跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/19 04:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳建翰
研究生(外文):Chen, Chienhan
論文名稱:捷運站聯合開發屬性對捷運使用及不動產價格之影響-台北捷運系統之實證研究
論文名稱(外文):The Influences of Metro Station Joint Development Attributes on Metro Use and Real Estate Value: An Empirical Study of Taipei Metro System
指導教授:林楨家林楨家引用關係
指導教授(外文):Lin, Jenjia
口試委員:蔡智發蔡育新
口試委員(外文):Tsai, JyhfaTsai, Yuhsin
口試日期:2011/05/31
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:都市計劃研究所
學門:建築及都市規劃學門
學類:都市規劃學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:203
中文關鍵詞:大眾捷運聯合開發捷運使用不動產價格線性迴歸
外文關鍵詞:mass rapid transitjoint developmentmetro ridershipreal estate valuelinear regression
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:2129
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:711
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
近幾年來隨著台北捷運路網建設趨於完善,與捷運站聯合開發規劃是國內配合捷運建設在場站附近推動大眾運輸導向發展的普遍性作法。目前台北捷運已通車路網中共有28處已正式完工辦理租售作業之聯合開發基地,這些聯合開發基地依不同的市場定位及需求具有相異的屬性,也因站區所位處的地理環境而存在多樣的特徵。但是目前國內對於聯合開發內容的屬性或特徵跟捷運使用與不動產價格間的影響關係,尚缺乏足夠的資訊,造成規劃或評估聯合開發計畫內容時的困難。因此,本研究以台北捷運系統民國99年已通車營運之80個車站為例,進行實證研究,透過既有資料蒐集及線性迴歸模式分析不同聯合開發基地的開發屬性及站區特徵對於捷運使用數量、捷運使用時間分散情況及不動產價格所造成的影響。

本研究根據文獻回顧與課題研析之內容,推論聯合開發屬性對捷運使用及不動產價格的影響關係,並且依此提出研究假說,繼而使用合適之統計方法設計驗證程序,以選定的變數、變數型態進行迴歸模式校估檢定工作,釐清捷運站聯合開發對捷運使用及不動產價格的影響關係及程度,實證結果有以下幾點發現:(一)聯合開發基地規模及基地停車位數對捷運運量存在正向的影響效果;(二)聯合開發通道系統設計對捷運運量時間分散情況存在正向的影響效果;(三)聯合開發站區相較於非聯合開發站區的捷運運量,轉乘公車路線數的正向影響會較小;站區停車位數的負向影響會較小;及業密度的正向影響會較小;距台北車站距離的負向影響會較大;(四)聯合開發站區相較於非聯合開發站區的運量分布情形,及業密度的正向影響會較大;距市府站距離的正向影響會較小;是否有自行車道的正向影響會較大;(五)聯合開發站區相較於非聯合開發站區的不動產價格,轉乘公車路線數的正向影響會較大;居住密度的負向影響會較大;及業密度的正向影響會較大;站區混合使用熵值的負向影響會較小;距市府站距離對平均房價的負向影響較小;屋齡的負向影響會較大。

最後,以促進大眾運輸使用與增加不動產收益為目標,研擬國內捷運場站聯合開發計畫內容的規劃策略或評估準則建議如下:聯合開發屬性面,應適度提高捷運站聯合開發大樓的樓地板面積,或是進行大範圍的站區整體開發計畫,並採用捷運連通道的規劃設計;建成環境系統面,應與當地公車業者配合增加轉乘公車路線的停靠班次與服務密度,並能將站區自行車道納入整體規劃考量。另一方面優先選擇市中心的捷運車站進行聯合開發規劃並鼓勵提供更多的就業機會與辦理捷運站區周邊老舊住宅的都市更新計畫。

關鍵詞:大眾捷運、聯合開發、捷運使用、不動產價格、線性迴歸

In recent years the Taipei MRT (mass rapid transit) network keeps growing, and the joint development (JD) of MRT stations has become a common approach to promote transit-oriented developments within metro station areas. There are 28 JD projects being completed and opened for rental operations on the present Taipei MRT network. These JD projects were developed with various attributes according to different market positioning and environmental context. However, the knowledge about impacts of JD project attributes on metro use and real estate value is still too vague to support JD project planning and assessing. Therefore, this study used 80 stations of Taipei MRT system in 2010 as study sample and applied linear regression method to empirically explored the impacts of JD attributes on daily ridership, ridership dispersion in time and real estate value.

Based on literature review and issue analysis, this study proposed hypothetical effects of JD attrbutes on metro use and real estate value. And then the sample data were collected and analyzed by linear regression models. The empirical results reached the following findings: (1) Increasing floor area or parking spaces of a JD project significantly increased metro ridership. (2) Providing cross passages between JD projects and metro stations significantly dispersed metro ridership in time. (3) Comparing with non-JD stations, JD stations performed different effects on metro ridership: number of feeder bus routes created smaller positive effects; number of parking spaces in station area created smaller negative effects; employee density created smaller positive effects; and, distance to Taipei Main Station created greater negative effects. (4) Comparing with non-JD stations, JD stations performed different effects on ridership dispersion in time: employee density created greater positive effects; distance to Taipei City Hall Station created smaller positive effects; and, providing bicycle exclusive lanes created greater positive effects (5) Comparing with non-JD stations, JD stations performed different effects on real estate value: number of feeder bus routes created greater positive effects; residential density created greater negative effects; employee density created greater positive effects; mixed land uses in station areas created smaller negative effects; distance to Taipei City Hall Station created smaller negative effects; and, house age created greater negative effects.

In order to promote travelers using public transportation systems and increase real estate profits for supporting transit operations, this study recommend numerous planning strategies or evaluation criteria for domestic MRT station JD projects- First, adequately increasing floor area, developing a whole scale of station area plan, and providing cross passages with metro stations could be considered for JD project planning. Second, improving feeder bus services and paving bikeway networks could be considered for transportation planning within metro station areas. Finally, preferentially deploying JD projects in city center areas, providing more employment opportunities and developing urban renewal plans could be considered for land use planning within metro station areas.

【Key words】:mass rapid transit, joint development, metro ridership, real estate value, linear regression

【章節目錄】
第一章 緒論
第一節 動機與目的.................................................................................................1-1
第二節 研究範圍....................................................................................................1-3
第三節 研究流程與內容...........................................................................................1-7
第四節 研究方法....................................................................................................1-11

第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 TOD與大眾運輸使用....................................................................................2-1
第二節 TOD與不動產價格.......................................................................................2-12
第三節 聯合開發....................................................................................................2-23
第四節 綜合評析....................................................................................................2-32

第三章 研究設計
第一節 課題研析.....................................................................................................3-2
第二節 假說研提.....................................................................................................3-15
第三節 驗證方法.....................................................................................................3-24

第四章 樣本資料分析
第一節 樣本資料蒐集.............................................................................................4-1
第二節 樣本特性分析.............................................................................................4-5
第三節 相關分析...................................................................................................4-23

第五章 迴歸分析
第一節 聯合開發分析..............................................................................................5-2
第二節 模式比較....................................................................................................5-22
第三節 假說驗證....................................................................................................5-27
第四節 策略研擬....................................................................................................5-34

第六章 結論與建議
第一節 結論.............................................................................................................6-1
第二節 後續研究建議.................................................................................................6-5

‧參考文獻
─國內文獻........................................................................................................文-1
─國外文獻........................................................................................................文-3
‧附錄
─附錄一 個案訪談紀錄..................................................................................附1-1
─附錄二 研究範圍所屬行政區及里對照表.........................................................附2-1
─附錄三 台北市稅捐稽徵處用途分類表............................................................附3-1
─附錄四 本研究土地使用分類表......................................................................附3-1
一、中文文獻
1.台北市政府捷運工程局(2009),「台北市政府捷運工程局聯開不動產租售資訊」,http://mobile.dorts.gov.tw/JPM2Net/JpmQryB2B.aspx,(2010年5月10日)
2.台北市政府捷運工程局(2010),「問答集>聯合開發>什麼叫做土地開發」,http://www.dorts.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=913503&ctNode=21792&mp=115001,(2010年5月10日)
3.台北捷運公司(2009),「台北捷運公司營運路網圖」,http://www.trtc.com.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1015926&CtNode=24569&mp=122031,(2010年5月10日)
4.江麗玲(1989),「捷運場站聯合開發權利轉換之研究」,國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
5.交通部(2000),「大眾捷運系統土地開發辦法」,台北:交通部。
6.何良慧(1998),「大眾捷運系統聯合開發政策執行評估之研究-以木柵線大安站為例」,淡江大學建築學系項士論文。
7.林勳杰(1996),台北都會區大眾捷運系統聯合開發規劃設計檢討與對策,「捷運技術」,第15 期,第119-129 頁。
8.邱澤惠(1997),「軌道捷運系統聯合開發基地評選模式之建立-以捷運新莊線台北縣轄段為例」,國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
9.李怡婷(2005),「大眾運輸導向發展策略對捷運站區房地產價格之影響分析」,國立成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文。
10.李欽漢(1989),「台北市大眾捷運系統聯合開發推動策略之研究以南港-板橋線為例」,淡江大學建築學系碩士論文。
11.邱皓政(2009),「量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析」,五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
12.周文彬(1999),捷運系統聯合開發變更都市計畫問題探討,「捷運技術」,第20 期,第41-52 頁。
13.黃瑞樺(1998),「市區捷運車站聯合開發強度之檢討」,國立台灣大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
14.陳碧玲(1987),「捷運聯合開發基地規劃之利用」,國立政治大學地政學系項士論文。
15.陳彥仲與呂昭宏(1999),「捷運聯合開發場站最適基地規模與不動產價格之互動機制」,中華民國住宅學會第八屆年會論文集,台北,109-124頁。
16.傅毓良(1987),「捷運車站與聯合開發地區之交通衝擊評估」,國立台灣大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
17.趙紹廉(2002),「土地開發基地評選」,臺北市政府捷運工程局捷運土建專業人員訓練授證教材聯合開發(上)12第0版,第23-50頁。
18.駱芙宜(2005),「臺北都會區大眾捷運聯合開發容積獎勵回饋比例合理性之研究」,中華大學營建管理學系碩士論文。
19.駱漢賓(2006),「城市軌道交通與房地產聯合開發研究」,武漢理工大學學報信息與管理工程版,第28卷,第1期,第86-89頁。

二、英文文獻
1.Atkinson- Palombo, C. and Kuby, M.J. (2010), The geography of advance transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000-2005, Journal of Transport Geography, in Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 21 April 2010.
2.Bernick, M. and Cervero, R. (1997), Transit Villages for the 21st Century, New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.Boarnet, M. and Crane, R. (1997), L.A. story, A reality check for transit-based housing, Journal of American Planning Association, Vol.63, No.2, pp.189-203.
4.Bowes, D. R. and Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (2001), Identifying the impacts of rail transit stations on residential property values, Urban Economics, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 1-25.
5.Cervero, R. (1994), Rail transit and joint development, Journal of American Planning Association, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp.83-94.
6.Cervero, R. (1996), Mixed land uses and commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey, Transportation Research: A, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 361-377.
7.Cervero, R. and Kockelman, K. (1997), Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design, Transportation Research: D, Vol.2, No. 3, pp.199-219.
8.Cervero, R. (2003), Effects of light and commuter rail transit on land prices: Experiences in San Diego County, Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 43, No.1, pp.121-138.
9.Cervero, R. (2006), Office development, rail transit, and commuting choices, Public Transportation, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp.41-55.
10.Cervero, R. (2008), Vehicle trip reduction impacts of transit-oriented housing, Public Transportation, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.1-17.
11.Cervero, R. and Murakami, J. (2008), Rail and property development in Hong Kong: Experiences, impacts, and extensions, Urban Studies, Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 2019-2043.
12.Debrezion, G., Pels, E. and Rietveld, P. (2007), The impact of railway stations on residential and commercial property value: A meta-analysis, Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 161-180.
13.Gatzlaff, D. and Smith, M. T. (1993), The impact of the Miami Metrorail on the value of residences near station locations, Land Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 54-66.
14.Keefer, L. E. (1985), Joint development at transit stations in the United States, Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 333-342.
15.Lin, J. J. and Jen, Y. C. (2009), Household attributes in a transit-oriented development: Evidence from Taipei, Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 101-121.
16.Lin, J. J. and Shin, T. Y. (2008), Does transit-oriented development affect metro ridership? Evidence from Taipei, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2063, pp. 149-158.
17.Lund, H. (2006), Reasons for living in a transit-oriented development, and associated transit use, Journal of American Planning Association, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 357-366.
18.Roeseler, W. G. and von Dosky, D. (1991), Joint development in urban transportation: a practical approach to modern growth management, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 325-346.
19.Sagalyn, L. B. (2007), Public/Private development- lessons from history, research, and practice, Journal of American Planning Association, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 7-18.
20.Soltani, A. and Allan, A. (2006), Analyzing the impacts of microscale urban attributes on travel: Evidence from suburban Adelaide, Australia, Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 132, No. 3, pp.132-137.
21.Transportation Research Board (2002), Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review, Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board.
22.Transportation Research Board (2004), Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects, Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top