(34.229.64.28) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/06 07:17
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳姿郡
研究生(外文):Chen, TzJiun
論文名稱:我國上市櫃公司女性董監事比例對投資決策 與公司績效之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship Among The Fraction of Women Directors, Investment Decision And Corporate Performance: An Empirical Study of Taiwanese Companies
指導教授:王祝三王祝三引用關係
指導教授(外文):C. Edward Wang
口試委員:陳若暉林美珍王祝三
口試委員(外文):Chen, JohuiLin, MeijenC. Edward Wang
口試日期:2011-06-03
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:57
中文關鍵詞:女性董監事公司治理投資決策公司績效
外文關鍵詞:female directorscorporate governanceinvestment decisioncorporate performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:504
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:53
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
根據過去國外文獻可以發現,在股東權利較低的公司其女性董事比例與公司績效之間具有正向的關係。本文則以投資決策的角度切入,透過OLS(一般最小平方法)、TSLS(兩階段最小平方法)以及GMM(一般動差估計法)三種迴歸模型,探討我國上市櫃公司之女性董監事比例對投資決策與公司績效的關聯性。實證結果顯示,我國上市櫃公司之董事會女性組成比例對於公司績效的影響,在我國並未存在有正向的提升效果。但在公司治理程度較不佳之公司,其女性董監事比例越高會相較於公司治理程度佳之公司具有顯著較佳之公司績效表現,亦即是女性董監事所執掌之監督角色進一步發揮作用,使得公司績效越佳。而在本研究中,並無法證實女性董監事對於投資決策之影響具有正向結果,女性董監事比例在有形的資產支出或是無形的研發支出上皆不具有正向提升公司績效之效果。
According to previous literature, it was found that company with lower shareholder rights, the female directors’ fraction has a positive effect on corporate performance. This paper added investment decisions, and to examine the relationship among the female directors’ fraction, investment decisions and corporate performance. Empirical results indicate that female directors don’t have impact on corporate performance. However, via female directors’ supervision, it can develop a positive impact on corporate performance in companies with weaker governance. Besides, we do not have supportive evidence claiming female directors’ fraction has a positive impact on investment decisions in our study. We find female directors’ fraction toward tangible or intangible assets has no positive effects on improving corporate performance.
目 錄
謝詞 I
中文論文提要 II
英文論文提要 III
目 錄 IV
表 次 V
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與貢獻 3
第三節 研究架構 3

第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 性別與行為差異 5
第二節 董事會成員性別平衡程度對公司治理 6
以及公司績效之影響 6
第三節 投資決策對公司績效之影響 7

第三章 研究方法 9
第一節 假說之建立 9
第二節 樣本選取與資料來源 10
第三節 變數定義和迴歸模式 10

第四章 實證結果 23
第一節 t檢定 23
第二節 變數之敘述統計結果 24
第三節 相關係數 25
第四節 董事會女性董監事比例與公司績效之實證結果 28
第五節 董事會女性董監事比例對公司投資與公司績效之實證結果 34
第六節 董事會女性董監事比例對資本支出、研發支出 39
與公司績效之實證結果 39
第七節 穩健度檢定 44

第五章 結論 45
第一節 結論 45
第二節 研究建議 46

參考文獻 47


參考文獻
一、中文部分
王祝三、莊雅雪、郭勁甫(2009),「公司治理、投資與公司價值之關聯性」,東吳經濟商學學報,第六十六期:頁69-114。
王祝三、陳若暉(2008),「臺灣企業交叉持股與股東利益相關性之研究」,財務金融學刊,第十六卷第三期:頁1-46。
曾俊堯(2004),創新資本對經營績效與公司價值影響之研究,國立台北大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
黃俊堯(1996),上市公司融資順位型態與經營績效關係之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
歐進士(1998),「我國企業研究發展與經營績效關聯之實證研究」,中山管理評論,第六卷第二期:頁357-386。

二、英文部分
Adams, R. B. & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250.
Adams, R. B. & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
Albuquerque, R. & Wang, N. (2008). Agency conflicts, investment, and asset pricing. Journal of Finance, 63(1), 1-40.
Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A. & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81-106.
Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
Brammer, S., Millington, A. & Pavelin, S. (2009), Corporate reputation and women on the board. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 17-29.
Barber, B. M. & Odean, T. (1999). The courage of misguided convictions: The trading behavior of individual investors. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(6), 41-55.
Barber, B. M. & Odean, T. (2000). Too many cooks spoil the profits: Investment club performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(1), 17-25.
Barber, B. M. & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292.
Bliss, R. T. & Potter, M. E. (2002). Mutual fund managers: Does gender matter? Journal of Business & Economic Studies, 9(4), 1-15.
Bowman, E. H. & Helfat C. E. (2001). Does corporate strategy matter? Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 1-23.
Brammer, S., Millington, A. & Pavelin, S. (2009). Corporate reputation and women on the board. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 17-29.
Campbell, K. & Minguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435-451.
Core J. E., Holthausen, R. W. & Larcker, D. F. (1999), Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371-406.
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J. & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.
Cho, M. H. (1998). Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(1), 103-121.
Deng, Z., Lev, B. & Narin, F. (1999), Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Finacial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20-32.
Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S. & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 35-54.
Francoeur C., Labelle, R. & Sinclair-Desgagne, B. (2006). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 83-95.
Gomes, L. & Ramasway, K. (1999). An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 173-187.
Hall, B. H. (1992). Investment and research and development at the firm level: Does the source of financing matter? NBER Working Paper Series, NO. 4096.
Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.
Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.
Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S. S. & Aulakh, P. S. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 79-97.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113-1155.
Lane, J. C. (1995). Ethics of business students: Some marketing perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(7), 571–580.
Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W. & Puncochar, J. (1994). Highly confident but wrong: gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments, Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 114-121.
Maital, S., Filer, R. & Simon, J. (1986). What do people bring to the stock market (beside money)? The economic psychology of stock market behavior. Handbook of Behavioral Economics Behavioral Macroeconomics, B, 273-307.
McLaughlin, R., Safieddine, A. & Vasudevan, G. K. (1996). The operating
performance of seasoned equity issuers: Free cash flow and post-issue performance. Financial Management, 25(4), 41-53.
Medland, D. (2004). Small steps for womankind. Corporate Board Member Europe, Winter.
Miller, T. & Triana, M. D. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755-786.
Morbey, G. K. (1988). R&D: Its relationship to company performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(3), 191-200.
Morck, R., Shleifer A. & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1-2), 293-315.
Modigliani, F. & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
Modigliani, F. & Miller, M. H. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, 34, 411-433.
Odean, T. (1998). Volume, Volatility, price and profit when all traders are above average. Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1887-1934.
Olsen, R. A. (1998). Behavioral finance and its implication for stock-price volatility. Financial Analysis Journal, 54(2), 10-18.
Prevost, A. K., Rao, R. P. & Hossain. (2002), Determinants of board composition in New Zealand: A simultaneous equations approach, Journal of Empirical Finance, 9(4), 373-397.
Rodriguez-Dominguez, L., Gallego-Alvarez, I. & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2009). Corporate governance and codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 187-202.
Schoenecker, T. & Swanson, L. (2002). Indicators of firm technological capability: Validity and performance implications, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 36-44.
Sougiannis, T. (1994). The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. The Accounting Review, 69(1), 44-68.
Terjesen, S. & Singh, V. (2008). Female presence on corporate boards: A multi-country study of environmental context. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1), 55-63.
Terjesen, S., Sealy, R. & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance-An International Review, 17(3), 320-337.
Wang, D. H. M. (2010). Corporate investment, financing, and dividend policies in the high-tech industry. Journal of Business Research, 63(5), 486-489.
Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(3), 255–277.
Williams, S. M. (2000). Relationship between board structure and a firm's intellectual capital performance in an emerging economy. University of Calgary, Calgary working paper, 1-45.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔