臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

早期的創業模式主要為透過獨立自行創業來進行，因此企業組織的經營型態主要以獨立經營為主。隨著許多成功的創業家選擇成為加盟主後，以連鎖加盟型態經營的企業逐漸增加。連鎖加盟體系的出現，為許多的潛在創業者提供了選擇加入連鎖加盟體系創業的機會。本研究觀察到臺灣近年來獨立自行創業與加入連鎖加盟體系兩種創業模式並存的現象，進而想要深入研究影響創業者選擇獨立自行創業或加入連鎖加盟體系創業的因素。
過去，許多國內外的學者致力於研究創業家精神，試圖描繪出創業者表現出的共同行為。本研究綜合Gedeon (2010)與Shane與Hoy (1996)學者的理論與實證結果，試圖從創業家精神中尋找出可以解釋不同創業模式的創業者行為，並從這些行為當中尋找其背後趨使的態度傾向。本研究經過對於過去文獻與實證結果的分析後，發掘創業者的創新傾向、風險傾向與自主性為三大影響創業者選擇獨立自行創業或加入連鎖加盟體系創業的態度傾向。除了創業家精神理論對於創業過程的解釋適用外，社會網絡理論也可以適用於描述創業者如何從社會網絡成員中獲得協助的狀況。根據學者Birley (1985)與Hayek (1945)對於社會網絡如何幫助創業者創業成功的解釋，可以發現社會網絡的多元性與工具性兩大重要的構面。社會網絡的多元性與工具性程度的高低反應出創業者獲得創業協助程度的高低，進而影響其選擇不同的創業模式來因應不同的創業情況。因此，本研究認為創業者的創新傾向、風險傾向、自主性、社會網絡的多元性與社會網絡的工具性程度的高低，會影響其選擇不同的創業模式。
本研究在實證過程中，主要研究的對象為已決策現在或未來要進行創業的創業者。本研究總計發放250份問卷，有效問卷數為162份。針對有效樣本進行樣本分析、信度分析與Logistic迴歸分析，以驗證本研究所提出的假設。實證研究的結果顯示，當創業者具有越高的創新傾向、越高的風險傾向、越高程度的自主性、擁有的社會網絡具有高程度的多元性與工具性功能，其會選擇獨立自行創業；當創業者具有越低的創新傾向、越低的風險傾向、越低程度的自主性、擁有的社會網絡具有越低程度的多元性與工具性功能，其會選擇加入連鎖加盟體系創業。

Early entrepreneurial form is primarily through starting up an independent business, as result, many corporations are running independently. As many successful entrepreneurs are becoming franchisors, emergence of plenty of franchise chain systems provides many potential entrepreneurs opportunities of joining franchise systems business as franchisees. In recent years, in Taiwan, we could observe the coexistence of starting up business as independent businesses and chained stores. Accordingly, our research wants to analyze what kind of factors can affect the choice between starting up an independent business and joining a franchised system as franchisees.
In the past, many domestic and foreign scholars dedicated to the study of entrepreneurship, which is trying to depict the common behaviors that entrepreneur exhibit. In this research, we combines diversity theories and empirical results from Gedeon (2010), Shane and Hoy (1996), and try to dig up the behaviors which can corresponded with entrepreneurial form choices, then, discover the attitudinal orientations attribute these behaviors. After reviewing and analyzing past literatures and empirical results, we find out that innovative propensity, risk propensity and autonomy the three attitudinal orientations which could affect the choice between starting up an independent business and join the franchise system as a franchisee. In addition to entrepreneurship theories for explaining entrepreneurial process, social network theory can also apply to entrepreneurial success on how to obtain assistance from the social network members. According to Barley’s (1985) and Hayek’s (1945) interpretations on how social network can help entrepreneurs succeed, social network-diversity of social network and the technical function from social network are two import dimensions of social network. Different degrees of diversity of social network and technical function from social network reflect different levels of entrepreneurial assistance. Therefore, our research suggests that entrepreneurs’ innovation propensity, risk propensity, autonomy, the diversity of social network, and the technical function from social network will influence the selection of different entrepreneurial forms.
In the empirical process, the main researched objects are those who have already made the decision to entrepreneur or will entrepreneur sooner or later. In our empirical result, 250 questionnaires are issued, and 162 questionnaires are valid questionnaires. For the valid samples, we analyze it through samples analysis, reliability analysis and logistics equation analysis to see if the hypothesizes are verified. According to the empirical results, corresponded with hypothesizes, we find out an entrepreneur with higher innovative propensity, higher risk propensity, higher autonomy, the higher diversity of social network, and the much technical function from social network will choose starting up an business independently. In the contrary, an entrepreneur with lower innovative propensity, lower risk propensity, lower autonomy, the lower diversity of social network, and the less technical function from social network will choose joining a franchised system as a franchisee.

口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………… i
誌謝…………………………………………………………………… ii
中文摘要……………………………………………………………… iii
英文摘要……………………………………………………………… iv
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究背景…………………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究動機…………………………………………………… 4
第三節 研究目的 …………………………………………………… 4
第二章 文獻探 討…………………………………………………… 5
第一節 獨立自行創業模式與加入連鎖加盟體系創業模式的差異 5
第二節 創業者的態度傾向之定義與衡量方式 …………………… 7
第三節 創業者的態度傾向對於創業模式選擇的影響…………… 12
第四節 社會網絡的定義與衡量方式……………………………… 17
第五節 社會網絡對於創業模式選擇的影響……………………… 19
第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………… 21
第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………… 21
第二節 研究假設…………………………………………………… 22
第三節 研究變數與衡量工具……………………………………… 24
第四節 實證模型…………………………………………………… 28
第五節 研究對象…………………………………………………… 29
第四章 實證結果與分析…………………………………………… 30
第一節 樣本分析…………………………………………………… 30
第二節 信度分析…………………………………………………… 33
第三節 均值差異分析……………………………………………… 36
第四節 相關分析…………………………………………………… 37
第五節 Logistic迴歸分析……………………………………………38
第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………… 40
第一節 研究結論…………………………………………………… 40
第二節 政策意涵…………………………………………………… 41
第三節 研究限制…………………………………………………… 42
第四節 後續研究的建議…………………………………………… 44
參考文獻 …………………………………………………………… 45
附錄-研究使用問卷………………………………………………… 49

1.《2009台灣連鎖店年鑑》，台灣連鎖加盟促進協會，pp. 1-33。
2.吳秉恩(1986)，《組織行為學》，台北：華泰書局。
3.宋明哲(2001)，《現代風險管理》，第五版，台北：五南圖書。
4.周文賢(2002)，《多變量統計分析: SAS/STAT使用方法(初版)》，台北: 智邦文化事業有限公司。
5.社梅明(2005)，〈風險偏好、組織氣候、激勵因素與組織承諾之相關性研究〉，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
6.陳志遠、張勝立、魏式琦與楊金展(2007)，〈態度傾向、社會資本、先前知識對創業機警性影響之實證研究：創業者與經理人的比較分析，創業管理研究〉，第二卷第四期，pp.25-56。
7.陳家聲、戴士嫻(2007)，創業者社會網絡行為之質性研究，創業管理研究2007年12月，第二卷第四期，pp.3-4。
8.Becker, G. & Murphy, K. (1992). “The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 1137-1160.
9.Bezemer, J. (2001). “Developments in Franchising Present New Challenges,” Paper Presented at the 15th Annual Conference of ISOF (International Society of Franchising), Las Vegas.
10.Birley, S. (1985). ” The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process,” Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 107-117.
11.Brehm, J.W. & Brehm, S.S. (1981). “Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control,” New York: Academic Press.
12.Combs, J. G., Michael, S. C., & Castrogiovanni, G. J. (2004). “Franchising: A Review and Avenues to Greater Theoretical Diversity,” Journal of Management, 30(6), 907-931.
13.Dandridge, T. & C. Falbe (1994). “The Influence of Franchisees Beyond Their Local Domain,” International Small Business Journal, 12(2), 39-49.
14.Dant, R.P., Wortzel, L.H., & Subramaniam, M. (1992). “Exploring the Relationship between Autonomy and Independence in Franchise Channels of Distribution,” In Kaufmann, P.J. (ed.). “Franchising: Passport for Growth and World of Opportunity,” Proceedings of the Society of Franchising, Palm Springs, CA.
15.DeCharms, E. (1968). “Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior,” New York: Academic Press.
16.Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1991). “A Motivational Approach to Self: Integration in Personality,” In R.Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 38. Perspectives on Motivation (P.237-288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
17.Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). “The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-determination of Behavior,” Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
18.Dubini, P. and Aldrich, H. E. (1991). “Personal and Extended Networks Are Central to the Entrepreneurial Process,” Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 305-313.
19.Forlani, David & Mullins, John W. (2000). “Perceived Risks and Choices in Entrepreneurs’ New Venture Decisions,” Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 305-322.
20.Gedeon, Steve (2010). “What Is Entrepreneurship?,” Entrepreneurial Practice Review, 1(3), 16-35.
21.Goldsmith, R.E. (1987). “Creative Level and Creative Style,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 317-323.
22.Granovetter, M. (1973). “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
23.Greenhaus, J., Callanan, G., & Godschalk, V. (2000). Career Management (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.
24.Greve, A. & Salaff, J.W. (2003). “Social Networks and Entrepreneurship,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28(1), 1-23.
25.Greve, A. (1995). “Networks and Entrepreneurship: An Analysis of Social Relations, Occupational Background, and Use of Contacts During the Establishment Process,” The Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(1), 1-24.
26.Hayek, F. A. (1945). “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” American Economic Review, 33(4), 519-530.
27.House, R.J. & Aditya, R.N. (1997). “The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo vadis?,” Journal of Management, 23, 409-473.
28.House, J. S, Umberson, D. & Landis, K. R. (1988). “ Structures and Processes of Social Support,” Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293-318.
29.Ibarra, H. (1993). “Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework,” Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56-87.
30.Jovanovic, B. (1982). “Selection and the Evolution of Industry”. Econometrica , 50, 649-670.
31.Kaufmann, Patrick J. & Dant, Rajiv P. (1998). “Franchising and the Domain of Entrepreneurship Research,” Journal of Business Venturing, 14, 5-16.
32.Kihlstrom, Richard E. & Laffont, Jean-Jacques (1979). “A General Equilibrium Entrepreneurial Theory of Firm Formation Based on Risk Aversion,” The Journal of Political Economy, 87(4), 719-748.
33.Kirton, M. (1976). “Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629.
34.Kirton, M.J. (1987). “Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory Manual,” Hatfield, England: Occupational Research Centre.
35.Kirton, M.J. (1989). “A Theory of Cognitive Style,” In M. J. Kirton, ed., “Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem-Solving,” London, England: Routledge, 1-36.
36.Kleysen, R.F. & Street, C.T. (2001). “Toward a Multi-dimensional Measure of Individual Innovative Behavior,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.
37.Kloyer, Martin (1995). “Management von Franchisenetzwerken: Eine Resource-Dependence-Perspektive,” Wiesbaden.
38.Knight, F.H. (1921). “Risk, Uncertainty and Profits,” University of Chicago Press: Chicago, II.
39.Kristiansen, S. (2004). “Social Networks and Business Success,” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63(5), 1151-1171.
40.Lafontaine, F. & Bhattacharyya, S. (1995). “Double-Sided Moral Hazard and the Nature of Share Contracts,” The Rand Journal of Economics, 26(4), 761-781.
41.Leibenstein, H. (1968). “Entrepreneurship and Development,” American Economic Review, 38(2), 72-83.
42.Liles, P.R. (1974). “New Business Ventures and Entrepreneur,” Homewood, lll.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc..
43.Marco van Gelderen, Paul Jansen, (2006) "Autonomy As A Start-up Motive,” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(1), 23 -32.
44.Mathewson, G., & Winter, R. (1985). “The Economics of Franchise Contracts,” Journal of Law and Economics, 28, 503-526.
45.Mitchell, J. (1969). “Social Network in Urban Situations: Analysis of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns,” Manchester: Manchester University Press.
46.Peterson, Alden & Dant, Rajiv (1990). “Perceived Advantages of the Franchise Option from the Franchisee Perspective: Empirical Insights from a Service Franchise,” Journal of Small Business Management, 28(3), 46-61.
47.Robbins, W. A. (1991), “GASB Statement No.13: New Standards Capture the Economics of Operating Leases with Scheduled Rent Increases,” The Government Accountants Journal, 40, 61.
48.Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2004). “Pathways to Successful Entrepreneurship: Parenting, Personality, Early Entrepreneurial Competence, and Interests,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 498-518.
49.Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). “The Theory of Economic Development,” Havard University, Cambridge, MA.
50.Shane, Scott A. & Hoy, Frank (1996). “Franchising: A Gateway to Cooperative Entrepreneurship,” Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 325-327.
51.Shanthakumar, D.K. (1992). “Attitudinal Characteristics of Male and Female Entrepreneurs in India and a Comparison with American Entrepreneurs,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Brigham Yough University, UT.
52.Solymossy, E. (1998). “Entrepreneurial Dimensions: The Relationship of Individual, Venture and Environmental Factors to Success”. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
53.Stanworth, J. & Curran, J. (2003). “Colas, Burgers, Shakes and Shirkers: Towards a Sociological Model of Franchising in the Market Economy,” Hoy, Frank & Stanworth, John (ed.) (2003). “Franchising: An International Perspective,” Routledge. London and New York.
54.Venkataraman, S. (1997). “The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: An Editor''s Perspective,” In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, 3, 119-138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
55.White, R.W. (1959). “Motivation Reconsidered: The Concept of Competence”. Psychological Review, 66, 297-333.
56.Williams, Darrell L. (1998). “ Why Do Entrepreneurs Become Franchisees? An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Choice”. Journal of Business Venturing 14, 103-124.