跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.44.148) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/06/14 10:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:廖文宜
研究生(外文):Wen-Yi Liao
論文名稱:冠羽畫眉雛鳥競爭機制
論文名稱(外文):The Mechanisms of Nestling Competition in Taiwan Yuhinas(Yuhina Brunneiceps)
指導教授:袁孝維袁孝維引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsiao-Wei Yuan
口試委員:劉小如王穎謝寶森
口試日期:2011-05-30
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:森林環境暨資源學研究所
學門:農業科學學門
學類:林業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:46
中文關鍵詞:冠羽畫眉合作生殖搶奪競爭雛鳥乞食不同步孵化
外文關鍵詞:Taiwan Yuhinacooperative breedingbeggingscramble competitionasynchronous hatching
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:294
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
競爭是動物群體間無可避免的現象,對晚熟性雛鳥而言,親鳥所能提供的食物資源有限,加上鳥巢空間狹小,導致雛鳥之間常會發生激烈的競爭。冠羽畫眉(Yuhina brunneiceps)具特殊之參與式合作生殖行為,由多對無親緣關係的成鳥共用一巢哺育雛鳥。由於巢中雛鳥間的親緣關係較低,因而雛鳥之間產生利益衝突的可能性更高。本研究目的為探討冠羽畫眉雛鳥競爭的機制,並測試搶奪競爭模式(scramble competition model)或誠實訊息模式(honest signalling model)在雛鳥乞食行為的應用。搶奪競爭模式的預測:(1)雛鳥為了獲得足夠的食物,在競爭個體數越多的環境中,乞食表現會越激烈,因此當巢中雛鳥數越多,隨著競爭個體數增加,乞食時間越久; (2)當孵化順序不同步時,巢中雛鳥競爭能力差距較大,所以整體的乞食時間較同步孵化時短,且乞食時間差距在巢中雛鳥數增加時更大; (3)當孵化順序不同步時,較早孵化的個體體型較大且體力較佳,在乞食競爭上比晚孵化者占優勢,乞食時間較短,獲得食物比較多;(4)為提高乞食的投資報酬率,早孵化雛鳥會占據離親鳥回巢餵食最近的區域,以在短時間內獲取較多的食物量,減少體力的消耗。誠實訊息模式的預測:(1)雛鳥乞食表現受到飢餓程度的影響,獲得食物的時間間隔越長,雛鳥處於越飢餓的狀態,因此多由時間間隔較長的雛鳥獲得食物;(2) 雛鳥乞食表現受到飢餓程度的影響,飢餓雛鳥往親鳥餵食方向靠近,非由體型大的雛鳥獨占。本研究資料來自2005-2007年每年3-8月冠羽畫眉繁殖季,於巢邊架設錄影設備,從影片中記錄雛鳥的乞食持續時間、獲得食物的間隔、每小時獲得食物次數及乞食距離作為雛鳥競爭程度的指標。依巢中雛鳥數分為小(2-3隻)及大(5-6隻)兩組,從影片中監測雛鳥孵化同步性為同步或不同步(12小時以內孵化者為同步),並將育雛時期分為前期(1-6天)及後期(7-12天)。研究樣本共計22巢,約5549筆紀錄,考量資料來源為22巢觀測值中重複取樣進行量化,因此採用廣義線性混合模式法(generalized linear mixed models, GLMM)進行分析。分析結果發現:雛鳥的乞食時間會隨巢中雛鳥數增加而增加,且不同步孵化的雛鳥其整體乞食時間較短。加入孵化同步性後,同步孵化的雛鳥其乞食時間會隨巢中雛鳥數增加而增加;不同步孵化的雛鳥雖然在大組的乞食時間也有增加的趨勢,但增加幅度較小。將雛鳥依孵化順序分為早孵化及晚孵化組,早孵化雛鳥的乞食時間顯著較短,獲得食物間隔較短,每小時獲得食物的次數較多,乞食距離也較近。本研究結果支持搶奪競爭模式假說下的四項預測,顯示不同步孵化是影響冠羽畫眉子代競爭能力的重要機制,而早孵化雛鳥有獨占食物的生存優勢。

Competition is widespread in animals. In altricial birds, nestlings highly rely on parent provision food. When food is limited and the nest is a narrow environment, it may cause the nestling competition. Taiwan yuhina (Yuhina brunneiceps) is an endemic species in Taiwan. They use join-nesting cooperative breeding system, almost formed non-kin group. Because the low relatedness between nestlings, it is more possible to induce the competitive conflicts of benefits. The object in this research is to investigate the mechanisms of nestling competition in Taiwan Yuhina and test between scramble competition model and honest signaling model. Under the scramble competition model, I predict that (1) to get more food, when brood size enlarges; the begging duration may get longer. (2) When asynchronous hatching, the competitive abilities would be large difference between nestlings, so that the whole begging duration would be shorter than synchronous hatching brood. (3) When asynchronous hatching, the early-hatched chicks have the dominance than late-hatched chicks such as obtaining more food and the shorter begging duration because the larger body and the better competitive ability. (4) To increase the rewards of begging, early-hatched chicks would jockey the nearest position. Under the honest signaling model, I predict that begging behavior reflects nestlings’ true need which is influenced by the hungry level so that (1) there is no difference between early-hatched and late-hatched chicks in eating interval. (2) When nestling become hungry, they would get closer to the feeding position of parents. It is equal for all nestlings to occupy this ‘good’ begging position. Data were collected in breeding season from March to August in 2005 to 2007. I used the micro infrared camera recoding the begging duration, eating interval, food obtained times and begging distance to indicate the level of nestling competition. The brood size was divided in small (2-3 nestlings) and large (5-6 nestlings) and monitored the hatching pattern (if all nestlings born in 12 hours I defined it as hatching synchrony). The nestling stage was divided in early stage (1-6 days) and later stage (7-12 days). All data was came from 22 nests about 5549 records and analyzed with generalized linear mixed models (GLMM). According to the results, the begging duration increase with brood size increase and it decrease in asynchronous brood. To consider the hatching pattern and the brood size, I found that the begging duration extent of asynchronous brood is smaller than synchronous one. Also the early-hatched chicks have shorter begging duration and eating interval, obtain more food per hour and have nearer begging distance. I suggest that asynchronous hatching play an important role in nestling competition in Taiwan Yuhina and early-hatched nestlings have dominance in food monopoly. It provides clear evidences to fit the scramble competition model.

摘要 III
Abstract V
第一章 文獻回顧 1
第二章 冠羽畫眉雛鳥競爭機制 6
前言 6
研究方法 10
研究地點 10
研究對象 10
研究方法及步驟 11
統計分析 14
結果 16
討論 19
參考文獻 24


Alexander, R. D. 1974. The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5:325-383.
Anderson, D. J., C. Budde, V. Apanius, J. E. M. Gomez, D. M. Bird, and W. W. Weathers. 1993. Prey size influences female competitive dominance in nestling American kestrels (Falco-sparverius). Ecology 74:367-376.
Arnold, K. E., and I. P. F. Owens. 1998. Cooperative breeding in birds: a comparative test of the life history hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 265:739-745.
Bengtsson, H., and O. Ryden. 1983. Parental Feeding Rate in Relation to Begging Behavior in Asynchronously Hatched Broods of the Great Tit Parus-Major - an Experimental-Study. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 12:243-251.
Brown, J. L. 1987. Helping and communal breeding in birds Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey, USA. Illus.
Bryant, D. M., and P. Tatner. 1990. Hatching Asynchrony, Sibling Competition and Siblicide in Nestling Birds - Studies of Swiftlets and Bee-Eaters. Animal Behaviour 39:657-671.
Budden, A. E., and J. Wright. 2001. Begging in nestling birds. Current Ornithology, Vol 16 16:83-118.
Christe, P., H. Richner, and A. Oppliger. 1996. Begging, food provisioning, and nestling competition in great tit broods infested with ectoparasites. Behavioral Ecology 7:127-131.
Clark, A. B., and W. H. Lee. 1998. Red-winged blackbird females fail to increase feeding in response to begging call playbacks. Animal Behaviour 56:563-570.
Cotton, P. A., A. Kacelnik, and J. Wright. 1996. Chick begging as a signal: Are nestlings honest? Behavioral Ecology 7:178-182.
Cotton, P. A., J. Wright, and A. Kacelnik. 1999. Chick begging strategies in relation to brood hierarchies and hatching asynchrony. American Naturalist 153:412-420.
Dorward, E. F. 1962. Comparative biology of the white booby and brown booby Sula spp.at Ascension. Ibis 103:174-220.
Drent, R. H. 1975. Incubation.in D. S. a. K. J. R. Farner, editor. Avian Biology. Academic Press, New York.
Dunn, E. H. 1976. Relationship between Brood Size and Age of Effective Homeothermy in Nestling House Wrens. Wilson Bulletin 88:478-482.
Dunn, E. H. 1979. Age of Effective Homeothermy in Nestling Tree Swallows According to Brood Size. Wilson Bulletin 91:455-457.
Emlen, S. T., and S. L. Vehrencamp. 1983. Cooperative breeding strategies among birds. Pages 93-120 in A. H. Brush and G. A. Clark, editors. Perspective in Ornithology. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, London. UK.
Fu, S.-W. 2005. Nestling sex allocation of a joint-nesting Yuhina brunneiceps population at Meifeng. National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Gargett, V. 1977. A 13-year study of the black eagles in the Matopos, Rhodesia, 1964-1976. Ostrich 48:17-27.
Godfray, H. C. J. 1991. Signaling of need by offspring to their parents. Nature 352:328-330.
Godfray, H. C. J. 1995. Signaling of need between parents and young-parent-offspring conflict and sibling rivalry. American Naturalist 146:1-24.
Godfray, H. C. J., and R. A. Johnstone. 2000. Begging and bleating: the evolution of parent-offspring signalling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 355:1581-1591.
Godfray, H. C. J., and G. A. Parker. 1991. Clutch Size, Fecundity and Parent Offspring Conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 332:67-79.
Hahn, D. C. 1981. Asynchronous Hatching in the Laughing Gull - Cutting Losses and Reducing Rivalry. Animal Behaviour 29:421-427.
Hussell, D. J. T. 1972. Factors Affecting Clutch Size in Arctic Passerines. Ecological Monographs 42:317-&.
Jens Krause, G. D. R. 2002. Living in groups. Oxford University Press New York.
Joste, N., J. D. Ligon, and P. B. Stacey. 1985. Shared paternity in the acorn woodpecker (melanerpes-formicivorus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 17:39-41.
Kolliker, M., H. Richner, I. Werner, and P. Heeb. 1998. Begging signals and biparental care: Nestling choice between parental feeding locations. Animal Behaviour 55:215-222.
Kacelnik, A., P. A. Cotton, L. Stirling, and J. Wright. 1995. Food allocation among nestling starlings - sibling competition and the scope of parental choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 259:259-263.
Khayutin, S. N., and L. P. Dmitrieva. 1977. Behavioural mechanisms synchronizing development of nestlings in same clutch under their non-simultaneous hatching. Zoologichesky Zhurnal 56:1195-1206.
Kilner, R. 1995. When do canary parents respond to nestling signals of need. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 260:343-348.
Kilner, R. M. 2002. Sex differences in canary (Serinus canaria) provisioning rules. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology:400-407.
Kilner, R. M., D. G. Noble, and N. B. Davies. 1999. Signals of need in parent-offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo. Nature 397:667-672.
Koenig, W. D., R. L. Mumme, M. T. Stanback, and F. A. Pitelka. 1995. Patterns and Consequences of Egg Destruction among Joint-Nesting Acorn Woodpeckers. Animal Behaviour 50:607-621.
Lack, D. 1947. The Significance of Clutch-Size. Ibis 89:302-352.
Lack, D. 1954. The natural regulation of animal numbers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lee, P. F., S. F. Shen, T. S. Ding, C. R. Chiou, and H. W. Yuan. 2005. Habitat selection of the cooperative breeding Taiwan Yuhina (Yuhina brunneiceps) in a fragmented forest habitat. Zoological Studies 44:497-504.
Leonard, M. L., A. G. Horn, and E. Parks. 2003. The role of posturing and calling in the begging display of nestling birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54:188-193.
Lipar, J. L., and E. D. Ketterson. 2000. Maternally derived yolk testosterone enhances the development of the hatching muscle in the red-winged blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 267:2005-2010.
Lotem, A. 1998. Differences in begging behaviour between barn swallow, Hirundo rustica, nestlings. Animal Behaviour 55:809-818.
Macedo, R. H. 1992. Reproductive patterns and social organization of the communal Guira cuckoo (Guira guira) in central Brazil. Auk 109:786-799.
Magrath, R. D. 1990. Hatching Asynchrony in Altricial Birds. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 65:587-622.
Magrath, R. D. 1992. Roles of Egg Mass and Incubation Patter in Establishment of Hatching Hierarchies in the Blackbird (Turdus-Merula). Auk 109:474-487.
McCarty, J. P. 1997. The role of energetic costs in the evolution of begging behavior of nestling passerines. Auk 114:135-137.
McRae, S. B. 1996b. Family values: Costs and benefits of communal nesting in the moorhen. Animal Behaviour 52:225-245.
Mock, D. W., and G. A. Parker. 1997. The evolution of sibling rivalry. Oxford University Press, Oxford,New York,Tokyo.
Moreno-Rueda, G. 2007. Is there empirical evidence for the cost of begging? Journal of Ethology 25:215-222.
Muller, R. E., and D. G. Smith. 1978. Parent-offspring interactions in zebra finches. Auk 95:485-495.
Neuenschwander, S., M. W. G. Brinkhof, M. Kolliker, and H. Richner. 2003. Brood size, sibling competition, and the cost of begging in great tits (Parus major). Behavioral Ecology 14:457-462.
Nilsson, J. A. 1995. Parent-Offspring Interaction over Brood Size - Cooperation or Conflict. Journal of Avian Biology 26:255-259.
Nilsson, J. A., and M. Svensson. 1996. Sibling competition affects nestling growth strategies in marsh tits. Journal of Animal Ecology 65:825-836.
Ostreiher, R. 1997. Food division in the Arabian babbler nest: Adult choice or nestling competition? Behavioral Ecology 8:233-238.
Ostreiher, R. 2001. The importance of nestling location for obtaining food in open cup-nests. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 49:340-347.
Parker, G. A. 1985. Models of parent-offspring conflict .5. effects of the behavior of the two parents. Animal Behaviour 33:519-533.
Parker, G. A., D. W. Mock, and T. C. Lamey. 1989. How selfish should stronger sibs be? American Naturalist:846-848.
Parker, G. A., N. J. Royle, and I. R. Hartley. 2002. Begging scrambles with unequal chicks: interactions between need and competitive ability. Ecology Letters 5:206-215.
Porkert, J., and M. Špinka. 2006. Begging in common redstart nestlings: Scramble competition or signalling of need? Ethology 112:398-410.
Price, K. 1998. Benefits of begging for yellow-headed blackbird nestlings. Animal Behaviour 56:571-577.
Price, K., H. Harvey, and R. Ydenberg. 1996. Begging tactics of nestling yellow-headed blackbirds, Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus, in relation to need. Animal Behaviour 51:421-435.
Price, K., and R. Ydenberg. 1995. Begging and provisioning in broods of asynchronously-hatched yellow-headed blackbird nestlings. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 37:201-208.
Redondo, T., and F. Castro. 1992. Signaling of nutritional need by magpie nestlings. Ethology 92:193-204.
Roulin, A. 2001a. On the cost of begging vocalization: implications of vigilance. Behavioral Ecology 12:506-511.
Royle, N. J., I. R. Hartley, I. P. F. Owens, and G. A. Parker. 1999. Sibling competition and the evolution of growth rates in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 266:923-932.
Royle, N. J., I. R. Hartley, and G. A. Parker. 2002. Begging for control: when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:434-440.
Ryden, O., and H. Bengtsson. 1980. Differential begging and locomotory behavior by early and late hatched nestlings affecting the distribution of food in asynchronously hatched broods of altricial birds. Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie-Journal of Comparative Ethology 53:209-224.
Schmaltz, G., J. S. Quinn, and S. J. Schoech. 2008. Do group size and laying order influence maternal deposition of testosterone in smooth-billed ani eggs? Hormones and Behavior 53:82-89.
Seutin, G., B. N. White, and P. T. Boag. 1991. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 69:82-90.
Shen, S.-F. 2002. The Ecology of Cooperative Breeding Taiwan Yuhinas (Yuhina brunneiceps) in Mayfeng Areas. National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
Slagsvold, T. 1997. Brood division in birds in relation to offspring size: sibling rivalry and parental control. Animal Behaviour 54:1357-1368.
Slagsvold, T., and J. T. Lifjeld. 1989. Hatching Asynchrony in Birds - the Hypothesis of Sexual Conflict over Parental Investment. American Naturalist 134:239-253.
Slate, J., T. Marshall, and J. Pemberton. 2000. A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Molecular Ecology 9:801-808.
Smith, H. G., and R. Montgomerie. 1991. Nestling American Robins compete with siblings by begging. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29:307-312.
Trivers, R. L. 1974. Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist 14:249-264.
Vehrencamp, S. L. 2000. Evolutionary routes to joint-female nesting in birds. Behavioral Ecology 11:334-344.
Vehrencamp, S. L., B. S. Bowen, and R. R. Koford. 1986. Breeding Roles and Pairing Patterns within Communal Groups of Groove-Billed Anis. Animal Behaviour 34:347-366.
Weathers, W. W., P. J. Hodum, and D. J. Anderson. 1997. Is the energy cost of begging by nestling passerines surprisingly low? Auk 114:133-133.
Wells, J. C. K. 2003. Parent-offspring conflict theory, signaling of need, and weight gain in early life. Quarterly Review of Biology 78:169-202.
Wright, J., and M. L. Leonard. 2002. The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Boston, London.
Yamashina, M. 1938. A sociable breeding habit among timaliine birds. Proceedings of the International Ornithological Congress 9:453-456.
Yuan, H. W., M. Liu, and S. F. Shen. 2004. Joint nesting in Taiwan Yuhinas: A rare passerine case. Condor 106:862-872.
Yuan, H. W., S. F. Shen, and H. Y. Hung. 2006. Sexual dimorphism, dispersal patterns, and breeding biology of the Taiwan Yuhina: a joint-nesting passerine. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 118:558-562.
Yuan, H. W., S. F. Shen, K. Y. Lin, and P. F. Lee. 2005. Group-slze effects and parental investment strategies during incubation in joint-nesting Taiwan Yuhinas (Yuhina brunneiceps). Wilson Bulletin 117:306-312.
Zhong, Q. D. 2006. Genetic structure and relatedness in the joint-nesting Taiwan Yuhina (Yuhina brunneiceps). Master thesis. National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
洪心怡。2003。以DNA微隨體技術探討梅峰地區冠羽畫眉群內親子關係。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院森林環境暨資源學系。
袁子能。2010。冠羽畫眉之群成員數與群穩定度。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院森林環境暨資源學系。
陳湘靜。2009。冠羽畫眉生蛋期競爭策略。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院森林環境暨資源學系。
黃斐悅。2006。冠羽畫眉共用一巢合作生殖親鳥餵食策略研究。94年國科會大專生研究計畫。
鄭凱中。2011。冠羽畫眉在不同群組成數對幼鳥的投資策略。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院森林環境暨資源學系。


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊