.
Wang, Y. C. (2003). Communication-orientation in freshman English curriculum: A new response. Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 588-598). Taipei: Crane.
Wang, M. J. & Wang, M. F. (2008). Does it work? Ability-based grouping and instruction. KHC Journal of General Education, 4, 1-12.
Wen, W. P. & Clement, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16, 18-38.
Wheellock, A. (1992). Crossing the tracks: How untracking can save America’s schools. New York: The New Press.
Yu, C. F. (1994). The assessment of ability grouping in the college lab program: The Soochow experience. Soochow Journal of Foreign Languages and Literatures, 10, 45-77.
Yu, C. F. (1996). Restructuring of the EFL lab listening class: The Soochow University experience. Soochow Journal of Foreign Languages and Literatures, 11, 119-136.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top