跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.192.67.10) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/11/09 17:14
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王雅雪
研究生(外文):Ya-Hsueh Wang
論文名稱:心像策略對學習表現影響之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Influence of Imagery Strategy in Learning Performance
指導教授:鄭英耀鄭英耀引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ying-Yao, Cheng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:綜合教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:88
中文關鍵詞:雙碼理論視覺緩衝器認知負荷心像策略想像效應
外文關鍵詞:visual bufferDual-Code theorycognitive loadimagination effectimagery strategy
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:276
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究旨在了解心像策略對學習表現的影響。根據心像和記憶的理論以及想像效應,使用心像策略可以幫助連結不同元素之間的訊息,降低認知負荷和工作記憶區處理訊息的空間,激化基模,將資訊編碼到長期記憶區中。受試者為181位大學一年級到研究所的學生,隨機分派到心像、手抄組、筆記組和閱讀組,以實驗的方式進行實徵的研。結果發現,心像組的學習表現和手抄組沒有差異,但是比筆記組和閱讀組表現要好。經過一個禮拜之後,四組的學習表現沒有顯著差異。在受試者對研究的回饋之中,心像組覺得使用的心像策略是較為有趣的,而手抄組的受試者不覺得有趣,甚至非常花費時間。文末討論上述發現的意義,並提出對未來研究的建議與教學上應用的啟示。
The purpose of this research was to investigate the influence of imagery strategy in learning performance. According to imagery and memory theory and imagination effect, using imagery strategy can help students integrate different information, reduce cognitive loading and the capacity of working memory, enhance schema acquisition and encoding the information to long-term memory. A total of 181 undergraduates and graduates were randomly assigned in the imagery group, transcribe group, note group, and study group. We found that there was no difference between imagery and transcribe group; however, the learning performance of imagery group was better than note group and study group. One week later, there was no difference between four groups. In the feedback of this research, the participant in imagery group thought the imagery strategy was interesting and cost few time than transcribe group. Finally, the primary findings were discussed and educational implications were provided.
論文審定書.......................................................................... i
誌謝……………………………………………………….. ii
中文摘要……………………………………………….….. iii
英文摘要……....……………………..……………………. iv
第一 章 緒 論……………………………………………… 1
第二 章 文獻探討……………….…………………………5
第一節心像…………………………………….………….5
第二節認知負荷理論…………………………………….12
第三節想像效應…………………………………….........14
第四節使用心像策略閱讀文章 ………………………...17
第三 章 研究方法…………………………………………19
第一節研究設計……………………………………….....19
第二節研究對象………………………………………….21
第三節研究材料…………………………………….........21
第四節研究程序………………………………………….23
第五節資料分析………………………………………….26
第四 章 研究結果……………………………………….…28
第一節心像策略對學習表現之影響..……………….…..28
第二節對研究的綜合回饋……………………………….35
第五 章 結論與建議…………………………………..…40
第一節討論…….…………………………………………40
第二節研究限制與建議………………………………….44
第三節對未來教學上的啟示…………………………....48
參考文獻……………………………………….………...49
附錄……………………………………………………….55
附錄(一)心像組施測問卷…………………………….55
附錄(二)手抄組施測問卷…………………………….63
附錄(三)筆記組和閱讀組施測問卷…………………71
附錄(四)再測學習表現測驗………………………….79
一、中文部份
王銘正(譯)(2009)N. Gregory Mankiw著。經濟學(Principles of Economics)。臺北市:新加坡商聖智學習出版。
林緯倫、連韻文、任純慧(2005)。想得多是想得好的前提嗎?探討發散性思考能力在創意問題解決的角色。中華心理學刊,27(3),211-227。
邱忠發、姚妃宴(2010)。調整焦點、目標時間距離對創造力表現的影響。教育心理學報,41,497-520。
高希均(1987)。經濟學的世界。台北:天下文化出版股份有限公司。
陳昭儀(2000)。傑出理化科學家之人格特質及創造歷程之研究。師大學報:科學教育類,45(1),27-45。
張重昭、張秋琪(1997)。引起心像的廣告效果策略對廣告溝通效果的影響。臺大管理論叢,8(1),85-128。
許景翔(譯)(2006)。Irvin B. Tucker著。今日經濟學(Principles of Economics)。臺北市:湯姆生出版。
許景翔、劉建裕(譯)(2006)。Robin Bade, Michael Parkin著。基礎經濟學(Foundation Foundations of Economics)。臺北市:臺灣培生教育出版。
葉連祺、林淑萍(2003)。布魯姆認知領域教學目標分類修定版之探討。教育研究月刊,105,94-106。
楊生(編)(1994)。經濟學歷屆試題分類題庫。台北市:鼎茂圖書。
溫美珍(2005)。圖解經濟學。台北:易博士文化,城邦文化事業股份有限公司。
詹志禹(2000a)。傑出發明人高發育先生的故事。教育研究,80,71-76。
詹志禹(2000b)。謀殺愛因斯坦?。教育研究,77,63-67。
鄭昭明(2006)。認知心理學:理論與實踐。臺北縣新店市:桂冠圖書出版社。
鄭英耀、王文中(2002)。影響科學競賽績優教師創意行為之因素。應用心理研究,15,163-189。
韓承靜、洪蘭、蔡介立(2008)。心、眼與世界的連結—從認知神經科學看知覺與心像的關係。科學教育,308,16-23。

二、西文部份
Adams, J. (2004). The imagination and social life. Qualitative Sociology, 27(3), 277-297.
Andersen, L. O. (2005). Imagination. Perspectives, 366, 709.
Atwood, G. (1971). An experimental study of visual imagination and memory. Cognitive Psychology, 2(3), 290-299.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, M. A. (2006). Object-spatial imagery: New self-report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 239-263.
Bower, G.. H. (1970). Imagery as a relational organizer in associative learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(5), 529-533.
Butler, A. C., Zaromb, F. M., Lyle, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Using popular films to enhance classroom learning: The good, the bad, and the interesting. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1161-1168.
Buzan, T. (2006). Mind mapping. Harlow BBC Active.
Caeyenberghs, K., Tsoupas, J., Wilson, P. H., & Smits-Engelsman, B. C. M. (2009). Motor imagery development in primary school children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 34(1), 103-121.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies New York: Cambridge Universiy Press.
Cheng, Y. Y., Wang, W. C., Liu, K. S., & Chen, Y. L. (2010). Effects of association instruction on fourth graders’ poetry creativity in Taiwan. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 228-235.
Colman, W. (2006). Imagination and the imaginary. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 51(1), 21-41.
Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001). Learning by Imagining. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(1), 68-82.
Cornoldi, C., Cavedon, A., Debeni, R., & Baldi, A. P. (1988). The Influence of The Nature of Material and of Mental Operations on The Occurrence of The Bizarreness Effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology, 40(1), 73-85.
Cornoldi, C., & Vecchi, T. (2003). Visuo-Spatial Working Memory and Individual Differences Hove: Psychology Press.
Cornoldia C., Benia, R. D., & Mammarellaa, I. C. (2008). Mental Imagery. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference 2, 103-123.
Cruz, H. D., & Smedt, J. D. (2010). Science as Structured Imagination. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(1), 29-44.
Czernecka, K., & Szymura, B. A. (2008). Alexithymia? Imagination? Creativity. Personality & Individual Differences, 45(6), 445-450.
Defeyter, M. A., Russo, R., & McPartlin, P. L. (2009). The picture superiority effect in recognition memory: A developmental study using the response signal procedure. Cognitive Development, 24(3), 265-273.
Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does Mental Practice Enhance Performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 481-492.
Ellen D., Gagne, C. W. Y., Frank R., & Yekovich, C. W. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Farah, M. J. (1988). Is visual imagery really visual? Overlooked evidence from neuropsychology. Psychological Review, 95, 307-317.
Frank, R. (2008). The Economic Naturalist in Search of Explanations for Everyday Enigmas: Perseus Books Group.
Frick, A., Daum, M. M., Wilson, M., & Wilkening F. (2009). Effects of action on children’s and adults’ mental imagery. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 104 , 34–51.
Gabbard, C. (2009). Studying action representation in children via motor imagery. Brain and Cognition, 71(3), 234-239.
Ginns, P. (2005). Imagining instructions: Mental practice in highly cognitive domains. Australian Journal of Education, 49(2), 128-140.
Ginns, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When imagining information is effective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 229-251.
Hampson, P. E. & Morris, P. J. (1983). Imagery and consciousness. London: Academic Press.
Hilgard, E. R. (1981). Imagery and imagination in american psychology. Journal of Mental Imagery,, 5, 5-65.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. [Review]. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3-28.
Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2008). The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science, 320(5875), 454-455.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for Cognition. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G.., & Thompson, W. L. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 635-642.
Kozhevnikov, M. M., Michael, A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31, 549-579.
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load and the imagination effect. [Article]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(7), 857-875.
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2008). The imagination effect increases with an increased intrinsic cognitive load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(2), 273-283.
LeBoutillier, N., & Marks, D. F. (2003). Mental imagery and creativity: A meta-analytic review study. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 29-44.
Lothane, Z. (2007). Imagination as reciprocal process and its role in the psychoanalytic situation. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 16(3), 152-163.
Macinnis, D. J., & Price, L. L. (1987). The role of imagery in information-processing: Review and extensions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 473-491.
Meyer, B. J. F., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 121-143.
Morris, P. E., & Hampson, P. J. (1983). Imagery and Consciousness. London: Academic Press.
Mountain, V. (2007). Educational contexts for the development of children’s spirituality: Exploring the use of imagination. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 12(2), 191-205.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
Paivio, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76(3), 241-263.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1969). Mental Imagery. New York: Springer.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The vuilding bolcks of cognition. Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Education, 33-58.
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(9), 657-661.
Sutherland, M. B. (1971). Everyday Imagining and Education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
Sweller, J. (1994a). Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty and Instructional Design. Learning & Instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
Sweller, J. (1994b). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
Thomas, N. J. T. (1999). Are theories of imagery theories of imagination? An active perception approach to conscious. Cognitive Science, 23(2), 207.
Van Meer, J. P., & Theunissen, N. C. M. (2010). Prospective Educational Applications of Mental Simulation: A Meta-review. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 93-112.
Wilsom, M. (2005).Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks: The Official Journal Of The International Neural Network Society, 11(7-8), 1317-1329.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top