臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

眷村是推動文化保存上重要的議題之一，臺中彩虹眷村因彩繪吸引了大批遊客，而使得存廢聲浪四起。究竟在「眷村」這樣的文化景觀上該保留些什麼，是本研究所欲探討的議題。因而，本研究選定兩處眷村但一處有彩繪而另一處則以原貌保存，瞭解至眷村參觀的遊客，對於眷村的整體環境及氛圍是否認為呈現的是真實的(authentic)樣貌，並比較不同類型的遊客評估眷村真實性的差異，以期對後續與眷村保存與維護上之議題有所幫助。
本問卷透過現地問卷調查，利用卡方檢定、獨立樣本T檢定、因素分析、集群分析與一般線性模式(GLM)進行資料驗證分析，研究結果顯示：(1)不同類型的遊客，對於眷村元素的感受有顯著差異，以憲光二村而言，遊客平均年齡較大，重遊性也較高，多為回憶眷村經驗的多元文化族群，並且多同意「蔣公肖像」和「銅像」兩元素的重要性，但是卻不一定為眷村必須具備的元素；彩虹眷村則以年輕的學生族群占多數，主要是受媒體介紹或親友邀約第一次遊玩；(2)不同的線索對於真實性的感受不同，政黨組遊客普遍受感受到圖像性(iconic)的真實、符號組遊客則為指示性(indexical)的真實，彩繪組遊客受到的感知程度較小；(3)不同真實性感受對於評估真實有顯著影響，遊客評估圖像真實性與指示真實性為「證據」或是「能與過往連結」，也具有顯著影響。電影圖像的真實性會因地點差異而有不同感受，圖像性的真實對遊客而言視為一種「證據」、指示性的真實則可「連結到過去」。

Military village is one of the most important issues to promote cultural preservation, in addition to media artists, one of the Taichung military village attracts a large number of tourists due to painting, and makes the abolition of voices everywhere. What in the “military villages” such as cultural landscape on the reservation, is this study aims to explore. Therefore, the study wants to know what are the elements of the military villages are representative, and the real feel of the tourists. Afterwards, the study will analysis and comparison to tourists.
Data was collected by on-site survey with tourists using established scales from tourism and authenticity literature. Findings suggested that different types of tourists are significantly different on feeling military villages’ elements. The tourists in original Military Village are elder, re-visit highly and most of them are multicultural groups. Besides, Furthermore, the potrait and bronze of Chiang Kai-shek are important but not necessarily. Most of the Rainbow Military Village’s tourists are student and the main reason come to visit is introduced by the media or friends. “The political group” of tourists in general feeling the image as iconic authenticity,” the symbol group” of tourists was indicative indexical authenticity, “the painting group”of tourists are lesser extent by the perception of authenticity. Furthermore, the tourists assessment that the iconic and indexical authenticity as an "evidence" or "link with the past" are also significant difference. The iconicity with fiction will have different feelings on different sites, and iconic authenticity seem as an “evidence’, indexical authenticity can be seem as "link to the past."

第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 2
第三節 研究流程 3
第貳章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 襲產觀光 5
第二節 真實性理論 6
第三節 應用真實性於觀光之研究 13
第四節 眷村相關研究 21
第参章 研究方法 24
第一節 研究範圍 24
第二節 研究架構與假設 27
第三節 研究工具與調查計畫 29
第肆章 結果與討論 32
第一節 遊客基本資料分析 32
第二節 眷村元素 38
第三節 真實性 53
第伍章 結論與建議 70
第一節 研究結論 70
第二節 研究建議 72
參考文獻 74
英文文獻 74
中文文獻 77
附 錄 76

英文文獻
1.Adorno, T. (1964). The jargon of authenticity: Routledge.
2.Asplet, M., & Cooper, M. (2000). Cultural designs in New Zealand souvenir clothing: the question of authenticity* 1. Tourism Management, 21(3), 307-312.
3.Bagnall, G. (1996). Consuming the Past’ in S. . Oxford: Blackwell.
4.Baloglu, S., & Mangaloglu, M. (2001). Tourism destination images of Turkey, Egypt, Greece, and Italy as perceived by US-based tour operators and travel agents. Tourism Management, 22(1), 1-9.
5.Baloglu, S., & McCleary, K. W. (1999a). A model of destination image formation. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(4), 868-897.
6.Belhassen, Y., Caton, K., & Stewart, W. (2008). The search for authenticity in the pilgrim experience. Annals of tourism research, 35(3), 668-689.
7.Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality New York. Doubleday, 124, 102-117.
8.Brown, S. (2001). Marketing: The retro revolution: Sage Publications Ltd.
9.Bruner, E. (1991). Transformation of self in tourism. Annals of tourism research, 18(2), 238-250.
10.Bruner, E. (1994). Abraham Lincoln as authentic reproduction: a critique of postmodernism. American Anthropologist, 96(2), 397-415.
11.Chhabra, D. (2010). Back to the past: a sub-segment of Generation Y's perceptions of authenticity. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(6), 793-809.
12.Chhabra, D., Healy, R., & Sills, E. (2003). Staged authenticity and heritage tourism. Annals of tourism research, 30(3), 702-719.
13.Chronis, A., & Hampton, R. D. (2008). Consuming the authentic Gettysburg:How a tourist landscape becomes an authentic experience. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7, 111-126.
14.Cohen, E. (1979). A phenomenology of tourist experiences. Sociology, 13(2), 179.
15.Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and Commoditization in Tourism Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371-386.
16.Court, B., & Lupton, R. A. (1997). Customer portfolio development: Modeling destination adopters, inactives and rejecters. Journal of Travel Research, 36(1), 35-43.
17.Culler, J. (1981). The semiotics of tourism. Telos, 29.
18.Delyser, D. (1999). Authenticity on the Ground: Engaging the past in a California ghost town. American Association of Anthropology Genetics, 89(4), 602-632.
19.Dolliver, M. (2001). It¡¦s Popular, But Authenticity Isn¡¦t What It Used to Be. Adweek Eastern Edition, 42(27), 19.
20.Fakeye, P. C., & Crompton, J. L. (1991). Image differences between prospective, first-time and repeat vsitors to the Lower Rio Grande Valley. Journal of Travel Research, 30(2), 10-16.
21.Fyall, A., & Garrod, B. (1998). Heritage tourism: at what price? Managing Leisure, 3(4), 213-228.
22.Garrod, B., & Fyall, A. (2000). Heritage tourism: a question of definition. Annals of tourism research, 28(4), 1049-1052.
23.Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor Doubleday.
24.Goulding, C. (2001). Romancing the past: Heritage visiting and the nostalgic consumer. Psychology and Marketing, 18(6), 565-592.
25.Grayson, K., & Martinec, R. (2004). Consumer perceptions of iconicity and Indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings [consumer research]. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 296-312.
26.Grayson, K., & Shulman, D. (2000). Indexicality and the verification function of irreplaceable possessions: A semiotic analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 27.
27.Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and Time. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1996.
28.Hunt, J. D. (1975). Image as a factor in tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 13(1-7).
29.Jamal, T., & Hill, S. (2002). The home and the world: (post)touristic spaces of (in)authenticity? In The Tourist as a Metaphor in the Social World, Dann GMS(ed.). New York: CAB International.
30.Kerstetter, D., & Pennington-Gray, L. (2001). What Do University-Educated Women Want from Their Pleasure Travel Experiences? Journal of Travel Research, 40(1), 49.
31.Kim, H., & Jamal, T. (2007). Touristic quest for existential authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(1), 181-201.
32.Liao, S., & Ma, Y.-Y. (2009). Conceptualizing Consumer Need for Product Authenticity. International Journal of Business and Information, 4(1), 89-114.
33.Littrell, M. A., Anderson, L. F., & Brown, P. J. (1993). What makes a craft souvenir authentic? Annals of Tourism Research, 20(1), 197-215.
34.MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589-603.
35.MacCannell, D. (1992). Empty meeting grounds: The tourist papers: Routledge.
36.MacCannell, D., & Lippard, L. (1976). The tourist: Schocken Books New York.
37.Magelssen, S. (2003). The staging of history: theatrical, temporal and economic borders of Historyland. Visual Communication, 2(1), 7.
38.Mantecon, A., & Huete, R. (2007). The role of authenticity in tourism planning: Empirical findings from southeast Spain. Tourism. An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 55(3), 323-333.
39.McIntosh, A., & Prentice., R. (1999). Affirming Authenticity: Consuming Cultural Heritage. Annals of TourismResearch 26:589–612.
40.Moscardo, G., & Pearce, P. (1986). Historic theme parks:: An Australian experience in authenticity. Annals of tourism research, 13(3), 467-479.
41.Pearce, P. L. (1982). Perceived changes in holiday destinations. Annals of Tourism Research, 9(2), 145-164.
42.Peirce, C. (1998). Collected Papers I-VIII. London: Thoemmes Press, 1976, 1867-1893.
43.Peleggi, M. (2005). Consuming colonial nostalgia: The monumentalisation of historic hotels in urban South East Asia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 46(3), 255-265.
44.Reid, L., & Reid, S. (1993). Communicating tourism supplier services: building repeat visitor relationships. Communication and channel systems in tourism marketing, 3-19.
45.Reisinger, Y., & Steiner, C. J. (2006). Reconceptualizing Object Authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(1), 65-86.
46.Revilla, G., & Dodd, T. (2003). Authenticity perceptions of Talavera pottery. Journal of Travel Research, 42(1), 94.
47.Richards, G. (1996). Production and consumption of European cultural tourism. Annals of tourism research, 23(2), 261-283.
48.Salamone, F. (1997). Authenticity in tourism:: The San Angel Inns. Annals of tourism research, 24(2), 305-321.
49.Schutz, A., Walsh, G., & Lehnert, F. (1932). The phenomenology of the social world: Northwestern Univ Pr.
50.Thyne, M., Hede, A.-M., & White, T. (2009). Co-constructing the museum vistors' experience: a case of two literary museums. ANZMAC, 1-8.
51.Urry, J. (1990). The Tourist Gaze. London: Sage Publication.
52.Waitt, G. (2000). Consuming Heritage perceived historical authenticity [tourism research]. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(4), 835-862.
53.Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of tourism research, 26(2), 349-370.
54.Weiler, B., & Hall, C. (1992). Special interest tourism: Belhaven.
55.Yeoman, I., Brass, D., & McMahon-Beattie, U. (2007). Current issue in tourism: The authentic tourist. Tourism Management, 28(4), 1128-1138.
56.Zeppel, H., & Hall, C. (1991). Selling art and history: cultural heritage and tourism. Journal of Tourism Studies, 2(1), 29-45.

中文文獻
1.何冠達。(2002)。台中都會公園遊客特性與遊憩環境體驗研究。逢甲大學。台中。
2.何思瞇。(2002)。臺北縣眷村調查研究。
3.李宜霖。(2010)。沒有彩虹的眷村 面臨迫遷。臺灣立報。
4.李俊賢。(2005)。空城記‧憶：從眷村影像符碼看一個世代的結束。世新大學。台北。
5.林桓丞。(2003). 霧台部落觀光文化之真實性詮釋. 屏東科技大學。屏東。
6.張瑞昇。(1995). 臺灣眷村社區環境之研究─一個邊緣城市的老舊眷村個案。台灣大學。台北。
7.畢恆達。(2001)。空間就是權力。台北。
8.陳怡均。(2008)。旅遊目的地熟悉感與旅遊意願之關係研究。高雄餐旅學院。高雄。
9.陳瑩育。(2007)。舞台化真實性理論應用於老街觀光意象之研究-以台南安平老街為例。逢甲大學。台中。
10.黃文珊。(2006)。高雄左營眷村聚落的發展與變遷。高雄師大。高雄。
11.黃淑美。(1996)。遊客對北海岸風景特定區住宿設施及服務的偏好與滿意度之研究。東海大學。台中。
12.臺灣省政府。(1956)。臺灣省政府公報.
13.鄭國賢。(2003)。時空異置下論文化資產展示中記憶與經驗之斷層。中原大學。中壢。