跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.221.73.157) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/06/20 10:45
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:李家駒
研究生(外文):Chia-chu Lee
論文名稱:租賃設備於失效率降低法下之最佳租期數與維修策略─以韋伯壽命分配為例
論文名稱(外文):Optimal Number of Leased Periods and Maintenance Policy for Leased Equipment Using Failure Rate Reduction-Weibull Case
指導教授:葉瑞徽葉瑞徽引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ruey-huei Yeh
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣科技大學
系所名稱:工業管理系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:42
中文關鍵詞:租賃設備失效率降低法預防保養小修
外文關鍵詞:lease equipmentpreventive maintenanceminimal repair
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:418
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:91
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
隨著高度專業分工的時代來臨,各企業開始僅專注於自身所擅長的核心活動,因此,專業設備租賃漸漸成為主流商業型態,並以合約約束租賃雙方之權利及義務。租賃合約中通常包含由出租者所提供的相關維修保養規定,如出租者必須負擔租期內設備故障的維修責任,且需賠償一金額以補償出租者的停機損失。因此,出租者通常會以預防保養的方式盡可能的減少設備在租期間故障的次數,以減少懲罰成本的支出,進而增加利潤。而實施預防保養的成本與設備故障懲罰成本之間的拉鋸則成為出租者訂定租賃合約與維修策略的重要關鍵。本文以設備出租者的立場,考慮在設備生命週期內,以失效率降低法的保養方式及故障小修的維修方式,以租賃設備為韋伯壽命分配建構數學利潤模式,並推導最佳維修策略與租期數,使出租者之期望總利潤為最大。
Due to professional services come of age, enterprises become only to put the resources into their core activities so that professional equipment leasing turn into a business trend. The rights and obligations are bounded by a lease contract. The rules of corrective and preventive maintenance are usually included in the lease contract and offered by the lesor, such as lessor must be responsible for repair of failure equipment and incurred a penalty cost to compensate for shutdown damage of lessee. Hence, lessor usually implements preventive maintenance actions to reduce the failure times of equipment as less as possible to reduce the penalty cost. Therefore, the choice between implementing preventive maintenance and incurring penalty is a key point of establishing lease contract and maintenance policy. This thesis constructs mathematical profit model for leased equipment with Weibull life-time by using failure rate reduction method and rectifies failures with minimal repairs and derives optimal maintenance policy and number of lease that maximize expected total profit.
摘 要 I
Abstract II
誌 謝 III
目 錄 IV
表 目 錄 VI
圖 目 錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究範圍 3
1.4 論文架構 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1維修 5
2.2預防保養 6
2.3 租賃 9
2.4本章小結 9
第三章 租賃設備之總利潤數學模式 11
3.1 符號與基本假設 11
3.2 利潤模式建構 13
3.3 韋伯壽命分配之設備最佳維修策略與租期數 16
3.4 本章小結 25
第四章 數值分析 26
第五章 結論與未來研究方向 32
5.1 結論 32
5.2 未來研究方向 33
參考文獻 34
附錄 40
[1]高國欽「失效率降低法下租賃設備之最佳預防保養策略」,博士論文,台灣科技大學工業管理系,台北(2009)。
[2]Barlow, R. E. and Hunter, L. C., “Optimum preventive maintenance policies,” Operations Research, 8, 90-100 (1960).
[3]Block, H. W., Borges, W. S. and Savits, T. H., “Age Dependent Minimal Repaire,” Journal of Applied Probability, 22, 370-385(1985).
[4]Brown, M. and Proschan, F., “Imperfect repair,” Journal of Applied Probability, 20, 851–859 (1983).
[5]Chan, J.K. and Shaw, L., “Modeling repairable systems with failure rates dependent on age and maintenance”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 42, 566-570 (1993).
[6]Chen, M. and Feldman, R. M., “Optimal replacement policies with minimal repair and age-dependent costs”, European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 75-84 (1997).
[7]Chun, Y. H., “Optimal number of periodic preventive maintenance operations under warranty,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 37, 223-225 (1992).
[8]Desai, P. and Purohit, D., “Leasing and selling: Optimal Marketing Strategies for a Durable Goods Firm,” Management Science, 44, 19-34, (1998).
[9]Doyen, L. and Gaudoin, O., “Classes of imperfect repair models based on reduction of failure intensity or virtual age”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 84, 45-56 (2004).
[10]Elton, M. B., “Executive memorandum-equipment leasing: Is it right for your foundry,” Modern Casting, 91(10), 43-45 (2001).
[11]Glickman, T. S. and Berger, P. D., “Optimal price and protection period decisions for a product under warranty,” Management Science, 22, 1381-1390 (1976).
[12]Jack, N. and Dagpunar, J. S., “An optimal imperfect maintenance policy over a warranty period”, Microelectronics and Reliability ,34, 529-534, (1994).
[13]Jaturonnatee, J., Murthy, D. N. P., and Boondiskulchok, R, “Optimal preventive maintenance of leased equipment with corrective minimal repairs”, European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 201-215 (2006).
[14]Kijima, M. and Nakagawa, T., “Replacement policies of a shock model with imperfect preventive maintenance”, European Journal of Operational Research, 57, 100-110 (1992).
[15]Levitin, G. and Lisnianski, A., “Optimization of imperfect preventive maintenance for multi-state systems”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 67, 193-203 (2000).
[16]Lin, D., Zuo, M. J. and Yam, R. C. M., “Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance models with two categories of failure modes”, Naval Research Logistic0s, 48, 172-183 (2001).
[17]Makis, V. and Jardine, A. K. S., “Optimal replacement of a system with imperfect repair”, Microelectronics and Reliability, 31, 381-388
(1991).
[18]Mansooreh, M., Julia, P. E. and Uma, G., “ Multiple criteria buy versus lease analysis for government contracts,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42(3), 278-287 (1995).
[19]Martin, H. H., “Contracting out maintenance and a plan for future research,” Journal of Quality in Maintenance, 3(2), 81-90 (1997).
[20]Murthy, D. N. P. and Nguyen, D. G., “Optimal age policy with Imperfect preventive maintenance”, IEE Transactions on Reliability, R-30, 80-81 (1981).
[21]Murthy, D. N. P., Jaturonnatee, J., and Boondiskulchok, R., “ Optimal preventive maintenance of leased equipment with corrective minimal repairs,” European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 201-215 (2006).
[22]Nakagawa, T., “A summary of periodic replacement with minimal repair at failure”, Journal of the Operational Research Society of Japan, 24(3), 213-227 (1981).
[23]Nakagawa, T., and Kowada, M., “Analysis of a system with minimal repair and its application to replacement policy”, European Journal of Operational Research 12, 176-182 (1983).
[24]Nakagawa, T., “Periodic and Sequential Preventive Maintenance Policies”, Journal of Applied Probability, R-23/2, pp.536-542, (1986).
[25]Nakagawa, T., “Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance policies”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 37(3), 295-298 (1988).
[26]Nguyen, D. G. and Murthy, D. N. P., “Optimal reliability allocation for products sold under warranty,” Engineering Optimization, 13, 35-45 (1988).
[27]Pham, H. and Wang, H., “Invited review-Imperfect Maintenance”, European Journal of Operational Research, 94, 425-438 (1996).
[28]Pongpech, J. and Murthy, D. N. P., “Optimal periodic preventive maintenance policy for leased equipment”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91, 772-777 (2006).
[29]Seo, J. H. and Bai, D. S., “An optimal maintenance policy for a system under periodic overhaul”, Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 39, 373-380 (2004).
[30]Sheu, S. H., “Periodic replacement with minimal repair at failure and general random repair cost for a multi-unit system”, Microelectronics and Reliability, 31, 1019-1025 (1991).
[31]Wang, H. and Pham, H., “Optimal age-dependent preventive maintenance policies with imperfect maintenance”, International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 3, 119-135
(1996b).
[32]Yeh, R. H. and Lo, H. C., “Optimal preventive-maintenance warranty policy for repairable products,” European Journal of Operational Research, 134, 59-69 (2001).
[33]Yeh, R. H. and Chang, W. L., “Optimal threshold value of failure-rate for leased products with preventive maintenance actions”, Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 46, 730-737 (2007).
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 9.吳漢、董慧明,「美中台三角關係對美台軍事售之影響:從雙層賽局理論分析」,展望與探索第7卷第5期(2009年8月),頁49。
2. 5.林正義,「美國與台海兩岸信心建立措施」,問題與研究,第44卷第6 期(2005年11月),頁1-28。
3. 4.呂翔,「現階段中共對美涉臺事務的立場」,中共研究第44卷第6期(2010年6月),頁52。
4. 8.初國華,「全球化與兩岸關係新遠景」,中國大陸研究,第51卷第4期(2008年12月),頁89-114。
5. 7.林正義,「『戰略模糊』、『戰略明確』或『雙重明確』:美國預防台海危機的政策辯論」,遠景基金會季刊第8卷第1期(2007年1月),頁38。
6. 6.林正義,「美國與臺灣軍事合作:威脅的評估與因應」,遠景基金會季刊,第10卷第2期(2009年4月),頁101-152。
7. 10.邵宗海,「胡錦濤對『一中原則』及『九二共識』之立場分析」,中共研究第43卷第11期(2009年11月),頁39-40。
8. 15.陳一新,「歐胡會後的美中台關係」,中共研究第43卷第12期(2009年12月),頁98-102。
9. 16.劉復國,「綜合性安全與國家安全:亞太安全概念是用性之檢討」,問題與研究,第38卷第2期(1999年2月),頁 21-37。
10. 17.蔡宏明,「兩岸關係的新情勢與新政府的新作為」,遠景基金會季刊,第9卷第3期(2008年7月),頁199-243。
11. 18.蔡明彥,「美國東亞軍事優勢地位的挑戰:中國『反介入』與美國『反反介入』的角力」,全球政治評論第21期(2008年5月),頁69-70。
12. 19.施澤淵,「析論中共『反介入』作戰之戰略意涵-兼論中共的反介入戰略及其對美國的影響」,中共研究第44卷第5期(2010年5月),頁100。
13. 20.傅立文,「對美國發表『中國軍事與安全發展報告』」之評析,中共研究第44卷第9期(2010年9月),頁45。
14. 21.童振源,「東亞經濟整合與台灣戰略」,問題與研究,第45卷第2 期(2006年4月), 頁25-60。
15. [ 34]桂人傑,大型變速風力機之控制系統與電力轉換,電機月刊第十九卷第五期,中華民國98年。