跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.86) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/08 23:12
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:侯清賢
研究生(外文):Hou, Ching Hsien
論文名稱:地方政府在臺灣海域空間規劃與管理所扮演之角色
論文名稱(外文):The role of local government in marine spatial planning and management in Taiwan
指導教授:劉文宏劉文宏引用關係
指導教授(外文):Liu, Wen-Hong
口試委員:劉燈城呂學榮劉文宏
口試委員(外文):Liu, DonchungLu, Hsueh-JungLiu, Wen-Hong
口試日期:2011-05-30
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄海洋科技大學
系所名稱:漁業生產與管理研究所
學門:農業科學學門
學類:漁業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:190
中文關鍵詞:海域使用管理海洋事務分權海岸管理海域空間規劃深度訪談法問卷調查法
外文關鍵詞:Marine AffairsDecentralizationCoastal ManagementSea Use ManagementMarine Spatial PlanningIn-depth interviewQuestionnaire Survey
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:673
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:80
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
隨著人口成長、經濟快速發展與海防管制的開放,國人對海洋與海岸的使用急劇增加。然而,由於政府當局現正草擬之「國土三法」(國土計畫法、國土復育條例及海岸法)及地方制度法對海洋管理規範也未盡連貫與周延,而造成地方政府海域規劃與管理之困難。本研究將先探討地方政府在海域空間規劃中扮演的角色,並利用高雄與基隆兩個城市為例,來探討地方政府海域管理職權、能力與資源、執政者意願、政府間協調管理之機制等四個因素,並利用深度訪談法針對地方政府有關單位主管及專家學者進行訪談。接著,將臺灣與國際狀況進行討論,以期找出臺灣地方政府海域空間規劃與管理問題的解決之道。研究結果顯示,目前臺灣急需擬訂與通過地方制度法與海岸法草案來賦予地方政府海域空間規劃與管理之權限,並提昇與加強上述四個因素,方可使臺灣海洋與海岸得以永續發展。
As a result of population growth and economic development, there has been a rapid increase in sea use around the island of Taiwan. Such increased use is placing pressure on the marine environment and its resources. Three draft territory laws (the Draft National Territory Planning Act, the Land Re-conservation Draft Bill, and the Draft Coastal Act) and the Local Government Act are neither consistent nor sufficiently comprehensive. Consequently, local Governments (municipalities and counties) experience difficulties in planning and managing their inshore waters. This paper will discuss the role local Governments plays in marine spatial planning and management. Local Government officials working in specialist marine affairs units from Kaohsiung and Keelung cities were surveyed to elicit their views with regards to management authority, management capacity and resources, officials’ commitment, and intergovernmental coordination/ collaboration with respect to inshore waters. In-depth interviews were also conducted with local directors of specialist marine affairs units along with experts, to identify the causes of problems brought to light through the survey and to propose potential solutions to these problems. The study findings indicated that it is necessary to specify the marine spatial planning and management authority, as well as the scope of local Governments, in both the Coastal Act and Local Government Act. In order to sustainably develop Taiwan’s marine and coastal areas, it is important that the following four primary factors (management authority, management capacity and resources, officials’ commitment, and intergovernmental coordination/collaboration) be improved.
中文摘要
英文摘要
謝辭
第壹章 緒論
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究方法與步驟 4
第四節 研究架構 6
第五節 研究範圍與限制 6
第貳章 各國海域空間規劃與管理
第一節 前言 11
第二節 國際海域空間規劃與管理之發展趨勢 11
第三節 加拿大 16
第四節 印尼 21
第五節 菲律賓 26
第六節 馬來西亞 34
第七節 美國 38
第八節 中國 43
第九節 小結 47
第參章 臺灣海域空間規劃與管理現況及問題探討
第一節 前言 59
第二節 臺灣海域管理之相關組織 59
第三節 臺灣海域管理之相關法令 65
第四節 臺灣中央與地方政府海域空間規劃與管理之議題 70
第肆章 地方政府扮演角色之分析
第一節 臺灣海域規劃與管理現況問卷分析 80
第二節 研究對象 80
第三節 問卷設計與蒐集 81
第四節 問卷分析統計方法 85
第五節 深度訪談問項設計 86
第六節 受訪者背景分析 89
第七節 臺灣海域管理現況問卷調查結果分析 90
第伍章 討論 101
第陸章 結論與建議
第一節 結論 115
第二節 建議 115
參考文獻 122
附錄
附錄一 臺灣海域管理現況調查表 135
附錄二 海洋事務專家訪談問項 141
附錄三 ○○市政府海洋事務主管現場訪談問項 143
附錄四 深度訪談機關對象說明 146
附錄五 訪談紀錄1 147
附錄六 訪談紀錄2 159
附錄七 訪談紀錄3 170
附錄八 訪談紀錄4 176

表目錄
表2-1 里斯本條例中央與地方權責之劃分 51
表2-2 加拿大海岸地區管理演變過程 52
表2-3 印尼海岸地區管理演變過程 53
表2-4 菲律賓海岸地區管理演變過程 54
表2-5 馬來西亞海岸地區管理演變過程 56
表2-6 美國海岸地區管理演變過程 57
表3-1 我國中央與地方政府主要海洋事務規劃與管理之權 73
表3-2 我國現行海岸管理之中央主管機關主要權責 76
表3-3 我國現行海岸管理之各事業目的主管機關主要權責 77
表3-4 我國現行海岸管理之地方政府主要權責 79
表4-1 受訪者對於管理職權問項之結果 113

圖目錄
圖1-1 臺灣地區海岸地區範圍 8
圖1-2 研究流程 9
圖1-3 論文架構 10
圖4-1 受訪者個人專長之比例 111
圖4-2 受訪者工作年資之比例 111
圖4-3 受訪者職級之比例 112
圖4-4 受訪者學歷之比例 112



參考文獻
一、中文部分
白小芬(2008). 高雄市海洋污染防治成效之研析。高雄市海洋局,高雄。
行政院海洋事務推動委員會(2006). 海洋政策白皮書。行政院研究發展考核委員會,台北,245頁。
朱堅真(2008). 海洋區劃與規劃。海洋出版社,北京, 225頁。
吳明隆(2007). SPSS操作與應用:問卷設計分析實務。五南,台北,680頁。
吳明隆(2007). SPSS統計應用學習事務:問卷設計分析與應用統計。知城,台北,511頁。
周繼祥(2005). 中共處理海洋事務策略與組織架構之研究。行政院海岸巡防署,台北, 315頁。
周繼祥(2009). 我國中央與地方海洋事務行政功能與組織之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會,台北, 346頁。
邱文彥(2003). 海岸管理理論與實務。五南,台北,494頁。
邱文彥(2003). 海洋與海岸資源合理利用與永續發展-整合性海岸管理理論與實務之研究(II)。行政院國家科學委員會,台北,116頁。
邱文彥(2007). 海洋國土的規劃:願景、範圍與主要議題。都市與計劃,34(3):241-272。
胡念祖(2007). 規劃建構海域功能區劃制度。內政部,台北, 46頁。
姜皇池.陳國勝.張志清(2009). 海洋事務統合法制之研究(I)。行政院研究發展考核委員會,台北, 650頁。
國土規劃及不動產資訊中心(2007). 95年度國土規劃總顧問案整合理報告。內政部營建署市鄉規劃局,台北, 89頁。
陳儀清(2007). 建構海域功能區劃制度-「海域」內、外界線之界定。海洋及水下科技季刊,17(3):37-41。
張靈杰(2002). 美國海岸管理的法律體系與實踐。海洋地質動態,浙江,18(3):28-33。
張宏聲(2003). 全國海洋功能區劃概要。海洋出版社,北京, 32頁。
張晏瑲(2007). 由海洋事務內涵析論中央與地方權限劃分-我國現行法制之檢討與建議。輔仁法學,27:81-125。
鹿守本.艾萬鑄編(2001). 海岸帶綜合管理-體制和運行機制研究。海洋出版社,北京, 285-304頁。
監察院(2004). 海洋與台灣相關課題總體檢調查報告。監察院,台北,頁585。
寧凌(2009). 海洋總合管理與政策。科學出版社,北京, 360頁。
營建署(2007). 永續海岸整體發展方案。營建署,台北, 48頁。
簡連貴.邱文彥.李信志(2008). 海域功能區劃與管理工作成果報告。內政部營建署市鄉規劃局,台北, 192頁。
二、網路部分
王聖銘(2007). 台東都蘭灣杉原海洋生態社區導覽手札。杉原漁業資源保護管理委員會,台東。http://blog.xuite.net/fish7031/ocean/25274274
Burke, L., L. Selig, and M. Spalding (2002) . Reefs at Risk in Southeast Asia. World Resources Institute. Washington. 72 pages. [cited 28 July 2005].
http://marine.wri.org/ pubs description.cfm?PubID=3144
FAO (2001). Fishery Country Profile: Malaysia. FID/CP/MAL. Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization (cited 28 November 2005).
http://www.fao.org/ fi/fcp/en/MYS/profile.htm
World Bank (2002). Decentralization & subnational regional economics. TheWorld Bank 2002 (cited 25 October 2002). http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization
三、英文部分
ASEAN-USAID CRMP (1991). The coastal environmental profile of South Johore, Malaysia. International Centre for Living Aquatic Resources Management. Manila, Tech. Rep. No. 24. 77 pp.
ASEAN-USAID CRMP and DGF (1992). The Integrated Management Plan for Segara Anakan- Cilacap, Central Java, Indonesia. International Centre for Living Aquatic Resources Management. Manila, Rep. No. 34. 99 pp.
Agrawal, Arun and Jesse C. Ribot (2000). Accountability in Decentralization: A Frameowork with South Asian an West African Cases. World Resource Institute. 63 pp.
ADB (Asian Development Bank)(2003). Integrated Coastal Resource Management Project, Philippines, Final Report, Volume I: Main Report. Asian Development Bank, Tetra Tech, EM Inc. and PRIMEX, Manila, Philippines. P 14.
Addison, B. and D. Petrachnko (2005).The Ocean Policy Summit, Lisbon, Portugal. Australia’s ocean policy.
ALAN, W., D. EVELYN and J WILLIAM(2006). Integrated Coastal Management in Philippine Local Governance: Evolution and Benefits. Coastal Management, 34:287–302.
Cheema, G. Shabbir and Dennis Rondinelli (1983). Decentralization and Development. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Christie, P., and A. T. White (1997). Trends in development of coastal area management in tropical countries: From central to community orientation. Coastal Management 25:155–181.
Cicin-Sain, B., R. W. Knecht, D. Jang, and G. W. Fisk (1998). Integrated coastal and ocean management: Concepts and practices, Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 517pp.
Courtney, C. A., A. T. White, and E. Anglo (2000). Coastal Resource Management in the Philippines:Lessons and Directions for Sustainability. Coastal Resource Management Project, Tetra TechEM Inc. and the Asian Development Bank, Cebu City, Philippines, 75 pp. (report).
Courtney, C. A., and A. T. White (2000). Integrated coastal management in the Philippines: Testing new paradigms. Coastal Management 28: 39–53.
Calestino, A. B (2001). Malaysia. Does it really need decentralization. In Sourcebook on decentralization in Asia. Decentralization and power shift: An imperative for good governance, eds. A. B. Brillantes, Jr. and N. G. Cuachon, Manila: Asian Resource Center For Decentralization.
Courtney, C., A. T. White, et al. (2002). Building Philippine local government capacity for coastal resource management. Coastal Management 30(1): 27-45.
Cicin-Sain, B., Ehler C and Kuska GF (2005). United States of America Ocean Policy. Ocean Policy Summit, The Lisbon, Portugal.
Crowder, L. B., G. Osherenko, O. R. Young, S. Airame, E. A. Norse, N. Baron, J. C. Day, F. Douvere, C. N. Ehler, B. S. Haplern, S. J. Langdon, K. L. McLeod, J. C. Ogden, R. E. Peach, A. A. Rosenberg and J. A. Wilson (2006). Resolving mismatches in U.S. ocean governance. Science, 313: 617-618.
Cristina, C., and J. R. Dave(2010). Ecosystem-basedmanagementinstitutionaldesign:Balancebetweenfederal, state, and local governments with in the Gulf of Mexico Alliance. Marine Policy 34:178–181.
Dahuri, R., and I. M. Dutton (2000). Integrated coastal and marine management enters a new era in Indonesia. Integrated Coastal Zone Management, 1:11–16.
DENR, DA-BFAR, and DILG (Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Department of Agriculture—Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, and Department of the Interior and Local Government) (2001). Philippine coastal management guidebook series (8 volumes). Coastal Resource Management Project of DENR. Cebu City, Philippines. Guidebook titles: 1. Coastal management orientation and overview. 58 pp.; 2. Legal and jurisdictional framework for coastal management. 170 p.; 3. Coastal resource management planning. 94 pp.; 4. Involving communities in coastal management. 84 pp.; 5. Managing coastal habitats and marine protected areas. 106 pp.; 6. Managing municipal fisheries. 122 pp.; 7. Managing impacts of development in the coastal zone. 108 pp.; 8. Coastal law enforcement, 164 pp.
Dahuri, R (2001). Decentralizing and delegating ICM to regional and local communities: A precarious balance of authority, capacity and consistency. UNESCO Oceans and Coasts Pre-World Summit on Sustainable Development Conference, Paris, France, UNESCO. 19 pp.
DA-BFAR (Department of Agrigulture—Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources) (2004). In Turbulent Seas: The status of Philippine Marine Fisheries. Coastal Resource Management Project of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Cebu City, Philippines, 378 pp.
Dutton, I. M (2005). If only fish could vote: The enduring challenges of coastal and marine resources management in post-Reformasi Indonesia. In: Resosudar- mo BP, editor. The politics and economics of Indonesia’s natural resources. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies; p162–78.
Defra (2005). Marine spatial planning literature review. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2005.136 pp.
Douvere F. and C. N. Ehler (2007). Conference report. Marine Policy 31 (2): 582-583.
EPU and DANCED (1999). Integrated Coastal Zone Management, Status Document. Kuala Lumpur: Economic Planning Unit Prime Minister’s Department Malaysia and Danish Cooperation on Environment and Development.
Ehler , C., and F. Douvere (2009). Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Paris: UNESCO. 99pp.
Fenger, B. H (1994). Solving environmental health problems at local level. Marine Policy 18(2): 116-120.
Gomez, E. D., P. M. Ali˜no, H. T. Yap, and W. Y. Licuanan (1994). A review of the status of Philippine reefs. Marine Pollution Bulletin 29(1–3):62–68.
GreenCom Project (1996). Results of formative research conducted in support of pilot environmental communication campaigns. United States Agency for International Development, Manila, Philippines.
Hildreth, R. G., and M. Gale (1995). Institutional and legal arrangements for coastal management in the Asia Pacific Region. In Coastal management in the Asia-Pacific region: Issues and approaches, eds. K. Hotta and I. M. Dutton, Japan International Marine Science and Technology Federation. Tokyo.
HENDRA, Y. S(2006). Decentralized Coastal Zone Management in Malaysia and Indonesia: A Comparative Perspective. Coastal Management, 34:267–285.
Haward, M. and J. Vince (2008). Oceans governance in the twenty-first century: managing the blue planet. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. 240pp.
Idris, I., and H. Y. Siry (1997). Indonesian integrated coastal zone planning and management: An institutional perspective. Jakarta: Directorate General for Regional Development (Ditjen Bangda), Ministry of Home Affairs.
International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management (ICLARM) (1995). Research proposal for the review and evaluation of community-based coastal resource management projects in the Philippines conducted between 1984 and 1994. Manila, Philippines: International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management .

Lisbon Declaration (1994). Lisbon Declaration on Implementation by Local Authorities of the Marine Chapter of UNCED’s Agenda 21. Marine Policy, 18 (2) 94-98
Lowry, K., A. White and C. Courtney (2005). National and local agency roles in integrated coastal management in the Philippines. Ocean and Coastal Management, 48: 314-335.
May, Peter J. and Raymond J. Burby (1996). Cooperative Versus Cooperative Policies: Comparing Intergovernmental Mandate Performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15, 2: 171-21.
MMAF (2002). The need for a new coastal zone and small island management act in national sustainable development. Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries. Jakarta.
Marine Law and Ocean Policy Centre (2002). Review of international approaches to integrated coastal management. Galway. Marine Law and Ocean Policy Centre. Ireland,108pp.
Mokhtar, M. B., and S. A. G. Aziz (2003). Integrated coastal zone management using the ecosystem approach: Some perspectives in Malaysia. Ocean & Coastal Management 46:407– 419.
Maes, F., M. De Batist, V. Van Lancker and M. Vincx (2005). Towards a spatial structure plan for sustainable management of the sea. The Belgian Science Policy, Brussels, 252pp.
Mageau, C., D. VanderZwaag and S. Farlinger (2005). The Ocean Policy Summit, Lisbon, Portugal. Ocean policy: a Canadian case study.
MSPP Consortium (2006). Marine spatial planning pilot. MSPP Consortium.98pp.
Norrena, E. J(1994).Stewardship of coastal waters and protected spaces. Marine Policy 18(2): 153-160.
National Ocean Office (2004). Purpose of the South-East Regional Marine Plan scoping paper. National Ocean Office, Hobart.
Nicole, M., and C. Patrick(2005). Financing integrated coastal management: experiences in Mabini and Tingloy, Batangas, Philippines. Ocean & Coastal Management 48: 427–449.
Otto-Zimmermann, K. (1994). Local implementation of Agenda 21. Marine Policy 18(2): 112-115.
Sebek V (1994). Introduction. Marine Policy 18(2):104–6.
Sloan, N. A., and A. Sugandhy (1994). An overview of Indonesian coastal environmental anagement. Coastal Management 22:215–233.
Saharuddin, A. H. 2001. National ocean policy—new opportunities for Malaysian ocean development. Marine Policy 25:427–435.
Siry, H. Y. (2006). Decentalized coastal zone management in Malaysia and Indonesia: a comparative perspective. Coastal Management 34: 267-285.
Viktor Sebek (1994). Introduction. Marine Policy 18(2) 104-106.
Wood-Thomas BC (1994). Land-based marine pollution and coastal zone management: role of state and local government in the USA. Marine Policy 18(2):165–74.
White, A. T., and H. P. Vogt (2000). Philippine coral reefs under threat: Lessons learned after 25 years of community-based reef conservation. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40(7):537–550.
White, A. T., P. Christie, H. d’Agnes, K. Lowry, and N. Milne (2005). Designing ICM projects for sustainability: Lessons from the Philippines and Indonesia. Ocean and Coastal Management 48:271–296.
Towfighi, P. S (1994). Integrated planning and management of coastal areas. Marine Policy 18(2): 107-111.
Tomascik, T., A. J. Mah, A. Nontji, and M. K. Moosa (1997). The ecology of the Indonesian Seas,Parts one and two. EMDI and Periplus. Singapore,746 pp.
UNDP (1998). Empowering people - A guide to participation. Civil Society Organizations and Participation Program (CSOPP), UNDP. New York,46 pp.
Uphoff, N (1998). Community-based natural resource management: Connecting micro and macro processes, and people with their environments.171pp.
UNEP RRCAP (2004). Sustainable development priorities for Southeast Asia, United Nations Environment Program—Regional Resources for Asia Pacific. Bangkok, 82pp.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top