臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究採用任務分析法，藉由三個階段的實習諮商心理師團體督導之實際資料分析，建構一個合於實務的事件取向結構式團體督導模式。研究對象為碩士班實習諮商心理師，一個督導團體招募5名，本研究招募二個督導團體共10名。
整體研究先透過文獻、初探研究與研究者的實務經驗提出一個理念模式，並以提案人陳述請求協助的問題作為起點行為的確認，及提案人自評問題解決情形作為終點行為的確認，且在終點行為的三個向度自評滿意度並說明具體內涵。然後逐一依據三個階段的團體督導之實際資料分析，修正和擴充原有的理念模式，建構一個合於實務的模式。
本研究結果提出一個具有十三個要件的模式，並能有效確認起點行為和終點行為。有關要件流程圖的分析，依時間順序可看出十三個要件呈現出整體團體督導的互動改變歷程，依要件的前後內容關聯進一步分析出「四組型三循環」和「互動回饋之4方向4型式4循環」之互動現象，如此更具體得知整體團體督導互動歷程的轉變脈絡。
研究者也根據研究問題提出四點主要結論：（1）實習諮商心理師的起點行為經歸納後之類別主要為專業技巧學習、自我覺察與個人成長，本模式可多數解決提案人問題並達到終點行為，其中在個人覺察和成長的滿意度最高；（2）事件取向結構式團體督導模式共有十三個要件；（3）十三個要件呈現四組型三循環的互動現象；（4）本模式的要件流程圖有助於後續研究和諮商督導實務，並且提出具體的督導介入原則。
最後研究者亦根據研究結果，針對諮商督導實務和未來研究提出建議。

This research aimed to construct the Model of Events-based Structured Group Supervision via a task analysis of three stages of group supervision for counseling psychologists in practicum. There were 5 subjects in a supervision group, and total 10 subjects of two groups in this study.
This study relied on literatures review, pilot study, and practical experiences of the researcher to first design a rational model. It verified the beginning behavior (marker) by the request-for-assistance statements of the presenter in group supervision, it also verified the final behavior (solution) by the self-rating of problem solving of the presenter and then describing their satisfaction and concrete reasons on the three variables. In addition, according to the actual study analysis of three stages of group supervision, the researcher could modify and amend an original rational model to construct for practice.
The results of this study provide the Model with 13 components, and it can effectively verify the beginning and final behavior of the presenter in group supervision. Furthermore, the 13 components also present changing process of interaction in group supervision, which to form the interaction phenomenon of “4 Groups with 3 Circles” and “4 Aspects, 4 Patterns, and 4 Circles of Feedback”.
Based on conclusions of the study, the researcher provides constructive suggestions for supervisors, clinical supervision, and future research respectively.

目 錄
第一章 緒論.......................................................................................................................1
第一節 研究動機...……………………………………………………..………...1
第二節 研究問題....................................................................................................7
第三節 名詞釋義....................................................................................................7
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………...……………………….………13
第一節 團體督導的重要概念與介入模式……………………………..……….13
第二節 團體督導的互動內涵...............................................................................25
第三節 團體督導的相關研究…….………………...….......................................38
第四節 結構化團體督導的理論概念與步驟…………………………..……….43
第五節 任務分析的研究步驟及其重要議題……………………………..…….53
第三章 研究方法............................................................................................................61
第一節 理念模式的建構………...………………………………………………61
第二節 研究參與者...............................................................................................69
第三節 研究工具...................................................................................................71
第四節 研究程序...................................................................................................76
第五節 資料整理與分析.......................................................................................84
第六節 研究倫理...................................................................................................94
第四章 結果與討論.......................................................................................................97
第一節 第一督導團體1至5次聚會互動歷程之分析.........................................97
第二節 第二督導團體1至3次聚會互動歷程之分析.......................................168
第三節 第二督導團體4至5次聚會互動歷程之分析......................................230
第四節 綜合討論…..………………………………………….………………..283
第五章 結論與建議....................................................................................................305
第一節 結論........................................................................................................305
第二節 建議........................................................................................................312
參考文獻 ........................................................................................................319
一、中文部份.........................................................................................................319
二、西文部份.........................................................................................................320


附錄
附錄一 團體督導任務達成情形檢核表…………………………………………………331
附錄二 實習諮商心理師研究邀請函……………………………………………………332
附錄三 參與研究同意書……………………………………............................................333
附錄四 受督導者基本資料表……………………………………………………………334
附錄五 第一督導團體1至5次聚會互動歸類原則……………………………………335
附錄六 第二督導團體1至3次聚會互動歸類原則……………………………………348
附錄七 第二督導團體4至5次聚會互動歸類原則……………….……………………357
附錄八 每次聚會的團體督導互動改變歷程之起點行為與終點行為…………...…….364
附錄九 每次聚會的互動歷程之要件及其細項…………………………………………374
附錄十 每次聚會的互動歷程要件流程對照表……………………...…………….……384

表次
表2-4-1 結構化團體督導各步驟的重要內涵與進行方式............................................52
表3-2-1 第一督導團體受督導者基本資料表................................................................70
表3-2-2 第二督導團體受督導者基本資料表................................................................71
表3-4-1 資料蒐集與擴充第一、二、三次模式對照表………………………………83
表4-1-1 第一督導團體1至5次聚會互動改變歷程之起點行為與終點行為彙整表107
表4-1-2 第一督導團體1至5次聚會互動歷程之要件及其細項...............................108
表4-1-3 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件一及其細項一覽表...................................109
表4-1-4 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件二及其細項一覽表...................................111
表4-1-5 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件三及其細項一覽表...................................113
表4-1-6 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件四及其細項一覽表...................................116
表4-1-7 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件五及其細項一覽表...................................120
表4-1-8 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件六及其細項一覽表....................................124
表4-1-9 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件七及其細項一覽表...................................126
表4-1-10 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件八及其細項一覽表...................................127
表4-1-11 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件九及其細項一覽表...................................129
表4-1-12 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件十及其細項一覽表...................................133
表4-1-13 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件十一及其細項一覽表..............................133
表4-1-14 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件十二及其細項一覽表..............................137
表4-1-15 第一督導團體1至5次聚會要件十三及其細項一覽表..............................140
表4-1-16 理念模式和第一次擴充後模式要件流程對照表..........................................145
表4-2-1 第二督導團體1至3次聚會互動改變歷程之起點行為與終點行為彙整表175
表4-2-2 第二督導團體1至3次聚會互動歷程之要件及其細項..............................176
表4-2-3 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件一及其細項一覽表...................................177
表4-2-4 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件二及其細項一覽表...................................178
表4-2-5 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件三及其細項一覽表...................................180
表4-2-6 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件四及其細項一覽表...................................183
表4-2-7 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件五及其細項一覽表...................................187
表4-2-8 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件六及其細項一覽表...................................190
表4-2-9 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件七及其細項一覽表...................................191
表4-2-10 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件八及其細項一覽表...................................193
表4-2-11 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件九及其細項一覽表...................................197
表4-2-12 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件十及其細項一覽表……………………...198
表4-2-13 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件十一及其細項一覽表..............................200
表4-2-14 第二督導團體1至3次聚會要件十二及其細項一覽表..............................203
表4-2-15 第一次擴充後模式與第二督導團體聚會1互動歷程要件流程對照表…..207
表4-2-16 第一次擴充後模式與第二督導團體1至3次聚會互動歷程的要件對照表210
表4-3-1 第二督導團體4至5次聚會互動改變歷程之起點行為與終點行為彙整表236
表4-3-2 第二督導團體4至5次聚會互動歷程之要件及其細項..............................238
表4-3-3 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件一及其細項一覽表...................................239
表4-3-4 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件二及其細項一覽表..................................240
表4-3-5 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件三及其細項一覽表..................................241
表4-3-6 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件四及其細項一覽表..................................244
表4-3-7 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件五及其細項一覽表....................................247
表4-3-8 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件六及其細項一覽表..................................250
表4-3-9 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件七及其細項一覽表..................................251
表4-3-10 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件八及其細項一覽表..................................252
表4-3-11 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件九及其細項一覽表...................................254
表4-3-12 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件十及其細項一覽表...................................256
表4-3-13 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件十一及其細項一覽表...............................257
表4-3-14 第二督導團體4至5次聚會要件十二及其細項一覽表...............................259
表4-3-15 第二督導團體4至5次聚會聚會要件十三及其細項一覽表.......................260
表4-3-16 第二次擴充後模式與第二督導團體4至5次聚會互動歷程的要件對照表264
表4-4-1 第一督導團體的起點行為之分析和問題類別簡表......................................286
表4-4-2 第二督導團體的起點行為之分析和問題類別簡表......................................287
表4-4-3 第一督導團體起點行為和終點行為之進一步對照......................................293
表4-4-4 第二督導團體起點行為和終點行為之進一步對照......................................293
表4-4-5 事件取向結構式團體督導模式之督導介入原則..........................................303


圖次
圖 2-2-1 團體督導互動歷程的任務分析之概念...............................................................36
圖 3-1-1 事件取向結構式團體督導的介入要件流程圖（依理念模式建構）...............66
圖 3-4-1 資料蒐集流程圖...................................................................................................80
圖 4-1-1 第一督導團體1至5次聚會終點行為達成情形……………………….…….108
圖 4-1-2 第一次擴充後團體督導互動歷程要件流程圖……………………………….152
圖 4-2-1 第二督導團體1至3次聚會終點行為達成情形…………………….……….175
圖 4-2-2 第二次擴充後團體督導互動歷程要件流程圖.………………………………216
圖 4-3-1 第二督導團體4至5次聚會終點行為達成情形…………………….……….236
圖 4-3-2 第三次擴充後團體督導互動歷程要件流程圖（四組型三循環）…….……270
圖 4-4-1 終點行為達成情形變化趨勢圖………………………………………….……288

一、中文部份
王文秀、徐西森、連廷嘉（2006）。我國大學校院與社會輔導機構諮商督導工作實施現況及其人員專業知覺之探討研究。中華輔導學報，19，1-40。
施香如（1996）。諮商督導過程的建構：循環督導模式的分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學研究所博士論文（未出版）。
施香如（1999）。循環發展督導模式的建構與應用。輔導季刊，35(2)，8-11。
許韶玲（2004）。督導團體過程中的重要事件及受督導者的影響－以個案呈現取向為例。新竹：國立交通大學。（國科會計劃編號：NSC92-2413-H-009-004）
許維素、蔡秀玲（2008）。高中職輔導教師焦點解決團體督導成效之研究。教育心理學報，39(4)，603-622。
陳清泉（2008）。正向的督導─焦點解決取向督導模式的應用，於國立高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所主辦，諮商督導理念與實務工作坊研習手冊。高雄：國立高雄師範大學。
陳曉茹（2003）。焦點解決團體督導對輔導員影響之探索研究。政治作戰學校軍事社會行為科學研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
劉一竹（1999）。團體督導對準諮商員專業諮商能力影響之研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文（未出版）。
劉志如（1998）。循環發展督導模式中督導員與受督導諮商員之口語行為分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士論文（未出版）。
鄭玉英（1998）。人際因應轉變諮商模式之理念模式的建構。國立台灣師範大學教育心理及輔導研究所博士論文（未出版）。
鄭如安（2006）。身體受虐兒童親子互動遊戲諮商模式之建構。國立高師範大學輔導與諮商研究所博士論文（未出版）。
鄭如安（2009）。任務分析法在研究上相關議題之探討。輔導季刊，45(1)，1-11。
鄭麗芬（1997）。循環發展模式督導歷程中受督導諮商員知覺經驗之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士論文（未出版）。
蕭文（1999）。循環督導模式的理念與建構。輔導季刊，35(2)，1-7。
謝麗紅、翁毓秀、張歆祐（2007）。團體督導對碩士層級準諮商師團體領導能力督導效果之分析研究。輔導與諮商學報，29（2），99-116。
羅幼瓊（2005）。提昇課業任務價值導向之課業學習諮商的當事人任務分析─以高中學生學習英文為例。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士論文（未出版）。
二、西文部分
Antonuccio, D. O., Davis, C., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Breckenridge, J. S. (1987). Therapist variables related to cohesiveness in a group treatment for depression. Small Group Behavior, 18(4), 557-564.
Aronson, M. L. (1990). A group therapist’s perspectives on the use of supervisory groups in the training of psychotherapists. Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, 8, 88-94. In J. M. Bernard and R. K. Goodyear (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision(pp.234, 3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Baker, B. G.. (2003). The process of group supervision: A grounded theory of masters students experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Idaho State University.
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2009). Fundamentals of clinical supervision(4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Betz, R. L., Wilbur, M. P., & Roberts-Willbur, J. (1981). A structural blueprint for group facilitation: Three group modalities. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 60, 31-37.
Biggs, D. A. (1988). The case presentation approach in clinical supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 28, 240-251.
Blocher, D. J. (1983). Toward a cognitive developmental approach to counseling supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 27-34.
Borders, L. D. (1990). Developmental changes during supervisees’ first practicum. Clinical Supervisor, 8(2), 157-167.
Borders, L. D. (1991). A systematic approach to peer group supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 248-251.
Borzumato-Gainey, C. (2004). An examination of factors affection peer feedback in group supervision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina.
Carter, J. W., Enyedy, K. C., Goodyear, R. K., Arcinue, F., & Puri, N. (2009). Concept mapping of the events supervisees find helpful in group supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(1), 1-9.
Carter, J. W., Pak, J. H., & Goodyear, R. K. (2000). Cultural differences in alliance formation during group supervision. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the APA(107th , Washington, DC, Aug. 4-8).
Chagnon, J., & Russell, R.K. (1995). Assessment of supervisee developmental level and supervision environment across supervisor experience. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 553-558.
Christensen, T. M. (1999). A naturalistic exploration of group supervision with group counselors . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Idaho State University.
Christensen, T. M., & Kline, W. B. (2000). A qualitative investigation of the process of group supervision with group counselors. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 25(4), 376-393.
Christensen, T. M., & Kline, W. B. (2001a). The qualitative exploration of process-sensitive peer group supervision. Journal of Specialists in Group Work, 26(1), 81-99.
Christensen, T. M., & Kline, W. B. (2001b). Anxiety as a condition for learning in group supervision. Journal of Specialists in Group Work, 26, 385-396.
Conyne, R., Wilson, F. R., & Ward, D. E. (1997). Comprehensive group work: What it means and how to teach it. Alexandria, VA: ACA.
Cota, A. A., Longman, S. R., Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1995). Using and misusing factor analysis to explore group cohesion. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(2), 308-316.
Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs(2009). The 2009 Standards. Retrieved April 9, 2009, from http://www.cacrep.org/2009standards.pdf
DeLucia, J. L., Bowman, V. E., & Bowman, R. L. (1989). The use of parallel process in supervision and group counseling to facilitate counselor and client growth. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 14, 232-238.
Drecher, S., Burlingame, G., & Fuhriman, A. (1985). Cohesion an odyssey in empirical understanding. Small Group Behavior,16(1),3-30.
Edwards, T. M., & Heshmati, A. (2003). A guide for beginning family therapy group supervision. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 295-304.
Enyedy, K. C., Arcinue, F., Puri, N. N., Carter, J. W., Goodyear, R.K., & Getzelman, M.(2003). Hindering phenomena in group supervision: Implications for practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 312-317.
Fatout, M., & Rose, S. R. (1995). Task groups in the social services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fitch, T. J., & Marshall, J. L. (2002). Using cognitive interventions with counseling practicum students during group supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 335-342.
Forsyth, D. (2006). Group dynamics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Fraleigh, P. W., & Buvhheimer, A. (1969). The use of peer group in practicum supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 8, 284-28.
Gainor, K. A., & Constantine, M. G. (2002). Multicultural Group Supervision: A Comparison of in-person versus web-based formats. Professional School Counseling, 6(2), 104-112.
Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Change process research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(1), 4-9.
Greenberg, L. S. (1992). Task analysis: Identifying components of intrapersonal conflict resolution. In S. Toukmanian & K. Rennie (Eds.), Psychotherapy process research (pp. 25-50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Greenberg, L. S., & Newman, F. L. (1996). An approach to psychotherapy change process research: Introduction to the special session. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(3), 435-438.
Hart, G. (1982). The process of client supervision. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R. (2000). Supervision in the helping professions : an individual, group and organizational approach. Pa.: Open University Press.
Hayes, R. (1990). Developmental group supervision. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 15, 225-238.
Hess, A. K. (Ed.)(1980). Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley.
Hess, A. K. (1997). The interpersonal approach to the supervision of psychotherapy. In C. E. Watkins(Ed.). Handbook of psychotherapy supervision. New York: John wiley and Sons.
Hilber, P. R. (1999). Group supervision: A qualitative examination. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Dakota.
Hill, C. E., Charles, D., & Reed, K. G. (1981). A longitudinal analysis of change in counseling skill during doctoral training in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 428-436.
Hillerbrand, E. (1989). Cognitive differences between experts and novices: Implications for group supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 293-296.
Hoese, J. A. (1987). An exploratory investigation of group supervision: Trainees, supervisors and structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin Madison.
Hogan, R. A. (1964). Issue and approaches in supervision. Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice, 20, 118-123.
Holloway, E. L., & Johnston, R. (1985). Group supervision: Widely practiced but poorly understood. Counselor Education and Supervision, 24, 332-340.
Jones, M., McPherson, F., Whitaker, D. S., Sutherland, J. D., Wolton, H, & Wolf, H. (1971). Small group psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books. In T. M. Christensen (1999). A naturalistic exploration of group supervision with group counselors . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Idaho State University.
Kagan, N. (1975). Influencing human interaction-eighteen years with IPR. In A. K. Hess(Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision :Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley.
Kruger, L. J., Cherniss, C., Maher, C. A., & Leichtman, H. M. (1988). A behavior observation system for group supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 27(4), 231-343.
Ladany, N., Friedlander, M. L., & Nelson, M. L. (2005). Critical events in psychotherapy supervision: An interpersonal approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Linton, J. M. (2003a). A preliminary qualitative investigation of group processes in group supervision: Perceptions of master-level practicum students . The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 28(3), 215-226.
Linton, J. M. (2003b). Group processes in group supervision: A quantitative and qualitative study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University.
Linton, J. M., & Hedstrom, C. M. (2006). An exploratory qualitative investigation of group processes in group supervision: Perceptions of master-level practicum students . The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 31(1), 51-72.
Littlepage, G. E., Cowart, L., & Kerr, B. (1989). Relationships between group environment scales and group and cohesion. Small Group Behavior, 20(1), 50-61.
Loganbill, C., Hardy, E., & Deworth, U. (1982). Supervision: A conceptual model. Counseling Psychologist, 10, 3-42.
MacKenzie, K. R., Dies, R. R., Coche, E., Rutan, J. S., & Stone, W. N. (1987). An analysis of AGPA institute groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37, 55-74.
MacKenzie, K. R., & Livesley, W. J. (1983). A developmental model for brief group therapy. In T. M. Christensen (1999). A naturalistic exploration of group supervision with group counselors . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Idaho State University.
Mcauliffe, G. J. (1992). A case presentation approach to group supervision to community college counselors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 31(3), 163-174.
Mcmaim, S. L., Goldman, R. N., & Greenberg, L. S. (1996). Resolving unfinished business: A program of study. In W. Dryden (Ed.), Research in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 211-232). London: Sage.
Miller, G., Cassidy, J., Harris, R., Hogan, C., & Keizer, J. (2002). Feminist mentoring through group supervision at a university counseling center. Presented at the Annual Conference of the APA (110th, Chicago, IL, Aug. 22-25).
Newman, J. A., & Lovell, M. (1993). A description of a supervision group for group counselors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 33(1), 22-31.
Orton, J. W. (1965). Areas of focus in supervising counseling practice students in group. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 44, 167-170.
Prieto, L. R. (1996). Group Supervision: Still widely practiced but poorly understood. Counselor Education and Supervision, 35(4), 295-307.
Ravets, P., Goodyear, R. K., & Halon, A. M. (August 1994). Group supervision: An intensive, multiple case study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
Ray, D. C. (1998). Effectiveness of group supervision versus combined group and individual supervision with masters-level counselor trainees. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas.
Ray, D., & Altekruse, M. (2000). Effectiveness of group supervision versus combined group and individual supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40(1), 19-30.
Rice, L. N., & Greenberg, L. S. (1984). Patterns of change: An intensive analysis of the psychotherapy process. New York: Guilford Press.
Rice, L. N., & Saperia, E. P. (1984). Task analysis of the resolution of problematic reactions. In L. N. Rice & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Patterns of change: An intensive analysis of the psychotherapy process(pp. 29-66). New York: Guilford Press.
Riva, M. T., & Cornish, J. A. E.(1995). Group supervision practices at psychology predoctoral internship programs: A national survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 523-525.
Rønnestad M. H., & Skovholt, T. M. (2003). The journey of the counselor and therapist: Research findings and perspectives on professional development. Journal of Career Development, 30, 5-44.
Sansbury, D. L. (1982). Developmental supervision from a skills perspective. The Counseling Psychologist, 10, 53-57.
Stanley, C. L. (2001). Examination of group supervision: Cohesiveness and supervision leadership as predictors of intern performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seattle Pacific University.
Starling, P. V., & Baker, S. B.(2000). Structured peer group practicum supervision: Supervisees’ perceptions of supervision theory. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39(3), 162-176.
Stern, R. S. (2001). A task analysis of parent-adolescent reattachment in family therapy. ( Doctoral dissertation, New school for social research, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International-B, 62(9), 4238.
Stoltenberg, C.(1981). Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: The counselor complexity model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 59-65.
Stoltenberg, C. D., McNeill, B. W., & Delworth, U. (1998). IDM: An intergrated developmental model for supervising counselors and therapists. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427.
Werstlein, P. O. (1994a). Fostering Counselor’s development in group supervision(Report No. EDO-CG-94-19). ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Student Services, Greensboro, NC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 372351)
Werstlein, P. O. (1994b). Group process variables in group supervision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina.
Werstlein, P. O., & Borders, L. D. (1997). Group process variables in group supervision. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 22(2), 120-136.
Wilbur, M. P., Roberts-Wilbur, J. M., Hart, G., Morris, J. R., & Betz, R. L. (1994). Structured Group Supervision (SGS): A pilot study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 33, 262-279.
Wilbur, M. P., Roberts-Wilbur, J., Morris, J., Betz, R., & Hart, G. M. (1991). Structured group supervision: Theory into practice. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 16(2), 91-100.
Wilkins, P. (1995). A creative therapies model for the group supervision of counselors. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling , 23(2), 245-257.
Wilson, F. R., Rapin, L. S., & Haley-Banez, L. (2000). Professional standards for the training of group workers. Retrieved Oct. 26, 2008, from http://www.asgw.org/training standards.htm.
Worthington, E. L. (1987). Changes in supervision as counselors and supervisors gain experience: A review. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 189-208.
Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York:　Basic Books.
Yogev, S. (1982). An eclectic model of supervision: A developmental sequence for beginning psychotherapy students. Professional Psychology, 13, 236-243.